54
Manufacturing Recovery Toolkit toward an (open) Paris / May 20th 2015 slow/d Andrea Cattabriga @andrecatta

The Manufacturing Recovery Toolkit - Kickoff Workshop

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Manufacturing Recovery Toolkit

toward an (open)

Paris / May 20th 2015

slow/d

Andrea Cattabriga @andrecatta

whySmall and medium manufacturing enterprises across Europe are completely alone in facing the future and imaging what's next. They have been effectively abandoned by trade associations and unions that, at the same time, have become incapable to read the markets and the society at large. They are facing fast cultural changes that cannot be interpreted without a new consciousness about what cooperations and collaboration means today, technology approach and collective intelligence potential, platforms and business modeling techniques.

This is the real tragedy we observe every day spending almost half of our time trying to develop projects aimed to increase they potential and exposure, and the other half explaining why they should join and how they must change their minds. Out there, they are dying, leaving millions of people unprepared to the future. That’s why we need to build an instrument and spread an actual strategy to leverage politicians and trade associations on the importance of changing manufacturing culture.

It’s not about exploring business opportunities in “new markets” or only “building new markets”, it’s about moving manufacturing from one-to-one and one-to-many to p2p, this time involving small companies.

This workshop is intended to be a kick-off for an international team aimed to develop a strategic toolkit specifically oriented to this.  We must explain with examples, strategies and behaviors how to turn companies in public commons. That’s it. 

what(we are going to lose)

how do you imagine the future

of manufacturing?

maybe something between this…

this…

and this?

I agree but…

it will take some years to become feasible

sometimes, thinking about the future makes us forget the present

people loss their job in manufacturing sector since 2008

in Europe

- 3,4 mln

and leave behind valuable things

artisans

deep knowledge traditional techniques

craftsmen

deep knowledge specific tools

small enterprisesspecific knowledge high-technology facilities

no, it isn’t all lost

we have a treasure to save

knowledge skills

jobs

culture humanity territories

factoriesDIY shared facilitiesSMEs

artisans craftsmen

fab labs micro-factories

people makers

robots machines

few people

mission

bring the most of them to a safer placeturn weaknesses into strengths convert production collaborate integrate production with social capital become commons

…the collaborative way

integrating revenues from production only,

with a comprehensive set of actions and good practices

(maybe more intangibles?)

what’s going on

- InfoPro. Open Information processing within Innovation Networks

- OPINET. Open Innovation Networking Platform for SMES

- HYBRISECTORS. Open Innovation in sectors with potential hybridation

- ORP. Open Research Platform

- SFFS. Open Innovation through Shared Facilities and Facility Sharing

- BMOI. Business Models for Open Innovation

1. not adoptable by artisans and micro companies

2. high capital consuming

3. too institutional

4. low agility level

EU open innovation strategies

1. not adoptable by artisans and micro companies

2. high costs

3. very closed-IP oriented

4. not that nimble…

technology clusters initiatives

not that accessible, lack of long term strategy,

lack of practical tools easy to be applied

on the other side…

P2P initiatives

tools

we don’t have the recipe (yet), but we have good

lines of action to be connected

local manufacturers as commons

which implications brings to start considering them as a community

value? how to extract economic value?

1

sharing/exchanging knowledge

what does it means to enter the era of open innovation?

2

become“open” and networked facilities

what kind of strategies and interfaces could turn closed sheds

into accessible facilities?

3

technology transfer from companies to people

what does it really means to transfer knowledge to

local communities?

4

EDUCATION

TOURISM/STORYTELLING

KNOWLEDGE SHARING & VALORIZATION

FACILITY SHARING

DISTRIBUTION (LOCAL/GLOBAL)

DISTRIBUTED/P2P MANUFACTURING

production

intangibles

FACILITY HYBRIDIZATION

topics

PLATFORMS

CLUSTERS (logical)

DISTRICTS (geographic))

COOPERATION

ASSOCIATIONS

tools

SOCIAL VALUE?POLICIES

let’s build it

workshopAndrea Cattabriga [email protected] @andrecatta

http://manufacturingrecovery.tk

workshop program✓ Participants mapping / round robin - 10’

let’s know each others, our expertise, expectations and possible contribution

✓ Empathizing with cases - 30’ personas given empathy map values: facilities, knowledge, technology, culture/heritage, market attractiveness

✓ Connect personas with topics - 30’ create opportunity areas intersecting values and topics what tools could be used for each topic? brainstorm some ideas

✓ Results showdown 15’

✓ Next steps: toolkit outputs - 10’ Project setup (tools, community dev.) Data collection (profiles, case histories) Pattern definition, from case to best practice scenarios to be applied Tool design Measuring and findings Papers and community development

round robin - 5’Participants mapping

let’s know each others! Tell us your: ✓ name, country, interests ✓ your expectations for the Manufacturing

Recovery Toolkit ✓ remember and share the last experience

with a local artisan

Empathyzing

1. case definition 2. empathy map 3. defining values:

facilities, knowledge, technology, culture/heritage, market attractiveness

30’

1

2

3

personas 5’

name

location

products

history

relations with other companies and territory

12

3

empathy mapping 12’ think

say and do

what to expect from future major preoccupations worries & aspirations

does for changing say in regards of work

seemarket changes

customer behaviors things he tends to

hear

pain gain“wants”/needs measures of success

fears frustrations obstacles

what employee say what colleagues say what politicians say

value definition 8’

facilities knowledge technology culture/heritage market attractiveness

where is value allocated in? 1. rate each category 1-5 2. define each category with a sentence

e.g. good and still efficient machines, underused

e.g. he is one of the few in the area to know that technique

15’Connections

1. create opportunity areas intersecting values and topics 2. what tools could be used for each topic? 3. brainstorm some ideas

value definition 7’

facilities knowledge technology

culture/heritage market

attractiveness

1. create opportunity areas intersecting values and topics 2. what tools could be used to catalyze a good practice? 3. choose a combination /value+topic and try to

brainstorm some ideas

social value? education knowledge sharing tourism/storytelling distribution (local/global) facility sharing distributed/p2p manuf. facility hybridization

topicsvalues

policies clusters (logical) districts (geographic)) cooperation associations platforms

tools (just a few…)

+5’ +3’

you look beautiful :)

12’Showdown

share with us your ideas in less than 2 minutes

what we are going to donext steps1. Project setup (collaborative tools, community dev.) 2. Data collection (profiles, case histories) 3. Pattern definition, from case histories to best practices 4. Tools design / what 5. Measuring and findings, papers suggestions? 6. Launch and dissemination (early 2016?)

we need contributors! researchers, companies, communities and passionated personswrite to [email protected] and submit to the newsletter

thank you!Andrea Cattabriga @andrecatta

http://manufacturingrecovery.tkor write to [email protected]

to join the team or subscribe to the mailing list at: