12
To, Date: Laura Dawkins, Chief, Regulatory Coordination Division, Office of Policy and Strategy, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of Homeland Security, 20 Massachusetts Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20529 Subject: Comments on Retention of EB–1, EB–2, and EB–3 Immigrant Workers and Program Improvements Affecting High Skilled Nonimmigrant Workers. Rule Making of RIN 1615AC05, DHS Docket No. USCIS20150008 Dear Sir/Madam, I am writing to comment and highlight my concerns with the proposed rule meant to to provide relief to skilled legal immigrants who are waiting for green cards with approved LPR petitions. Our excitement when President Obama announced the EO on Nov 20th, 2014 was short lived. I would like to register my strong opposition to the rule in its current form as it fails to address the problems of the skilled immigrants stuck in GC backlog while they continue to face insecurity along with career stagnation while waiting to file Adjustment of Status. This proposed rule does very little to address these issues What are the issues with the current legal immigration system? The current highskilled nonimmigrant and immigrant system is outdated and broken and has failed to change with the changing times. The broken employmentbased legal immigration system is designed to make sure that Americans can be discriminated in the job marketplace by making employees from certain countries more attractive to employers. The whole system ensures that highskilled workers from certain countries are unable to change jobs for long periods of time while waiting for green cards. And as direct consequence of having to wait for many years (rather many decades in vast majority of cases), it is a fact the immigration regulations (not laws) are artificially designed in a manner to artificially restrict immigrant employees from being able to change employer for many years (often decades). This type of employeeemployer relationship gives absolute control to employers, whereby making immigrant workers more attractive over American workers.

I140 EAD AP - Public Comments - Sample Comments Template

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: I140 EAD AP - Public Comments - Sample Comments Template

To, Date: Laura Dawkins, Chief, Regulatory Coordination Division, Office of Policy and Strategy, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of Homeland Security, 20 Massachusetts Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20529 Subject: Comments on Retention of EB–1, EB–2, and EB–3 Immigrant Workers and Program Improvements Affecting High­ Skilled Nonimmigrant Workers. Rule Making of RIN 1615­AC05, DHS Docket No. USCIS­2015­0008 Dear Sir/Madam, I am writing to comment and highlight my concerns with the proposed rule meant to to provide relief to skilled legal immigrants who are waiting for green cards with approved LPR petitions. Our excitement when President Obama announced the EO on Nov 20th, 2014 was short lived. I would like to register my strong opposition to the rule in its current form as it fails to address the problems of the skilled immigrants stuck in GC backlog while they continue to face insecurity along with career stagnation while waiting to file Adjustment of Status. This proposed rule does very little to address these issues What are the issues with the current legal immigration system? The current high­skilled nonimmigrant and immigrant system is outdated and broken and has failed to change with the changing times. The broken employment­based legal immigration system is designed to make sure that Americans can be discriminated in the job marketplace by making employees from certain countries more attractive to employers. The whole system ensures that high­skilled workers from certain countries are unable to change jobs for long periods of time while waiting for green cards. And as direct consequence of having to wait for many years (rather many decades in vast majority of cases), it is a fact the immigration regulations (not laws) are artificially designed in a manner to artificially restrict immigrant employees from being able to change employer for many years (often decades). This type of employee­employer relationship gives absolute control to employers, whereby making immigrant workers more attractive over American workers.

