Upload
kevin-lee
View
750
Download
9
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
According to FDA Draft Guidance for Industry in Electronic Submission and Study Data Technical Conformance Guide, the pharmaceutical companies will need to provide CDISC Electronic submission to FDA. The paper will explain Data Standard Catalog which will dictate FDA Standards. The paper will discuss how to prepare CDISC electronic submission and what to prepare in CDISC electronic submission.
Citation preview
Accenture Accelerated R&D
CDISC Electronic Submission to FDA
Kevin LeeClinical Data Strategies, Senior Consultant
PharmaSUG 2014 Annual Conference
2
Disclaimer
Any views or opinions presented in this presentation are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the company.
© 2014 Accenture All Rights Reserved.
3
Why?
© 2014 Accenture All Rights Reserved.
What
How
Why
Agenda
4© 2014 Accenture All Rights Reserved.
•Why do we care CDISC electronic submission? •How can we prepare CDISC electronic submission?•What do we prepare CDISC electronic submission?•Conclusion•Questions & Answers
Current Status in eSubmission in CDER FDA
5© 2014 Accenture All Rights Reserved.
Current Status in CDISC Submission in CDER FDA
6© 2014 Accenture All Rights Reserved.
In 2010, 23% of SDTM in NDA
In 2011, 39% of SDTM and 32% in ADaM in NDA
In 2013, 55% of SDTM in NDA
Section 745A(a) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act)
7© 2014 Accenture All Rights Reserved.
• Enhanced by Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act (FDASIA) on July 9, 2012.
• Requires that submissions be submitted in electronic format.
New FDA Draft Guidance on CDISC eSubmission
8© 2014 Accenture All Rights Reserved.
Guidance for Industry: Providing Regulatory Submissions in Electronic Format – Standardized Study Data
Guidance for Industry: Providing Regulatory Submissions in Electronic Format – Submissions Under Section 745A (a) of the Federal Food Drug, and Cosmetic Act
Binding rather than recommendation
How to prepare CDISC eSubmission
9© 2014 Accenture All Rights Reserved.
• eCTD(Electronic Common Technical Document)• Data Standard Catalog• CDISC Standards• Study Data Technical Conformance Guide
Electronic Common Technical Document
10© 2014 Accenture All Rights Reserved.
• An interface for industry to agency transfer of regulatory information
Introduction of eCTD
File formats (i.e., pdf, txt, xml and xpt)
• Module 1 – Administrative information• Module 2 – Summary document• Module 3 – Quality• Module 4 – Non-clinical Study Reports• Module 5 – Clinical Study Information
Submission folder - modules and their contents
Data Standards Catalog
11© 2014 Accenture All Rights Reserved.
Data Standards Catalog– Standards Type and Version (i.e., eCTD, xml, SDTM 1.3, ADaM 2.1, Define.xml 2)– FDA Center (i.e., CBER, CDER, CDRH)– FDA Support start and end date – FDA Requirement start and end date
Standard Exchange Format
Supported Version
Implementation Guide
ReferenceFDA Center
Date Support Begins
(yyyy-mm-dd)
Date Support Ends (yyyy-mm-dd)
Date Requirement
Begins
Date Requirements
Ends
SDTM XPT 1.3 3.1.3 CBER, CDER 2012-12-01
SDTM XPT 1.2 3.1.2 Amendment 1 CBER, CDER 2013-08-07
SDTM XPT 1.2 3.1.2 CBER, CDER 2009-10-30
SDTM XPT 1.1 3.1.1 CBER, CDER Ongoing 2015-01-28
ADaM XPT 2.1 1.0 CBER, CDER Ongoing
SEND XPT 1.2 3.1.2 CDER 2011-06-13
Define XML 2.0 N/A CBER, CDER, CDRH 2013-08-07
SDTM 1.3 and SDTM IG 3.1.3 is accepted on CBER and CDER from 2012-12-01 on xpt format.SDTM 1.1 and SDTM IG 3.1.1 will be no longer accepted on CBER and CDER from 2015-01-28.
Timetables for Standards
12© 2014 Accenture All Rights Reserved.
New Format (with 24 months Implementation Period)
New Format(with 36 months Implementation Period)
Update to Required Format (with 12 months Implementation Period)
Correction to Required Format(with 2 weeks Implementation Period)
StandardExchange Format
Supported
Version
Implementation Guide Reference
FDA CenterDate Support
Begins (yyyy-mm-dd)
Date Support
Ends (yyyy-mm-
dd)
Date Requirement Begins
Date Requirements Ends
SDTM XPT 4.1 CBER, CDER 2016-05-06 2018-03-
15
Timetable Example (Update – 12 months Implementation)
13© 2014 Accenture All Rights Reserved.
2016-02-15
• CDISC Version Update of SDTM from 4.0 to 4.1
2016-05-06
• FDA Date Support on SDTM 4.1
2017-03-15
• FDA Effective Implementation Date of SDTM 4.1
2018-03-15
• FDA RequirementDate of SDTM 4.1
Data Standards Catalog
Study Data Technical Conformance Guide
14© 2014 Accenture All Rights Reserved.
