35
talking ‘bout Games People Play (every night and every day now) Eric Berne and Transactional Analysis

Transactional analysis

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Transactional Analysis Games - People Play by Eric Berne

Citation preview

Page 1: Transactional analysis

talking ‘bout

Games People

Play(every night and every day now)

Eric Berneand Transactional Analysis

Page 2: Transactional analysis

A phenomenal book

The bestselling book by psychiatrist Dr. Eric Berne that uncovered the dynamics of human relationships. Since its publication in 1964 to the newly released and updated 40th anniversary edition, over 5 million copies have been sold worldwide in over ten languages. The book remains immensely popular and has recently experienced a huge increase in sales due to renewed interest.

Page 3: Transactional analysis

The value of the book

"Many times in my life, I was placed in social situations that left me feeling so depleted afterwards and I could not exactly grasp why this was happening. When I read Games People Play, I started to understand how many people play these games that end up making me feel used and hopeless. After a year or so, I also began realizing that I play some of these games myself... This is when I really decided to change my life. I began living with a new awareness of the behaviours of not only others but my own as well!"

Page 4: Transactional analysis

What Game?

A game is an ongoing series of complementary ulterior transactions progressing to a well-defined, predictable outcome. Descriptively, it is a recurring set of transactions... with a concealed motivation... Or gimmick.“

What happens in the game is explained by transactional analysisLet’s look at an example called IWFY

Page 5: Transactional analysis

If It Weren't For You" or IWFY. Mrs. White complained that her husband severely restricted her social activities, so that she had never learned to dance. Due to changes in her attitude brought about psychiatric treatment, her husband became less sure of himself and more indulgent.

Mrs. White was then free to enlarge the scope of her activities. She signed up for dancing classes, and then discovered to her despair that she had a morbid hear of dance floors and had to abandon this project.

Page 6: Transactional analysis

If It Weren't For You" or IWFY. This unfortunate adventure, along with similar ones, laid out some important aspects of her marriage. Out of her many suitors, she had picked a domineering man for a husband. She was then in a position to complain that she could do all sorts of things "it if weren't for you." Many of her woman friends had domineering husbands, and when they met for their morning coffee, they spent a good deal of time playing "If It Weren't For Him."

Page 7: Transactional analysis

IWFY

As it turned out, however, contrary to her complaints, her husband was performing a very real service for her by forbidding her to do something she was deeply afraid of, and by preventing her, in fact, from even becoming aware of her fears. This was one reason... [she] had chosen such a husband.

Page 8: Transactional analysis

IWFY

His prohibitions and her complaints frequently led to quarrels, so that their sex life was seriously impaired. She and her husband had little in common besides their household worries and the children, so that their quarrels stood out as important events.

Page 9: Transactional analysis

The Payoff

Both Mr. and Mrs. White are participating in a game; they are not consciously aware of their active participation. As with any game, at least one party must achieve a "payoff" for the game to proceed. In this game, Mrs. White, and to a lesser degree Mr. White achieve their respective payoffs. In Mr. White's case, by restricting Mrs. White's activities, he can retain the role of domineering husband, which provides him comfort when things do not necessarily go his way.

Page 10: Transactional analysis

Mrs White’s Payoff

Mrs. White obtains her payoff at many levels. On the psychological level, the restrictions imposed by Mr. White prevent Mrs. White from experiencing neurotic fears or being placed in phobic situations. By having Mr. White prevent her from being placed in these situations, Mrs. White does not have to acknowledge (or even be aware of) her fears. On the social level, Mrs. White's payoff is that she can say "if it weren't for you." This helps to structure the time she must spend with her husband, as well as the time spent without him. In addition, it allows her to say "if it weren't for him" with friends.

Page 11: Transactional analysis

Ending the Game

As with any game, it comes to an abrupt end when one player decides (usually unconsciously) to stop playing. If instead, Mr. White said "Go ahead" instead of "Don't you dare", Mrs. White loses her payoff. She can no longer say "if it weren't for you" and then must go out and confront her fears.

By continuing to play this game, each participant receives his or her payoff, but the price is a marriage with serious problems.

Page 12: Transactional analysis

Ending the Game

IWFY, like most other games, when perpetuated, can lead to adverse effects. Identification of the game is the first step. Once the player(s) recognize they are playing a game, efforts can be made to improve upon the problem. This is the basis of Transactional Analysis Therapy.

