174
STANDARDS OF CARE IN PERIODONTICS, ENDODONTICS, AND PROSTHODONTICS Paul Levy, DDS Peter Velyvis, DDS Robert J. Chapman, DMD Barry J. Regan, VP, Claims and Risk Mgmt, EDIC 1

Risk management presentation

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: Risk management presentation

STANDARDS OF CARE IN PERIODONTICS,

ENDODONTICS, AND PROSTHODONTICS

Paul Levy, DDS Peter Velyvis, DDS Robert J. Chapman, DMD Barry J. Regan, VP, Claims and Risk Mgmt, EDIC

1

Page 2: Risk management presentation

Standardof Care

Average, qualified dentistWhat a reasonable and prudent

practitioner would do in the same or similar circumstance

Established by:What is taught in dental schoolsWhat is promulgated by the specialty

academies

2

Page 3: Risk management presentation

Standardof Care

To a lesser extent, what is published in peer-reviewed journals

State licensing boardsAnd, unfortunately:

By juries in malpractice actions

3

Page 4: Risk management presentation

Standardof Care

Juries determine standards of care based on information presented during trials:Patient RecordsTestimony of staff and other witnessesExpert witness testimony

4

Page 5: Risk management presentation

Standardof Care

Is there a separate standard of care for a specialist than for a general dentist doing specialty work?

NO!!!

5

Page 6: Risk management presentation

Standards of CarePeriodontology

Paul Levy, DDS

6

Page 7: Risk management presentation

Failure to diagnose and treat periodontal disease falls below

the standard of care.

7

Page 8: Risk management presentation

First, an accurate diagnosis is essential. Then an appropriate treatment plan including etiology and prognosis must be formulated.

8

Page 9: Risk management presentation

Clinical diagnosis, treatment planning, and procedures are decided, whenever possible, on evidence-based data and controlled clinical studies in peer-reviewed scientific literature.

This is somewhat of a controversial statement.

9

Page 10: Risk management presentation

Second, treatment is traditionally divided into 3 phases:

Non-surgical Therapy Surgical Therapy Maintenance Phase

10

Page 11: Risk management presentation

Periodontal surgery when not followed by good professional and personal care, will, in many cases, fail.

Nyman et al, J. Clin. Perio, 1977

Becker et al, J. Perio, 1984 showed that when maintenance is provided, a surgical approach to treatment of moderate to advanced periodontitis is highly successful

11

Page 12: Risk management presentation

Patient compliance, even when optimal, must be reinforced by frequent maintenance and recall.

This requires a team effort by referring dentists, hygienists, and periodontists, which results in tooth retention and successful treatment in most cases.

Lindhe and Nyman, J. Clin. Perio, 198412

Page 13: Risk management presentation

Dentistry is not a perfect science. Outcomes of treatment do not have to be ideal to conform to the standard of care.

Treating beneath the standard of care is considered negligence.

13

Page 14: Risk management presentation

Essential Components of Record Keeping

Medical and dental history Chart notes and results of

examinations Professional correspondence Insurance Requests Billing statements Informed consent HIPPA rules Radiographs Models, Photographs

14

Page 15: Risk management presentation

Informed Consent

Patient must understand the options of treatment. Several possibilities usually exist to treat the periodontal problem.

The patient is an “active partner” to the clinician in their own care.

15

Page 16: Risk management presentation

There are 5 Steps to Consent:

1. Their must be an understanding of the problem, the diagnosis.

2. The proposed treatment and alternative treatments must be fully explained.

3. No warranties or guarantees can be given.

4. Authorization must allow for change in plan if unforseen circumstances arise.

5. Discussion of all sequelae or side affects must be given.

16

Page 17: Risk management presentation

Consent may be verbal or written but it must be fully understood by the patient. I use different forms for each procedure.

17

Page 18: Risk management presentation

Beneficence

This is a legal concept that refers to providing the best possible care. If the practitioner is unable to do this, the patient must be referred to a competent specialist for continuing or more advanced care.

Dentists and periodontists are treatment partners.

18

Page 19: Risk management presentation

Record Keeping

All records must be contemporaneous and must be signed and dated. Legally, a professional written record carries more weight than plaintiff’s (patient’s) recollection. If something is documented in the chart, it is claimed to have occurred. Conversely, it is difficult to establish the event, if not documented. Radiographs are important records. The number and timing depends on the severity and activity of the case. The FDA issued guidelines for a full mouth survey every 5 years and bite-wing films approximately every 12-18 months to illustrate periodontal disease and its changes.

