128
Spinal injuries Spinal injuries GEORGE SAPKAS GEORGE SAPKAS 1 st st Orthopaedic Department Orthopaedic Department Athens University Athens University Atticon Hospital Atticon Hospital

Spinal injuries 2009

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Spinal injuries 2009

Spinal injuriesSpinal injuries

GEORGE SAPKASGEORGE SAPKAS

11stst Orthopaedic Department Orthopaedic DepartmentAthens UniversityAthens UniversityAtticon HospitalAtticon Hospital

Page 2: Spinal injuries 2009

5% -10% of 5% -10% of unconscious patients unconscious patients who present to the who present to the Emergency Dept. as Emergency Dept. as the result of a M.V.A. the result of a M.V.A. or fall, have a major or fall, have a major injury to the Cervical injury to the Cervical SpineSpine

Page 3: Spinal injuries 2009

Spinal cord injury occurs in more Spinal cord injury occurs in more than 11.000/USA pts per year/USA than 11.000/USA pts per year/USA or in 40- 50 persons per millionor in 40- 50 persons per million

Injuries of the Cervical Spine Injuries of the Cervical Spine produce neurological damage in produce neurological damage in approximately 40% of patientsapproximately 40% of patients

Page 4: Spinal injuries 2009

1/3 of cervical injuries occur at the 1/3 of cervical injuries occur at the Levels CLevels C11 to C to C22

1/2 of cervical injuries occur at the 1/2 of cervical injuries occur at the levels Clevels C55 to C to C77

Page 5: Spinal injuries 2009

Most fatal cervical spine Most fatal cervical spine injuries occur in upper cervical injuries occur in upper cervical levels, either at cranio-cervical levels, either at cranio-cervical junction or at Cjunction or at C11 - C - C2 2 level.level.

Page 6: Spinal injuries 2009

Injuries of the sub Injuries of the sub --axial cervical spine axial cervical spine ( C( C33--77) are among ) are among the most common the most common and potentially and potentially most devastating most devastating injuries involving injuries involving the axial skeletonthe axial skeleton

Page 7: Spinal injuries 2009

Approximately Approximately 10% of traumatic 10% of traumatic cord injuries have cord injuries have no obvious no obvious roentgenroentgenοοgraphic graphic evidence of evidence of vertebral injuries vertebral injuries

Page 8: Spinal injuries 2009

Arterial supplyArterial supply

1.1. Anterior spinal artery (in central sulcus)Anterior spinal artery (in central sulcus)

2.2. Posterior spinal arteries (2, Posterior spinal arteries (2, posterolateral)posterolateral)

3.3. Vertebral arteryVertebral arterya.a. In foramen transversarium CIn foramen transversarium C66 C C22

b.b. Crosses posterolateral arch of CCrosses posterolateral arch of C11 (5cm (5cm from mid-line)from mid-line)

Page 9: Spinal injuries 2009
Page 10: Spinal injuries 2009
Page 11: Spinal injuries 2009

Cord Cord 1.1. Central –grey matter –cellsCentral –grey matter –cells

a.a. Anterior = 1Anterior = 1oo motor motorb.b. Posterior – 1Posterior – 1oo sensory sensory

2.2. Peripheral – tractsPeripheral – tractsa.a. Lateral spinothalamicLateral spinothalamic

i.i. Pain and temperaturePain and temperatureii.ii. Antero-lateral Antero-lateral

b.b. Lateral corticospinalLateral corticospinali.i. MotorMotorii.ii. Mid lateralMid lateral

c.c. Posterior columnsPosterior columnsi.i. Proprioception, deep pressure, Proprioception, deep pressure,

vibrationvibrationii.ii. Posterior 1/3 of cordPosterior 1/3 of cord

d.d. Orientation (medial Orientation (medial peripheral) peripheral)i.i. Arms, thoracic, legs, sarcal Arms, thoracic, legs, sarcal ii.ii. Medial portion of tracts = most Medial portion of tracts = most

proximal function (arms)proximal function (arms)iii.iii. Peripheral portion of tracts = most Peripheral portion of tracts = most