Page 13: Transactional analysis

The Drama Triangle

NIGYSOB = Now I’ve got you, you son of a bitch

Page 14: Transactional analysis

Choose your role (or choose them all)

• Victim• Perpetrator/Persecutor• Rescuer

What’s the payoff?

Page 15: Transactional analysis

The Victim

The Victim is a person who asks other people to sort things out for him or her rather than doing it him- or herself: in other words, operating from a "one-down" position. Victims may put themselves down and disown their capacity to think and act for themselves. They may not use their own Adult capacity to think and may believe that "I cannot cope on my own". The Victim may portray him- or herself as powerless, and often feels powerless on the inside; however, even though Victims disown their own power, they have the power to initiate the switch of roles within a game (which gives them a lot of power in relationships).

Page 16: Transactional analysis

The Rescuer

The Rescuer is a person who comes in with the overt agenda of doing things for other people or sorting them out in some way. The hidden belief is that other people are not capable of doing stuff for themselves, which puts the Rescuer in a "one-up" position. However, the hidden assumption is often unconscious and a lot of Rescuers are well-meaning. Even so, classic Rescuers go in to help people without asking, doing more than their fair share, and ending up doing things they don't want to do.

Page 17: Transactional analysis

The Perpetrator or Persecutor

Lastly, the Persecutor. He or she dismisses the capacity of others to think, feel or act on their own behalf. The Persecutor has a hidden agenda of punishing or belittling people in some way. Like the Rescuer, he or she comes from a one-up position

Page 18: Transactional analysis

Start the game!

A game can start once two people recognize each other to be in opposite roles, e.g. a Rescuer and a Victim. A set of predictable interactions follows, after which one person switches roles, say the Victim switches into Persecutor mode and the Rescuer follows the switch and becomes the Victim (possibly also a Persecutor). The switch in the game can be from any of the three positions to a different one. Just as with specific roles, people will also have a preferred point to switch to.

Page 19: Transactional analysis

Why do all this?

There are many reasons why people play these types of games.One is that it justifies one's outlook on the world (the original Victim in the above example will feel confirmed in his belief that the world is a bad place and he can be angry with it).It is also a way of not taking responsibility for changing anything about oneself.

Page 20: Transactional analysis

And more why

Another reason why people play games is that they constitute attention. Games can be emotionally highly charged and despite the fact that they produce negative attention, this can be better than no attention at all. Not playing games might leave people feeling their loneliness and disconnection from others.

The Victim/Persecutor in the above example may not have any friends or family and manages to get some interaction with others through playing games.

Page 21: Transactional analysis

I just want to get close to you

If one looks at it like that, one could say a game is a failed attempt to be close to people. The participants want to be close and authentic with each other, but don't quite manage the risks of being open and honest and instead go for a slightly more predictable relationship pattern, a game.

Page 22: Transactional analysis

Authenticity

So, we have three psychological roles, and once you take any one of them, you set yourself up to participate in a game. People will have their favourite game position, which they start off from. Often our favourite position is something we have learned as a child. All three positions are inauthentic and dismiss some aspects about oneself or someone else (e.g. as a Rescuer I dismiss other people's capacity to think and act on their own behalf).

Page 23: Transactional analysis

At least I have structure

Although games leave us feeling bad, they are still structured according to predictable lines: the same thing happens again and again, which is much less frightening than going for the all-out unknown of being really close to someone.If I choose to be close to another human being, all structure goes, there is just you and me relating to each other, and anything may happen! For some people that's a very frightening thing, so they divert their energy into games instead.

Page 24: Transactional analysis

Kick MeThis is played by men whose social manner is equivalent to wearing a sign that reads “Please Don’t Kick Me.” The temptation is almost irresistible, and when the natural result follows, White cries “piteously, “But the sign says ‘don’t kick me.’” Then he adds incredulously, “Why does this always happen to me?” (WAHM.). Clinically, the WAHM may be introjected (unconsciously incorporated) and disguised in the “Psychiatry” cliché: “Whenever I’m under stress, I get all shook up.” One game element in WAHM comes from inverse pride: “My misfortunes are better than yours.” This factor is often found in paranoids.

Page 25: Transactional analysis

Kick MeIf the people in this environment are restrained from striking at him by kind-heartedness, “I’m Only Trying to Help You,” at social convention or organizational rules, his behaviour becomes more and more provocative until he transgresses the limits and forces them to oblige. These are men who are cast out, the jilted and the job losers.