Page 2: I140 EAD AP - Public Comments - Sample Comments Template

What was documented in the Executive Order? The specific sections of the Executive Action are: "Providing portable work authorization for high­skilled workers awaiting LPR status and their spouses. Under the current system, employees with approved LPR applications often wait many years for their visa to become available. DHS will make regulatory changes to allow these workers to move or change jobs more easily. DHS is finalizing new rules to give certain H­1B spouses employment authorization as long as the H­1B spouse has an approved LPR application. Ensuring that individuals with lawful status can travel to their countries of origin. DHS will clarify its guidance to provide greater assurance to individuals with a pending LPR application or certain temporary status permission to travel abroad with advance permission ("parole")." The fact sheet published by the White House acknowledges that current artificial regulations and green card backlogs unfairly prevent high­skilled workers with approved immigrant petition to change employer and jobs. The White House fact sheet also recognizes that DHS has the authority to change these artificial regulations such that high­skilled immigrants with approved LPR application will be granted portable work authorization to move or change jobs. Additionally it also states DHS’s ability to clarify guidance so that individuals with pending LPR application to be granted Advance Parole to travel abroad. What are the issues with the proposed rule? This proposed rule does not make an attempt to change this situation in spite of what was proposed in the President’s Executive Action as well as Secretary Jeh Johnson’s letter to USCIS. This rule strongly favors the employers and their lawyers rather than the employee. An applicant can qualify for EAD under 2 circumstances: 1. An applicant needs to have “compelling circumstance” to qualify for EAD. The compelling circumstances are provided in the proposed rule. The proposed “Compelling Circumstance” required to be eligible to qualify for EAD is too strict and it is presumed that very few will qualify for these. USCIS also reserves the right to adjudicate a “compelling circumstance” making the process more confusing for the applicant. 2. Even if an applicant qualifies for an EAD under “compelling circumstance”, in order to qualify for an extension, the applicant will need another “compelling circumstance” or must be within 1 year of his Priority Date being current in the Visa Bulletin. Any high skilled immigrant stuck in Green Card backlog as well as USCIS themselves know how unpredictable the cut­off date movement in the Visa Bulletin is. (See the enclosure 1). It is impossible for an applicant to predict that when it will be time for him to renew his EAD if his PD will be 1 year from cut­off date in the Visa Bulletin. Even USCIS themselves cannot predict where the cut­off dates themselves will be 1 year from now as it is dependent on a lot of other factors. This will further discourage an applicant to apply for EAD.

Page 3: I140 EAD AP - Public Comments - Sample Comments Template

3. In this proposed rule, USCIS has said that they expect around 155,000 will qualify for EAD, yet have failed to provide any methodology as to how they arrived at this projection. I think this number is grossly overestimated to show a false benefit of this rule to the high skilled immigrant. Here are the changes that this rule needs to stay true to the EO's original intent: 1. Provide immediate Employment Authorization (EAD) and Advance Parole (AP) to everyone who has an approved I­140 for more than 180 days and eliminate the “compelling circumstance” to qualify for EAD. Someone who is not born in one of the backlogged countries can avail this and this should be provided to all skilled workers irrespective of country of birth. When someone has an approved PERM and an approved I­140 (Immigrant Petition), it has been proven that the company requires that person’s skills and hence, have applied for his/her Permanent Residency. So, why should someone’s country of birth be a barrier in that? If someone from Pakistan or Iran can get EAD/AP with an approved I­140 and can change jobs or take a promotion after 180 days, why can’t a skilled worker born in China or India? . These backlogs are unjustly hurt people from a few countries only (China, India, Philippines, Mexico) and individuals from these countries are stuck in the same jobs without an ability to change employers, start their own business or even take promotions within the same company severely harming their career growth. This also makes the employee more attractive to the employer than a US citizen with the same skills as he/she is unlikely to leave the company once the Green Card is in process which could be more than a decade’s wait. 2. Eliminate the need to re­apply for PERM and I­140 if someone takes another job with an approved I­140 as long as the job is “same or similar”. This is one of the prime reasons for skilled workers not taking better job offers. They have to start their GC process all over again. Eliminating this process helps the workers and well as help US maintain the competitive edge. USCIS/ DHS should realize that it is incredibly short­sighted to infer that an ability to take a new job due to a (visa transfer) + (refile of PERM) + (refile of I­140) + (same or similar clarification) is not the same as having an Employment Authorization. In fact equating the two just indicates that people who drafted this rule are either incredibly naive or really sinister in their intentions. Asking prospective employers for visa transfers and restarting the immigration process instantly puts a lot of job opportunities out of the reach of candidates while having an EAD creates minimal burden on both the new employer and the employee and thereby makes the candidate more desirable. Forcing legal immigrants to go through the process again just creates an endless stream of revenue for the legal firms and most importantly suppresses wages and hurts the American workers because immigrants continue to be exploited like slaves with no freedom. I do support some of the regulations \ clarifications in this proposed rule: I­140 ownership by the immigrant, 60 day grace period in case of job loss, I­140 portability even in case of withdrawal) but I would like to state these there are current practices that are just being formally codified. So in that sense, these are nothing new ­ These were long overdue codifications of the processes that USCIS already practiced and hopefully they will eliminate any inconsistencies in the future.

