Upload
rockys11
View
553
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Citation preview
GLGi: Lightspeed vs. FiOS
Copyright Telecom Pragmatics & GLG© 2007 Gerson Lehrman Group Inc., All Rights Reserved
Council Member Biography
Sam Greenholtz is the Co-Founder and Principal of Telecom Pragmatics, a consulting and market research company specializing in telecommunications markets and related technologies. He specializes in the telecom sector, t limited to FTTx, optical networking, switching and routers, VoIP, Ethernet, packet switching, wireless technology, cell towers, Wi-Max, 3G, CDMA and EV-DO. Previously, Mr. Greenholtz was a Senior Analyst at CIR, Inc.; and an Engineer at Verizon. He is knowledgeable on OSS, signaling, and billing, capital expenditure budgets, standards, and lab testing. He is a member of several Board of Directors, Technical Advisory Boards and the as IEEE, and OSA. He has published documents and articles in the telecom industry.
Copyright Telecom Pragmatics & GLG© 2007 Gerson Lehrman Group Inc., All Rights Reserved
Table of Contents
Is Verizon doing the right thing in building out fiber to the home. What are the advantages and the disadvantages to this plan?
What are the key differences in the Verizon Plan (FiOS) versus LightSpeed at AT&T and cable TV offerings by Qwest?
What are the hidden advantages to all of the plans?
Copyright Telecom Pragmatics & GLG© 2007 Gerson Lehrman Group Inc., All Rights Reserved
About GLG Institute GLG Institute (GLGiSM) is a professional organization focused on educating business and investment professionals through in-person meetings. It is designed to revolutionize the professional education market by putting the power of programming into the hands of the GLG community.
GLGi hosts hundreds of Seminars worldwide each year.
GLGi clients receive two seats to all Seminars in all Practice Areas.
GLGi’s website enables clients to: Propose Seminar topics, agenda items and locations View and RSVP to scheduled and proposed Seminars Receive a daily briefing with new posts on your favorite tickers, subject areas and
from trusted Council Members Share Seminar details with colleagues or friends
Copyright Telecom Pragmatics & GLG© 2007 Gerson Lehrman Group Inc., All Rights Reserved
Gerson Lehrman Group Contacts
John AronsohnVice PresidentGerson Lehrman Group850 Third Avenue, 9th FloorNew York, NY [email protected]
Christine RuaneSenior Product ManagerGerson Lehrman Group850 Third Avenue, 9th FloorNew York, NY 10022212-984-8505 [email protected]
Copyright Telecom Pragmatics & GLG© 2007 Gerson Lehrman Group Inc., All Rights Reserved
IMPORTANT GLG INSTITUTE DISCLAIMER – By making contact with this/these Council Members and participating in this event, you specifically acknowledge, understand and agree that you must not seek out material non-public or confidential information from Council Members. You understand and agree that the information and material provided by Council Members is provided for your own insight and educational purposes and may not be redistributed or displayed in any form without the prior written consent of Gerson Lehrman Group. You agree to keep the material provided by Council Members for this event and the business information of Gerson Lehrman Group, including information about Council Members, confidential until such information becomes known to the public generally and except to the extent that disclosure may be required by law, regulation or legal process. You must respect any agreements they may have and understand the Council Members may be constrained by obligations or agreements in their ability to consult on certain topics and answer certain questions. Please note that Council Members do not provide investment advice, nor do they provide professional opinions. Council Members who are lawyers do not provide legal advice and no attorney-client relationship is established from their participation in this project.
You acknowledge and agree that Gerson Lehrman Group does not screen and is not responsible for the content of materials produced by Council Members. You understand and agree that you will not hold Council Members or Gerson Lehrman Group liable for the accuracy or completeness of the information provided to you by the Council Members. You acknowledge and agree that Gerson Lehrman Group shall have no liability whatsoever arising from your attendance at the event or the actions or omissions of Council Members including, but not limited to claims by third parties relating to the actions or omissions of Council Members, and you agree to release Gerson Lehrman Group from any and all claims for lost profits and liabilities that result from your participation in this event or the information provided by Council Members, regardless of whether or not such liability arises is based in tort, contract, strict liability or otherwise. You acknowledge and agree that Gerson Lehrman Group shall not be liable for any incidental, consequential, punitive or special damages, or any other indirect damages, even if advised of the possibility of such damages arising from your attendance at the event or use of the information provided at this event.
Copyright Telecom Pragmatics & GLG
7
General
• Copyright 2007 by Telecom Pragmatics and GLG. – All rights reserved.
• Information may only be reproduced within the company receiving the presentation.
– Otherwise, no information on these slides may be reproduced in total or in part without prior written approval of GLG.
• Neither the information nor the opinions presented in this presentation should be construed as a recommendation for buying or selling any security.
• Telecom Pragmatics obtained information from sources that we believe to be reliable.
– As with any market research, neither its completeness nor its accuracy can be guaranteed.
• Opinions stated in this report are based on our interpretation of available information and are subject to change.