distal functiondistal function

Page 12: Spinal injuries 2009

Roots Roots 1.1. CC11- exits above C- exits above C11, body , body

2.2. CC22 a.a. Greater occipitalGreater occipital

b.b. Exits between CExits between C11 and C and C22

3.3. CC33 exits between C exits between C22 and and CC33

4.4. CC88 exits between C exits between C77 and and TT11

5.5. TT11 exits between T exits between T11 and and TT22

Page 13: Spinal injuries 2009

Pathophysiology of spinal cord injuryPathophysiology of spinal cord injury

Tator, 1996; Fehlings, 1999; Slucky, 1999; Giraldi, 1999; Ramer 2000

Page 14: Spinal injuries 2009

Primary injuryPrimary injury

Initial contusion and compression of cordInitial contusion and compression of cord

Damage to:Damage to:– neuronal cells, neuronal cells,

– axonal membranesaxonal membranes– blood vesselsblood vessels

Page 15: Spinal injuries 2009

Secondary injurySecondary injuryAn auto-destructive cascade of biomechanical An auto-destructive cascade of biomechanical events lasting hours to days that expands the events lasting hours to days that expands the zone of injuryzone of injuryIndependent or synergistic mechanisms Independent or synergistic mechanisms – Vascular Vascular

Reduced blood flowReduced blood flow Loss of autoregulationLoss of autoregulation Neurogenic shockNeurogenic shock HemorrhageHemorrhage Loss of micro-circulationLoss of micro-circulation VasospasmVasospasm thrombosisthrombosis

Page 16: Spinal injuries 2009

Secondary injurySecondary injury– Electrolyte shiftsElectrolyte shifts

Increased intracellular calciumIncreased intracellular calcium Increased extracellular potassiumIncreased extracellular potassium Increased sodium permeabilityIncreased sodium permeability

– Neurotransmitter accumulationNeurotransmitter accumulation SerotoninSerotonin CatecholaminesCatecholamines Extracellular glutamate (leads to exitotoxicity)Extracellular glutamate (leads to exitotoxicity)

– Arachidonic acid releaseArachidonic acid release– Free radical formationFree radical formation– Eicosanoid productionEicosanoid production– Lipid peroxidationLipid peroxidation– Edogenous opioid releaseEdogenous opioid release– InflammationInflammation– Loss of energy metabolism (decreased ATP)Loss of energy metabolism (decreased ATP)

Page 17: Spinal injuries 2009

Cord syndromesCord syndromes

Page 18: Spinal injuries 2009

Anterior cordAnterior cord– Anterior 2/3 of cord “not” Anterior 2/3 of cord “not”

functioning (anterior spinal functioning (anterior spinal artery)artery)

– No motorNo motor– No sharp/dull, hot/cold No sharp/dull, hot/cold

discriminationdiscrimination– Posterior columns intact: Posterior columns intact:

deep pain, prop.deep pain, prop.– Mechanism Mechanism

flexion/compression type flexion/compression type injuries, disc or retropulsed injuries, disc or retropulsed bonebone

– Limited recoveryLimited recovery

Page 19: Spinal injuries 2009

Central CordCentral CordCentral portion of cord Central portion of cord (cell bodies)(cell bodies)– Central portion of tracts Central portion of tracts

(upper extremities > lower (upper extremities > lower extremities)extremities)

– < motor in upper < motor in upper extremitiesextremities

– < sensory in upper < sensory in upper extremitiesextremities

– Better lower ext. functionBetter lower ext. function

– May have sarcal sparing May have sarcal sparing

Page 20: Spinal injuries 2009

– MechanismMechanism Extension injuriesExtension injuries Ussually elderly patients with spondylosisUssually elderly patients with spondylosis Narrow canalsNarrow canals

– CongenitalCongenital– Large osteophytesLarge osteophytes– ““Stiff” spinesStiff” spines

– Some improvement expectedSome improvement expected

Central CordCentral Cord

Page 21: Spinal injuries 2009

Brown – Sequard syndromeBrown – Sequard syndrome– Hemi – section of cordHemi – section of cord– Ipsilateral motor lossIpsilateral motor loss

Lateral corticospinal tractLateral corticospinal tract Motor cells from cord at levelMotor cells from cord at level

