Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
01/05/2023 Shared Services for Research Data Management
2
OverviewShared Services For Research Data Management July 2015
• RDM systems Architecture• Institutional Scenarios• Vision for shared service• Concept for Jisc procured/provided shared
service• Benefits• Timescales
3
Top Level RDM ArchitectureShows need for interoperability and transfers of data and metadata between a number of systems and services
• Data Storage (Active and Archive
• DMPs• CRIS systems• Repositories• Data catalogues and
registries• External data centres• National and International
aggregation and identifier services
Credit for Architecture concepts: John Lewis (Sheffield) & Stuart Lewis (Edinburgh) http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1202230
Shared Services For Research Data Management July 2015
Shared Services For Research Data Management July 2015 4
Institutional Scenarios
• Scenarios range from Greenfield (no RDM infrastructure in place) to various brownfield scenarios
• Brownfield scenarios based on gaps within architecture. Examples include:• Institutions who may have established central
active data storage, but are lacking a publication platform, data registry and archive storage.
• Institutions with a data repository, who may be lacking active data storage options for researchers
Scenarios and requirements derived from architecture
Shared Services For Research Data Management July 2015 5Vision for Jisc provided shared service
Jisc could facilitate researchers cloud storage space which can sync with their personal machines and common workflows to store active research data and allow sharing and collaboration between peersWithin this space allow easy functionality to publish and archive research outputs fulfilling policy requirements throughout the RDM lifecycle
Researchers shouldn’t need to think (too much!) about Research Data Management
Shared Services For Research Data Management July 2015 6
What a researcher should seeFamiliar user friendly UI that links with workflows
Shared Services For Research Data Management July 2015 7
What a researcher should seeIngest to publication repository or archive – Minimal metadata
UK Research Data Store June 2015 8
What a researcher should seePublication Page for Research Object (with DOI/Metrics etc)
Shared Services For Research Data Management July 2015 9
What we needModules that seamlessly integrate with each other
Shared Services For Research Data Management July 2015 10
Technology already exists
Active Data Storage and File syncing and sharing (OneDrive, Sharepoint DropBox, Box, Owncloud, Institutional Storage etc.) Services that researchers are used to as the base interface to store active data and use as access points to publication/archival servicesPublication/Archival Ingest UI (Figshare, Eprints, Zenodo other? In house?)Repository Front End (Figshare, Eprints, UKRDDS etc.)Archival Management / Long term Storage (Arkivum/Others) Metadata Schema (From Research at Risk Metadata WP)EEA based storage (AWS, Azure etc.)Network (JANET)Long Term Preservation (Metadata and tools need specifying for RDM)
Don’t re-invent the wheel, join up technology that already exists
Shared Services For Research Data Management July 2015 11
BenefitsMeets policy requirements An easy way to meet funder’s requirements with little effort from the institutionNetwork connecting with Janet means that data egress costs will be reduced or negligibleStorage shared storage could be procured at cheaper ratesUser Friendly many researchers are already familiar with the types of UI’s mentionedDiscoverability and Access Allows easy open access to research outputs if requiredAggregation allows for easy aggregation of UK research outputs to share globallyLong Term Storage archived research objects are safely stored with multiple copiesIntegration These systems already exist and are starting to integrate Local View System could be institutionally brandedResearch Data Problem Eases RDM issues for the institutions where there isn’t the capacity or desire to implement their own system
Timeline 2015-16
Jan 15
Mar 15
May 15
Jul 15
Sep 15
Nov 15
Jan 16
Mar 16
May 16
Jul 16
Sep 16
Nov 16
USAGE STATISTICS FOR RESEARCH DATA
RESEARCH DATA MANAGEMENT
SHARED SERVICE
SHARED SERVICES IN THE PRESERVATION & CURATION GAP
Shared Services & Infrastructure
Medium priority
High priority
Early consultation ProcurementSurveyRequirements refinement
workshop
Outline RDM architecture Early adopters engaged
Beta Business case
Shared service
Early intelligence gathering Requirements defined
Scope
Prototype with IRUS software Service design Business case
BetaConsultative group establishedInput to COUNTER Service
Shared Services For Research Data Management July 2015
Shared Services For Research Data Management July 2015 13
Proposed Stages?1st Stage: fully Jisc provided/procured/hosted system2nd Stage: Jisc offer modules or national agreements to fill architecture gaps in existing systems• Jisc require feedback from the community and will
consult before and after an October event with preceeding publication of shared services concepts
• If there is community agreement Jisc will begin procurement/development
• To take these concepts forward volunteer pilot institutions to work up detailed requirements and develop/test the service in partnership will be needed.
Find out more…
Thank you!Email: [email protected]@jisc.ac.uk
Twitter:rachelbruce
Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under CC-BY-NC-ND