Page 4: I140 EAD AP - Public Comments - Sample Comments Template

I would like to add that since they already have PERM and an I­140 approved proving that they get the market wages, no Americans were displaced by their hiring and that their skills are required by the sponsoring company. The only reason these people are waiting patiently in line is because of the broken and outdated immigration laws which judges skilled workers based on their country of birth. By providing them EAD and AP, USCIS will grant them the same status as other skilled workers get who are not born in a backlogged country. Finally, why do undocumented individuals get Employment Authorization cards (a case that the Government and Agency hopes to defend successfully in the Supreme Court) while legal immigrants have to continue to file and re­file their papers while getting stuck in a non­immigrant visa without any Employment Authorization. It is absolutely corrupt and outrageous to ask legal immigrants for "Compelling Circumstances" while the bar is set different for undocumented individuals. By the same yardstick, legal Immigrants should simply be granted their EAD. I am hoping that the administration looks at the comments and makes appropriate fixes to this rule asap. It is still not late to do the right thing! Sincerely, Name: City, State: Enclosure 1: A medium article on how broken the immigration system is Enclosure 2: European Union’s Blue Card programme to attract highly skilled immigrants Like the Green cards that are issued to foreign workers in the United States, the EU Blue cards are common sense work authorization which would bring workers to the European Union. The plan calls for admission of an additional 20 million Asian, African and Latin American workers in the next two decades. EU hopes that the proposal would divert the flow of skilled migrants from developing countries who have been choosing the United States over Europe. It is irony that while the rest of the developed countries are proposing ways to modernize the immigration system to attract highly talented, US skilled immigration system continues to be broken and skewed towards benefitting employers and displacing american born workers. Tieing employees to employers for decades, absolute ‘Indentured servitude’ nature of H1B are so outdated and doesn’t do good for the economy. The proposed rule RIN 1615AC05 simply benefits corporates and lawyers by preferring H1B immigrant over american born worker by depressing wages, and control over H1B worker. You must refer to the ‘Bluecard’ policies to see how the common sense immigration system should be structured. http://www.bluecard­eu.de/eu­blue­card­germany/

Page 5: I140 EAD AP - Public Comments - Sample Comments Template

This Is What Waiting for an Employment-BasedGreen Card Looks LikeAugust 2015 marked the start of my nineteenth year as a legal resident in theUnited States. I went to school for six of those years and have worked legallyin the country for more than twelve years. I’ve helped build a company thathas improved access to high quality, affordable healthcare for hundreds ofthousands of Americans. I’ve helped create jobs on U.S. soil. I’ve helpedmodernize inpatient care for a health system that is world-renowned for itsquality of care. Now, I lead pioneering work that enables healthcare providersto deliver care that focuses on prevention — something the U.S. healthcaresystem needs to reduce costs. But I’m still waiting for freedom — the freedomthat only a green card can provide.

When people ask me how much longer I have to wait for a green card, I havethis graphic ready to show them. This is what the “line” in the employment-based legal immigration system looks like. Depending on the month, myexpected wait time for a green card could be two months — or six years.

Enclosure 1

Page 6: I140 EAD AP - Public Comments - Sample Comments Template

As an analogy, imagine sitting at the DMV, waiting for your number to showup on the monitor. Let’s say your number is 100. The monitor shows 99, butthen jumps back to 10. That would be frustrating right? That’s how theemployment-based immigration “line” behaves. I guarantee you that if theline at the DMV worked the same way, people would be driving aroundwithout licenses, not driving, or riding around on bicycles with a megaphonetelling others that the system is broken. I would likely be in the third category.