19

Page 20: Risk management presentation

Measuring and recording of pocket depths on six locations for each tooth provide the minimum foundation to document the legal responsibility for each patient. These pocket depth recordings are done at the initial exam, on completion of treatment, and once or twice a year during maintenance.

20

Page 21: Risk management presentation

OSHA

Occupational Safety and Health Administration

♦Universal precautions and bloodborne pathogens

♦ Hazard communication♦ Waste management♦ Illness and injury prevention

21

Page 22: Risk management presentation

HIPAA

Health Insurance Portability and Accountabilty

Electronic Transaction StandardPrivacy StandardSecurity Standard

HIPAA is enforced by the Office of Civil Rights

22

Page 23: Risk management presentation

Continually Upgrade Skills

Use updated comprehensive text books, continuing education courses, current studies in the scientific literature.

23

Page 24: Risk management presentation

Traditional periodontal treatment including both surgical and non surgical techniques have very high success rates in saving teeth in a healthy, functional and esthetic state. This has been known for over 20-50 years.

Hirshfeld and Wasserman, J. Perio. 1978 Oliver, J. West Soc. Perio. 1969 Goldman, MJ et al, J Perio. 1986

24

Page 25: Risk management presentation

Proper use of surgical regenerative procedures with a variety of grafts and membrane barriers have shown that bone and soft tissue that had been lost to periodontal disease can be regenerated and questionable teeth saved.

25

Page 26: Risk management presentation

Controversial Comments

Using ineffective therapies to avoid traditionally effective ones may result in progression of disease around teeth that may ultimately be extracted.

Before using any new modality, any dentist should have histological, clinical and long-term proof that these procedures are effective.

Do we allow industry and companies with profit motive and little track record to establish the standard of care?

26

Page 27: Risk management presentation

The Keyes technique, many time-released local antibiotics (chlorhexidine in a gelatin chip, tetracycline fibers, docycyline hyclate in a polymer carrier or minocycline microspheres) and even lasers were tested scientifically and found to yield little, if any, improvement over traditional scaling and root planing (without surgical therapy).

27

Page 28: Risk management presentation

New products such as tissue healing modulators, growth factors (BMP-2) and even stem cells are promising additions to currently proven materials and techniques which will require evidence-based research currently being performed.

28

Page 29: Risk management presentation

Implants-Controversy

Implant surfaces and designs make it difficult to find comparable long-term statistics for implants currently being used.

Would you rather have a healthy functioning tooth or an implant?

29

Page 30: Risk management presentation

In 1952, in the JADA, DeVan stated that ”Our objective should be the perpetual preservation of what remains rather than the meticulous restoration of that which is missing.”

30

Page 31: Risk management presentation

When do we place implants?

When periodontal disease is present; how long should we wait to place the implant? How much bone loss do we accept before deciding to place the implant?

There are shades of gray- answers are not always black and white.

Do we place implants when adjacent teeth are virgin teeth?

31

Page 32: Risk management presentation

In circumstances where extraction and implant placement is indicated, the patient should know the options, risks, benefits, anticipated results and potential complications before implant treatment is considered.

32

Page 33: Risk management presentation

There can be complications in implant placement. Pjetursson (2004) reported that 38.7 percent of patients had complications in the first 5 years after implantation

Lang(2004) reported that biological and technical complications with implant-supported restorations occurred in about 50 percent of cases after 10 years in function.

33

Page 34: Risk management presentation

This may dispel the belief that implants are a trouble- free panacea when compared to the retention of teeth that require periodontal treatment.

The standard of care takes into account all of our findings, clinical and radiographic, all our knowledge of diagnosis, prognosis and treatment considerations and alternatives.

34

Page 35: Risk management presentation

Flossophy

Do good work and carry as much insurance as possible.

We are fortunate to be in a profession where we can earn a living and help people.

