49
Radio Buttons vs. Dropdowns How knowing the right way to collect customer information led to a 15% lift in orders

ME - Radio buttons vs dropdown

  • Upload
    dinh-le

  • View
    138

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: ME - Radio buttons vs dropdown

Radio Buttons vs. DropdownsHow knowing the right way to collect customer information led to a 15% lift in orders

Page 2: ME - Radio buttons vs dropdown

We’re sharing on Twitter!#WebClinic

Page 3: ME - Radio buttons vs dropdown

Jon PowellSenior Manager Research and StrategyMECLABS@jonpowell31

Today’s speakers

Lauren PitchfordOptimization Manager MECLABS

Austin McCrawDirectorContent ProductionMECLABS@McOptimize

Page 4: ME - Radio buttons vs dropdown

Experiment: Background

Background: A large people search company catering to customers searching for military personnel.

Goal: To significantly increase the total number of subscriptions.

Research Question: Which subscription option format will produce the highest subscription rate: a dropdown or radio button?

Test Design: A/B single factorial split test

Experiment ID: TP1774Record Location: MECLABS Research LibraryResearch Partner: [Protected]

Page 5: ME - Radio buttons vs dropdown

Experiment: Treatment 1

Treatment 1

Page 6: ME - Radio buttons vs dropdown

Experiment: Treatment 2

Treatment 2

Page 7: ME - Radio buttons vs dropdown

Experiment: Side-by-side

Treatment 2

Treatment 1

Which treatment won?

Page 8: ME - Radio buttons vs dropdown

Experiment: Results

Design Order Rate Stat. Significance

Treatment 1 – Radio Buttons 11.73% -

Treatment 2 – Dropdown 10.69% -

% Relative Change: 14.6% 92%

Relative increase in orders15%In this case, the radio button field outperformed the dropdown field by 15% in order rate.

Page 9: ME - Radio buttons vs dropdown

Experiment analysis

Treatment 2

Treatment 1

15%Order Rate

Shouldn’t the shorter form produce better results?

Page 10: ME - Radio buttons vs dropdown

What we discovered

FKey Principles

1. One of the most effective ways to improve the performance of the webpage is to reduce friction (psychological resistance).

Page 11: ME - Radio buttons vs dropdown

What is friction?

Definition: Friction

Physics: A force that resists the relative motion or tendency to such motion of two bodies in contact.

Marketing: Psychological resistance to a given element in the sales process.

For more on friction: MECLABS.com/LPO

Page 12: ME - Radio buttons vs dropdown

What is friction?

To this

40%Revenue per Visit

From this

Protocol ID: TP1267

Page 13: ME - Radio buttons vs dropdown

What is friction?

To this

From this

189%In Conversion

Protocol ID: TP1341

Page 14: ME - Radio buttons vs dropdown

What is friction?

201%Capture Rate

To thisFrom this

• Treatment asks for one less piece of information

Protocol ID: TP1291

Page 15: ME - Radio buttons vs dropdown

What we discovered

FKey Principles

1. One of the most effective ways to improve the performance of the webpage is to reduce friction (psychological resistance).

2. However, in our attempts to minimize friction (length-oriented), we must beware of undermining the conversation with the customer in 2 ways:

i. Intensifying difficulty-oriented friction

Page 16: ME - Radio buttons vs dropdown

Danger #1. Increasing difficulty

Wherein:fSC = Friction of sales conversion

lT = Length (time)

dT = Difficulty

fSC = lT + dT©

For more on friction: MECLABS.com/LPO

Design Elements

• Eye Path

• Options Selection

• Button Design

• Organization

• Flash Video

Page 17: ME - Radio buttons vs dropdown

Danger #1. Increasing difficulty

Radio Dropdown • By moving from a

radio to dropdown field, we significantly reduced the perceived length of the form.

Page 18: ME - Radio buttons vs dropdown

Danger #1. Increasing difficulty

Dropdown• However, length is only one form of friction. By reducing the length, we inadvertently increased difficulty.