But the “line” above doesn’t tell my whole story.

I started the employment-based permanent residency process in 2006 whileworking for a top-tier management consulting firm. Strangely, theirimmigration counsel did not get me a number to wait in line during my tenureat that firm. While working for that firm, a client offered me to work directlyfor them. Had I accepted that offer in 2006 instead of sticking around, I wouldlikely be a U.S. citizen by now. Friends that worked at other companies whostarted their process in 2006 became permanent residents in 2010 and 2011and are U.S. citizens now. So it isn’t just a dysfunctional and outdated systemthat I’ve faced: questionable handling of my permanent residency applicationwhile working for a large multinational corporation set my freedom in thiscountry back by several years as well.

The story of my expected wait in the employment-based Green Card “line”

Page 7: I140 EAD AP - Public Comments - Sample Comments Template

Why is the wait so long?

After going to school here and contributing to the U.S. economy for over adecade, I’m still subjected to huge amounts of paperwork to stay in thecountry legally and still face the risk of self-deportation without ever havingan opportunity to return to work here. Traveling overseas to visit family comeswith the risk of not being able to return. The travel restrictions while I’ve beenin the process have forced me to spend unreasonably long periods of timeaway from immediate family. For instance, I’ve gone almost two years withoutseeing my parents and almost three years without seeing my younger brother.

My most recent trip to India was a striking example of what I have to gothrough when visiting immediate family. Having spent almost 17 yearswithout celebrating Diwali, a religious festival, with my family, I decided tobreak that trend and make an annual effort to visit them during the festival.This year, to make sure I could return to the United States, I had to make anappointment at the U.S. consulate in Chennai, India to attend an interviewand get a visa stamp in my passport. That stamp would allow me to re-enterthe United States to continue working. To get that stamp, I had to spend twodays of my short visit to India in Chennai — a city where I have no friends orrelatives. On the first day, I provided electronic fingerprints and got a phototaken. On the second day, I attended an interview carrying a pile ofpaperwork documenting my history in the United States. During theinterview, the consular officer, who acted very professionally and had a kinddemeanor, grimaced when he heard I was still waiting for my green card.Coincidentally, this was the same consulate where I attended an interviewmore than 18 years ago to get my student visa. Back then, I was excited tobegin my journey. Never did I imagine that my legal pathway to citizenshipwould last more than 18 years and counting and that I’d be back at the sameconsulate renewing a work visa to extend my legal stay from 18 to 21 years.

Me in my favorite city

Page 8: I140 EAD AP - Public Comments - Sample Comments Template

Waiting in line also comes with incredible professional constraints, such as theinability to easily accept promotions and change jobs. I cannot easily start acompany. There have been years I’ve spent in underemployment because Icould not change employers without having to restart key parts of the greencard process from scratch.

Why is this wait so long? At this point, there’s one and only one reason whyI’m still waiting and subjected to these constraints: because of where I wasborn. I cannot control where I was born any more than the color of my skin.Because the system judges me on country of birth and outdated merit-basedcriteria, coming from a populous country I’ve had to wait in line much, muchlonger than someone that was born in a less populous country like, say,Pakistan. In fact, had I been born in Pakistan, I would have been a permanentresident at least five years ago, and a citizen by now.

President Obama is AWESOME for issuing executive orders to bring relief

On November 20, 2014, President Obama announced executive orders thatwould modernize and streamline the legal immigration system. Thoseexecutive actions will provide more freedom to those like me caught in thisarchaic system; basic freedoms such as the ability to more easily changeemployers and accept promotions, allowing for greater contributions to theU.S. economy. While my turn to claim those freedoms has not arrived, the firstbatch of employment-based immigrants waiting in line were able to file forthose freedoms on October 1, 2015.

