17
Open Science – the be-er science? Dr. Katja Mayer Social Studies of Science and Technology SE 230 157 | 5 ECTS | 2 SST | Winter Semester 2015/16 [email protected] @katja_mat "What science becomes in any historical era depends on what we make of it" Sandra Harding

Open Cultures and Open Innovation - Open Science STS Course 2015

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Open  Science  –    the  be-er  science?  

Dr.  Katja  Mayer  Social  Studies  of  Science  and  Technology  SE  230  157  |  5  ECTS  |  2  SST  |  Winter  Semester  2015/16  

[email protected]  @katja_mat  

"What  science  becomes  in  any  historical  era  depends  on  what  we  make  of  it"      

Sandra  Harding  

Seminar  DocumentaSon  Seminar  units  will  be  documented  here:  h-p://openscience-­‐thebe-erscience.blogspot.co.at/  ParScipants  to  write  blog  entries  consisSng  of:  

•  Short  abstract  of  following  content  •  Summarizing  course  literature  •  Outlining  discussions  and  related  discourses  (based  on  respecSve  assignment)  •  SuggesSng  further  research,  addiSonal  informaSon,  outlook  •  ~  2500  words,  to  be  online/handed  in  by  Jan  6th  2016.  

Each  Par(cipant/group  will  present  their  preliminary  findings  (=main  discussion  points)  in  a  10  minute  recap  at  the  beginning  of  the  next  unit  The  group's  blog  entry  will  be  peer  reviewed  in  the  last  unit.    –  Bernhard:  Open  Cultures  and  Open  Innova(on  (12.11.)  –  Elena:  Open  Access,  Open  EducaSon  and  DisrupSve  Technologies  (19.11.)  –  Steve:  Open  Research  Data  and  Open  Methods  (26.11.)  –  Berry,  Daniel:  Ethos  of  Science:  Reproducility  and  Open  EvaluaSon  –  Lucia,  Walter:  CiSzen  Science  and  DIY  ExperSse  (10.12.)  –  Anastasia:  Opening  Social  Sciences  (17.12.)  

OPEN  SCIENCE:  PARADIGM  SHIFT,  MOVEMENT,  REVOLUTION?  

5.11.2015  Transforming  Knowledge  PracSces  

Theories  of  changing  knowledge  producSon  

•  ScienSfic  RevoluSons  •  FalsificaSon  •  Ethos  in  science  •  Co-­‐producSon  •  ?  

Opening  Science  –  transforming  knowledge  prac(ces?  

 Recap  •  Which  elements  of  Mode1  and  Mode2  knowledge  producSon  does  Open  Science  embrace?  

•  What  is  missing?  

Ope

n  Science  

Open  Access  

Open  (Research)  Data  /  Materials  

Open  Source  /  Open  Methods  

Open  EducaSon  

Open  EvaluaSon  

CiSzen  Science  

society  

 novel  quality  

control  

autonomy  

homogeneity  

disciplinarity  

acadenic  context  

Open  Science  and  its  changing  modes  of  knowledge  producSon  

mode2  context  of  applicaSon  

trans-­‐disciplinarity  

diverse  sites  of  knowledge  producSon  

reflexivity  

quality  control  

 reconfiguraSon  of  insStuSons  

management  and  governance  

of  Mode2  

uncertainSes  

self-­‐organizaSon  

 economic  raSonality  

 changing  

Sme-­‐spaces  

•  weak,  middle,  strong  contextualizaSon  •  socially  robust  knowledge  •  agora  

Assignment  2    deadline  11  Nov  8:00  pm  

Open  Cultures  and  Open  Innova(on  Chesbrough,  H.  (2015).  From  Open  Science  to  Open  Innova1on.  Science  Business  Publishing  •  Summarize  the  Open  InnovaSon  model  as  described  by  Chesbrough,  and  

locate  the  role  of  universiSes  and  other  public  research  organisaSon  in  this  model.  Reflect  briefly  in  one  paragraph  potenSal  obstacles,  challenges  or  benefits  from  this  model.    (max  300  words)  

Moedas,  C.  (2015).  Open  InnovaSon,  Open  Science,  Open  to  the  World.  Speech  22  June  2015:  Brussels,  ‘A  new  start  for  Europe:  Opening  up  to  an  ERA  of  Innova1on’  Conference.    Mayer,  K.  (2015).  From  Science  2.0  to  Open  Science:  Turning  rhetoric  into  acSon?  STCSN-­‐eLeBer,  3(1).    •  In  the  next  unit  we  will  be  wriSng  a  blog-­‐entry  together:  h-ps://

pad.okfn.org/p/openscience_blog    Prepare  a  short  list  of  ideas  for  this  blog  text  and  bring  it  with  your  laptop  to  class  (if  possible)  

