Quality circle

TITLE OF CASE STUDY

REDUCTION OF

LATECOMERS TO

THE COLLEGE

Title of QCC Case Study Report : REDUCTION OF LATECOMERS TO

THE COLLEGE

Name of the QCC : FUMA QUALITY CIRCLE

(EMERGING EXCELLENCE) ROSE

QUALITY CIRCLE

Name of the College and Address : Meenakshi Mission Hospital

College

Lake area, Melur Road, Madurai,

Tamil Nadu,.

Country : India

College Profile

No. of students : 256

No of lecturers : 12

No. of QCC in the College : 2

Date of starting QCC movement : June 4,2012

Other quality concepts implemented : Kaizen, 5S

BRIEF HISTORY OF INSTITUTION & QC

QCC Profile

Date of Formation : June 4,2011

Section / Department : College

Coordinator : Mrs. Sumithra devi

Facilitator : Mrs. Meena

Leader / Dy. Leader : Mr.Karunakaran / Mr.Balaji

Members : Ms. Manikanda eswari,

Ms.Prabhahari ,Ms.Vijaya lakshmi

Meeting Periodicity : Every Mondays& Fridays,

Duration of meeting : 3 pm to 4 pm.

Meeting conducted : During College hours

No. of problems completed : Nil

Contact Person and Designation : Mr.Ramachandran- Quality Service

Co-Ordinator

Phone with STD Code : 0452 - 2588741 - ( 10 lines )

Fax : 0452 -2586353

Email : mmhrc @sancharnet.in

BRIEF HISTORY OF INSTITUTION & QC

BRIEF HISTORY OF CASE STUDY

Brief case of the problem : Reducing the Latecomers to college

Analysis of the problem :Identified primary causes by brain storming

Root causes of the problem :No time management, No adequate bus

facilities, Locked up, Family situation

Solution Implementation : Origination of TATA Forum . Appreciation award

will be given to the students if they are attending

classes on time without fail.


Gains : a) Attainment of 100% result & attendance which brought

satisfaction to students, teachers & parents.

b) Exposure of students skills & talents which shaped them

to apply practical situations

c) Mutual understanding between staffs & students.

Statistical tools used : a) Brain Storming b) Data Collection c) Pareto diagram

d) Flow diagram e) Bar graph f) Mile stone chart g) Gantt

chart h) Tree diagram

Methods : a) Category analysis b) Ranking methods c) Causes

enumeration method d) why? Why? Analysis e) PDCA


MEENAKSHI MISSION HOSPITAL COLLEGE

HISTORY:-

MBA( Hospital Administration) was started in the year 2006, which is a part of Meenakshi mission hospital and research centre.

VISION:-

“Developing health care professionals of today’s relevance with insight to tomorrow’s need.”

MISSION:-

“ Internationally renowned centre for health care education.”

Quality Policy

Meenakshi Mission Hospital And Research Centre in

pursuit of excellence is committed to comply with applicable

requirements for developing and providing World Class Health

Care at an affordable Cost.

We shall foster an environment in which every person is

motivated to continually improve the efficiency and effectiveness

in the management of healthcare services.

QUALITY POLICY

TEAM INTRODUCTION

DATE OF FORMATION OF CIRCLE – 04.06.2011

DATE & TIME OF MEETING -EVERY MONDAY &

FRIDAY

(3PM – 4P.M)