35

Page 36: Risk management presentation

Periodontal Plastic Surgery:

Framework for the Perfect Smile

36

Page 37: Risk management presentation

Esthetics

37

Page 38: Risk management presentation

Achieving Optimal Esthetic Results

Treatment Options Resective Therapy Augmentation Therapy

Root coverage procedures

Hard and soft tissue ridge

augmentation38

Page 39: Risk management presentation

Esthetics

Crown Lengthening

39

Page 40: Risk management presentation

Anterior Crown Lengthening

Pre-restorative For smile enhancementBiologic width sensitivePapillary retention critical

40

Page 41: Risk management presentation

Before

After 41

Page 42: Risk management presentation

42

Page 43: Risk management presentation

Crown Lengthening

Before

After

43

Page 44: Risk management presentation

Crown Lengthening

Before Incisions

44

Page 45: Risk management presentation

Crown Lengthening

Immediate Post-Suturing

One-Month Healing

45

Page 46: Risk management presentation

Crown Lengthening

Before

Incision

46

Page 47: Risk management presentation

Crown Lengthening

Before After

47

Page 48: Risk management presentation

Crown Lengthening

Before

One-Month Postsurgical

48

Page 49: Risk management presentation

Crown Lengthening

Before

Incisions

49

Page 50: Risk management presentation

Crown Lengthening

Immediate Post-Op

Surgical

50

Page 51: Risk management presentation

Crown Lengthening

Before

Incisions

51

Page 52: Risk management presentation

Crown Lengthening

Before After

52

Page 53: Risk management presentation

Augmentation Therapy

Hard and Soft Tissue

Augmentation Procedures

53

Page 54: Risk management presentation

Augmentation Therapy

Clinical Indications RecessionDeficiency in Gingival Form•Ridge Collapse•Loss of Papilla

Anterior Extractions54

Page 55: Risk management presentation

The presence or absence of papillae can be anticipated by

measuring the distance from the proximal bone o the contact point.

When the distance is less than 5mm (4.2mm), the chances of having a complete papilla is

excellent.