– Contra - lateral sensoryContra - lateral sensory Lateral spinothalamic tractLateral spinothalamic tract Axons have crossed over 1-2 Axons have crossed over 1-2

segments highersegments higher

– Ipsilateral post column function Ipsilateral post column function lossloss

– Mechanism penetrating injuryMechanism penetrating injury

– May recover significantlyMay recover significantly

Page 22: Spinal injuries 2009

– Posterior column loss (vibration, deep Posterior column loss (vibration, deep pressure, proprioception)pressure, proprioception)

– Mechanism – direct traumaMechanism – direct trauma

– Rare Rare

Posterior cordPosterior cord

Page 23: Spinal injuries 2009

– Sparing (motor and or sensory) below Sparing (motor and or sensory) below level of injurylevel of injury

– Definition level = last normal Definition level = last normal functioning levelfunctioning level

Incomplete SCIIncomplete SCI

Page 24: Spinal injuries 2009

Complete SCIComplete SCI– No motor or sensory below lesionNo motor or sensory below lesion– Spinal blockSpinal block

Cessation of reflex functionCessation of reflex function Etiology ?? Etiology ??

– Chemical/ electrophysiologic Chemical/ electrophysiologic dysfunctiondysfunction

Ends with return of B.C. reflex, anal Ends with return of B.C. reflex, anal wink or “48 hours”wink or “48 hours”

– Bulbo-cavernosus (B.C>) reflexBulbo-cavernosus (B.C>) reflex Spinal cord reflex, no central controlSpinal cord reflex, no central control 10% do not have B.C. reflex return 10% do not have B.C. reflex return

(need time period to call complete (need time period to call complete (see F-2 C)(see F-2 C)

Page 25: Spinal injuries 2009

Injuries of the upper cervical spineInjuries of the upper cervical spine(C0 – C1 – C2)(C0 – C1 – C2)

Page 26: Spinal injuries 2009
Page 27: Spinal injuries 2009
Page 28: Spinal injuries 2009
Page 29: Spinal injuries 2009
Page 30: Spinal injuries 2009
Page 31: Spinal injuries 2009
Page 32: Spinal injuries 2009
Page 33: Spinal injuries 2009
Page 34: Spinal injuries 2009
Page 35: Spinal injuries 2009

Μετεγχειρητικές ακτινογραφίες – 18mts

Page 36: Spinal injuries 2009

FRACTURES- FRACTURES- DISLOCATIONSDISLOCATIONSOF THEOF THELOWER CERVICAL LOWER CERVICAL SPINESPINE

Page 37: Spinal injuries 2009

Compression fractures are characterized by Compression fractures are characterized by failure of the anterior column under failure of the anterior column under compression with intact middle and posterior compression with intact middle and posterior columns: these are stable injuriescolumns: these are stable injuriesWhen the anterior and middle columns fall When the anterior and middle columns fall under axial loading forces, a burst fracture is under axial loading forces, a burst fracture is producedproduced

Page 38: Spinal injuries 2009

Distraction of the Distraction of the middle and posterior middle and posterior columns produces a columns produces a seat-belt type of seat-belt type of flexion distraction flexion distraction injury. These two injury. These two injury patterns can injury patterns can express varying express varying degrees of degrees of instabilityinstability

Page 39: Spinal injuries 2009

Fracture - dislocation Fracture - dislocation injuries are injuries are characterized by characterized by involvement of all involvement of all three columns in three columns in compression, compression, distraction, rotation distraction, rotation and or shear. These and or shear. These are typically grossly are typically grossly unstableunstable

Page 40: Spinal injuries 2009

Classification of spinal injuries of Classification of spinal injuries of the lower cervical spine (Cthe lower cervical spine (C33 – C – C77))

Page 41: Spinal injuries 2009

EvaluationEvaluation–RadiographicRadiographic

X-raysX-rays–AP, Lateral, swimmers AP, Lateral, swimmers

viewview–Evaluate posterior Evaluate posterior

structuresstructures–Instability patternsInstability patterns

Page 42: Spinal injuries 2009

CT - scanCT - scan–Posterior arch Posterior arch

well definedwell defined–Retropulsed Retropulsed

fragnents fragnents cord - nerves cord - nerves compromisedcompromised

–Adjacent level Adjacent level injury – 10%injury – 10%

Page 43: Spinal injuries 2009

MRIMRI– Useful to evaluate Useful to evaluate

discrepancy discrepancy between clinical between clinical evaluation and x-evaluation and x-ray / CT findingsray / CT findings

