Let's Get Real (time): Server-Sent Events, WebSockets and WebRTC for the soul

Let’s get real (time): Server-Sent Events, WebSockets and WebRTC for

the soulA guided tour of modern browser networking

Swanand Pagnis [email protected]

Yours truly• Originally from Krypton, often mistaken as the last

survivor

• Sent to earth in a spaceship while still a baby

• A few useful superpowers

• Suspiciously good at hiding in plain sight

Yours truly• Originally from Krypton, often mistaken as the last

survivor

• Sent to earth in a spaceship while still a baby

• A few useful superpowers

• Suspiciously good at hiding in plain sight

Yours truly• Bangalore RUG, Mysore RUG, Garden City

RubyConf

• Hack code at Simplero for a living

• Twitter @_swanand

• Github @swanandp

What’s in store for us

1. Why bother ?


1. Why bother ?

2. The Zen of Real Time Communication


1. Why bother ?


3. Concepts and app Integration with:


1. Why bother ?



1. SSE


1. Why bother ?



1. SSE

2. WebSockets


1. Why bother ?



1. SSE

2. WebSockets

3. WebRTC


1. Why bother ?



1. SSE

2. WebSockets

3. WebRTC

4. Further reading and open source opportunities


Problems with traditional approaches

Why Bother ?

1. Poor performance because of high latency

2. Neither truly async nor truly real time, often limited to Text transfer only

3. Either additional complexity and inconvenience or hacky methods

��7

Problems with traditional approaches

The Zen of Real Time Communication

• Escape from Request-Response cycle

• Do not be bound to HTTP

• It may or may not always REST

Also known as the EventSource API

Server-Sent Events

Server-Sent Events : Introduction

��12


1. Designed for Server to Client communication

��12



2. Single long lived connection; hence low latency

��12



2. Single long lived connection; hence low latency

3. Simple cross browser API��12

Server-Sent Events : Use cases

• Activity feeds like Twitter, Facebook, Stock Tickers

• Analytics, Dashboards, Monitoring

• Chats, Instant Messaging *, Collaborative editing like Google Docs

��13

��14

Server-Sent Events : The Browser

Server-Sent Events : The Server

��15

Server-Sent Events : Summary

1. Simple Protocol that builds on top of HTTP

2. Truly async

3. Perfect for “notifying” the client

4. Great cross browser support, but no binary support

��16

1. Traditional Rack based app are a slight misfit because

of response buffering ( Remember our first Zen ? )

2. Evented architecture works in our favour ( Think of

EM::Deferrable or Thin )

