Upload
ingrid-le-ru
View
110
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Methodological Aspects
Slide 2
Consumption Patterns for Sustainable Development (CPSD)
• A controlled web-based consultation (open for 28 days)
• Questionnaire with 22 questions distributed as follows:
Diagnosis: Conceptual Aspects; Transition Trends; Obstacles, Opportunities and Risks
Proposals: Agenda; Instruments; Monitoring; Governance; Post-2015 Development Agenda
Country Respondents % Population
(millions)
Sub-Total %
Brazil 390 79.4 203 73.0
France 76 15.5 66 23.8
Sweden 25 5.1 9 3.2
Total 491 100.00 278 100.0
The relation respondents / population provides some support to compare the three
countries that are highlighted: Brazil, France and Sweden.
Obs.: ( 1 ) The nationals respondents do not represent in any way the public opinion from that country; (
2 ) There isn't also any kind of statistical sampling.
Slide 3
2nd level 1st level
O1 - Conscious, Responsible & Ethical Consumption;
O2 - Green & Ecological Consumption & Eco-friendly Lifestyle;
O3 - Individual Well-Being & Social Welfare & Social Equity
Other expressions
Expressions that better fit the notion of CPSD
Slide 4
Tackling consumption patterns involves
0,0
5,0
10,0
15,0
20,0
25,0
30,0
Improvement of the quality of life
Satisfaction of basic needs
Reduction of inequalities
Make unsustainable productsmore expensive
Concern for future generations
Minimization of environmentalimpact
Use of natural resources withintheir capacity for renewal
Brazil France Sweden
Consumption characteristics incompatible with SD
Slide 5
0,0 5,0 10,0 15,0 20,0 25,0
Overconsumption
Under consumption
Inadequate food habits
Non-organic products
Inefficient use
Insuficient public transport
Use of fossil fuels
Toxic materials
Packaging
Inadequate disposal of waste
Inadequate water use
Unfair labor conditions
Unfair trade conditions
Brazil
France
Sweden
Sweden
All 3 countries
Brazil
Sweden
Slide 7
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Yes, with highergrowth rates
Yes, with the samegrowth rates
Yes, but with lowergrowth rates
No, it would result inzero or negative
growth
An
sw
ers
%
Brazil (CP)
France (CP)
Sweden (CP)
Brazil (GE)
France (GE)
Sweden (GE)
Obs: CP (Consumption Patterns); GE (Green Economy)
How have perceptions evolved since Rio+20?
Is the transition to CPSD compatible with economic growth?
Slide 8
A - Food and nutrition; B - Housing and appliances; C - Mobility and transport;
D - Health and personal care; E - Water and sanitation; F - Clothing ; G - Education;
H – Communication / Information; I - Entertainment / leisure; J - Other sectors not listed
Country A B C D E F G H I J Total
Brazil 17.2 10.2 25.5 3.7 23.1 0.6 12.6 3.9 0.3 2.9 100.0
France 16.8 21.9 27.6 5.6 12.2 0.0 8.2 2.6 2.0 3.1 100.0
Sweden 15.8 19.3 33.3 0.0 8.8 10.5 7.0 1.8 0.0 3.5 100.0
Other 16.5 11.3 26.0 5.6 15.2 0.4 11.7 9.5 1.7 2.2 100.0
Consumption areas where technological evolution is necessary
1st option 2nd option 3rd option
Slide 9
Priority areas of the 10YFP for the transition to CPSD
0,0
5,0
10,0
15,0
20,0
25,0
30,0
35,0
40,0
Tourism
Consumer information
Lifestyles and education
Public procurement
Buildings and construction
Food systems
Brazil France Sweden
0,0
5,0
10,0
15,0
20,0
25,0
30,0
35,0Product bans
Marketing andadvertisingregulations
Codes andmandatory labels
Command andcontrol
regulations
Mandatoryperformance
standards
Publicsustainable
procurement
Slide 10
Regulatory
Main instruments to encourage the adoption of CPSD
0,0
10,0
20,0
30,0
40,0
50,0
60,0
State-financedloans
Taxes andcharges
Subsidies andfiscal incentives
Larger financialincentives
Publicinvestments
Privateinvestments
Financial
Information 0,05,0
10,015,020,025,030,035,040,0
Voluntarylabelling
Awarenesscampaigns
Training andeducation
Corporatesocial and
environmentalresponsibilit…
Cooperationactivities
Life cycleassessments
Benchmarking
Brazil France Sweden
Corporate social
and environmental
reporting
0,0
2,0
4,0
6,0
8,0
10,0
12,0
14,0
Vehicles/population ratio
Proportion ofpopulation in
extreme poverty
Tax incentivesfor energy
efficient/lowcarbon
technologies
Share ofimported foodcompared to
locally sourcedproduced food
Slide 11
Economic
Indicators to measure the transition to CPSD
0,0
2,0
4,0
6,0
8,0
10,0
12,0
14,0
Change inforest and land
Carbonfootprint per
capita
Water footprintper capita
Energyconsump. per
capita
Solid wastegenerated and
recycled
Electricity fromrenewableresources
Wasteconverted back
Environmental
Social
0,0
2,0
4,0
6,0
8,0
10,0
12,0
14,0
Park and facilityspace per capita
Population living inslums or informal
lodgings
Access to drinkingwater and basic
sanitation
Access to reliabletransportation and
electricity
Population withinwalking distance of
public transport
Brazil France Sweden
Tax incentives for energy
efficient/low carbon
technologies
Thank you! Antonio Galvão: [email protected]
Marcelo Poppe: [email protected]
Celena Soeiro: [email protected]
Consumption Patterns for Sustainable Development (CPSD)