43
NURSES BURNOUT: IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING LEADERSHIP STEVE IDUYE DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY

Nurses burnout

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

NURSES BURNOUT: IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING LEADERSHIPSTEVE IDUYEDALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY

OUTLINE

INTRODUCTION TO BURNOUT SYNDROME AMONG NURSES

CAUSES THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK STAGES OF BURNOUT

IMPACTS OF BURNOUT BURNOUT CYCLE HOW TO ADDRESS BURNOUT MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION

APPROACH RECOMMENDATIONS

A VIDEO EXCERPT ON NURSES BURNOUT

A VIDEO EXCERPT ON NURSES BURNOUT

What can you say about Jimmy?

INTRODUCTION TO NURSES BURNOUT

World Health Organization reported a shortage of 4.3 million healthcare workers globally, and estimated that over the next two decades this figure would increase by 20%(Laschinger, Grau, Finegan, & Wilk, 2010).

In Canada As more nurses become eligible for retirement each year than those

graduating from nursing education programs, and with the alarmingly high rates of turnover intentions, the ability of the nursing workforce to sustain itself is severely threatened (Laschinger, Grau, Finegan, & Wilk, 2010).

INTRODUCTION TO NURSES BURNOUT

CNA (2009) warns that Canada may suffer a shortage of 60,000 full-time equivalent RNs by 2022 (Canadian Nurses Association, 2009).

The new graduated nurses who represent the future of the profession are not encouraged to stay. Several studies have shown that new graduates’ working conditions are stressful and have resulted in increased levels of burnout (Cho et al. 2006, Gustavsson et al. 2010).

Evidence suggest that the first two years of practice influences new nurses’ desire to leave the profession due to burnout (Beecroft et al., 2008).

INTRODUCTION TO NURSES BURNOUT

A recent study of 309 new nurses in Quebec found that 43% reported a high level of psychological distress.

The same study revealed that 62% of respondents intended to quit their present jobs for other jobs in nursing, and 13% intended to leave the profession entirely

(Lavoie-Tremblay, O’Brien-Pallas, Desforges & Marchionni, 2008)

WHAT IS BURNOUT

International Classification of Diseases ICD-10 defines Burnout as a clinical condition or a work-related neurasthenia with the following symptoms. A persistent and distressing complaints of exhaustion after a

minor mental effort, or a persistent and distressing complaints of fatigue and bodily weakness after minimal physical effort.

At least two out of the following six distress symptoms: muscular aches and pain, dizziness, tension headaches, sleep disturbance, inability to relax, or irritability

WHAT IS BURNOUT

The patient is unable to recover from the symptoms by means of rest

The duration of the disorder is at least three months The criteria for any more specific disorders do not apply. SCHAUFELI & ENZMAN, 1998

WHAT IS BURNOUT

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders DSM-IV describes Burnout as a mental adjustment disorder which are characterized by “the development of clinically significant emotional or behavioral symptoms in response to an identifiable psychosocial stressor or stressors.

The two definitions provide three hallmarks or characteristics of burnout Mental Exhaustion Depersonalization Lack of Career accomplishment

(Schaufeli & Enzman, 1998)

WHAT BURNOUT IS NOT

Burnout has often been mistaken for Stress, Depression or Post-Traumatic Disorder due to similarities in their symptoms.

IN STRESS Stress produces urgency and hyperactivity. Burnout, on the

other hand, produces helplessness. (Burisch, 2006) Emotions associated with stress are over-reactive, those

associated with burnout are more blunted.( Burisch, 2006)

WHAT BURNOUT IS NOT

IN DEPRESSION Depression may extend over every life domain (e.g., work, family, leisure).

Burnout, however, is specific to work context (Maslach et al., 2001).

IN POST-TRAUMATIC DISORDER Post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is “caused by the exposure to a

traumatic event or extreme stressor that is responded to with fear, helplessness, or horror”.

Burnout, on the other hand, is caused mainly by interpersonal and emotional stressors in the workplace and is characterized by different reactions e.g emotional exhaustion. (Mealer, Burnham, Goode, Rothbaum & Moss, 2009, p. 1118).

CAUSES OF BURNOUT

THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK

Structural Empowerment Theory (Kanter, 1977 & 1993) theory of structural empowerment in organizations

conceptualizes empowering conditions as social structures in the workplace that enable employees to accomplish their work in meaningful ways.

