19
Copyright Conundrum on 3D Data and 3D Works Tomoaki Watanabe, Ph.D. Project Associate Professor, Graduate School of Media and Governance, Keio University Imaging Conference Japan 2016, 2016.06.07-09, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo.

Copyright conundrum on 3D data and 3D works

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Copyright conundrum on 3D data and 3D works

Copyright Conundrum on 3D Data and 3D

WorksTomoaki Watanabe, Ph.D.

Project Associate Professor, Graduate School of Media and Governance, Keio University

Imaging Conference Japan 2016, 2016.06.07-09, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo.

Page 2: Copyright conundrum on 3D data and 3D works

About:CommonSphere (Creative Commons Japan)GLOCOM (ICT policies, information society)Open Knowledge Japan (Open Data)Keio U. (Digital fabrication, open innovation)

Not a lawyerViews my own, not those of the affiliated

Page 3: Copyright conundrum on 3D data and 3D works

Copyright LawVery broadly applicable

Indiscriminate re: quality of works (historic masterpieces and mediocre failures both covered)

The law gives “protection”: author‘s exclusive rights over a work .

Page 4: Copyright conundrum on 3D data and 3D works

Copyright Law (2) copyright law protects creative expression of thoughts and emotions Authors (or right-holders) have the exclusive right to use the works for a duration of time.

Page 5: Copyright conundrum on 3D data and 3D works

Copyright Law (3)“Creativity” of expressions: low bar

Courts should not be in the position of determining what is creative and what is not.

not expression: facts, ideasnot creative enough: season’s greetings, opening of obituaries data (faithful reproduction of facts), others …

Page 6: Copyright conundrum on 3D data and 3D works

Scope and duration of protectionBroad and long protection: Other people cannot make use of the works

Narrow and short protection: Authors cannot make money from the works

Page 7: Copyright conundrum on 3D data and 3D works

Copyright Law: 3D Works, 3D Data3D Works for pragmatic use: usually treated differently

Why 3D works (for pragmatic use) treated differently?What are they anyway?

Highly artistic

Others

Pragmatic 3D Objects

Protected Mostly Not

Others Protected Protected

Page 8: Copyright conundrum on 3D data and 3D works

Why & WhatDesign law “protects” … registered aesthetic mass-production designs of visual patterns, shapes, colors, and combinations thereof

Copyright law is interpreted to avoid duplicative coverage with the design law over the same object.

Houses, Chairs/ Figurines/ Sculptures

Page 9: Copyright conundrum on 3D data and 3D works

3D Data: Data issues and a 3D twist3 Issues inherent in data:A. 2D works for pragmatic use ... Does not affect the protection (cf. maps, architectural plans)B. non-creative expression ... Does matterC. creative works captured non-creatively ... Does matter

3D data issue: seemingly creative 3D works captured non-creatively (cf. architectural plans)

Page 10: Copyright conundrum on 3D data and 3D works

3D Data (2) ExamplesMediocre sculpture plan on paper in straightforward manner(Creative work, non-creative capturing) … protected

Mediocre chair plan on paper in straightforward manner(Non-creative work, non-creative capturing) … not protected

Page 11: Copyright conundrum on 3D data and 3D works

A twist: gap b/w intended use and shapeIntent and shape do not correspond one-to-oneSame shape, different copyright treatments?

A chair for: sculpture earrings figurines furniture 3D animation movie/ video game

Page 12: Copyright conundrum on 3D data and 3D works

3D Data: examples for intent-shape gapMediocre chair for 3D animation movie/ video game (creative work (!), non-creative capturing) … protectedMediocre chair for 3D printing for earrings (creative work, non-creative capturing) … protectedMediocre chair for 3D printing for seating (non-creative work, non-creative capturing) … not protected? (see. Inoue, 2015)

Page 13: Copyright conundrum on 3D data and 3D works

Another twist: ScanningScanning: faithful reproduction of real-world (facts) * general problems with tools; with automation/robots1. A mythical creature for 3D printing as a figurine (data)

… probably protected2. The mythical creature, 3D-printed as a figurine (thing)

… probably protected3. The creature above, 3D scanned (data)

… not protected

Page 14: Copyright conundrum on 3D data and 3D works

Foreign situationUS… severability the key, but confusingly many tests FR… very broad coverageGE… has been narrow, but revisiting (similar to Japan)

No uniformity, no convergence in sight

Page 15: Copyright conundrum on 3D data and 3D works

ImplicationsFreely-available common resource (somewhat) abundant

[market& communities] helps expansion [R&D] helps analysis[innovation] social sphere benefits professionals needs to be creative

Page 16: Copyright conundrum on 3D data and 3D works

Is copying harmful for innovation?- Music file-sharing- Unauthorized uploading of video - Manga in foreign markets- Fashion, American Football, Magic, etc. (negative space)

Page 17: Copyright conundrum on 3D data and 3D works

If you still want to protect your data/object- Copy-protection technologies- Other laws, contracts

Laws Subjects Novelty Reg. Area

Copyright Creative Exp. No No Cult

Design Shapes, Patterns Yes Yes Indus

tTrademark Brands No yes Indus

tUnfair Compet.Outlook No No Indus

t

Page 18: Copyright conundrum on 3D data and 3D works

Still…- Copy protection may not be able to prevent “copying-by-3D scanning”

Page 19: Copyright conundrum on 3D data and 3D works

Alternative: Embrace openness- Immitation happens- You can expand your network/ platform- You can increase your recognition

Losing control may be scary, but it can bring you a leverage (empowered “social” “crowd” empowering you)