WORKING AREA - COLLEGE

PROBLEM SORTED SO FAR – 1

NO. OF MEETINGS – 33

ATTENDANCE – 92%

DATE OF SELECTING THE

PRESENT PROBLEM – 18.6.2011

NO. OF MEETINGS CONDUCTED

FOR THE PRESENT PROBLEM - 25

WE ARE NEW BORN TO QC

TEAM MEMBERS INTRODUCTION

Mrs.Meena – Facilitator

Mr.B.Karunakaran – Leader Mr.N.Balaji – Deputy Leader

Ms.S.D.Prabhahari – Member Ms.M.S.Manikanda Eswari – Member

Ms.J.Vijayalakshmi - Member

S.Sumithra Devi – Co-ordinator

PDCA cycle with 12 steps

1

0

11

1

2

4

5

6

7 8 9

PLAN

CHECK

ACT

PRPROBLEM SOLVING CONTENTS

DO

1. LACK OF STUDENT UNITY

2. IRREGULARITY IN ATTENDING CLASS

3. LATE COMING

4. FREQUENT ABSENTEEISM

5. NO ACTIVE PARTICIPATION

6. LACK OF INTERPERSONAL RELATIONSHIP

7. LACK OF SELF-CONFIDENCE

8. LACK OF COMMUNICATION SKILL

9. STAGE FEAR

10. PROBLEM TO FACE REALITIES

11. NO PROPER TIME MANAGEMENT

12. NOT MAINTAINING CLASSROOM DECORUM

13. STUDENTS POOR PHYSICAL APPEARANCE

14. NO SCHEDULED PROPER CLASSES

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

B

51 PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED BY BRAINSTORMING The First Meeting was Held On 10.06.2012 We found 51 Problems

Through brainstorming and the problems are listed below

STEP

1

15. LATEST TECHNOLOGIES ARE NOT USED IN TEACHING

16. LACK OF DISCIPLINE

17. MESS FOOD IS NOT UPTO THE COST

18. LACK OF EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES

19. LACK OF HOSPITAL VISIT

20. LACK OF ADEQUATE REFERRAL BOOKS IN LIBRARY

21. BOOKS ARE NOT ISSUED FROM LIBRARY TO TAKE PHOTOCOPY

22. NO PARENTS MEET

23. NO WI-FI WITHIN COLLEGE CAMPUS

24. REDUCED NUMBER OF INTER-COLLEGE MEET

25. STUDENTS ARE NOT SATISFIED WITH THE MARKS

GIVEN BY LECTURERS

26. EGOISM IS NOTICED AMONG STUDENTS A

B

A

C

C

C

C

B

B

C

B

A

27. LACK OF PARTICIPATION OF STUDENTS

IN SEMINARS & CONFERENCES

28. UNIVERSITY INFORMATIONS ARE

NOT CONVEYED TO STUDENTS IN TIME

29. LACK OF SELF-MOTIVATION

30. LACK OF CO-ORDINATION

31. NO SEPARATE PARKING AREA FOR STUDENTS

32. NO SEPARATE AUDITORIUM FOR COLLEGE

33. BOYS HOSTEL IS NOT ATTACHED WITHIN

THE COLLEGE PREMESIS

34. NO SEPARATE CAFATERIA FOR COLLEGE

35. LECTURERS ARE NOT TOO STRICT

36. NO AUDIO VISUAL ROOM

37. NO LOCKERS FOR STUDENTS

38. NO UPDATED KNOWLEDGE AMONG STUDENTS

39. NO COLLEGE FM TO EXPOSE INDIVIDUAL TALENTS

40. NO ADEQUATE TIME ALLOTED FOR

ANCILLARY PAPERS

B

B

A

A

C

C

C

C

B

C

C

A

C

B

41. NO COLLEGE VEHICLE

42. CLASSES ARE NOT IN INTERACTIVE MANNER

43. INADEQUATE GUEST LECTURERS CLASSES

44. LACK OF FORCED MOTIVATION TOWARDS POOR

PERFORMANCE STUDENTS

45. NO PROPER LIASON BETWEEN STAFFS AND STUDENTS

46. STUDENTS ARE NOT TAKING CLASS NOTES PROPERLY

47. COMMUNICATION GAP BETWEEN SENIORS & JUNIORS

48. NO MUTUAL UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN BOYS & GIRLS

49. GOSSIPING IS MORE AMONG STUDENTS

50. ASSIGNMENT SUBMISSION & PRESENTATIONS

ARE NOT PROFESSIONALISTIC

51. STUDENTS ANSWERS ARE NOT CLEAR IN THE EXAMINATION

C

B

C

B

B

A

A

A

A

A

A

PIE-CHART

SELECTION OF PROBLEM Category Number of Problems %

A Problems which can be solved

within the department

25

51%

B Problems which requires

intervention by other

departments

12 24%

C Problems which require

management approval

14 25%

STEP-2.