Copyright Telecom Pragmatics & GLG
8
Technology & Industry Fundamentals
Copyright Telecom Pragmatics & GLG
9
Fiber Optics
• Light signals on very thin glass fibers – Advantages over electronic transmission on copper– Theoretically, no capacity limitations– Movement to replace copper will take decades– Relatively recent shift to fiber to homes in a big way
Copyright Telecom Pragmatics & GLG
10
Copper & DSL
Source: IEC
Copyright Telecom Pragmatics & GLG
11
Public Network Segmentation
Source: IETF
Copyright Telecom Pragmatics & GLG
12
Fiber to the X
Source: IEC
Copyright Telecom Pragmatics & GLG
13
PONs
Source: IEC
APON EPON
GPON
Copyright Telecom Pragmatics & GLG
14
RBOC Landscape
Source: Wikipedia
Copyright Telecom Pragmatics & GLG
15
Verizon’s FiOS
Copyright Telecom Pragmatics & GLG
16
FTTN/VDSL 2 vs. FTTH SummaryAT&T’s
Fiber/Copper/IPTV Verizon’s All-Optical Approach
ROI Reasonable period of time; using lots of employees for video services
Often > desired 3 years; no guarantees; will not string fiber directly to home without contract; < 50% of territory to get FTTH
CAPEX Moderate increases as needed; copper already in place; though reality is that FTTP needed within 5 years
Very huge investment -- a total focus to exclusion of almost everything else; mitigated by passing large businesses
Capacity Limited (in reality, hard to get > 50 MB/S); 2-3 HDTV sets in home problematic; exaggerated claims would need node on premises
Theoretically future proof (testing 100 MB/S); unlimited content & user flexibility with eventual all-IPTV over fiber
Maintenance Significant cost with copper that can be several decades old; lots of truck rolls
Much fewer issues with cleaner fiber; mainly only backhoe situations creating problems
Security Less secure than fiber Very secure (though tapping not impossible)
Operations Can be hard to troubleshoot; difficult to design & engineer networks; issues with policing traffic
Straight fiber results in immediate location of faults; many fixes can be performed via software at CO
Experience A lot of deployment in Europe, but fewer channels & less demand for content
Relatively far out on learning curve; impressive cost reductions achieved
Technology IPTV & VDSL 2 immature; deploying fibers to DSLAM dedicated to individual homes in anticipation of FTTH
BPON settled in well; outlook for GPON good; eventually wavelength PON; IPTV only used for broadband on demand now
Topology Cities spread far apart; harder to achieve economies with video architectures
All major cities in close proximity; fewer headends required
Copyright Telecom Pragmatics & GLG
17
Verizon & FTTH
• Vision of CEO, Ivan Seidenberg• FCC ruling on no requirement to unbundle
– Extremely quick deployment -- fear of regulatory change
• Huge maintenance & operations savings
Source: Verizon
Copyright Telecom Pragmatics & GLG
18
Main Verizon Goal: Enterprise
• Residential not reaching 3-year payback– Getting closer though
• Focus on I-95 corridor from Boston to Richmond– Fortune 2000 customer
locations– Pass every business
park, etc.
Copyright Telecom Pragmatics & GLG
19
Future Plans & Deployment
• Goals of current CTO, Mark Wegleitner– FTTH total amount not
likely to exceed 30-40% of area
– Eventually to all-IPTV (currently uses IPTV for video on demand)
• More user control– Ex. Camera angles
• Potential for unlimited content delivery
Source: Verizon
Copyright Telecom Pragmatics & GLG
20
Big Pipes are Not Enough
• Content differentiation critical in getting residents to switch from MSO– Verizon is looking at gaming & unique on-demand
events• Broadway shows, local sporting events, etc.
Source: IEC
Copyright Telecom Pragmatics & GLG
21
FiOS Take-Rates
• For video services higher outside of traditional footprint– Dallas, Los Angeles, Tampa
• Lack prejudice against “Verizon” name– Not their incumbent telco
Source: Verizon
Copyright Telecom Pragmatics & GLG
22
AT&T’s Lightspeed
Copyright Telecom Pragmatics & GLG
23
FTTN/VDSL 2 vs. FTTH SummaryAT&T’s
Fiber/Copper/IPTV Verizon’s All-Optical Approach
ROI Reasonable period of time; using lots of employees for video services
Often > desired 3 years; no guarantees; will not string fiber directly to home without contract; < 50% of territory to get FTTH
CAPEX Moderate increases as needed; copper already in place; though reality is that FTTP needed within 5 years
Very huge investment -- a total focus to exclusion of almost everything else; mitigated by passing large businesses
Capacity Limited (in reality, hard to get > 50 MB/S); 2-3 HDTV sets in home problematic; exaggerated claims would need node on premises
Theoretically future proof (testing 100 MB/S); unlimited content & user flexibility with eventual all-IPTV over fiber
Maintenance Significant cost with copper that can be several decades old; lots of truck rolls
Much fewer issues with cleaner fiber; mainly only backhoe situations creating problems
Security Less secure than fiber Very secure (though tapping not impossible)
Operations Can be hard to troubleshoot; difficult to design & engineer networks; issues with policing traffic
Straight fiber results in immediate location of faults; many fixes can be performed via software at CO
Experience A lot of deployment in Europe, but fewer channels & less demand for content
Relatively far out on learning curve; impressive cost reductions achieved
Technology IPTV & VDSL 2 immature; deploying fibers to DSLAM dedicated to individual homes in anticipation of FTTH
BPON settled in well; outlook for GPON good; eventually wavelength PON; IPTV only used for broadband on demand now
Topology Cities spread far apart; harder to achieve economies with video architectures
All major cities in close proximity; fewer headends required
Copyright Telecom Pragmatics & GLG
24
Current Game Plan for AT&T
• FTTN– Incremental method with new technology– Lowest cost alternative– Use of IPTV
• Instead of traditional RF
• FTTH for greenfield• Satellite • Potentially extend BellSouth FTTC to home
Copyright Telecom Pragmatics & GLG
25
Technological Challenges
• Long lengths of copper from node– Capacity constraints
• Hundreds of channels; HDTV; video on demand; interactive services; etc.