The empowering conditions are derived from the ability of the leadership to mobilize human and material resources to accomplish work and is attained through access to information, support and resources in the work setting.

According to Kanter (1993), when employees have access to these working conditions, they will be empowered to accomplish their work in meaningful ways.

Moreover, the absence of this structural empowerment in a workplace creates a toxic environment for nurses.

Laschinger,Grau, Finegan,& Wilk,(2010).

THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK

A Dualistic Model (Passion and Harmonious Theory)

This model posits that obsessive passion produces conflict between work and other life activities because the person cannot let go of the work activity. Conversely, harmonious passion is expected to prevent conflict while positively contributing to work satisfaction.

With obsessive passion, one displays rigid persistence attitude toward work and cannot let go of one’s work involvement. This is expected to lead to conflict between work and other life activities and consequently to burnout.

(Vallerand, Paquet, Philippe, & Charest, 2010).

THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK

A Dualistic Model (Passion and Harmonious Theory)

Whereas, in harmonious passion, the individual maintains control over the passionate activity, and can physically and mentally disengage from the work activity when needed

Because of this sense of balance in harmonious passion, the person is protected from the experience of conflict between work and other life activities, one is also protected from the experience of mental and emotional staleness, and from burnout.

This explains why in the same organization, one individual is thriving well, whereas another one is experiencing burnout symptoms.

(Vallerand, Paquet, Philippe, & Charest, 2010).

THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK To test the proposed Dualistic Model in France Hospitals. A study

using cross-sectional design with experienced registered nurses was carried out.

It was posited that obsessive passion would positively predict conflict between work and other life activities.On the other hand, harmonious passion was expected to positively predict work satisfaction.

Vallerand et al, 2010

THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK

Method A total of 97 nurses working in France hospitals took part in the study. Most of them were female nurses (90 women, 6 men, and 1 missing

value) Their ages range between 21 and 57 years (M 34.07 years, SD 9.95

years). The nurses were working on average of 34.15 hr per week (SD 4.16 hr)

and had been working as nurses for an average of 11.21 years (SD 10.12 years

Vallerand et al, 2010

THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK

Instrumentation The Passion Scale: is composed of two subscales of six items

each, assessing harmonious (HP) and obsessive (OP) passion.

Each item is responded to a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (do not agree at all) to 7 (completely agree).

Vallerand et al, 2010

THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK

Maslach Burnout Inventory is composed of 22 items assessing burnout with three subscales tapping emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and diminished personal accomplishment

The Satisfaction at Work Scale (SAWS)assesses work satisfaction. The SAWS contains five items responded to on a 7-point Likert scale (1 = do not agree at all, 5= completely agree)

Vallerand et al, 2010

THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK

Result As predicted, with significant p-value for 0P and HP, OP

predicted conflict that was in turn associated with burnout. while, HP positively predicted satisfaction at work.

The former playing a facilitative role and the latter a protective role in burnout.

Vallerand et al, 2010

STAGES OF BURNOUT

SIGNS & SYMPTOMS OF BURNOUTAffective signals: • Depressed mood / changing moods • Tearfulness • Emotional exhaustion • Increased tension / anxiety Cognitive signals: • Helplessness / loss of meaning and hope • Feelings of powerlessness / feelings of being “trapped” • Sense of failure • lack of career fulfillment• Guilt • Inability to concentrate / forgetfulness / difficulty with complex tasks Schaufeli and Enzman (1998)

SIGNS & SYMPTOMS OF BURNOUT

Behavioral signals: • Hyperactivity / impulsivity • Increased consumption of: caffeine, tobacco, alcohol, illicit drugs • Abandonment of recreational activities • Compulsive complaining / denial Motivational signals: • Loss of zeal / loss of idealism • Resignation • Disappointment • Boredom Schaufeli and Enzman (1998)

SIGNS & SYMPTOMS OF BURNOUT

Physical signals: • Headaches • Nausea • Dizziness • Muscle pain • Sleep disturbances • Ulcer / gastro-intestinal disorders • Chronic fatigue Schaufeli and Enzman (1998)

BURNOUT CYCLE

IMPACTS OF BURNOUT

The nursing shortage has far-reaching effects on the quality of care and patient safety (Alexandra, 2015). A lot of studies have demonstrated the nurses shortage often leads to burnout with resultant effects:On Nurses Inadequate staffing and continuous overtime for nurses Decrease quality of care The potential for medication errors

IMPACTS OF BURNOUT

On Patients

Medication adverse effects for patients and patient mortality. Increase patients neglect, cross infections or complications Patient Dissatisfaction

IMPACTS OF BURNOUT

On Management

High rates of employee turnover Increased employee absenteeism due to clinical symptoms of diseases It creates a hostile and toxic work environments and increases lawsuits

for the management.