• Now, instead of clearly seeing all of the options available to the customer, they have to click and squint to examine the options.

Page 19: ME - Radio buttons vs dropdown

Danger #1. Increasing difficulty

Page 1 Page 2

Page 3

Version A• Version A is a 3-step cart

checkout process. The length of the process is significant.

• Our analysts hypothesized that by shortening the steps into a one-page accordion checkout process, we could reduce length-oriented friction.

Protocol ID: TP1666

Example

Page 20: ME - Radio buttons vs dropdown

Danger #1. Increasing difficulty

Page 1

Version B

Page 1 Page 2

Page 3

Version A

29%Conversion Rate

Protocol ID: TP1666

Example

Page 21: ME - Radio buttons vs dropdown

Danger #1. Increasing difficulty

Page 1

Version B

29%Conversion Rate

! What You Need to Understand: While we may have reduced length, we increased the perceived difficulty of the checkout. As a result, the conversion rate dropped.

Example

Page 22: ME - Radio buttons vs dropdown

Danger #1. Increasing difficulty

TreatmentControl

60%In Revenue

! What You Need to Understand: By not suggesting donation amounts, we made the form shorter, but the value of the donation was undermined by 60%.

Protocol ID: TP1055

Example

Page 23: ME - Radio buttons vs dropdown

What we discovered

FKey Principles

1. One of the most effective ways to improve the performance of the webpage is to reduce friction (psychological resistance).

2. However, in our attempts to minimize friction (length-oriented), we must beware of undermining the conversation with the customer in 2 ways:

i. Intensifying difficulty-oriented friction

ii. Eliminating necessary value force

Page 24: ME - Radio buttons vs dropdown

Danger #2. Undermining value

ValueForce

CostForce

VfAc - CfAc = Nf

Page 25: ME - Radio buttons vs dropdown

Danger #2. Undermining value

Treatment 2Treatment 1

How might Treatment 2 be undermining the value in Treatment 1?

?

Page 26: ME - Radio buttons vs dropdown

Danger #2. Undermining value

Treatment 1

Which price format do you see first in Treatment 1?

a. Per monthb. Total

?

Page 27: ME - Radio buttons vs dropdown

Danger #2. Undermining value

Treatment 2Which price format do you see first in Treatment 2?

a. Per monthb. Total

?

Page 28: ME - Radio buttons vs dropdown

Danger #2. Undermining value

Treatment 2

• By de-emphasizing the savings and/or placing the total price before the monthly price in Treatment 2, we undermined the value.

• Between the lack of emphasis or and/or the point-first structure of the price, the savings are clearly bolded and easier to understand in Treatment 1.

Treatment 1

Page 29: ME - Radio buttons vs dropdown

Experiment IDs: TP1662Record Location: MECLABS Research LibraryResearch Partner: (Protected)

Background: An addiction and mental health rehabilitation facility.

Goal: Increase the total number of leads captured.

Primary Research Question: Which page will obtain the most form submissions?

Approach: A/B multifactor split

Experiment - Background

Danger #2. Undermining value

Page 30: ME - Radio buttons vs dropdown

• Version A is long copy information on the treatment centers.

• The call-to-action is at the bottom of the page.

Version A

Danger #2. Undermining valueExperiment - Treatment

Page 31: ME - Radio buttons vs dropdown

Version B

• Version B short-form page template with a rotating banner.

• Call-to-action is on the right-hand side above the fold.

Danger #2. Undermining valueExperiment - Control

Page 32: ME - Radio buttons vs dropdown

Design Capture Rate

Version A 2.48%

Version B 0.78%

% Relative Change: 68.5%

Relative decrease in capture rate69%The shorter version B decreased capture rate by 69%.

Danger #2. Undermining value

! What You Need to Understand: The shorter length of the page made it more difficult for the right customers to gain the information they needed. By decreasing the length, conversions decreased by 69%.