3. Long running connection means long running

process on the server

Server-Sent Events : App Integration

��17

1. ActionController ::Live

2. Sinatra’s Streaming API

3. Faye

4. Cramp

5. Pusher

Server-Sent Events : App Integration

��18

1. Streaming and SSE support baked right into Rails ( > 4.0 )

2. You keep the full context ( current_user etc )

3. Integration friendly, almost a drop-in feature into existing Rails apps

ActionController ::Live

��19

EDGE

ActionController ::Live

��20

Sinatra’s Streaming API

1. You only need Sinatra, Thin and some Javascript

2. So simple, you will cry with happiness

3. No app context

4. So simple, you will beg for more features


1. You only need Sinatra, Thin and some Javascript

2. So simple, you will cry with happiness

3. No app context

4. So simple, you will beg for more features


1. Running a separate process that acts as a server, and your server and client act as clients to this server

2. Pub / sub model, drop-in integration with your app

3. Graceful degradation

4. No app context

Faye + Your App

��22

Faye + Your App

Apps that have more traditional components than real time

1. Use a separate process / service / app for the real time part ( e.g. Faye or Pusher or BYOT )

2. Use existing infrastructure for non real time aspects of the app

Recommended approachRant

��24

WebSocketsWhen Server-Sent Events are just not enough

WebSockets : Introduction

��27


1. Standalone Bidirectional protocol

��27



2. Message oriented, supports events by design

��27




3. Reliable text and binary transfers

��27




3. Reliable text and binary transfers

4. HTTP Compatible

��27

1. All the use cases of SSEs, plus:

2. Multiplayer games, Multi-media chat *

3. Remote pair programming, Online contests, Live interviews, Screen sharing, Remote Desktop etc.

WebSockets : Use Cases

��28

WebSockets : The Browser

WebSockets : Upgrade Handshake

1. Faye + Your app

2. Cramp + Your app

3. websocket-rails

4. em-websocket, em-websocket-rails

5. Pusher

WebSocket

WebSockets : App Integration

��31

Cramp + Your App

��32

1. Run Cramp as a standalone app

2. Provides an app like functionality around RTC

3. Think of it as Rails for real time apps

4. No drop-in integration with existing app

Cramp + Your App

��33

1. Controller becomes Action

2. Action becomes Event, triggered with on_data

3. params become data

4. Connection open by default

Recommended approach

��34

Apps that are heavily real time

1. Use Cramp to build a stand alone app

2. Be an API consumer for your other app for any additional functionality

Rant

http://www.personal.psu.edu/afr3/blogs/siowfa13/yawning.jpg

Modern Day Kazaa, in an Iron Man Suit

WebRTC

WebRTC : Introduction

��39

1. Peer-to-peer audio, video, and data sharing between browsers

2. Standardised to a JavaScript API

3. Google Backed


��40

1. Acquire Audio and Video data

2. Communicate Audio and Video data

3. Communicate Arbitrary Application Data


��41

1. MediaStream

2. RTCPeerConnection

3. RTCDataChannel


��42

1. MediaStream

2. RTCPeerConnection

3. RTCDataChannel

WebRTC : Typical Workflow - Phase 1

��43


��43

1. Connect to the Signalling Server, let it know:

1. Your Identity ( STUN )

2. How to reach you ( ICE Candidate )

2. Once a peer is detected by the server, it in turns gives you the above info

3. At this point, we are ready for a P2P connection


Incomplete

Code

WebRTC : Typical Workflow - Phase II

��45


��45

1. Create a stream to send and receive binary data

2. Create a channel to send and receive text data

3. Actually send and receive data


– Oscar Wilde

“Consistency is the last refuge of the unimaginative”

WebRTC : Use Cases

��48

1. Motherlode of Skype clones, free and open source!

2. Screen sharing, remote pairing, multiplayer games, browser based torrents, Live MOOCs

3. In reality, this is limited mostly by our imagination and browser’s computing abilities

WebRTC : Dive in

��49

1. Use any of the JavaScript libs / SDKs :

1. Open Source: SimpleWebRTC, webRTC.io, PeerJS, EasyRTC, ShareFest

2. Commercial: PubNub WebRTC SDK

2. Signalling service example in Ruby

1. OSS : github.com/palavatv/palava-machine

http://github.com/palavatv/palava-machine

Further Reading

• HTML5Rocks ( it’s a website, not a collection of rocks )

• http://studio.html5rocks.com/

• WebRTC official website

• Mozilla Developer Network

• http://simpl.info/

Websites

http://simpl.info/

• Ilya Grigorik

• Sam Dutton

• Paul Irish

• Eric Bidelman

• Your own blog, one year from now

Blogs

• High Performance Browser Networking

• Getting Started with WebRTC

• HTML5: Up and Running

Books

Open Source Opportunities

• Help out Faye, Cramp and other libraries mentioned so far

• Open source all your throw-away code written during learning ( Mine is on Github )

• Async-proof versions of commonly needed ruby gems ( e.g. github.com/rkh/async-rack )

http://github.com/rkh/async-rack

• Helper Libraries for Cramp, e.g.

• To easily build simple board games

• To write calendar based real time apps

• Augment the testing libraries to test real time stuff

• Write and make your benchmarks available

Thank You !

��57

Questions ?

��58

Technology

Let's Get Real (time): Server-Sent Events, WebSockets and WebRTC for the soul