19
“IMPLICATIONS FAR AND WIDE” OVERVIEW AND ANALYSIS OF STATE ELECTIONS AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS FOR IA, MN, ND, SD, NE AND WI

MACE Policy, Politics and Advocacy

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: MACE Policy, Politics and Advocacy

“IMPLICATIONS FAR AND WIDE”

OVERVIEW AND ANALYSIS OF STATE ELECTIONS AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS

FOR IA, MN, ND, SD, NE AND WI

Page 2: MACE Policy, Politics and Advocacy

BACKGROUND

Page 3: MACE Policy, Politics and Advocacy

About Chris and WJPA■ Chris Tiedeman – Principal, Weber Johnson Public Affairs■ WJPA - Getting the important work done on behalf of Corporations,

Associations and large Public Affairs Firms in the Upper Midwest.“Our specialty – and what we love to do the most – is the fieldwork

needed to help clients succeed by working closely with constituents and motivating them to take action. People are our medium, and we know the value of inspiring them to affect their political and social landscape.”

@weberjohnsonpahttp://www.weberjohnsonpa.com/ https://www.facebook.com/WeberJohnsonPublicAffairs/ [email protected]

Page 4: MACE Policy, Politics and Advocacy

We deliver a ground game

Build grassroots coalition

Mobilize it

Create PR opportunities along the way

Page 5: MACE Policy, Politics and Advocacy

2016 ELECTION CYCLE?

OR

Page 6: MACE Policy, Politics and Advocacy

2016 Pre-Election Partisan Control

2016 Post-Election Partisan Control

Page 7: MACE Policy, Politics and Advocacy

Iowa

2016 partisan composition (pre-election)

2016 presidential election results

■ Chamber priorities– Workforce development– Infrastructure– Simplifying Iowa’s corporate

and personal income tax structures

Page 8: MACE Policy, Politics and Advocacy

Minnesota

2016 partisan composition (pre-election)

2016 presidential election results

■ Chamber priorities– Tax competitiveness– Transportation– Education and Workforce– Labor/management– Healthcare– Environmental reforms– Energy

Page 9: MACE Policy, Politics and Advocacy

North Dakota

2016 partisan composition (pre-election)

2016 presidential election results

■ Chamber priorities– Taxation– Education and Workforce– Natural resources– Healthcare– Transportation and

Infrastructure– Economic development

Page 10: MACE Policy, Politics and Advocacy

South Dakota

2016 partisan composition (pre-election)

2016 presidential election results

■ Chamber priorities– Workforce development– Future fund– REDI Fund– Economic development– Transportation– Unemployment insurance– Education– Healthcare

Page 11: MACE Policy, Politics and Advocacy

Wisconsin

2016 partisan composition (pre-election)

2016 presidential election results

■ Chamber priorities– Taxes and government spending– Regulatory reform– Civil justice and legal reform– Education and talent attraction– Transportation and infrastructure– Jobs and economic development– Environment and energy– Human resources and

employment law– Affordable health care

Page 12: MACE Policy, Politics and Advocacy

Nebraska

2016 partisan composition (pre-election)

2016 presidential election results

■ Chamber priorities– A more competitive tac climate– Retain and enhance business

incentives– Enhance Nebraska’s workforce– Highway and infrastructure

development

Page 13: MACE Policy, Politics and Advocacy
Page 14: MACE Policy, Politics and Advocacy
Page 15: MACE Policy, Politics and Advocacy

The importance of grassroots ■ Grassroots advocacy and coalition building provides an excellent

support to direct lobbying■ The trend is already moving in this direction, toward grassroots

activation and away from traditional lobbying at the Capitol– (https://about.bgov.com/blog/why-the-lobbyist-of-the-future-will-never-step-inside-the-capitol)

Page 16: MACE Policy, Politics and Advocacy

Constituent Engagement■ Research– What is the Chamber Policy Priority?– Who are the Key Votes?– What moves each Swing Vote (Hyper-Targeted)?

■ Message Construction and Delivery– How do you best talk about the issue?– What is the Left, and what is the Right reason for your Policy?

Page 17: MACE Policy, Politics and Advocacy

Constituent Engagement■ Strategy– How are you going to get to Zero Opposition?– If impossible, how are you going to get to 50%+1■ Messengers Recruited– Who are your key stakeholders who are influential to you targets?– How will you manage diverse groups of messengers around your

issue?– How do you avoid using messengers who will simply be characterized

as “the establishment” or “politically connected elites?” (while still engaging people who have influence?

■ Message Delivery – What set of tactics are needed for your messengers to communicate to

targets?

Page 18: MACE Policy, Politics and Advocacy

Conclusion/Discussion

Page 19: MACE Policy, Politics and Advocacy

THANK YOU!HTTP://WWW.WEBERJOHNSONPA.COM

@WEBERJOHNSONPA

HTTPS://WWW.FACEBOOK.COM/WEBERJOHNSONPUBLICAFFAIRS