55

Page 56: Risk management presentation

Augmentation Therapy

Root Coverage Procedures

56

Page 57: Risk management presentation

Root Coverage

Before

Immediate Post-Op

57

Page 58: Risk management presentation

Root Coverage

Before

After

58

Page 59: Risk management presentation

Root Coverage

BeforePrepared Root Surfaces

59

Page 60: Risk management presentation

Root Coverage

60

Page 61: Risk management presentation

Root Coverage

Before After

61

Page 62: Risk management presentation

Root Coverage

Before

After

62

Page 63: Risk management presentation

Root Coverage

Before

After

63

Page 64: Risk management presentation

Augmentation Therapy

Root Coverage for

Implants

64

Page 65: Risk management presentation

Root Coverage for Implants

After

Before

65

Page 66: Risk management presentation

Augmentation Therapy

Ridge Augmentation

66

Page 67: Risk management presentation

Root Coverage for Implants

After

Before

67

Page 68: Risk management presentation

Ridge Augmentation

Before

After

68

Page 69: Risk management presentation

Ridge Augmentation

Before

Post-Suturing

69

Page 70: Risk management presentation

Ridge Augmentation

Before

After

70

Page 71: Risk management presentation

Augmentation Therapy

Site Preservation

71

Page 72: Risk management presentation

Site Preservation

Before

72

Page 73: Risk management presentation

Site Preservation/Root Coverage

Before

One-Month Post-Extraction

73

Page 74: Risk management presentation

Site Preservation

Before

After

74

Page 75: Risk management presentation

Site Preservation/Ridge Augmentation

75

Page 76: Risk management presentation

Site Preservation

76

Page 77: Risk management presentation

Site Preservation

Before After

77

Page 78: Risk management presentation

Augmentation Therapy

Combination Procedures

78

Page 79: Risk management presentation

Combination Procedures

Before

After

79

Page 80: Risk management presentation

Combination Procedures

Before

Suturing

80

Page 81: Risk management presentation

Combination Procedures

Before After

81

Page 82: Risk management presentation

Combination Procedures

Incisions

Before

82

Page 83: Risk management presentation

Combination Procedures

Before

Immediate Post-Suturing

83

Page 84: Risk management presentation

Combination Procedures

AfterBefore

84

Page 85: Risk management presentation

Combination Procedures

Before After

85

Page 86: Risk management presentation

Esthetics with Implants

86

Page 87: Risk management presentation

Site Preservationfor Implants

87

Page 88: Risk management presentation

Before

Site Preservation/Implants

Immediate Post-Op

88

Page 89: Risk management presentation

Site Preservation/Implants

89

Page 90: Risk management presentation

Site Preservation/Implants

90

Page 91: Risk management presentation

Implant Placement

91

Page 92: Risk management presentation

Implant Placement

92

Page 93: Risk management presentation

After

After

Site Preservation/Implants

93

Page 94: Risk management presentation

Site Preservation/Implants

94

Page 95: Risk management presentation

Augmentationand

Implants

95

Page 96: Risk management presentation

Before

Guided Bone Regeneration

Implant Site Development

96

Page 97: Risk management presentation

Implant Placement

Gingival Augmentation

Augmentation/Implants

97

Page 98: Risk management presentation

Augmentation/Implants

98

Page 99: Risk management presentation

Augmentation/Implants

99

Page 100: Risk management presentation

Final Results

Augmentation/Implants

100

Page 101: Risk management presentation

Before After

Augmentation/Implants

101

Page 102: Risk management presentation

The Key that Brings it Together:

CommunicationInterofficePatient

102

Page 103: Risk management presentation

103

Page 104: Risk management presentation
Page 105: Risk management presentation

Standards of Carein Endodontics

Peter Velyvis, DDSLimited to Endodontics

105

Page 106: Risk management presentation

Diagnosis

Evaluation of pulpal and periradicular status must be performed for every tooth to be treated

106

Page 107: Risk management presentation

Pulp Testing

Indicated tests include thermal, electrical, percussion, palpation and mobility

Occlusal discrepancies should also be evaluated

Reproduction of patient’s symptoms “is desirable, if not mandatory”

107

Page 108: Risk management presentation

Diagnosis

Pulpal and periradicular diagnosis should be formulated for each tooth to be treated using endodontic terms

108

Page 109: Risk management presentation

Pulpal Diagnosis

109

Page 110: Risk management presentation

Periradicular Diagnosis

110

Page 111: Risk management presentation

TreatmentPlan

Patient’s case difficulty as well as dentist’s abilities, experience and equipment should be evaluated before embarking on endodontic treatment

Case difficulty assessment checklist is available through the AAE

111

Page 112: Risk management presentation

112

Page 113: Risk management presentation

Radiographs

Radiographs of diagnostic quality are requiredIf periapical lesion is apparent,

entire lesion should be visualizedMay require additional angles or types of films (bitewing, occlusal, panoramic)

113

Page 114: Risk management presentation

Emergencies

Many emergencies can or even should be initially treated with medication

Pulpotomies are acceptable treatments for vital teeth

Pulpectomies are the indicated treatment for necrotic teeth, with or without periradicular disease

Incision and drainage can be used to relieve pressure buildup in a localized fluctuant swelling

114

Page 115: Risk management presentation

Analgesics

OTC drugs are usually sufficient to control much endodontic-related painNSAIDs , if tolerated, typically offer

more relief than other analgesicsNSAIDs help remove the source of a

patient’s pain- a buildup of inflammation in the jawbone

Acetaminophen is recommended if there is a contraindication to NSAIDs or in combination with NSAIDs for enhanced pain control

115

Page 116: Risk management presentation

Antibiotics

Primary infections tend to be a mixed flora of aerobic and anaerobic bacteriaPenicillin is the first choice

antibioticRecurrent or long-standing

infections are anaerobicClindamycin, or penicillin with metronidazole is a good first choice

116

Page 117: Risk management presentation

Antibiotics

117

Page 118: Risk management presentation

Narcotics

Narcotics should be used to temporarily control breakthrough painThey do little to relieve the source

of the patient’s pain

118

Page 119: Risk management presentation

Endodontic Treatment

119

Page 120: Risk management presentation

Informed Consent

Consent should include the possibilities of post-op discomfort, swelling, need for medication, or complicationsAltered sensation, separated

instruments, blocked or perforated canals, root fractures, damage to restorations

Also included: the need for a subsequent restoration after RCT (filling, crown, etc.)

120

Page 121: Risk management presentation

Rubber Dam

• This is the only AAE dictated standard of care

121

Page 122: Risk management presentation

Anesthesia

• My advice, don’t skimp

122

Page 123: Risk management presentation

Magnification

• This could be considered a standard of care, as the AAE requires all endodontists to be trained in the use of magnification and illumination

123

Page 124: Risk management presentation

Magnification

Accreditation Standards for Advanced Specialty Education Programs in

Endodontics

Use of magnification technologies. Intent: The intent is to ensure that students/residents are trained in the use of instruments that provide magnification and illumination of the operative field beyond that of magnifying eyewear. In addition to the operating microscope, these instruments may include, but are not limited to, the endoscope, orascope or other developing magnification.