 

• Open  data  and  content  can  be  freely  used,  modified,  and  shared  by  anyone  for  any  purpose  

• use  (read,  analyze,  display)  • re-­‐use  (re-­‐analyze,  modify,  combine)  

• distributable,  preserving  promenance  and  openness  

Ope

n  Kn

owledge  

Open  DefiniSon  

DefiniSons  Ope

n  Science  

Open  Access  

Open  (Research)  Data  /  Materials  

Open  Source  /  Open  Methods  

Open  EducaSon  

Open  EvaluaSon  

CiSzen  Science  

Open  science  is  the  idea  that  scienSfic  knowledge  of  all  kinds  should  be  openly  shared  as  early  as  is  pracScal  in  the  discovery  process.    Open  strategies  share  the  following  objecSves  •  transparency  and  reproducibility  •  re-­‐usability  and  new  applicaSons  •  societal  parScipaSon  and  feedback  loops  

OPEN  CULTURES  12.11.2015:  the  diversity  of  

The  Open  Science  MulSple  

Publics  

Fields  

researchers  

administraSons  

media  

policies  

industries  

ngos  

sciences  

social  sciences  

humaniSes  

Epistemic  Cultures  

PerspecSves  

archives  

History  

Time  

Epistemic  Cultures  

„Those  amalgams  of  arrangements  and  mechanisms  [...]  which,  in  a  given  field,  make  up  how  we  know  what  we  know.  Epistemic  Cultures  are  cultures  that  create  and  warrant  knowledge  [...].“  

Karin  Knorr  CeSna  

the  crowd  that  is  you  

commons  

open  source  

free  soqware  

freedom  from  barriers  

cyberspace  

open  property  

parScipaSon  

diversity  mulStude  

acquiring  means  of  producSon  

prosumers  

inclusion  

privacy  

open  culture  

intellectual  property  

music  

art  

science  

open  hardware  

Cultu

res  of  Ope

nness  

Cultures  of  Openness  

Openness   is   an   overarching   concept   or  philosophy  that  is  characterized  by  an  emphasis  on  transparency  and  free,  unrestricted  access  to  knowledge   and   informaSon,   as   well   as  collaboraSve   or   cooperaSve   management   and  decision-­‐making  rather  than  a  central  authority.  Openness   can   be   said   to   be   the   opposite   of  secrecy.    

(Wikipedia)  is  that  a  good  (enough)    definiSon?  

BREAK  short  

h-p://pad.okfn.org/p/openscience_blog      

Open  InnovaSon,  Open  Science,  Open  to  the  world  a  collaboraSve  comment  to  the  speech  by  Carlos  Moedas,  Commissioner  for  Research,  Science  and  InnovaSon,  Europe,  22  June  2015  

Intro  •  Summarizing  the  main  points  of  the  speech    PosiSoning  •  CriScal  analysis  of  selected  concepts  as  described  by  Moedas  (decide  

together,  which  ones  to  choose)  

Outlook  •  What  to  expect  from  European  commission's  OS  iniSaSve,  how  to  react  to  

it?  

Assignment  3    deadline  18  Nov  8:00  pm  

Open  Access,  Open  Educa(on  and  Disrup(ve  Technologies  

1.  Finish  your  "paragraph"  in  the  etherpad  document  h-ps://pad.okfn.org/p/openscience_blog  

2.  Read  Herb,  U.  (2010).  Sociological  implicaSons  of  scienSfic  publishing:  Open  access,  science,  society,  democracy,  and  the  digital  divide.  First  Monday,  15(2).    

3.  Daniel,  J.  (2012).  Making  sense  of  MOOCs:  Musings  in  a  maze  of  myth,  paradox  and  possibility.  Journal  of  interacSve  Media  in  educaSon,  2012(3).Read  the  text  and  write  1  A4  page:  Despite  all  evidence  of  how  MOOCS  might  be  overrated  today,  how  could  they  actually  improve  educaSon?  Which  characterisScs  shows  an  imaginary  or  real  MOOC  you  would  like  to  parScipate  in?  (1  A4  page  min)