But there’s more that can be done to make the system work better for theU.S. economy — and only Congress can do it

America is at its best when individuals are at their best, and we need animmigration system that allows that. An immigration system that stimulatesentrepreneurship and innovation — not one that facilitates indenturedservitude and puts an immigrant at the mercy of questionable immigrationcounsel retained by a large corporation. A system that rewards immigrants forjob creation through successful startups on U.S. soil — not just one thatrewards immigrants at multinational corporations for creating jobs overseas.A system that retains the best and brightest graduating from U.S. universities — not one that increasingly drives them away to other countries that competeagainst us. And a system that strengthens the bond of family — not one thatweakens it through unreasonable periods of forced separation.

Page 9: I140 EAD AP - Public Comments - Sample Comments Template

The last major change to the high-skilled employment-based immigrationsystem occurred in 1990; it is obsolete and does not meet the needs of U.S.employers nor the economy; and because it’s not a smart system, imposesinjustice on certain skilled immigrants. It is time to update this archaicsystem. And that doesn’t necessarily mean letting in more high-skilledimmigrants every year. The bar to qualify for a green card can be raised andthe system can be made smarter without adding a single immigrant to theannual high-skilled employment-based green card quota.

There’s more that can be done to make the system work better for the U.S.economy and only Congress can do it. Go to my story on FWD.us to find outhow you can push Congress to act.

This essay is part of the My Time in Line series, in which immigrants are sharingtheir experiences of what it’s really like to get legal status.

Page 10: I140 EAD AP - Public Comments - Sample Comments Template

1/16/2016 Eu Blue Card

http://www.bluecard­eu.de/eu­blue­card­germany/ 1/2

Create Account | Sign Inwww.blue­card­eu.deEu Blue Card Germany

Blue Card EU for GermanyWould you like to live and work in Germany, a member state of the European Union?Similar to the Green Card in the USA, the EU blue card offers highly educated skilled workers of non­ EU­ States the opportunity and the right to work and stay in theEuropean Union. Register in our network, find a job and apply for the EU blue card for Germany or another state in the EU.

EU Blue CardThe EU blue card for Germany is a residence title for specific purposes; it provides an evidence for the legal stay of a citizen from a non­EU­country in an EU­ member statefor the purpose of working. So the blue card is a card for citizens from non­EU­states. For members of EU­ states generosity is valid concerning their stay. The EU­ regulationsconcerning the blue card will be valid in Germany as a part of the German law from the 1st August 2012, through the law for reaction of the high­ qualification –outline ofthe European Union. In particular, the stay law was modified. The core regulation of the stay law is addressed by the EU blue card. The most important paragraph is section19a of the German Residence Act ­ EU Blue Card.

Conversion of the highly qualified directive of the European UnionConversion of the highly qualified directive of the European Union is the basis of the EU Blue Card; namely, the directive can be found in 2009 / 50 /EG. The blue cardgrants a stay in the EU to highly qualified non­EU­state members. This should help to combat the shortage of skilled workers. The rules for the administration of the singleEU states are outside of the rules of action of the EU. These rules do not control the immigration of citizens from non EU­ states, who are staying in the EU to researchprojects, who enter the EU because of family unification for migrants living in Germany or who cannot be deported. Owners of the EU blue card will get the same salary ascitizens of the EU who do in the same job. The equalisation concerning the rights for education or welfare is not yet a law but shall be practiced that way. The EU blue card islimited. The duration of this limit is one to four years. The format in the EU is the same in all member states and belongs to the legal order (EG) 1030/2002.

