29
Accenture Accelerated R&D CDISC Electronic Submission to FDA Kevin Lee Clinical Data Strategies, Senior Consultant PharmaSUG 2014 Annual Conference

CDISC Electronic Submission to FDA

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

According to FDA Draft Guidance for Industry in Electronic Submission and Study Data Technical Conformance Guide, the pharmaceutical companies will need to provide CDISC Electronic submission to FDA. The paper will explain Data Standard Catalog which will dictate FDA Standards. The paper will discuss how to prepare CDISC electronic submission and what to prepare in CDISC electronic submission.

Citation preview

Page 1: CDISC Electronic Submission to FDA

Accenture Accelerated R&D

CDISC Electronic Submission to FDA

Kevin LeeClinical Data Strategies, Senior Consultant

PharmaSUG 2014 Annual Conference

Page 2: CDISC Electronic Submission to FDA

2

Disclaimer

Any views or opinions presented in this presentation are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the company.

© 2014 Accenture All Rights Reserved.

Page 3: CDISC Electronic Submission to FDA

3

Why?

© 2014 Accenture All Rights Reserved.

What

How

Why

Page 4: CDISC Electronic Submission to FDA

Agenda

4© 2014 Accenture All Rights Reserved.

•Why do we care CDISC electronic submission? •How can we prepare CDISC electronic submission?•What do we prepare CDISC electronic submission?•Conclusion•Questions & Answers

Page 5: CDISC Electronic Submission to FDA

Current Status in eSubmission in CDER FDA

5© 2014 Accenture All Rights Reserved.

Page 6: CDISC Electronic Submission to FDA

Current Status in CDISC Submission in CDER FDA

6© 2014 Accenture All Rights Reserved.

In 2010, 23% of SDTM in NDA

In 2011, 39% of SDTM and 32% in ADaM in NDA

In 2013, 55% of SDTM in NDA

Page 7: CDISC Electronic Submission to FDA

Section 745A(a) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act)

7© 2014 Accenture All Rights Reserved.

• Enhanced by Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act (FDASIA) on July 9, 2012.

• Requires that submissions be submitted in electronic format.

Page 8: CDISC Electronic Submission to FDA

New FDA Draft Guidance on CDISC eSubmission

8© 2014 Accenture All Rights Reserved.

Guidance for Industry: Providing Regulatory Submissions in Electronic Format – Standardized Study Data

Guidance for Industry: Providing Regulatory Submissions in Electronic Format – Submissions Under Section 745A (a) of the Federal Food Drug, and Cosmetic Act

Binding rather than recommendation

Page 9: CDISC Electronic Submission to FDA

How to prepare CDISC eSubmission

9© 2014 Accenture All Rights Reserved.

• eCTD(Electronic Common Technical Document)• Data Standard Catalog• CDISC Standards• Study Data Technical Conformance Guide

Page 10: CDISC Electronic Submission to FDA

Electronic Common Technical Document

10© 2014 Accenture All Rights Reserved.

• An interface for industry to agency transfer of regulatory information

Introduction of eCTD

File formats (i.e., pdf, txt, xml and xpt)

• Module 1 – Administrative information• Module 2 – Summary document• Module 3 – Quality• Module 4 – Non-clinical Study Reports• Module 5 – Clinical Study Information

Submission folder - modules and their contents

Page 11: CDISC Electronic Submission to FDA

Data Standards Catalog

11© 2014 Accenture All Rights Reserved.

Data Standards Catalog– Standards Type and Version (i.e., eCTD, xml, SDTM 1.3, ADaM 2.1, Define.xml 2)– FDA Center (i.e., CBER, CDER, CDRH)– FDA Support start and end date – FDA Requirement start and end date

Standard Exchange Format

Supported Version

Implementation Guide

ReferenceFDA Center

Date Support Begins

(yyyy-mm-dd)

Date Support Ends (yyyy-mm-dd)

