17
A LOOK AT POTENTIAL REMEDIES FOR A BROKEN SYSTEM Stefan Kapferer Deputy Secretary General of the OECD Economist Pharma Summit London, 26 th February 2015

A look at potential remedies for a broken system

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

A LOOK AT POTENTIAL REMEDIES FOR A BROKEN SYSTEMStefan KapfererDeputy Secretary General of the OECD

Economist Pharma Summit

London, 26th February 2015

• The health innovation• 3 problems with innovation in health

– Wrong innovation– Wrong diseases– Wrong price

• How to fix them– Better process regulating innovation– Improve R&D environment to reduce risks

and costs – Pay for result when RoI is low

Roadmap

Q: Why is health the only sector of the economy where new technologies end up costing more than the old ones?

A: Our innovation system is broken

Smith et al. 2000

Peden and Freeland 1995

Cutler 1995 Newhouse 1992

US (1940-90) US (1960-93)

US (1940-90)

US (1940-90)

Life expectancy/aging

2% 6%-7% 2% 2%

Administrative costs

3%-10% * 13% *

Changes in financing

10% 4%-5% 10% 10%

Personal income growth

11%-18% 14%-18% 5% <23%

Health care prices 11%-22% * 19% *

Technology 38%-62% 70%-75% 49% >65%Notes: *Not estimated

…and broken systems cost us all heavily

Sorenson et al, 2013. Medical technology as a key driver of rising health expenditure: disentangling the relationship

Problem 1: we get the wrong innovations…

Major Important Moderate Minor None No rating1 0

8 10

148

20 2 48

19

1

Added therapeutic value of medicines launched in 2013, as assessed by the French Transparency Commission

New drug New indication, existing drug

Source: Haute Autorité de santé, Rapport d’activité 2014

Problem 2: … in the ‘wrong’ diseases…

Unipolar depressive disorders

Ischaemic heart disease

Other malignant neoplasms

Breast cancer

Prostate cancer

Other cardiovascular diseases

Alzheimer & other dementias

Alcohol use disorders

Nu

mb

er

of

tech

nolo

gie

s

Burden of disease

R2 Linear=0.225

New and Emerging Health Technologies identified by horizon scanning from 2000 to 2009.

Source: Euroscan network

Problem 3: …at the ‘wrong’ prices (for payers)

Problem 3: High prices threaten access and health systems sustainability

WHAT CAN WE DO?

• Late trails that failed

• Little transfer of biomedical innovation to point of care

• Risks and rewards for innovators not aligned

Research on Alzheimer’s disease illustrates the problem

Solving the problem of price: It is true that costs of innovation are inflating

Costs of bringing a successful drug to market estimated between USD 1.3 – 1.7B

2013

Solving the problem of price: policymakers can help reduce costs by…

Stronger Public Private Partnerships

Modernising regulatory pathways

Open Science for greater International Collaboration Big Data

Big data in particular has great potential

New discovery programs

Big Data

Crowd-sourcingMultidisciplinary collaborations

New models of care

Kaiser Permanente Electronic health records stores 9 million patients - 30 petabytes(*) with 2 petabytes added each year

European Bioinformatics Institute is storing 20 petabytes of data

* [1 petabyte = 1 million gigabytes]

Solving the problem of price: pay for ‘value’

Many countries grant a price premium to innovative products. However,They do not agree on « innovativeness » of new productsThey do not agree on what « value » should encompass.The price accepted for a QALY gained differs widely across therapeutic area. Does it reflect society values?They do not set cost/QALY threshold or find difficult to stick to them

What can we do?Use performance-based agreements to guarantee quick access and reduce uncertainty (evidence-development) and/or share financial risks (e.g. when health benefits lower than claimed)Do not stick to “price x volume” where inappropriate

Sometimes valuable innovations will not be used, but governments should still pay

For example, there is much discussion of how to encourage the development of antibiotics

“Push mechanisms”

• Easing approval (FDA and EC) – not enough to reduce significantly the costs of clinical trials and risky for patients

• Public-provider partnerships to support clinical trials: BARDA in the USA and ND4BB in Europe.

• Longer market exclusivity: FDA 2012 GAIN – but we doubt this will work.

“Pull mechanisms”:

• Advanced commitments or prize award in exchange to commitment to sell at low price or not sell at all (financed by a tax on animal consumption of antibiotics?)

Governments are ready to work with private sector to tackle emerging problems