Defining RRI, consulting stakeholders: setting the basis for an RRI Toolkit

“la Caixa” Foundation

|

1.- Share knowledge gained in 1st analysis phase

2.- Open up the number of quality contributions

3.- Train the Hubs for the M9-M10 Workshops:- To contribute to the definition of RRI - To gather promising practices - To analyse stakeholders needs and constraints- To create a Community of Practice

AIMS OF THE WORKSHOP

|

|

1.- Responsible Research and innovation

2.- RRI Tools: state of the project

3.- RRI Definition and good practices

4.- Stakeholders needs, constraints and motivations

5.- Next steps: M9 –M10 workshops Dissemination

Toolkit.

6.- Consortium meeting program

AIMS OF THE WORKSHOP

|

BENEFITS OF SCIENCE FOR HUMANITY

RISK MANAGEMENT

ETHICAL ACCEPTABILITY

Ethical and Regulatory Challenges to Science and Research Policy at the Global Level. European Commission Report. © European Union, 2012

RESPONSIBLE RESEARCH AND INNOVATION

| Benefits for humanity

|

Responsible Innovation, First Edition, Ed. by Richard Owen, John Bessan and Maggy Heintz. 2013 John Wiley & Sons

Ethical acceptability: smart meters in the Netherlands

|Risk Management

|

RRI Tools: state of the project

|RRI TOOLS

D1.1 Policy brief on RRI and working definitionD1.2 Guidelines on the methodologies for the collection, classification and evaluation method for RRI Good PracticesD1.3 Report on the quality criteria of Good Practice Standards in RRI (to be used in WP2 and WP3) - shiftedD6.1 RRI Toolkit Dissemination Plan

Barcelona Workshop Background note and ReportD5.1 Report on Coverage of RRI aspects in STI

(Science, Technology, Innovation) evaluations. D2.1 Guidelines for the implementation of the

Stakeholders consultation in relation to RRI

|

D1.1 Policy brief on the state of the art on RRI and a working definition of RRI (Month 8)

D1.4 A catalogue of Good Practice Standards in RRI (Month12)

(WP1)

(WP2)

RRI Tools - Following Deliverables

D 2.2 Report on the analysis of needs and constraints of the stakeholder groups in RRI practices in Europe (M12)

D3.1 Multimedia 2.0 collaborative platform (M12)(WP3)

D6.2 Project information sheet(WP6)

|

RRI Definition and good practices

|Responsible Research and Innovation

Governance

Ethics

Open Access

EducationPublic engagement

Gender Equality

Process requirements

Outcomes

Policy Agendas Stakeholders

... dynamic, iterative process by which stakeholders involved in the

R&I practice become mutually responsive to each other and

share responsibiity regarding the outcomes and process

requirements

(D1.2)

Diversity & Inclusion

Openness & Transparency

Responsiveness & Adaptive change

Anticipation & Reflexivity

|RRI promising Practices

Embedding social responsibility in the design of offshore wind energy systems

A Siemens- Univ. Delft project funded by the National Research Council of the Netherlands specific program for Responsible Innovation

- Value sensitive design

- Institutional design

- Stakeholder analysis

- Participatory integrated assesment

- Social acceptance/ social acceptability

|

Value sensitive design

RRI promising Practices

4 P’s: Product, process, purpose, people.

(Sthal)

|

Formulating research agendas between RESEARCHERS AND CSO’s. Generates dialogues on science (including social science, engineering...) Debates move upstream into agenda setting

Promising practices

- “Upstream” debate, (beyond mindstream modulation)

- Agenda setting

- Community based research

Public engagement with research and research engagement with society

|RRI Promising Practices

Structural change through transformational gender action plans

Implentation of sustaibable institutional transformation, creating environments in which women and men can perform equally.

Organizational structure

Engagement of decision makers

|

Socio-Technical integration Research

Set of 20 laboratory engagement studies to assess and compare the varying pressures on – and capacities for – laboratories to integrate broader societal considerations into their work

RRI Promising Practices

http://youtu.be/feOOT2iI16o

- Embedded social scientist and humanities scholars

- Midstream modulation

|Responsible Research and Innovation

|

Stakeholders needs, constraints and motivations

| Stakeholders

www.rri-tools.eu

| Stakeholders

• Stakeholders needs, constraints and motivations.

• Worskshops: Stakeholder consultation: recruitment criteria, moderation, reporting...

+ Engagement of CSO’s in science through agenda setting

Getting free open access to research results

Acknowledgement of CSO knowledge and expertise

Unfamiliarity/lack of understanding of the issue

Democratic deficit

Sufficiency of compliance of legal requirements

Unfamiliarity with RRI

Freedom of research and concerns about bureaucracy

Pressure to publish and job security

|

Next steps: the workshops, the Toolkit

|

•2 Workshops (definition and promising practices / stakeholders) in 1 day

•In October – November

•A Manual will exist with details

•Suport from coordination, Hubs coordination and WP1 and WP2 will b given

Next steps: M9-M10 Hubs workshops

|

M6 M9-M10

Next steps: Disseminations

|

Self-assessment tools Dissemination tools Good practices and good practices standards

RRI Tools Search engine Library Specific policy agenda’s resources

Next steps: The tools

Training and advocacy Resources...

Community of Practice

Governance

Ethics

Open Access

EducationPublic

engagement

Gender Equality

Diversity & Inclusion

Openness & Transparency

Responsiveness & Adaptive change

Anticipation & Reflexivity

|

Day 1: RRI Definition and good practices Day 2: Stakeholders needs, constraints and motivations

Workshop program

Defining RRI, consulting stakeholders: setting the basis for an RRI Toolkit

“la Caixa” Foundation