15
Online Public Participation Tim Bonnemann Founder and CEO Intellitics, Inc.

Online Public Participation

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Slides from panel discussion at NCDD 2010 Austin on Online Engagement (with Tim Bonnemann, Gary Chapman, Phil Tate).

Citation preview

Page 1: Online Public Participation

Online Public ParticipationTim BonnemannFounder and CEOIntellitics, Inc.

Page 2: Online Public Participation

Key Take-Aways

• Technology and the internet provide a lot of opportunity for broadening and deepening civic engagement, specifically public participation

• You can do this!

• Please do this (and let us know how it went)

Page 3: Online Public Participation

Does Online Make Sense?

Opportunities

• Bridge limitations of time and space

• Ability to scale

• Participants as resources

• Cost savings

Challenges

• Digital divide

• No replacement for face-to-face

• Uncivil behavior

• Very resource-intensive and expensive

Page 4: Online Public Participation

Project Examples

• Public information and community building on Facebook

• Community asset mapping with Google Maps and Drupal

• Participatory budgeting with IdeaScale

• Civic contest (crowdsourcing) around redistricting in Ohio using ArcGIS

Page 5: Online Public Participation

Public Information & Community Building

Type Social Media

Year 2009 — current

Context Urban planning in Portland, OR

Goals Inform, community building

Technology Facebook

http://www.facebook.com/pdxplan

Page 6: Online Public Participation

Community Asset Mapping

Type Collaborative mapping

Year 2009

Context Development of after-school program

Goals Assess, Discover, Inform

Technology Google Maps, Drupal

http://biloxiyouthassets.org

Page 7: Online Public Participation

Participatory Budgeting

Type Crowdstorming

Year 2010

Context Seattle city budget 2011/2012

Goals Consult

Technology IdeaScale

http://seattlecitycouncil.ideascale.com

Page 8: Online Public Participation

Civic Contests & Crowdsourcing

Type Civic contest, mapping, crowdsourcing

Year 2009

Context Redistricting in the state of Ohio

Goals Capacity building, awareness, consult

Technology ArcGIS

http://www.sos.state.oh.us/sos/redistricting.aspx

Page 9: Online Public Participation

The Tool Landscape

• There are hundreds of tools (generic, specialized, custom)

• Often multi-purpose, broadly applicable. Not always easy to clearly match tools to processes or desired outcomes

• Online participation and the tools involved often require a broad skill set (technology, social media, community management, online facilitation, editing etc.)

Page 10: Online Public Participation

Some Web-Specific Considerations• Accessibility

• Data security

• Identity

• Privacy & publicness

• Intellectual property

• Moderation

• Archiving

• Legal

• Mobile

• Tool support

Page 11: Online Public Participation

Design Principles & Success Factors• Know your objectives, audience, resources

• Apply good process (e.g. IAP2 framework)

• Find the right combination of people, process and tools

• Be transparent about commitments, set realistic expectations

• Consider web-specific issues (e.g. privacy, security, identity)

Page 12: Online Public Participation

Resources

• Intellitics Bloghttp://www.intellitics.com/blog

• ParticipateDBhttp://participatedb.com

• NCDD 2010 Resource Guide on Public Engagementhttp://www.ncdd.org/files/NCDD2010_Resource_Guide.pdf

• Promising Practices in Online Engagementhttp://www.publicagenda.org/pages/promising-practices-in-online-engagement

• Social Media Clubhttp://socialmediaclub.org

Page 13: Online Public Participation
Page 14: Online Public Participation

Thank You!http://www.intellitics.comFollow @intellitics on Twitter…

Page 15: Online Public Participation

Some Rights ReservedExcept where noted, the contents of this presentation are licensed to the public under the Creative Commons Attribution-

Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License. The terms of this license are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/

v1.0 2010/11/05