of 22/22
Eight Months of APS Wikipedia Initiative Rosta Farzan & Robert Kraut Human Computer Interaction Institute Carnegie Mellon University

Kraut farzan-wiki powerpoint

  • View
    279

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Text of Kraut farzan-wiki powerpoint

  • 1. Eight Months of APSWikipedia InitiativeRosta Farzan & Robert KrautHuman Computer Interaction InstituteCarnegie Mellon University

2. Outline History of the APS Wikipedia Initiative Evidence that the Initiative has beensuccessful Got psychologists & students involved Improved many psychology articles Some problems Some solutions2 3. Wikipedia is the number one source forgeneral public Google search for most psychological concepts returns the link to Wikipedia article within the first few results3 4. Google searches4 5. Yet many Wikipedia articles on psychology wereimpoverished or out of date 5 6. APS call to fix the problem6 7. APSWI initiative participation has beengrowing ~12% per month1,438 psychologists and their students have joined andcontributed to 1,284 (~18%) of psychology articles inWikipedia 7 8. 8 9. How to evaluate success Comparison of initiative members vs. others who are editing psychology articles Comparison of psychology articles vs. other scientific disciplines 9 10. Initiative editors work harder 2,066 new non-initiative editors since Sep 1,2011 edited psychology articles 720 initiative editors Add more content Add better content (i.e. longer lived) APSWI editors Non-APSWI editorsWords per editor395 296% high quality contributions 73.8% 60.3% 10 11. APSWI newcomers did high quality work In 74% of articles, over 50% of work survived Better survival than edits in Wikiproject: Psychology,Sociology or Neuroscience 11 12. 35 faculty engaged their classes in writingWikipedia articles 35 classes with 676 students joined the initiative in Fall 2011 and Spring 2012 Students edited 601 articles adding 173,185 words Edits are as good as non-classroom participation 12 13. Students found Wikipedia assignmenteffective in their learning Topic of the articlethey edited Norms and culture ofWikipedia community Technical aspects ofWikipediaMotivational benefits come from authentic writing experiences seen by thousands13 14. Initiative has been successfulon many measuresStill lots of challenges 14 15. Wikipedia editing can be hard Need to learn Domain Technology Culture Students received the most feedback from their professor, and less from other students or Wikipedia community15 16. Feedback from other Wikipedians can behelpfulBut established Wikipedia editors can be hostile 16 17. Reverting contentI have been working on my project over vacation and I tried to put up all ofmy edits on the wikipedia website. I have been trying to get the website towork for over three hours and I asked a friend who is good with computersto help me. Neither one of us can make the project work. When we go intothe history it shows that everything I am trying to post is gettingreverted or removed by other people. I do not know what to do. If youcan please email me back so I know what to do. Thank you for your help.When I try to post my edits to the wikipedia page they dont go on atall it just tells me that it is rejected. I also am unable to enter myreferences. Nothing will work for me. I followed the step by step directionson how to edit that you sent us the link for and it still wont work. Thank youfor your understanding. I have been working really hard on this project andI dont want my difficulties with Wikipedia to affect my grade. If you haveany other suggestions please let me know. Thank you. 17 18. Email: Deleted articles and urgent request for help a user has flagged an article for deletion of one ofmy students, without much specific content about thereasons for deletion, but more of vague and generalrants about her bitterness, frustration, andannoyance. She has gone on to make personalattacks on me and to make broad and overlynegative comments about the students work. Mystudents are understandably upset by this, and I feelbad about exposing them to this kind of thing. 18 19. Nasty or unhelpful feedback Harassed students about General notability guidelines Using primary (i.e. peer-reviewed) sources 19 20. SolutionsStudents mentoring each other Wikipedia Ambassador program, but no theytypically dont have domain expertise We invited 14 students from Fall 2011 whopresented high level of success to mentor studentsin Spring 2012 classes 6 students agreed to participate and activelyparticipated 20 21. Mentors and students communications Hi Alyssa, I am having some troubles uploading pictures to my wikipedia page or even my sandbox. Any tips? Thanks for your help, Moriah Hi Moriah, Here is the Wikipedia page on uploading: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Uploading_images It looks like you were successful in uploading a few images to your sandbox. Are you still having trouble? Also, please remember to use only images that are fair use or free license. 21 22. APSWI Portal Support psychologists to find psychology articles inneed of work Support faculty who use Wikipedia in classroom Support students by providing tutorials andinformation about activities of their classmatesStop by our Wikipedia booth (102) to learn moreDemo sessions:Friday: 12:00-12:30 and 4:00-4:30Saturday: 1:00-1:30 and 4:00-4:30 22