A

B

C24%

51%

25%

A- Problems Which Can Be Solved Within The Department 25

B - Problems Which Requires Other Department’s Intervention 12

C - Problems Which Requires Management Approval 14

STEP - 2

We Selected ‘A’ Category Problem for our case study

‘A’ CATEGORY PROBLEMS 1. LACK OF STUDENT UNITY

2. IRREGULARITY IN ATTENDING CLASS

3. LATE COMING

4. FREQUENT ABSENTEEISM

5. NO ACTIVE PARTICIPATION

6. LACK OF INTERPERSONAL

RELATIONSHIP

7. LACK OF SELF-CONFIDENCE

8. STAGE FEAR

9. PROBLEM TO FACE REALITIES

10. NO PROPER TIME MANAGEMENT

11. NOT MAINTAINING CLASSROOM

DECORUM

12. STUDENTS POOR PHYSICAL

APPEARANCE

13. LACK OF SELF-MOTIVATION

14. LACK OF CO-ORDINATION

15. NO UPDATED KNOWLEDGE AMONG

STUDENTS

16. LACK OF COMMUNICATION SKILL

17. STUDENTS ARE NOT TAKING CLASS

NOTES PROPERLY

18. COMMUNICATION GAP BETWEEN

SENIORS & JUNIORS

19. NO MUTUAL UNDERSTANDING

BETWEEN BOYS & GIRLS

20. GOSSIPING IS MORE AMONG STUDENTS

21. ASSIGNMENT SUBMISSION &

PRESENTATIONS

ARE NOT PROFESSIONALISTIC

22. STUDENTS ARE NOT SATISFIED WITH

THE MARKS GIVEN BY LECTURERS

23. EGOISM IS NOTICED AMONG STUDENTS

24. STUDENTS ANSWERS ARE NOT CLEAR

IN THE EXAMINATION

25. LACK OF DISCIPLINE

GROUPING OF PROBLEM SELECTION

BY BRAIN STORMING

IN SELECTED CATEGORY TEAM WORK: 1-LACK OF UNITY

2-LACK OF INTERPERSONEL RELATIONSHIP

3-COORDINATION

4-CLASS DECORUM

5- PARTICIPATION

6- NO MUTUAL RELATION BETWEEN BOYS & GIRLS

7-IMPROPER COMMUNICATION BETWEEN SENIORS & JUNIORS

8-NO ACTIVE PARTICIPATION

PERSONALITY DEVELOPMENT:

1-LACK OF SELF CONFIDENCE

2-STAGE FEAR

3-PROBLEM TO FACE REALITIES

4-POOR PHYSICAL APPEARANCE

5-SELF MOTIVATION

6- GOSSIPING

7- EGOISM

8- LAGGING COMMUNICATION SKILL

9-NOT MAINTAINING CLASS ROOM DECORUM

ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE: 1- LATECOMING

2-NO PROPER TIME MANAGEMENT

3-FREQUENT ABSENTEISM

4-IRREGULARITY IN ATTENDING CLASSES

5- ASSIGNMENT SUBMISSION & PRESENTATIONS ARE NOT PROFESSIONALISTIC

6- IRRELEVENT ANSWERS IN EXAM

7- MARKS ARE NOT SATISFACTORY FOR STUDENTS

8- LACK OF PARTICIPATION IN SEMINARS & CONFERENCES

RANKING METHOD TO PRIORITISE

PROBLEM GROUP

GROUP MEMBERS

A B C D E

RANK SELECTION

PRIORITY

TEAM WORK

ACADEMIC

PERFORMANCE

PERSONALITY

DEVELOPMENT

3

1

2

2

3

1

1

2

3

3

1

2

3

1

2

12

8

10

III

II

We have selected “ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE” on priority basis