124

Page 125: Risk management presentation

Apex Locators

Eliminate need for multiple working films

Canal lengths should be verified radiographically before root canal filling is bonded into place

Apex locators do not replace radiographs in confirming that all canals or tortuous canal space has been instrumented

125

Page 126: Risk management presentation

Cone Beam CT Scans

Interpretation

Clinicians ordering a CBCT are responsible for interpreting the entire image volume, just as they are for any other radiographic image. Any radiograph may demonstrate findings that are significant to the health of the patient. There is no informed consent process that allows the clinician to interpret only a specific area of an image volume. Therefore, the clinician can be liable for a missed diagnosis, even if it is outside his/her area of practice. Any questions by the practitioner regarding image data interpretation should promptly be referred to a specialist in oral and maxillofacial radiology.

126

Page 127: Risk management presentation

Cone Bean CT Scans

CBCT should only be used when the question for which imaging is required cannot be answered adequately by lower dose conventional dental radiography or alternate imaging modalities.

Smaller scan volumes generally produce higher resolution images, and since endodontics relies on detecting disruptions in the periodontal ligament space measuring approximately 200μm, optimal resolution is necessary.

127

Page 128: Risk management presentation

Cone Bean CT Scans

128

Page 129: Risk management presentation

Cone Bean CT Scans

129

Page 130: Risk management presentation

Irrigation

Most common intracanal irrigant is Sodium Hypochlorite (NaOCl)Dilution to 1% or 2.5% is generally

considered a safer concentration in the prevention of “hypochlorite accidents”

Side-venting irrigating syringe should fit into the canals loosely, and never be expressed under pressure

NaOCl has both antibacterial and tissue dissolving properties

130

Page 131: Risk management presentation

Irrigation

Chlorhexidine 2%, EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid) and saline are also commonly used during instrumentation

Calcium Hydroxide gel is the most often used inter-appointment medicament

131

Page 132: Risk management presentation

NiTi vs. Stainless Steel

Rotary Nickel-Titanium instrumentation is currently the most common method of cleaning and shaping the root canalsThese do have a higher propensity of

instrument separation than stainless steel hand files.Experience in handling these

instruments is the only way to learn the limits of torque and pressure

132

Page 133: Risk management presentation

Filling Materials

Gutta Percha with eugenol-based sealer is still the most common root canal filling material

Resin based, bonded root canal fillings are becoming more popular, as wellThere does not appear to be any

conclusive advantage to either filling material at this time

133

Page 134: Risk management presentation

Filling Materials

No more Silver Points

134

Page 135: Risk management presentation

Filling Materials

135

Page 136: Risk management presentation

Occlusal Restorations

• The occlusal restoration of a root canalled tooth is as important at preventing infection as the root canal, itself.

• Cuspal coverage minimizes likelihood of root fracture

136

Page 137: Risk management presentation

Occlusal Restorations

• During the time between the onset of root canal treatment and placement of the definitive occlusal restoration, heavy occlusal and lateral forces should be eliminated.

137

Page 138: Risk management presentation

Post-op Radiographs

This is essential to proper endodontic treatmentEntire apex of tooth should be

visible on radiograph to evaluate and confirm treatment of the entire canal system

138

Page 139: Risk management presentation

Post Treatment

139

Page 140: Risk management presentation

Persistent Discomfort

Several days of discomfort post-treatment is not unusual.

Discomfort that lasts weeks or months sometimes resolves on its own, but often indicates either uncleaned irritant in the canal system or other, more serious defects, i.e.cracked root.

140

Page 141: Risk management presentation

Extraction/Implants

141

Page 142: Risk management presentation

Cracked Teeth

142

Page 143: Risk management presentation

Cracked Teeth

143

Page 144: Risk management presentation

Cracked Teeth

144

Page 145: Risk management presentation

Cracked Teeth

145

Page 146: Risk management presentation

Documentation

146

Page 147: Risk management presentation

Standards of CareProsthodontics

Robert J. Chapman DMD

147

Page 148: Risk management presentation

Standards?What do we mean?

