Upload
katja-mayer
View
261
Download
4
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Open Science – the be-er science?
Dr. Katja Mayer Social Studies of Science and Technology SE 230 157 | 5 ECTS | 2 SST | Winter Semester 2015/16
[email protected] @katja_mat
"What science becomes in any historical era depends on what we make of it"
Sandra Harding
Seminar DocumentaSon Seminar units will be documented here: h-p://openscience-‐thebe-erscience.blogspot.co.at/ ParScipants to write blog entries consisSng of:
• Short abstract of following content • Summarizing course literature • Outlining discussions and related discourses (based on respecSve assignment) • SuggesSng further research, addiSonal informaSon, outlook • ~ 2500 words, to be online/handed in by Jan 6th 2016.
Each Par(cipant/group will present their preliminary findings (=main discussion points) in a 10 minute recap at the beginning of the next unit The group's blog entry will be peer reviewed in the last unit. – Bernhard: Open Cultures and Open Innova(on (12.11.) – Elena: Open Access, Open EducaSon and DisrupSve Technologies (19.11.) – Steve: Open Research Data and Open Methods (26.11.) – Berry, Daniel: Ethos of Science: Reproducility and Open EvaluaSon – Lucia, Walter: CiSzen Science and DIY ExperSse (10.12.) – Anastasia: Opening Social Sciences (17.12.)
Theories of changing knowledge producSon
• ScienSfic RevoluSons • FalsificaSon • Ethos in science • Co-‐producSon • ?
Opening Science – transforming knowledge prac(ces?
Recap • Which elements of Mode1 and Mode2 knowledge producSon does Open Science embrace?
• What is missing?
Ope
n Science
Open Access
Open (Research) Data / Materials
Open Source / Open Methods
Open EducaSon
Open EvaluaSon
CiSzen Science
society
novel quality
control
autonomy
homogeneity
disciplinarity
acadenic context
Open Science and its changing modes of knowledge producSon
mode2 context of applicaSon
trans-‐disciplinarity
diverse sites of knowledge producSon
reflexivity
quality control
reconfiguraSon of insStuSons
management and governance
of Mode2
uncertainSes
self-‐organizaSon
economic raSonality
changing
Sme-‐spaces
• weak, middle, strong contextualizaSon • socially robust knowledge • agora
Assignment 2 deadline 11 Nov 8:00 pm
Open Cultures and Open Innova(on Chesbrough, H. (2015). From Open Science to Open Innova1on. Science Business Publishing • Summarize the Open InnovaSon model as described by Chesbrough, and
locate the role of universiSes and other public research organisaSon in this model. Reflect briefly in one paragraph potenSal obstacles, challenges or benefits from this model. (max 300 words)
Moedas, C. (2015). Open InnovaSon, Open Science, Open to the World. Speech 22 June 2015: Brussels, ‘A new start for Europe: Opening up to an ERA of Innova1on’ Conference. Mayer, K. (2015). From Science 2.0 to Open Science: Turning rhetoric into acSon? STCSN-‐eLeBer, 3(1). • In the next unit we will be wriSng a blog-‐entry together: h-ps://
pad.okfn.org/p/openscience_blog Prepare a short list of ideas for this blog text and bring it with your laptop to class (if possible)
• Open data and content can be freely used, modified, and shared by anyone for any purpose
• use (read, analyze, display) • re-‐use (re-‐analyze, modify, combine)
• distributable, preserving promenance and openness
Ope
n Kn
owledge
Open DefiniSon
DefiniSons Ope
n Science
Open Access
Open (Research) Data / Materials
Open Source / Open Methods
Open EducaSon
Open EvaluaSon
CiSzen Science
Open science is the idea that scienSfic knowledge of all kinds should be openly shared as early as is pracScal in the discovery process. Open strategies share the following objecSves • transparency and reproducibility • re-‐usability and new applicaSons • societal parScipaSon and feedback loops
The Open Science MulSple
Publics
Fields
researchers
administraSons
media
policies
industries
ngos
sciences
social sciences
humaniSes
Epistemic Cultures
PerspecSves
archives
History
Time
Epistemic Cultures
„Those amalgams of arrangements and mechanisms [...] which, in a given field, make up how we know what we know. Epistemic Cultures are cultures that create and warrant knowledge [...].“
Karin Knorr CeSna
the crowd that is you
commons
open source
free soqware
freedom from barriers
cyberspace
open property
parScipaSon
diversity mulStude
acquiring means of producSon
prosumers
inclusion
privacy
open culture
intellectual property
music
art
science
open hardware
Cultu
res of Ope
nness
Cultures of Openness
Openness is an overarching concept or philosophy that is characterized by an emphasis on transparency and free, unrestricted access to knowledge and informaSon, as well as collaboraSve or cooperaSve management and decision-‐making rather than a central authority. Openness can be said to be the opposite of secrecy.
(Wikipedia) is that a good (enough) definiSon?
h-p://pad.okfn.org/p/openscience_blog
Open InnovaSon, Open Science, Open to the world a collaboraSve comment to the speech by Carlos Moedas, Commissioner for Research, Science and InnovaSon, Europe, 22 June 2015
Intro • Summarizing the main points of the speech PosiSoning • CriScal analysis of selected concepts as described by Moedas (decide
together, which ones to choose)
Outlook • What to expect from European commission's OS iniSaSve, how to react to
it?
Assignment 3 deadline 18 Nov 8:00 pm
Open Access, Open Educa(on and Disrup(ve Technologies
1. Finish your "paragraph" in the etherpad document h-ps://pad.okfn.org/p/openscience_blog
2. Read Herb, U. (2010). Sociological implicaSons of scienSfic publishing: Open access, science, society, democracy, and the digital divide. First Monday, 15(2).
3. Daniel, J. (2012). Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. Journal of interacSve Media in educaSon, 2012(3).Read the text and write 1 A4 page: Despite all evidence of how MOOCS might be overrated today, how could they actually improve educaSon? Which characterisScs shows an imaginary or real MOOC you would like to parScipate in? (1 A4 page min)