Upload
rbfhealth
View
204
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
A presentation from the 2014 Annual Results and Impact Evaluation Workshop for RBF, held in Buenos Aires, Argentina. French version.
Citation preview
Impact Evaluation Note ARMENIA
GOA: Saro Tsaturyan, Yervand Elibekyan, !Task team: Wezi Msisha, Susanna Hayrapetyan!IE team: Son-Nam Nguyen, Kent Ranson
H E A LT H R E S U LT S I N N O VAT I O N T R U S T F U N D
Background (1)
• Nation-wide RBF in PHC since 2011 • Government-funded, covering 350 PHC facilities • RBF on top of capitation payment mechanism • Started with 10 performance indicators (2011) • Increased to 30 indicators in 2012 • Each visit to PHC provider is registered with special
form, then entered into electronic HIM system • Electronic reports are presented to State Health
Agency of MoH on a monthly basis, and are summarized annually for payment
2
Background (2)
• Payment frequency – annual (second quarter of next year)
• Bonus payments amount to 5 to 7 percent of providers’ annual income
• Indicators cover: o Disease prevention (6 indicators) o Control of chronic diseases (7 indicators) o Maternal and Reproductive Health (3 indicators) o Child Care (7 indicators) o TB detection (1 indicator) o Maintaining Electronic Registers of Patients with certain Diseases (6
indicators).
3
2. Description of Intervention
From July 2014, WB will pool $ with GoA to Nation-wide • Add 3 more indicators for screening of diseases
(cervical cancer, diabetes, hypertension) • Increase size & frequency of incentives • Strengthen verification of results For a sub-set of facilities • Test different supplementary interventions to
enhance RBF scheme
4
Description of Intervention (2) Interventions for a subset of health facilities - Quarterly supportive QoC
supervision by MOH to 30 facilities - Quarterly clinical vignettes
administered to PHC providers in 30 facilities and feedbacks
4. Primary Research Questions
For the nation-wide RBF: 1. Does the RBF improve providers performance related to the new indicators? For a subset of facilities 2. Does regular QoC supportive supervision improve quality of care under RBF scheme? 3. Do regular vignettes and feedbacks improve quality of care under RBF scheme?
6
5. Outcome Indicators
For the first research question: • Indicators related to coverage of MCH and
NCD interventions under RBF scheme For the last two research questions: • Focus on indicators related to quality of care
(clinical processes) related to MCH and NCD • We will also consider possible health
outcome indicators
7
6. Identification Strategy/ Method
1. First research question: before-and-after 2. Last two questions: Randomized Controlled Trial 90 PHC facilities will be randomly selected and assigned into 3 arms: - Arm 1: QoC supportive supervision visit - Arm 2: Regular clinical vignettes and feedbacks
to providers - Arm 3: Control
8
7. Data source
• Household surveys • Facility surveys • Provider surveys (including direct
observation, chart review) • Routine HMIS data • Qualitative data from IDI and FGD
9
8. Time Frame / Work Plan
• Baseline survey for question 1 (before and after): 2012 HHS, facility and provider surveys
• Concept note: May 2014 • Baseline for questions 2 and 3: facility and
provider surveys in September 2014 • Implementation of interventions for 60 health
facilities: Jan 2015-Dec 2016
• End-line surveys: Jan 2017
10