• IPTV & VDSL 2– Immature solutions
• Difficult to design & engineer networks
– Scalability concerns – Possible policing of traffic problems
Copyright Telecom Pragmatics & GLG
26
Impact of New Leadership
• Strong belief in shift to FTTP direction– Probably need to move this way in 5 years anyway
• Already deploying a lot of fibers to DSLAMs– Dedicated to individual subscribers
» Infrastructure passing Fortune 500 businesses
Source: AT&T
Copyright Telecom Pragmatics & GLG
27
U-verse Video Customers
• Appears over half are AT&T employees• Will continue to penetrate new markets
– More of a deliberate way than aggressive– Big focus on former BellSouth territory
Source: AT&T
Copyright Telecom Pragmatics & GLG
28
Topological Constraints
• AT&T lacks Verizon’s geographical edge– Cities far apart
• Can not take advantage of super headends
– Exception somewhat on CA west coast
» San Francisco-Los Angles-San Diego
– Look to take advantage of sectors of cities relatively close together
» Ex. Texas triangle of Dallas, Houston, & San Antonio
Qwest Solution’s
Satellite?
Copyright Telecom Pragmatics & GLG
30
Qwest & Video Services• Reselling DirecTV as part of bundle• Partnership with Microsoft for PC VOD• VDSL• Potential new directions with new leadership• FTTx trials being held near Salt Lake City
Source: Qwest
Copyright Telecom Pragmatics & GLG
31
Future of RBOC Video Services
• Three-year CAPEX outlook– Strong AT&T ramp-up– Verizon finished with major construction in 2008
• Changes in subscriber fees & in churn rates expected to be moderate
• CATV triple play threat– Can be effective in offering up to $40/month savings for
telephone, modem, and video– Cablevision has defended position exceptionally well
including in lucrative areas of New York• MSO using FTTH itself
Copyright Telecom Pragmatics & GLG
32
Staying Power of RBOCs in Video Services
• Verizon– Good chance it eventually exits -- just
focus on enterprise business• Short-term franchise agreements• Would be high level of interest in CATV firms in
buying FTTH networks
• AT&T– Much likely to stay in market given size
• A satellite company purchase still possibility
Copyright Telecom Pragmatics & GLG
33
Supplier Competition & Other Industry Trends
Copyright Telecom Pragmatics & GLG
34
Key Vendors
ADC
Alcatel-Lucent
CommScope
Corning
Emerson
Ericsson
Motorola
Tellabs
Others
Copyright Telecom Pragmatics & GLG
35
PON Semiconductor Supplier Differentiation
Copyright Telecom Pragmatics & GLG
36
Effects of Access Investment on Metro & Long Haul
• Higher capacity multiplexed signals on backbones– Need for more optical networking gear in these spaces
• DWDM, optical cross-connects, etc.
• Long-haul wholesale pricing not expected to improve very much
Source: IEC
Copyright Telecom Pragmatics & GLG
37
Detrimental Effects of Fiber Installations to CLECs
• Verizon often disconnects copper line after installing fiber– Can make life more difficult for CLECs
• Apparently stopped outright removal of copper– Still, inviting potential investigations from regulators
Source: IEC
Copyright Telecom Pragmatics & GLG
38
Look for Lots of Landline Territory Sold By RBOCs
• Verizon sale to Fairpoint of N. NE just the start– Western portions of NY, PA, MD, & VA
along with all of WV up for purchase• Lack of interest in bringing broadband to these
areas– Will still have to satisfy state PUCs
• AT&T will probably sell huge portions as well
Copyright Telecom Pragmatics & GLG
39
Voice & Data
• Burgeoning growth of data will continue• VoIP market will continue to expand gradually
– Total replacement by soft switches at Verizon & AT&T as early as 10 years
– Still quality of service issues• Enterprises still tend to use it more for internal communications
Source: AT&T
Copyright Telecom Pragmatics & GLG
40
Dark Fiber
Source: Qwest
Copyright Telecom Pragmatics & GLG
41
Thank You