12
International Web-Based Consultation on Consumption Patterns for Sustainable Development (CPSD)

Soeiro moraes scr_20150709_1500_upmc_jussieu_-_room_201

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

International Web-Based Consultation on Consumption Patterns

for Sustainable Development (CPSD)

Methodological Aspects

Slide 2

Consumption Patterns for Sustainable Development (CPSD)

• A controlled web-based consultation (open for 28 days)

• Questionnaire with 22 questions distributed as follows:

Diagnosis: Conceptual Aspects; Transition Trends; Obstacles, Opportunities and Risks

Proposals: Agenda; Instruments; Monitoring; Governance; Post-2015 Development Agenda

Country Respondents % Population

(millions)

Sub-Total %

Brazil 390 79.4 203 73.0

France 76 15.5 66 23.8

Sweden 25 5.1 9 3.2

Total 491 100.00 278 100.0

The relation respondents / population provides some support to compare the three

countries that are highlighted: Brazil, France and Sweden.

Obs.: ( 1 ) The nationals respondents do not represent in any way the public opinion from that country; (

2 ) There isn't also any kind of statistical sampling.

Slide 3

2nd level 1st level

O1 - Conscious, Responsible & Ethical Consumption;

O2 - Green & Ecological Consumption & Eco-friendly Lifestyle;

O3 - Individual Well-Being & Social Welfare & Social Equity

Other expressions

Expressions that better fit the notion of CPSD

Slide 4

Tackling consumption patterns involves

0,0

5,0

10,0

15,0

20,0

25,0

30,0

Improvement of the quality of life

Satisfaction of basic needs

Reduction of inequalities

Make unsustainable productsmore expensive

Concern for future generations

Minimization of environmentalimpact

Use of natural resources withintheir capacity for renewal

Brazil France Sweden

Consumption characteristics incompatible with SD

Slide 5

0,0 5,0 10,0 15,0 20,0 25,0

Overconsumption

Under consumption

Inadequate food habits

Non-organic products

Inefficient use

Insuficient public transport

Use of fossil fuels

Toxic materials

Packaging

Inadequate disposal of waste

Inadequate water use

Unfair labor conditions

Unfair trade conditions

Brazil

France

Sweden

Sweden

All 3 countries

Brazil

Sweden

Slide 6

Required changes for a global transition to CPSD

SA>70%

SA>70%

SA< 50%

SA>50%

Slide 7

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Yes, with highergrowth rates

Yes, with the samegrowth rates

Yes, but with lowergrowth rates

No, it would result inzero or negative

growth

An

sw

ers

%

Brazil (CP)

France (CP)

Sweden (CP)

Brazil (GE)

France (GE)

Sweden (GE)

Obs: CP (Consumption Patterns); GE (Green Economy)

How have perceptions evolved since Rio+20?

Is the transition to CPSD compatible with economic growth?

Slide 8

A - Food and nutrition; B - Housing and appliances; C - Mobility and transport;

D - Health and personal care; E - Water and sanitation; F - Clothing ; G - Education;

H – Communication / Information; I - Entertainment / leisure; J - Other sectors not listed

Country A B C D E F G H I J Total

Brazil 17.2 10.2 25.5 3.7 23.1 0.6 12.6 3.9 0.3 2.9 100.0

France 16.8 21.9 27.6 5.6 12.2 0.0 8.2 2.6 2.0 3.1 100.0

Sweden 15.8 19.3 33.3 0.0 8.8 10.5 7.0 1.8 0.0 3.5 100.0

Other 16.5 11.3 26.0 5.6 15.2 0.4 11.7 9.5 1.7 2.2 100.0

Consumption areas where technological evolution is necessary

1st option 2nd option 3rd option

Slide 9

Priority areas of the 10YFP for the transition to CPSD

0,0

5,0

10,0

15,0

20,0

25,0

30,0

35,0

40,0

Tourism

Consumer information

Lifestyles and education

Public procurement

Buildings and construction

Food systems

Brazil France Sweden

0,0

5,0

10,0

15,0

20,0

25,0

30,0

35,0Product bans

Marketing andadvertisingregulations

Codes andmandatory labels

Command andcontrol

regulations

Mandatoryperformance

standards

Publicsustainable

procurement

Slide 10

Regulatory

Main instruments to encourage the adoption of CPSD

0,0

10,0

20,0

30,0

40,0

50,0

60,0

State-financedloans

Taxes andcharges

Subsidies andfiscal incentives

Larger financialincentives

Publicinvestments

Privateinvestments

Financial

Information 0,05,0

10,015,020,025,030,035,040,0

Voluntarylabelling

Awarenesscampaigns

Training andeducation

Corporatesocial and

environmentalresponsibilit…

Cooperationactivities

Life cycleassessments

Benchmarking

Brazil France Sweden

Corporate social

and environmental

reporting

0,0

2,0

4,0

6,0

8,0

10,0

12,0

14,0

Vehicles/population ratio

Proportion ofpopulation in

extreme poverty

Tax incentivesfor energy

efficient/lowcarbon

technologies

Share ofimported foodcompared to

locally sourcedproduced food

Slide 11

Economic

Indicators to measure the transition to CPSD

0,0

2,0

4,0

6,0

8,0

10,0

12,0

14,0

Change inforest and land

Carbonfootprint per

capita

Water footprintper capita

Energyconsump. per

capita

Solid wastegenerated and

recycled

Electricity fromrenewableresources

Wasteconverted back

Environmental

Social

0,0

2,0

4,0

6,0

8,0

10,0

12,0

14,0

Park and facilityspace per capita

Population living inslums or informal

lodgings

Access to drinkingwater and basic

sanitation

Access to reliabletransportation and

electricity

Population withinwalking distance of

public transport

Brazil France Sweden

Tax incentives for energy

efficient/low carbon

technologies

Thank you! Antonio Galvão: [email protected]

Marcelo Poppe: [email protected]

Celena Soeiro: [email protected]

Consumption Patterns for Sustainable Development (CPSD)