• Provides specifications, recommendations and general consideration on Standardized data in Data Standards Catalog
• Supplements eStudy Data Guidance• Non-binding documents
Background
• Provides technical recommendation on standard data in IND, NDA, ANDA and BLA.
• Complement and promote interactions between sponsors and FDA
Purpose
What to prepare for CDISC eSubmission
15© 2014 Accenture All Rights Reserved.
• CDISC components according to Data Standard Catalog
• Its electronic formats according to eCTD
CDISC Clinical Trial Process
16© 2014 Accenture All Rights Reserved.
PRN (Protocol)
eCRF
ODM.xml, LAB SDTM TFLADaM
SAP
CDASH
CSR
CT
Define.xml
FDA Submission Components
Study Data Standardization Plan
17© 2014 Accenture All Rights Reserved.
At pre-IND stage in 1.13.9 general investigational plan
List of the planned studies
Type of Studies
Study Design
Planned Data Standards, formats and terminologies and their revisions
List of and justification for studies that may not conform to the standards
Study Data Reviewer’s Guide (SDRG)
18© 2014 Accenture All Rights Reserved.
Study Protocol title, number and version
Study Design
Standards, formats and terminologies and their versions
Description of study datasets
Data Standards conformance validation rules, versions and issues
Format of Electronic Files according to eCTD
19© 2014 Accenture All Rights Reserved.
Protocol • pdf (i.e., study001-protocol.pdf)
SAP • pdf (i.e., sutdy001-sap.pdf)
eCRF • pdf (i.e., blankcrf.pdf)
SDTM • xpt (i.e., dm.xpt, ae.xpt, and ds.xpt)
ADaM • xpt (i.e., adsl.xpt, adae.xpt, and adtteos.xpt)
SEND • xpt (i.e., dm.xpt, se.xpt, and bw.xpt)
CSR • pdf (i.e., sutdy001-csr.pdf)
Define • xml or pdf (i.e., define.xml/define.pdf)
ADaM SAS programs • txt (i.e., c-adsl-sas.txt)
Efficacy SAS programs • txt (i.e., t-14-01-001-ds-sas.txt )
SDRG/ADRG • pdf (study001-study-data-reviewer-guide.pdf)
Naming Conventions of Electronic Files According to eCTD
20© 2014 Accenture All Rights Reserved.
Lower case of letter from “a” to “z” (i.e., ae.xpt)
Number from “0” to “9”
“-” hypen (i.e., c-adae-sas.txt)
No special character ( #, %, $ and etc)
File name should be less than or equal to 64 characters including the appropriate file extension
The length of entire path of the file should not exceed 230 characters. (m5/datasets/study001/tabulations/sdtm/ae.xpt)
pdf File Guidance according to eCTD
21© 2014 Accenture All Rights Reserved.
Version – 1.4 thru 1.7 are acceptable
• Standard : Arial, Courier New, Times Roman• Sizes : range from 9 to 12 point ( Times New Roman
12-point font is recommended for narrative text )
Fonts
• Print area : 8.5 inches by 11 inches• Margin : at least ¾ inch
Page
xpt File Formats Guidelines
22© 2014 Accenture All Rights Reserved.
• Variable length is less than or equal to 8• Variable label is less than or equal to 40• Dataset length is less than or equal to 8• Dataset label is less than or equal to 40
Length
• less than 1 GB (LB1, LB2, and so on)
Dataset Size
• should be minimized – i.e, if the maximum length of USUBJID is 20 character long, keep the length as 20, not 200.
The length of character variables
Reports in module 5.3.1.1 of eCTD
23© 2014 Accenture All Rights Reserved.
CSR, SAP, Protocol, CRF
CDISC Datasets in module 5.datasets
24© 2014 Accenture All Rights Reserved.
ADaM xpt datasets, Define.xml, ADRG
ADaM SAS programs, TFL SAS programs
SDTM xpt datasets, Define.xml, SDTM annotated blank CRF, SDRG
Any xpt datasets
Patient profile
Waiver Criteria for FDA Standards
25© 2014 Accenture All Rights Reserved.
Discuss the waiver request with FDA prior to or at the pre-IND meeting and submit the request in writing prior to submission.
A written waiver request • The specific
requirements that sponsors seek for waivers
• A necessary reason
• A description of the alternatives
No Waivers, but sponsors may apply for it
FDA Support
26© 2014 Accenture All Rights Reserved.
– Study Data Technical Conformance Guide: non-binding– Sponsor can arrange pre-submission technical review on sample data
Implementation Support
– Study Data Standardization Plan– Data Standardization Issues
Meeting with FDA on pre-IND or prior to end-of-phase 2
Conclusion
27© 2014 Accenture All Rights Reserved.
• Before : “should” in FDA documents means that something is suggested or recommended, but not required.
• After : “should” in Guidance for Industry in Electronic Submission means required.
• It is better to start with the end in minds.
Contact Information
28© 2014 Accenture All Rights Reserved.
Email address : [email protected]
Linkedin Profile : www.linkedin.com/in/HelloKevinLee/
Tweet : @HelloKevinLee
Slide share : http://www.slideshare.net/KevinLee56
Blogs : HiKevinLee.tumbrl.com
Questions and Discussion
29© 2014 Accenture All Rights Reserved.