I

A- Karuna karan B- Balaji C- Prabha hari D- Manikanda Eswari E-

Vijaya Lakshmi

LOCATING THE PROBLEM

15

9

6

3

0

3

6

9

12

15

18

21

24

27

30

NO

.OF

.PE

RS

ON

S

A B C D

A – LATE COMING C – FREQUENT ABSENTEEISM

B – NEGLIGENCE D – IRREGULARITY IN ATTENDING

CLASSES

DATA COLLECTION FOR

ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE

S.NO ACADEMIC

PERFORMANCE

JUNE

4 – 23

/DAY

JUNE 24-

JULY-

13/DAY

JULY-14

AUG-

3/DAY

AVG

PUPILS/DA

Y

1. Late coming 10 15 10 15

2. Negligence 10 8 9 9

3. Frequent

absenteeism

9 4 5 6

4. Irregularity in

attending classes

2 4 3 3

DURATION : JUNE – AUG (2011)

TOTAL NO OF STUDENTS : 60

PARETO TABLE

S.N

O

ACADEMIC

PERFORMANCE

AVG

(PUPILS)

/DAY

CUMUL

ATIVE(P

UPILS)

PERCEN

TAGE(%)

CUMULATIV

E %

1. Late coming 15 15 46 46


3. Frequent

absenteeism

6 30 18 91

4. Irregularity in

attending class

3 33 9 100

PARETO DIAGRAM

0

3

6

9

12

15

18

21

24

27

30

X

Y

100%

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

33

9%

15

46%

27%

18 %

6

3

9

73%

LATE

COMING NEGLIGENCE ABSENTISM IRREGULARITY

Base

d o

n P

are

to P

rin

cip

le W

e

Sel

ecte

d

LA

TE

CO

MIN

G 80%

OBJECTIVE AND TARGET

15

3

0

3

6

9

12

15

18

21

24

27

30

33

NO

.OF

.PE

RSO

NS

BEFORE

IMPLEMENTATION

TARGET

We foot fort our effort to reduce the late comers from present condition 15

persons(100%) to 3 persons (20%) within period of one month.

Mile Stone Chart Quality Circle Activity Planning

QUALITY CIRCLE NAME :

FUMA QUALITY CIRCLE

PROJECT NO : 1

MEETING DAY : MONDAY & FRIDAY

TIME : 3.00PM TO 4.00PM

DEPT : COLLEGE

LEADER:

Mr.karunakaran.B

FACILITATOR:

Mrs.Meena

REASON FOR SELECTION : Attaining 100% result & attendance

DATE OF BEGINING : 4.6.2012 DATE OF COMPLETION : 19.8.2012

NO. OF PROJECTS COMPLETED : Nil

MR.BALAJI.N DY LEADER

MEMBERS NAME :

• Ms.Prabhahari.S.D

• Ms.Vijayalakshmi.J

• Ms.Manikanda eswari.

SL.

NO. PROCEDURE

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

TARGET

MEETING

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Define the problem

Analysis of the

problem

Identifying the causes

Root cause analysis

Development of solution

Trial implementation

Follow up

Data analysis

2

2

2

2

2

4

4

4

2

ACTIVITY MEETING

- PLAN 25 Total Meetings

Standardization

Regular implementation

1

PROJECT: REDUCE

LATECOMERS TO COLLEGE

WHY WE SELECTED THIS PROBLEM?

AFFECTS 100% RESULT & GOODWILL OF INSTITUTION

POOR PER FORMENCE IN EXAMINATION & LACK OF ATTENDENCE

TOTAL CONCEPT OF SUBJECT IS UNKNOWN

NO CLEAR IDEA ABOUT THE SUBJECT KNOWLEDGE

DISTRACTION OF LECTURES & OTHER STUDENTS

LATE COMING

DEFINE THE PROBLEM HIGH LIGHTING LATECOMING

EFFECT ON INDIVIDUAL

LETHARGY

POOR SELF DISCIPLINE

PARTIAL KNOWLEDGE IN SUBJECT

NO TIME MANAGEMENT

STEP 3


EFFECT ON

RESULT

NO 100% RESULT

BURDEN FOR STUDENTS

DEPRESSED PARENTS

NON COMPLETION OF COURSE IN

TIME


EFFECT ON

INSTITUTION

SPOILS GOODWILL

MORE PRESSURE ON

MANAGEMENT

NO PROPER LIASON

BETWEEN LECTURES & STUDENTS

HESITATION OF

FORECOMERS TO JOIN

WHAT IS THE PROBLEM?

