12
Sean Bechhofer, Stian Soiland-Reyes, Matthew Gamble University of Manchester [email protected] @seanbechhofer Harmony 2014, Manchester Research Objects 1

Research Objects @ HARMONY 2014

  • Upload
    seanb

  • View
    552

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

A short presentation given during the COMBINE archive session at HARMONY 2014: http://co.mbine.org/events/HARMONY_2014

Citation preview

Page 1: Research Objects @ HARMONY 2014

Sean Bechhofer, Stian Soiland-Reyes, Matthew Gamble

University of Manchester

[email protected]@seanbechhofer

Harmony 2014, Manchester

Research Objects

1

Page 2: Research Objects @ HARMONY 2014

Why? Publication• Publications are about argumentation:

Convince the reader of the validity of a position [Mesirov]– Reproducible Results System: facilitates

enactment and publication of reproducible research.

• Results are reinforced by reproducability [De Roure]– Explicit representation of method.

• Verifiability as a key factor in scientific discovery.

J. Mesirov Accessible Reproducible Research Science 327(5964), p.415-416, 2010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1179653

D. De Roure and C. Goble Anchors in Shifting Sand: the Primacy of Method in the Web of Data Web Science Conference 2010, Raleigh NC, 2010 http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/20817/

Stodden et. al. Reproducible Research: Addressing the Need for Data and Code Sharing in Computational Science Computing in Science and Engineering 12(5), p.8-13, 2010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2010.113

Page 3: Research Objects @ HARMONY 2014

Why? Reproducible Science

3Goble: SSI Collaborations Workshop 2014

Page 4: Research Objects @ HARMONY 2014

Why? Preservation

4Wf4Ever Final Review Presentations

Page 5: Research Objects @ HARMONY 2014

ROs as a Currency

5

CreatorContributorCollaborator

CuratorReader FinderTrainer

ComparatorRe-User

EvaluatorReviewerTraineeTrainerReader

Publisher

Curator

Librarian

RepositoryManager

Page 6: Research Objects @ HARMONY 2014

• An aggregation object that bundles together experimental resources that are essential to a computational scientific study or investigation. – An identity– A suite of annotations (which can be about this

bundle itself and/or the resources of the bundle)– Aggregated Resources:

data used results produced in an experiment study; (computational) methods employed to

produce and analyse that data; people involved in the investigation.

Research Objects

6

Page 7: Research Objects @ HARMONY 2014

Identity• Mechanisms for referring to the resources that are

aggregated within a Research Object

• URIs– Web Resources

• DOIs– Documents/papers/datasets

• ORCID IDs– Researchers

7

Page 8: Research Objects @ HARMONY 2014

Aggregation• Open Archives Initiation Object Reuse and Exchange

(OAI ORE) is a standard for describing aggregations of web resources– http://www.openarchives.org/ore/

• Uses a Resource Map to describe the aggregated resources

• Proxies allow for statements about the resources within the aggregation

• Several concrete serialisations– RDF/XML, Atom, RDFa

8Graceful Degradation

Page 9: Research Objects @ HARMONY 2014

Annotation• Open Annotation specification is a community

developed data model for annotation of web resources– http://www.openannotation.org/spec/core/

• Developed by the W3C Open Annotation Community Group

• Allows for “stand-off” annotations• Developed to fit with Web Architecture• Usage in a number of domains

9Graceful Degradation

Page 10: Research Objects @ HARMONY 2014

Annotation Content• Essential to the understanding and interpretation of

the scientific outcomes captured by a Research Object as well as the reuse of the resources within it. – Provenance information about the experiments, the

study or any other experimental resources– Evolution information about the Research Object

and its resources, – Descriptions of computational methods– Dependency information or settings

about the experiment executions

10

Page 11: Research Objects @ HARMONY 2014

RO Core

11

Page 12: Research Objects @ HARMONY 2014

Vocabularies and Domains• Thinking to date has been focused on “workflow-

centric” ROs (cf. Wf4Ever presentation to come)– Specific vocabularies covering, e.g. workflow

abstractions and provenance information: wfdesc, wfprov, ro-evo

• Now shifting focus to other use cases, domains and problems– RO Advisory Board

12

Christine Borgman, UCLAMichel Dumontier, StanfordScott Edmunds, GigaSciencePaul Groth, VU AmsterdamBrian Hole, Ubiquity PressPaolo Manghi, ISTI of CNRBrian Matthews, STFC

Paolo Missier, Newcastle UniversitySusanna Sansone, Oxford University/Nature PublishingHerbert Van de Sompel, LANLKaitlin Thaney, Mozilla ScienceMark Wilkinson, UPMKaty Wolstencroft, Leiden University