Date Requirement

Begins

Date Requirements

Ends

SDTM XPT 1.3 3.1.3 CBER, CDER 2012-12-01      

SDTM XPT 1.2 3.1.2 Amendment 1 CBER, CDER 2013-08-07      

SDTM XPT 1.2 3.1.2 CBER, CDER 2009-10-30      

SDTM XPT 1.1 3.1.1 CBER, CDER Ongoing 2015-01-28    

ADaM XPT 2.1 1.0 CBER, CDER Ongoing      

SEND XPT 1.2 3.1.2 CDER 2011-06-13      

Define XML 2.0 N/A CBER, CDER, CDRH 2013-08-07      

SDTM 1.3 and SDTM IG 3.1.3 is accepted on CBER and CDER from 2012-12-01 on xpt format.SDTM 1.1 and SDTM IG 3.1.1 will be no longer accepted on CBER and CDER from 2015-01-28.

Page 12: CDISC Electronic Submission to FDA

Timetables for Standards

12© 2014 Accenture All Rights Reserved.

New Format (with 24 months Implementation Period)

New Format(with 36 months Implementation Period)

Update to Required Format (with 12 months Implementation Period)

Correction to Required Format(with 2 weeks Implementation Period)

Page 13: CDISC Electronic Submission to FDA

StandardExchange Format

Supported

Version

Implementation Guide Reference

FDA CenterDate Support

Begins (yyyy-mm-dd)

Date Support

Ends (yyyy-mm-

dd)

Date Requirement Begins

Date Requirements Ends

SDTM XPT 4.1 CBER, CDER 2016-05-06   2018-03-

15   

Timetable Example (Update – 12 months Implementation)

13© 2014 Accenture All Rights Reserved.

2016-02-15

• CDISC Version Update of SDTM from 4.0 to 4.1

2016-05-06

• FDA Date Support on SDTM 4.1

2017-03-15

• FDA Effective Implementation Date of SDTM 4.1

2018-03-15

• FDA RequirementDate of SDTM 4.1

Data Standards Catalog

Page 14: CDISC Electronic Submission to FDA

Study Data Technical Conformance Guide

14© 2014 Accenture All Rights Reserved.

• Provides specifications, recommendations and general consideration on Standardized data in Data Standards Catalog

• Supplements eStudy Data Guidance• Non-binding documents

Background

• Provides technical recommendation on standard data in IND, NDA, ANDA and BLA.

• Complement and promote interactions between sponsors and FDA

Purpose

Page 15: CDISC Electronic Submission to FDA

What to prepare for CDISC eSubmission

15© 2014 Accenture All Rights Reserved.

• CDISC components according to Data Standard Catalog

• Its electronic formats according to eCTD

Page 16: CDISC Electronic Submission to FDA

CDISC Clinical Trial Process

16© 2014 Accenture All Rights Reserved.

PRN (Protocol)

eCRF

ODM.xml, LAB SDTM TFLADaM

SAP

CDASH

CSR

CT

Define.xml

FDA Submission Components

Page 17: CDISC Electronic Submission to FDA

Study Data Standardization Plan

17© 2014 Accenture All Rights Reserved.

At pre-IND stage in 1.13.9 general investigational plan

List of the planned studies

Type of Studies

Study Design

Planned Data Standards, formats and terminologies and their revisions

List of and justification for studies that may not conform to the standards

Page 18: CDISC Electronic Submission to FDA

Study Data Reviewer’s Guide (SDRG)

18© 2014 Accenture All Rights Reserved.

Study Protocol title, number and version

Study Design

Standards, formats and terminologies and their versions

Description of study datasets

Data Standards conformance validation rules, versions and issues

Page 19: CDISC Electronic Submission to FDA

Format of Electronic Files according to eCTD

19© 2014 Accenture All Rights Reserved.