LATE COMING

WHERE DOES IT HAPPENS?

CLASS ROOM

WHEN DOES IT OCCUR?

DURING 1st HOUR IN MORNING SESSION

WHO IS ACCOUNTABLE?

STUDENTS

HOW DOES IT OCCUR?

- LETHARGY OF STUDENTS

-NON-AVAILABILITY OF BUS

STEP 4

LATE

COMERS

PRODUCTION PROCESS CLASSIFICATION TYPE

C & E DIAGRAM

NO TIME MANAGEMENT

NO BUS FACILITY

LOCKED UP FAMILY

SITUATION

STEP 5

C & E DIAGRAM

LATE

COMERS

CAUSES IDENTIFIED THROUGH BRAIN STORMING

NO TIME MANAGEMENT

NO BUS FACILITIES

FAMILY SITUATION LOCKED UP

NO FREQUENT BUSES

NO PROPER ROAD

LONG DISTANCE

NO ECONOMICAL BUS

LETHARGY LONG DISTANCE

INDISCIPLINE

NON SYSTEMATIC

WAITING FOR FRIENDS

PARTY

SOCIAL NETWORKING HANGOVER

SECOND SHOW MEDIA

ECONOMIC PROBLEM

FAMILY FUNCTION

FAMILY PROBLEM

BEFORE IMPLEMENTATION LOW LEVEL OF STUDENT PRESENTATION

BEFORE QC

STUDENTS ATTENDANCE DATA

BEFORE QC STUDENTS 1st-INTERNAL MARK LIST

DATA

WHY? WHY? ANALYSIS

NO TIME MANAGEMENT

SELF

DISCIPLINE LETHAGICNESS LACK OF INTEREST

NO BUS FACILITY NO COLLEGE BUS

PROVIDED

LESS NO OF

STUDENTS

RURAL AREA / LONG DISTANCE

LOCKED UP PREVIOUS DAY

COMMITMENTS CHATING WITH

FRIENDS

LACK OF INTEREST

FAMILY

SITUATION

LOW FAMILY

INCOME PART TIME JOB

IRREGULARITY IN CLASS

PRIMARY CAUSES SUB CAUSE SUB SUB CAUSE ROOT CAUSE

STEP 6

DATA ANALYSIS FOR LATECOMERS

0

3

6

9

12

15

18

21

AUG 4 TO AUG

13

AUG 14 TO

AUG 23

AUG 24 TO SEP

2

3 2 2

NO

.OF

.PE

RS

ON

S

IMPLEMENTATION PERIOD

STEP 7

“We cannot always build the future for our youth, but we

can build our youth for the future”

To begin with that, TATA forum was started in a full

swing by the FUMA Quality circle which has got all

the components like facing interviews, extracting

individual talents, group discussion, debates to boom

the students.

(EVERY DAY MORNING 9.30AM-10AM)