Procedural Specific treatments: Example: Crown

preparation = minimal reduction for desired outcome? (esthetics = ?porcelain)

CareOverall care: Treatments which in

toto attempt to deal with all of patients needs or desires

148

Page 149: Risk management presentation

Reasons to Know & Use Standards

• Better possible patient care outcome if followed• Benchmarking to an agreed upon and codified

process and outcome– Generally developed by some recognized

dental organization– Often evaluated and modified over many years

• Guidelines to treatment planning• May offer some (not guaranteed) legal “shelter”

especially in procedural outcomes• If not used can allow for challenge by expert or

institutional (insurance, licensing, educational, peer) review

149

Page 150: Risk management presentation

What Are the Problems with Standards

Not all are agreed upon: What is most important

No Gold Standard to compare toOften address procedural rather

than patient care processes or outcomes

150

Page 151: Risk management presentation

Probably the Most Important Standard Is…

… the Process of Treatment• Findings

– Histories, examinations (intraoral, radiographs, etc.)

• Diagnosis• Treatment planning

– What do patients want?– Can it be achieved?– Informed consent

• Risks, benefits, potential outcomes

151

Page 152: Risk management presentation

Second Most Important Standard

Information and communicationAsk What the patient wantsLet them know their needsWhat are the risks associated with

treatment of either needs or wants

152

Page 153: Risk management presentation

What Determines Success?

Three things:DiagnosisTreatment planning

OHRQOL - Patient CenteredPrognosis from Evidence Based Information

Informed consentOHRQOL - Patient CenteredPrognosis from Evidence Based Information

153

Page 154: Risk management presentation

Radiographs and Study Casts with Dx Wax-ups

Follow ADA/AAOMR Radiographic Guidelines

RC 9154

Page 155: Risk management presentation

Good preparations.Good marginsGood maintenance plaque control electric brush flossingPatient over 65 so use risk-reducing high fluoride contenttoothpastes and varnishes

All ceramic-1st premolar to 1st premolar

PFM- premolars & 1st molarsGold - 2nd molars

155

Page 156: Risk management presentation

(My) Guidelines

• Use some guideline/standard that has been developed by some recognized group

– American College of Prosthodontists, AAGD, Dental School (nearby/community/accredited, graduated from), state, other

– Fairly recently developed or revised– In some way addresses patient concerns and your

communication to them

• Treatment guide is evidence that is literature basedwhenever possible

– CorchoranCollborative reviews,– Research at some level above technique, case report, or bench

study articles

• Communicate– Write in record– Write letters

156

Page 157: Risk management presentation

Diagnosis

• After your findings, determine if you wish to proceed

• Diagnostic Codes will SOON be a reality– Introduces new level of documentation– Electronic health records (Standard in 2014)

well help • Insurance companies and lawyers will be

looking at Dx codes related to treatment plans– Not lists of required tx’s but possibilities

• document tx reasons related to findings for paper or electronic record

157

Page 158: Risk management presentation

American College of Prosthodontics

Not procedural standards but Prosthodontic Diagnostic Index Resources (PDI)

Class IV = refer to a prosthodontist

158

Page 159: Risk management presentation

159

Page 160: Risk management presentation

Good preparations.Good marginsGood maintenance plaque control electric brush flossingPatient over 65 so use risk-reducing high fluoride contenttoothpastes and varnishes

All ceramic-1st premolar to 1st premolar

PFM- premolars & 1st molarsGold - 2nd molars

160

Page 161: Risk management presentation

Comprehensive Standards

University of Kentucky

Very thorough and complete without being overly detailed

Long but worth reviewing

161

Page 162: Risk management presentation

University of Kentucky College of Dentistry - SOC

FULL CROWN COVERAGE (All Porcelain )The Full Crown Coverage-(All Porcelain) restoration is an indirect restorative procedure involving full replacement of the functional clinical crown. The crown is fabricated from different porcelains without a metal substructure. These restorations are usually limited to single unit crowns and are indicated when maximum esthetics is desired for a full coverage crown.Indications1. For restoration of tooth defects from either dental caries, tooth fracture, developmental defects, or replacement of defective restorations.2.When full coverage is required and the esthetic demand is paramount. 3.Retainer for a fixed partial denture. 4.Retainer and rest seat for removable partial denture clasp. 5.Patient preference.Contraindications1.Patient has a demonstrated allergy or medical intolerance to a component of the restorative material.2.Poor periodontal prognosis for tooth retention. 3.Presence of a direct pulp cap. 4.Patients with high and/or poorly controlled caries activity. 5.When there is insufficient sound tooth structure to support and retain the restoration. 6.Excessive or abrasive occlusal function. 7.Patient preference. 8.Patient economic resources. Outcomes Assessment1. No evidence of caries beneath or adjacent to the Full Crown Coverage-(All Porcelain) restoration.2.Normal occlusal functions and tooth contours are maintained. 3.The restoration remains intact and continues to function acceptably.