Protocol • pdf (i.e., study001-protocol.pdf)

SAP • pdf (i.e., sutdy001-sap.pdf)

eCRF • pdf (i.e., blankcrf.pdf)

SDTM • xpt (i.e., dm.xpt, ae.xpt, and ds.xpt)

ADaM • xpt (i.e., adsl.xpt, adae.xpt, and adtteos.xpt)

SEND • xpt (i.e., dm.xpt, se.xpt, and bw.xpt)

CSR • pdf (i.e., sutdy001-csr.pdf)

Define • xml or pdf (i.e., define.xml/define.pdf)

ADaM SAS programs • txt (i.e., c-adsl-sas.txt)

Efficacy SAS programs • txt (i.e., t-14-01-001-ds-sas.txt )

SDRG/ADRG • pdf (study001-study-data-reviewer-guide.pdf)

Page 20: CDISC Electronic Submission to FDA

Naming Conventions of Electronic Files According to eCTD

20© 2014 Accenture All Rights Reserved.

Lower case of letter from “a” to “z” (i.e., ae.xpt)

Number from “0” to “9”

“-” hypen (i.e., c-adae-sas.txt)

No special character ( #, %, $ and etc)

File name should be less than or equal to 64 characters including the appropriate file extension

The length of entire path of the file should not exceed 230 characters. (m5/datasets/study001/tabulations/sdtm/ae.xpt)

Page 21: CDISC Electronic Submission to FDA

pdf File Guidance according to eCTD

21© 2014 Accenture All Rights Reserved.

Version – 1.4 thru 1.7 are acceptable

• Standard : Arial, Courier New, Times Roman• Sizes : range from 9 to 12 point ( Times New Roman

12-point font is recommended for narrative text )

Fonts

• Print area : 8.5 inches by 11 inches• Margin : at least ¾ inch

Page

Page 22: CDISC Electronic Submission to FDA

xpt File Formats Guidelines

22© 2014 Accenture All Rights Reserved.

• Variable length is less than or equal to 8• Variable label is less than or equal to 40• Dataset length is less than or equal to 8• Dataset label is less than or equal to 40

Length

• less than 1 GB (LB1, LB2, and so on)

Dataset Size

• should be minimized – i.e, if the maximum length of USUBJID is 20 character long, keep the length as 20, not 200.

The length of character variables

Page 23: CDISC Electronic Submission to FDA

Reports in module 5.3.1.1 of eCTD

23© 2014 Accenture All Rights Reserved.

CSR, SAP, Protocol, CRF

Page 24: CDISC Electronic Submission to FDA

CDISC Datasets in module 5.datasets

24© 2014 Accenture All Rights Reserved.

ADaM xpt datasets, Define.xml, ADRG

ADaM SAS programs, TFL SAS programs

SDTM xpt datasets, Define.xml, SDTM annotated blank CRF, SDRG

Any xpt datasets

Patient profile

Page 25: CDISC Electronic Submission to FDA

Waiver Criteria for FDA Standards

25© 2014 Accenture All Rights Reserved.

Discuss the waiver request with FDA prior to or at the pre-IND meeting and submit the request in writing prior to submission.

A written waiver request • The specific

requirements that sponsors seek for waivers

• A necessary reason

• A description of the alternatives

No Waivers, but sponsors may apply for it

Page 26: CDISC Electronic Submission to FDA

FDA Support

26© 2014 Accenture All Rights Reserved.

– Study Data Technical Conformance Guide: non-binding– Sponsor can arrange pre-submission technical review on sample data

Implementation Support

– Study Data Standardization Plan– Data Standardization Issues

Meeting with FDA on pre-IND or prior to end-of-phase 2

Page 27: CDISC Electronic Submission to FDA

Conclusion

27© 2014 Accenture All Rights Reserved.

• Before : “should” in FDA documents means that something is suggested or recommended, but not required.

• After : “should” in Guidance for Industry in Electronic Submission means required.

• It is better to start with the end in minds.

Page 28: CDISC Electronic Submission to FDA

Contact Information

28© 2014 Accenture All Rights Reserved.

Email address : [email protected]

Linkedin Profile : www.linkedin.com/in/HelloKevinLee/

Tweet : @HelloKevinLee

Slide share : http://www.slideshare.net/KevinLee56

Blogs : HiKevinLee.tumbrl.com

Page 29: CDISC Electronic Submission to FDA

Questions and Discussion

29© 2014 Accenture All Rights Reserved.