INTRODUCTION OF TAPPING

TALENT (TATA) FORUM

STEP 8

‘TATA’ ACTIVITIES

GROUP DISCUSSION

ACTIVITIES OF TATA EXPLORATION OF INDIVIDUAL TALENT

ACTIVITIES OF ‘TATA’ EXPLORATION OF INDIVIDUAL TALENT

‘TATA’ ACTIVITIES PUBLICATION OF STUDENTS ACTIVITIES IN

MAGIZHCHI

DEPLOYMENT MEASURE TREE CHART

LATE

COMERS

PRIMARY

MEANS

SECONDARY

MEANS

NO TIME

MANAGEMENT

NO BUS

FACILITY

LOCKED UP

ORIGINATION OF

TATA FORUM

VECHILE

ARRANGED

ORIGINATION OF

TATA FORUM

F OE E ACTION RES

TY ITY IMP

DISCUS

SED

WITH

PRINCIP

AL &

STUDEN

TS

DISCU

SSED

WITH

PRINCI

PAL

DISCUS

SED

WITH

PRINCIP

LE &

STUDEN

TS

LEA

DER

& DY

LEA

DER

QC

ME

MB

ER

LEA

DER

&DY

LEA

DER

15

DA

YS

10

DA

YS

10

DA

YS

F-FEASIBLE. OE-OVER ALL EFFECTIVE

-V. GOOD -GOOD. -IMPLEMENTED

E-EFFECTIVE .ITY-ITINERARY. IMP-IMPLEMENTATION

RESTY- RESPONSIBILITY

STEP 9

DATA COLLECTION

AFTER IMPLEMENTATION

DURATION: AUG 4 - SEP 2

S.NO PROMBLES AUG 4 TO

AUG 13

AUG 14 TO

AUG 23

AUG 24 TO

SEP 2

AVERAGE

1. Late coming 3 2 1 2


3. Frequent

absenteeism

1 0 2 1

4. Irregularity

in attending

classes

2 1 0 1

AFTER IMPEMENTATION OF ‘TATA’

PARETO TABLE FOR LATECOMERS

S.NO PROBLEM AVERAGE

PERSONS

(per day)

CUMULAT

IVE

PERCENT

AGE(%)

CUMULATI

VE

1. Late coming 2 2 6% 6%

2. Negligence 1 3 3% 9%

3. Frequent

absenteeism

1 4 3% 12%

4. Irregularity

in attending

class

1 5 3% 15%

0

3

6

9

12

15

18

21

24

27

30

X

Y

100%

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

PARETO CHART

6% 3 % 3 % 3 %

LATE

COMING NEGLIGENCE FREQUENT

ABSENTEEISM IRREGULARITY IN

ATTENDING CLASS

Late comers are reduced

from 15 to 2 persons (15%)

33

AFTER IMPLEMENTATION MAXIMUM % OF STUDENTS PRESENT

AFTER QC STUDENTS ATTENDANCE DATA

AFTER QC STUDENTS 2nd-INTERNAL MARK LIST

DATA

DATA ANALYSIS AND COMPARISON

15

2

0

3

6

9

12

15

18

21

24

NO

.OF

.PE

RSO

NS

BEFORE QC AFTER QC

Average computed from 1 month data

Foreseeing Probable Resistance

Students may not give importance

to the TATA forum ,they feel it is

waste of time .

Students may not believe that

through the TATA forum they

cannot improve their individuals

talents.

Solutions

Importance of participating in

TATA forum was taught.

Students individual talents are

recognized and published in

magizhchi journal and

awarded according to their

performance.

PROBLEM RECTIFICATION METHOD

BY PDCA

SYSTEM IS

IMPLEMENTED

TO REDUCE THE

LATECOMERS

LATECOMERS

DECREASED

INTRODUCTION OF

TATA (TAPPING

TALENT FORUM)

& HOSPITAL

VEHICLE

ARRANGED

ACTION PLAN

CHECK DO

STEP 10

TARGET VS ACHIEVED

15

32

0

3

6

9

12

15

18

21

24

NO

.OF

.PE

RS

ON

S

BEFORE TARGET ACHIEVED

100%

20% 15%

IMPLEMENTATION Trial (Month of June)

• TATA forum activities are continued

• Data collected

• Getting appreciation from the management

Regular (Month of July & Aug)

• Checking the attendance

• FUMA members are checking whether the students attending the classes regularly

• Continuing the TATA forum activities

Follow up & Review (Month of sep, oct, nov)

• Monitoring the late comers continuously

• continuing TATA forum activities

• Recognition of students who are exposing their talents

• Late comers are reduced from 15 to 2 persons

STEP 11

FOLLOW UP AND REVIEW

43

0

3

6

9

12

15

NO

.OF

.PE

RS

ON

S

SEP3 TO SEP10 SEP11 TO SEP18

STEP 12

STANDARDISATION

The TATA Forum motivated the students to maintain

time management.