– Disc herniationDisc herniation– Ligamentous Ligamentous

injuryinjury

Page 44: Spinal injuries 2009

Treatment Treatment

Page 45: Spinal injuries 2009

Determine neurologic Determine neurologic statusstatus

Evaluate stabilityEvaluate stability

Page 46: Spinal injuries 2009

Halo brace

Page 47: Spinal injuries 2009

Operative managementOperative management

Page 48: Spinal injuries 2009

OperativeOperative– 3 column burst3 column burst

– Incomplete SCIIncomplete SCI

– Complete SCI, canal Complete SCI, canal compromise and compromise and inadequate root inadequate root recoveryrecovery

– Contraindication to Contraindication to halohalo

Page 49: Spinal injuries 2009

TimingTiming– Allow for medical stabilizationAllow for medical stabilization

– SCI dependent upon pressure and timeSCI dependent upon pressure and time

– Early ischemic changes in cordEarly ischemic changes in cord

– Earlier mobilization with surgery Earlier mobilization with surgery

– Decreased pulmonary complicationsDecreased pulmonary complications

Page 50: Spinal injuries 2009

ApproachApproach–Anterior decompression / stabilizationAnterior decompression / stabilization

–Posterior decompression / stabilizationPosterior decompression / stabilization

–Combined Combined

Page 51: Spinal injuries 2009

Anterior decompressionAnterior decompression– Traction Traction – Intraoperative distractionIntraoperative distraction– Midline troughMidline trough– Bone/disc fragment removalBone/disc fragment removal

Page 52: Spinal injuries 2009
Page 53: Spinal injuries 2009
Page 54: Spinal injuries 2009
Page 55: Spinal injuries 2009

Tear drop fracturesTear drop fractures

Page 56: Spinal injuries 2009

DefinitionDefinition– Acute flexion injury of Acute flexion injury of

the cervical spine the cervical spine characterized by characterized by compression of the compression of the vertebral body with vertebral body with anterior displacement anterior displacement of the anteroinferior of the anteroinferior cornercorner

Page 57: Spinal injuries 2009
Page 58: Spinal injuries 2009
Page 59: Spinal injuries 2009

Treatment Treatment

Page 60: Spinal injuries 2009

Non operativeNon operative– Immobilization (collar or halo)Immobilization (collar or halo)

– Neuro intactNeuro intact

– Anterior injury onlyAnterior injury only

– Compression – flexion I, II, IIICompression – flexion I, II, III

– Less than 11Less than 11oo angulation angulation

Page 61: Spinal injuries 2009

Operative treatmentOperative treatment– No neurologyNo neurology

Anterior plateAnterior plate Posterior rods - platePosterior rods - plate CombinedCombined

Page 62: Spinal injuries 2009

Neurologic deficitNeurologic deficitAnteriorAnterior

decompression, fusion, decompression, fusion, plateplate

PosteriorPosterior stabilization stabilization for significant posterior for significant posterior injury for longer injury for longer segment involvementsegment involvement

Page 63: Spinal injuries 2009

Facet fractures and Facet fractures and DislocationsDislocations

Page 64: Spinal injuries 2009

DefinitionDefinition–Disruption of Disruption of

spinal integrity spinal integrity as result of as result of flexion flexion distractiondistraction forces result in forces result in either soft tissue either soft tissue injury or fractureinjury or fracture

Page 65: Spinal injuries 2009

Bilateral facet Bilateral facet dislocationdislocation

– Significant disc Significant disc disruption in addition disruption in addition to capsular ligamnets to capsular ligamnets and posterior and posterior ligamentsligaments

– Translation (>50%)Translation (>50%)

Page 66: Spinal injuries 2009

Unilateral Unilateral ligamentous injuryligamentous injury

– Rotational componentRotational component

– Facets, spinous process Facets, spinous process rotated on one siderotated on one side

– Capsular ligament Capsular ligament disruption on dislocated disruption on dislocated side, posterior side, posterior longitudinal ligament longitudinal ligament disruption as well as disruption as well as interspinous ligament interspinous ligament disruptiondisruption