FAQThe following section provides answers to the most important questions concerning the EU blue card.Who can apply for the EU blue card?A foreigner, a citizen of a non­EU­ country, can apply for the EU blue card ifa) he or she has a German or an accredited foreign or a university degree that is comparable to a German one.b) he or she has a working contract with a gross annual compensation of at least €48.400 (4.034 Euros per month), a contract in the so­called shortage occupation (scientists,mathematics, engineers, doctors and IT­ skilled workers) with the amount of €37.752 (3.146 Euros per month).Does a foreigner need to apply for the EU blue card before he enters the country?Yes. The journey into Germany complies with the general entry rules. Therefore, a citizen of a non­EU­country needs to apply for the EU blue card before his entry intoGermany. The German representation embassy abroad is responsible in each case.How long is the blue card valid for?The EU blue card is at first valid for 4 years. If the working contract covers a period of less than 4 years, meaning it is limited, the EU blue card will be valid for the time of theworking contract plus 3 months.It can be extended or establishment permission can be given.When can the owner of a blue card qualify for a permanent right of residence?Foreigners who own the EU blue card can apply for permanent residence after 33 months. If they have German language knowledge at level B1 then they can apply earlierafter 21 months (19a, passage 6, law of residence).Can the EU card become invalid if a person stays in a non­EU country for a longer time?Owners of the EU blue card can stay out of the EU for up to 12 months without losing the right of staying in Germany or the EU.Can owners of the EU blue card move to another EU country?

EU Blue Card Germany Blaue Karte EU Deutschland Carte bleue UE Allemagne Tarjeta azul UE Alemania Arbeitgeber Application Forum

Enclosure 2

Page 11: I140 EAD AP - Public Comments - Sample Comments Template

1/16/2016 Eu Blue Card

http://www.bluecard­eu.de/eu­blue­card­germany/ 2/2

Owners of the EU blue card have the right, after having stayed in Germany for 18 months, to move to another country of the EU.Will the duration of stay in another state of the EU be considered concerning the permanent right of residence?If the foreigner has already stayed in another EU­member state with the EU blue card, this will be considered concerning the permanent right of residence in Germany.Is it necessary to carry out a visa procedure to move around in the EU?If the foreigner wants to move on in the EU, he / she can be sure that in almost all EU member states a visa is not necessary. The application can be made at home. In Germanythe application must be made within one month after entering Germany.Is a priority check carried out? Are members of the German job market treated better?Check of priority means that a check will be done to see whether German employees are potential candidates for the job. Such a check is done within the salary borders. Butthere will be a check of the working conditions. If a salary of at least € 37.752 will be paid there will be a priority check for non­ shortage occupations, so the EU blue cardcan be given.Can relatives of the EU blue card owners work without limits in Germany?Relatives of the owners of the EU blue card can work without delay and without limits in Germany.Do spouses need to have proof of German language knowledge?The spouse is not required to have proof of German language knowledge. Even simple knowledge of the German language is not necessary for marriage partners.

Immigration to GermanyFor more information about the topic immigration to Germany have a look at this site: immigration to germany. There you can read in detail which visa is necessary forentering Germany, you can inform yourself about the different kinds of residence permit and about the subsequent family immigration.© Verein Für soziales Leben e.V. ImpressumLayout based on YAML

Facebook

Google Pluseu-blue-card

+ 130

Follow +1

Am 1. August 2012 werden die neuenRegelungen im AufenthG zur BlueCard wirksam.18 Jul 2012Der Bundestag hat die Einführung derEU Blue Card in Deutschlandgebilligt. Die Regelungen findensich...

Be the first of your friends to like this

EU­Blue­Card1,645 likes

Like Page Share

Page 12: I140 EAD AP - Public Comments - Sample Comments Template

INSTRUCTIONS:

1. Take print out of this file 2. Write date on top right corner and sign the letter 3. Write your name, City & state at the bottom 4. Cut out the addresses provided below 5. If you have more than one person your household, please repeat the same. Send one letter for

each person in your house, like spouse, father, mother, kids etc. 6. Ask at least five (5) of your friends to send these letters.

Laura Dawkins, Chief, Regulatory Coordination Division, Office of Policy and Strategy, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ref: DHS Docket No. USCIS­2015­0008 Department of Homeland Security, 20 Massachusetts Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20529

Important Note: Please write your FROM address in the envelope. Apparently the envelopes without from addressgo through severe screening process because of Anthrax threats. Due to this addition security clearance process themails take as much as 2 weeks to reach the destination. This was brought to our attention by our members.