The corresponding game among women is “Threadbare.”

Page 26: Transactional analysis

The light is on

This time the husband makes up his mind that he is really through, that they will find a sexless modus vivendi. Months pass. He declines the negligee parade and the forgotten towel manoeuvre. The wife becomes more provocatively informal and more provocatively forgetful, but he still resists. Then one evening she actually approaches him and kisses him. At first he doesn't respond, remembering his resolution, but soon nature begins to take its course after the long famine, and now he thinks he surely has it made. His first tentative advances are not repulsed. He becomes bolder and bolder. Just at the critical point, the wife steps back and cries: 'See, what did I tell you! All men are beasts, all I wanted was affection, but all you are interested in is sex!'

Page 27: Transactional analysis

Rapo

First-Degree 'Rapo', or 'Kiss Off', is popular at social gatherings and consists essentially of mild flirtation. White signals that she is available and gets her pleasure from the man's pursuit. As soon as he has committed himself, the game is over. If she is polite, she may say quite frankly 'I appreciate your compliments and thank you very much', and move on to the next conquest. If she is less generous, she may simply leave him. A skilful player can make this game last for a long time at a large social gathering by moving around frequently, so that the man has to carry out complicated manoeuvres in order to follow her without being too obvious.

Page 28: Transactional analysis

Second Degree Rapo

In Second-Degree 'Rapo', or 'Indignation', White gets only secondary satisfaction from Black's advances. Her primary gratification codes from rejecting him, so that this game is also colloquially known as 'Buzz Off, Buster'. She leads Black into a much more serious commitment than the mild flirtation of First-Degree 'Rapo' and enjoys watching his discomfiture when she repulses him. Black, of course, is not as helpless as he seems, and may have gone to considerable trouble to get himself involved. Usually he is playing some variation of 'Kick Me'.

Page 29: Transactional analysis

Threesome – the Parent

This is our ingrained voice of authority, absorbed conditioning, learning and attitudes from when we were young. We were conditioned by our real parents, teachers, older people, next door neighbours, aunts and uncles, Father Christmas and Jack Frost. Our Parent is made up of a huge number of hidden and overt recorded playbacks. Typically embodied by phrases and attitudes starting with 'how to', 'under no circumstances', 'always' and 'never forget', 'don't lie, cheat, steal', etc, etc. Our parent is formed by external events and influences upon us as we grow through early childhood. We can change it, but this is easier said than done.

The Parent is now commonly represented as a circle with four quadrants:Nurturing - Nurturing (positive) and Spoiling (negative).Controlling - Structuring (positive) and Critical (negative).

Page 30: Transactional analysis

The Child

Our internal reaction and feelings to external events form the 'Child'. This is the seeing, hearing, feeling, and emotional body of data within each of us. When anger or despair dominates reason, the Child is in control. Like our Parent we can change it, but it is no easier.The Child is now commonly represented as circle with four quadrants:Adapted - Co-operative (positive) and Compliant/Resistant (negative).Free - Spontaneous (positive) and Immature (negative).

Page 31: Transactional analysis

The AdultOur 'Adult' is our ability to think and determine action for ourselves, based on received data. The adult in us begins to form at around ten months old, and is the means by which we keep our Parent and Child under control. If we are to change our Parent or Child we must do so through our adult.

In other words:Parent is our 'Taught' concept of life Adult is our 'Thought' concept of life Child is our 'Felt' concept of life

Page 32: Transactional analysis

Adult - Adult

There is no general rule as to the effectiveness of any ego state in any given situation (some people get results by being dictatorial (Parent to Child), or by having temper tantrums, (Child to Parent).But for a self-aware and non-manipulative approach to life, Adult to Adult is generally recommended.

Page 33: Transactional analysis

The OK Corral

Page 34: Transactional analysis

Fundamental Concepts of TA• Everyone is born OK • Each person has a right to be in the world, accepted for

who they are • Everyone is responsible for themselves • We all seek physical and emotional nurturing so we modify

our behaviour to achieve this • There are three behavioural states we can switch between:

child, parent and adult • Some people have a life script, which will determine :

– how they behave – how they interpret the behaviour of others – how they respond to people;

Page 35: Transactional analysis

Know thyself