Experiment - Results

Page 33: ME - Radio buttons vs dropdown

Experiment - TreatmentTreatment

Control

36%In Total Sales

Danger #2. Undermining value

Protocol ID: 1700

Page 34: ME - Radio buttons vs dropdown

Danger #2. Undermining value

TreatmentControl

16%In Conversions

Example

Protocol ID: TP1362

Page 35: ME - Radio buttons vs dropdown

Danger #2. Undermining value

Not thisBut this

24%Purchase Rate

Protocol ID: TP1740

! What You Need to Understand: By adding two fields (start date and number of copies per day) we also added clarity and value to the form. The control form was undermining the value by 24%.

Example

Page 36: ME - Radio buttons vs dropdown

Radio buttons vs. dropdowns?

Dropdown

Radio Buttons

Which capture technique should you use??

Page 37: ME - Radio buttons vs dropdown

Summary: Putting it all together

FKey Principles

1. One of the most effective ways to improve the performance of the webpage is to reduce friction (psychological resistance).

2. However, in our attempts to minimize friction (length-oriented), we must beware of undermining the conversation with the customer in 2 ways:

i. Intensifying difficulty-oriented friction

ii. Eliminating necessary value force

3. In the end, increasing conversion is less about the technique (dropdowns vs. radio buttons), and more about understanding the entire mental impact (value vs. cost).

Page 38: ME - Radio buttons vs dropdown
Page 39: ME - Radio buttons vs dropdown

Live Optimization

Page 40: ME - Radio buttons vs dropdown

Live optimization

Primary Audience: People with diabetesPrimary Objective: Resources

Cornerstones4Care

http://bit.ly/1hgb98I #WebClinic

Page 41: ME - Radio buttons vs dropdown

Live optimization

Primary Audience: Home ownersPrimary Objective: Lead generation

SunPro Solar

http://bit.ly/1llD1Mb #WebClinic

Page 42: ME - Radio buttons vs dropdown

Live optimization

Primary Audience: B2B availability servicesPrimary Objective: Lead generation page

Netelligent.ca

http://bit.ly/1jAhoED #WebClinic

Page 43: ME - Radio buttons vs dropdown

Live optimization

HRSA

http://1.usa.gov/1pteftT #WebClinic

Primary Audience: Public interested in census health dataPrimary Objective: Informational site

HRSA

Page 44: ME - Radio buttons vs dropdown

Live optimization

Zycus

http://bit.ly/1fTPzmi #WebClinic

Primary Audience: Professional organizationsPrimary Objective: Lead generation form fill

Page 45: ME - Radio buttons vs dropdown

Live optimization

Strayer University

http://bit.ly/1fTQ9k5 #WebClinic

Primary Audience: Prospective studentsPrimary Objective: Recruitment

Page 46: ME - Radio buttons vs dropdown

Background: A large global media company seeking to sell premium software to businesses.

Goal: To move visitors to the next step in the funnel.

Research Question: Which call-to-action will result in a significant increase in clicks and leads captured?

Test Design: Single factorial A/B split

Experiment ID: TP1785Record Location: MarketingExperiments Research LibraryResearch Partner: (Protected)

Next Clinic: Background

Page 47: ME - Radio buttons vs dropdown

Next Clinic: Side-by-side

Treatment A Treatment B Treatment C

Treatment D Treatment E

Which treatment won?

Page 48: ME - Radio buttons vs dropdown

Live March 12 at 4:00 p.m. EST

• What is the best color for my CTAs?• What is the best position?• How many CTAs are optimal on a page?• What is the best CTA copy?

Join the live 35-minute Web clinic

To see the results

To join live, register at the link below:

MarketingExperiments.com/EffectiveCTAs

Page 49: ME - Radio buttons vs dropdown

See how you can conduct research with us

MECLABS conducts rigorous experiments in the new science of optimization. We apply our discoveries to help leaders optimize the financial performance of their sales and marketing programs.

Learn more about how you may be a fit for a MECLABS Research Partnership:

• Select Research Partnership Opportunities on the post-webinar survey

• Contact us [email protected]

x