For adequate bus facility hospital Van was arranged to

pick up the students to avoid late coming.

By extracting the hidden talents from students through

TATA, they were not locked in unwanted events.

QUALITY CIRCLE NAME :

FUMA QUALITY CIRCLE

PROJECT NO :1

PROJECT : REDUCE LATECOMERS

TO COLLEGE

MEETING DAY :MONDAY & FRIDAY

TIME : .3.00 to 4.00pm

DEPT : MEENAKSHI

MISSION COLLEGE

LEADER:

Mr. KARUNAKARAN.B

FACILITATOR:

Mrs.MEENA

REASON FOR SELECTION : POOR ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE

DATE OF BEGINNING : 04-06-2012 DATE OF COMPLETION :03.09.2012

NO. OF PROJECT COMPLETED :NIL

DEPUTY LEADER:Mr.BALAJI.N

MEMBERS NAME:

MS. S.D.PRABHAHARI

MS. M.S.MANIKANDA ESWARI

MS. J.VIJAYALAKSHMI

GANTT CHART

SL.

NO. PROCEDURE

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

TAR-

GET

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Define the problem

Analyzing the

problem

Identifying the causes

Root cause analysis

Development of solution

Trial implementation

Follow up and review

Standardization

Data analysis

2

2

2

2

2

4

4

ACTIVITY MEETING

- PLAN

Total weeks

-ACTION

Regular implementation

Achi-

eved

1

1

1

2

4

3

4

4

1 1

25 23

2

3

3

STEP-12.

BENEFITS OF TIME MANAGEMENT

Late comers are reduced and attainment of 100% results and attendance.

Self-confident, discipline is developed among every individual.

Students are self-motivated to develop their individual talents.

Shaped themselves to face realities and to overcome impedance in life.

The above benefits were obtained by effective utilization of

TATA forum by students. They put forth their full-fledged involvement and commitment in both academic and extra curricular activities.

TANGIBLE BENEFITS

TATA forum has reduced the number of persons without time-management to 4 persons.

Hospital Van facility has reduced the number of students suffering from inadequate bus facility to 1 person.

Students with frequent locked-ups have overcome this situation by developing their extra-curriculars and reduced to 3 persons.

INTANGIBLE BENEFITS

Unity, co-ordination and IPR is noticed among

students.

Students started updating their knowledge by

sharing information among friends.

Professionalism was enlightened.

Self-confidence, self-motivation and decorum

was developed in students.

Students participation and strength to face

realities increased.

SPECIAL GAINS TO STUDENTS

We received special appreciation from our

lecturers and principal for maintaining discipline

and achievement of 100% result.

We personally got impressed by seeing our

friends and competitively ripened.

Management also kindly endorsed our noble

idea by which students who lacked attendance

percentage was tallied by considering TATA

forum.

Students extra-curricular ’s were recognized and

published in our college journal (Magizhchi).

CONCLUSION

“Time is what we want most, but what we

use worst.”

TATA forum will work continuously to

reduce this problem and develop our

Future Managers.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We are indebted to our founder Dr.N.Sethuraman and our

Executive Director Mrs.Dr.Rajam Sethuraman and our

vice chairman Dr.Guru Shankar Sethuraman for

encouraging us to present our quality circle project at

chapter convention.

We owe a special dept of gratitude to our principal

Dr.P.Balakrishnan and Mr.Ramachandran, co-ordinator ,

Quality circle for his guidance and insightful comments

to realize quality circle concepts.

We acknowledge Nursing Superintendent and our college

staffs who has helped FUMA quality circle to realize its

dream. Further we express our sincere thanks to all who

favoured us directly and indirectly.

Healthcare

Quality circle