162

Page 163: Risk management presentation

Focused Standards

• Delta Dental– Quality of Life (recently validated)

• Published but not used• Not embraced by community

• Dental schools, offices– Process promises

• We promise to do our best• We will communicate• We’ll be nice• Etc.

163

Page 164: Risk management presentation

Standards would be impossible to achieve if too

detailed and without exceptions.

Be careful which ones you choose.

164

Page 165: Risk management presentation

What are minimal procedural standards for prosthodontics

we could all feel comfortable with?

Preparation Know anatomy of tooth so as not to over-

prepare Look at recent literature, i.e.

Full crown preparation removes approximately ~ 67 -75% of coronal tooth structure:Toothstructure removal associated with various preparation designs for posterior teeth.Edelhoff D, Sorensen JA.Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2002 Jun;22(3):241-9.

165

Page 166: Risk management presentation

Biologic Health Potential (analysis of in vitro information) after crown preparation of 1.5 mm depth

Enamel & Dentin Thickness (mm)* with 1.5 mm removed and numbers in parentheses what remains from prep to pulp

incisal thickness mid-crown 1 mm above CEJ(tip of pulp to incisal edge) Labial Lingual Labial Lingual

Maxillary Central Incisor 4.2 - 1.5= (2.7) 2.4(.9) 1.7 (.2) 2.7 (1.2) 3.2 (1.7)

Maxillary Canine 5.5 - 1.5 = (4.0) 2.8 (1.3) 2.7 (1.2) 2.9 (1.4) 3.1 (1.6)

Mandibular Incisor 4.6 - 1.5 = (3.1) 2.0 (.5) 1.5 (0) 2.4 (.9) 2.4 (.9)

Mandibular Canine 4.6 - 1.5 = (3.1) 2.8 (1.3) 2.3 (.8) 2.9 (1.4) 2.9 (1.4)Prognosis:Green = good;Blue = fair;Pink = marginal;Red = bad,

*Modified from: Shillingburg HT, Grace CS. Thickness of enamel and dentin. J South Calif Dent Assoc 1973;41:33.

166

Page 167: Risk management presentation

If Pulp Exposure Happens Anyway

Tell patient beforehand of risks and what will happen if a pulp exposure resultsEndodontics, post, etc

Do or refer endodontics and don’t charge

167

Page 168: Risk management presentation

Probable Agreement for Fixed and Removable

• Occlusion: normal comfort ,function and bilateral simultaneous contact Beyron, H, 1959

• Esthetics: Fits within the remaining tooth structure

• Materials: those which are least likely to fail according to most recent literature

• Communication with patient:– Informed consent – At least discussion noted in record as to

potential problems and longevity

168

Page 169: Risk management presentation

169

Page 170: Risk management presentation

Continuing Education: Always Good to Have Recorded

• Keep up with state CE requirements• Go to programs that are relevant to patient

care and keep copies– Hands-on can be good– Jump-in with new procedures or

products at peril unless research outcomes are well documented

• DON’T base a Standard , or any other treatment, on what some lecturer says! Won’t hold up in court no matter what the Speaker’s reputation.

170

Page 171: Risk management presentation

What’s in the Future

• Implants– With dentures: likely yes, but with limitations – bone,

patient health– Fixed prosthodontics: Soon but with limitations as above– Grafting – not many longitudinal studies but some

• CaMBRA– Yes and very soon

• TMD?– Unlikely although research data is getting better

• CAD/CAM?– Too early to tell in popular literature

• Amalgam v. Composite– No current research evidence but a lot of buzz in popular

press

171

Page 172: Risk management presentation

Council on Dental Accreditation – CODA

• One of main Standards is to teach to evidence based care– Cochrane Collaborative= highest level of

research reviews = http://www2.cochrane.org/reviews/

– National Library of Medicine website: pubmed.gov http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/

• CODA will de facto determine the standards of care for procedural outcomes within the next 10 years as this mandated dental school accreditation standard will go into affect 2013

172

Page 173: Risk management presentation

Review at Leisure But Do It!

http://jada.ada.org/cgi/content/full/135/10/1449JOSEPH P. GRASKEMPER,

D.D.S., J.D. 2004 ADA This article on standards is excellent. If recommendations followed can help avoid problems

Review literature: pubmed.gov

173

Page 174: Risk management presentation

Questions

174