Page 67: Spinal injuries 2009

Fractures – distinct Fractures – distinct injuriesinjuries

Bilateral facet fracturesBilateral facet fractures– Superior, inferior, Superior, inferior,

combinationcombination– Translation, slight flexionTranslation, slight flexion– Best visualized with CTBest visualized with CT– Ligaments may be intactLigaments may be intact

Page 68: Spinal injuries 2009

Unilateral facet Unilateral facet fracturesfractures

– SuperiorSuperior Most commonMost common Flexion, rotationFlexion, rotation

– InferiorInferior– Fracture separation Fracture separation

of articular massof articular mass Pedicle and Pedicle and

lamina fracture lamina fracture (unilateral)(unilateral)

Page 69: Spinal injuries 2009

Treatment Treatment

Page 70: Spinal injuries 2009
Page 71: Spinal injuries 2009
Page 72: Spinal injuries 2009
Page 73: Spinal injuries 2009
Page 74: Spinal injuries 2009

Whiplash Whiplash injuriesinjuries

Page 75: Spinal injuries 2009

Extension followed by flexionExtension followed by flexionMay have severe injuriesMay have severe injuries– Cervical ligamentsCervical ligaments– Anterior or posterior musculatureAnterior or posterior musculature– Temporo – mandibular jointTemporo – mandibular joint– Esophagus/tracheaEsophagus/trachea– Difficult to diagnoseDifficult to diagnose

Page 76: Spinal injuries 2009
Page 77: Spinal injuries 2009

Recovery periodRecovery period– 3-4 days3-4 days– 3-4 weeks3-4 weeks– 6 months6 months– 2 years2 years

10% have long term pain10% have long term painRxRx– Soft collarSoft collar– Isometric strengtheningIsometric strengthening– Repeat flex/ext lateral x-rays if no Repeat flex/ext lateral x-rays if no

improvement in 3-4 weeksimprovement in 3-4 weeks

Page 78: Spinal injuries 2009

Cord contusionsCord contusions

Page 79: Spinal injuries 2009
Page 80: Spinal injuries 2009

SCISCIAll radiologic studies normalAll radiologic studies normalEtiology elastic deformation of spinal Etiology elastic deformation of spinal column within physiologic range of column within physiologic range of bone/ligaments, but beyond physiologic bone/ligaments, but beyond physiologic range of cord range of cord Rx depends on levelRx depends on level– HaloHalo– CTOCTO– CO CO

Page 81: Spinal injuries 2009
Page 82: Spinal injuries 2009
Page 83: Spinal injuries 2009
Page 84: Spinal injuries 2009

Thoraco - Thoraco - Lumbar InjuriesLumbar Injuries

Page 85: Spinal injuries 2009

ClassificationClassification

Page 86: Spinal injuries 2009

THE THREE COLUMN SPINE THE THREE COLUMN SPINE and its significance in the classification of acute and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries.thoracolumbar spinal injuries. Denis F. Denis F. ((Spine 1983Spine 1983))

Page 87: Spinal injuries 2009

DESTRUCTIONDESTRUCTION22

out of theout of the33

COLLUMNSCOLLUMNS

MAJOR INSTABILITYMAJOR INSTABILITY

Page 88: Spinal injuries 2009

A comprehensive classification of A comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries.thoracic and lumbar injuries.

Magerl F, Aebi M, Gertzbein SD, Magerl F, Aebi M, Gertzbein SD, Harms J, Nazarian S. Harms J, Nazarian S.

Eur Spine J 1994Eur Spine J 1994

Page 89: Spinal injuries 2009
Page 90: Spinal injuries 2009

Type AType A

Page 91: Spinal injuries 2009
Page 92: Spinal injuries 2009
Page 93: Spinal injuries 2009

Type BType B

Page 94: Spinal injuries 2009
Page 95: Spinal injuries 2009
Page 96: Spinal injuries 2009

Type CType C

Page 97: Spinal injuries 2009
Page 98: Spinal injuries 2009

DESTRUCTIONDESTRUCTIONof theof the

33COLLUMNSCOLLUMNS

MAXIMUM INSTABILITYMAXIMUM INSTABILITY

ROTATIONAL ROTATIONAL INJURIESINJURIES

Page 99: Spinal injuries 2009

TREATMENTTREATMENT

Page 100: Spinal injuries 2009

Check listCheck listofof

Thoraco-LumbarThoraco-Lumbarinstabilityinstability

Page 101: Spinal injuries 2009

Radiological parametersRadiological parameters

Kyphosis of the Kyphosis of the vertebral bodyvertebral body

Segmental Segmental kyphosiskyphosis

Disc heightDisc height

Vertebral body Vertebral body height:Beck indexheight:Beck index

Page 102: Spinal injuries 2009
Page 103: Spinal injuries 2009

Purposes of the operative Purposes of the operative treatmenttreatment

A.A. The stabilization of the spineThe stabilization of the spine

B.B. The decompression of the spinal cord-The decompression of the spinal cord-nervesnerves

C.C. The correction of the spinal deformityThe correction of the spinal deformity

Page 104: Spinal injuries 2009

PROCEDURESPROCEDURES

Page 105: Spinal injuries 2009

Posterior ProcedurePosterior Procedure

Page 106: Spinal injuries 2009
Page 107: Spinal injuries 2009
Page 108: Spinal injuries 2009
Page 109: Spinal injuries 2009

Anterior ProcedureAnterior Procedure

Page 110: Spinal injuries 2009
Page 111: Spinal injuries 2009

Anterior – Posterior decompression and Anterior – Posterior decompression and stabilizationstabilization one – two sessionsone – two sessions

Page 112: Spinal injuries 2009

SACRAL SACRAL

FRACTURES FRACTURES

Page 113: Spinal injuries 2009

NORMAL SACRUM & NERVE ROOTS

MRI

Page 114: Spinal injuries 2009

ZONE IAcross sacralNeurological injuries

•due to superior migration of fragments•6% of the whole•lumbrosacral plexus L5,S1 (24%)•Femoral nerve

Page 115: Spinal injuries 2009

ZONE II

• Through the neuroforamina

• Neurological injuries → L5, S1 (50%)

• Unilateral sacral anesthesia• Incontinence• Flaccid bowel and bladder• impotence

• Evaluation • Achilles reflex• Bulbocaverosus reflex• Rectal tone

Page 116: Spinal injuries 2009

ZONE III

• through the body of the sacrum

• Neurological injuries

• 56% of the whole• Cauda equina• Neurogenic bladder• Saddle anesthesia• Loss of sphincter tone• Bowel, bladder dysfunction 70%

Page 117: Spinal injuries 2009

CT - SCAN

Page 118: Spinal injuries 2009

TREATMENT

ZONE I

• Without neurologic deficits and stable

• Symptom relief

• Bed rest (7-10 days)

• Log-rolled

Page 119: Spinal injuries 2009

TREATMENT

ZONE II and III

• Without neurologic deficits

• Bed rest for 4-8 weeks

• Weight bearing at 4-8 weeks on the fractured side

Page 120: Spinal injuries 2009

TREATMENT

ZONE III

• Without neurologic deficits

• Observation: neuropraxia that will resolve

• Symptoms beyond 6-8 weeks: foraminal decompression

Page 121: Spinal injuries 2009

TREATMENT

ZONE III

• With neurologic injury

• Aggressive radiologic examination

• Early posterior

decompression

forReturn of – bowel, bladder

control

Reserval of foot drop

Page 122: Spinal injuries 2009

SURGICAL INDICATION

• posterior or vertical displacement or both (>1cm)

• Rotationally unstable pelvic ring injuries

• Sacral fractures with unstable pelvic ring that requires mobilization

• Neurological injury

Page 123: Spinal injuries 2009

PROCEDURE PRONE POSITION

Page 124: Spinal injuries 2009

PERCUTANEOUS ILIOSACRAL SCREW FIXATION

• For unilateral sacral fractures zone I or zone II

• Under fluoroscopic control the reduction is obtained and

held by iliac screws (cannulated)

Page 125: Spinal injuries 2009

OPEN REDUCTION AND INTERNAL FIXATION

Page 126: Spinal injuries 2009
Page 127: Spinal injuries 2009
Page 128: Spinal injuries 2009

UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL “ATTIKON”UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL “ATTIKON”