HOW TO ADDRESS BURNOUT

MEASUREMENT & EVALUATION

The criterion standard for measuring burnout is the MBI (Maslach Burnout Inventory), a self-assessment tool first published in 1981 by Maslach and Jackson

The tool has been shown to be reliable, valid, and easy to administer and has been translated into several languages for use around the world.

The MBI is often used in conjunction with other assessments to evaluate the relationship between burnout and organizational policies, productivity, and social support

Maslach C, Jackson SE. (1981) Maslach Burnout Inventory.

MEASUREMENT & EVALUATION

The MBI addresses the three defining aspects of burnout syndrome with 22 statements in three subscales

Emotional exhaustion: Nine statements to measure feelings of being emotionally overextended and exhausted by one's work

Depersonalization: Five statements to measure an unfeeling and impersonal response to the recipients of one's services, care treatment, or instruction

Personal accomplishment: Eight statements to measure feelings of competence and successful achievement in one's work

Maslach C. (2003) Burnout: The Cost of Caring

MEASUREMENT & EVALUATION

Another useful tools is The General Health Questionnaire in conjunction with the MBI which can help professionals gain a better understanding of the sources of stress for individuals.

The General Health Questionnaire has been translated into several languages and is available in a variety of versions. the version with 28 items (GHQ-28) has been used most often in workplace settings.

A score of 0 to 3 is assigned to four possible responses ("not at all," "no more than usual," "rather more than usual," and "much more than usual")

Jackson C. (2007)The General Health Questionnaire. Occup Med.

MEASUREMENT & EVALUATION

Another tool for measuring burnout is the Burnout Risk Survey.

This tool is designed to demonstrate the probability of mismatches between an individual and his or her work environment.

A "yes" response to three or more of these items indicates a risk of burnout and a "yes" response to four or more items indicates a high risk.

Pfifferling JH. (2015) Burnout Risk Appraisal.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Lifestyle Modification Approach Take Care of Yourself First Nurses are trained to put the care of others ahead of themselves. It is important

for nurses to recognize that self-care is not equivalent to selfishness; rather, self-care is essential for energizing, restoring, and maintaining the physical and emotional stamina to reduce fatigue and manage stress.

Nurses should also seek outside activities that will help them disengage from their professional routine and provide enjoyment, such as yoga, music, art, reading, journaling, sports, and volunteerism.

Maslach C. (2003) Burnout: The Cost of Caring

RECOMMENDATIONS

Quick identification of the signs and symptoms of stress overload and burnout should be a continuous process, and individuals should remain alert to the use of unhealthy and ineffective coping mechanisms, such as excessive use of caffeine, alcohol, or prescription medication; overeating or undereating; smoking; inactivity; or social withdrawal ( Carr, 2006)

Individual should focus on changing one behavior at a time and seek help from professional counseling if necessary (American Psychological Association,2015)

RECOMMENDATIONS

Enhance Interpersonal and Social Relationships by remaining connected to a positive social network of people

Grief Well: Grieving well involves accepting the reality of the loss, experiencing the pain of grief, adjusting to the absence, and moving on with life (Worden, 1991).

Become an advocate for changes in the work environment can help nurses increase a sense of control (Maslach, 2003)

RECOMMENDATIONS

Structural Empowerment in Organizational culture An integral step in preventing burnout is to survey staff about important aspects of the

organizational culture Organizations can protect nurses from burnout by creating an organizational culture of trust,

support, and open communication and fostering a healthy work environment through1. Appropriate staffing2. Meaningful recognition3. True collaboration4. Skilled communication5. Effective decision making6. Authentic leadership (AACN, 2015)

RECOMMENDATIONS

Improve Issues Related to Staffing and Work Hour: how?Employers should stop using mandatory overtime as a staffing solution

Employers should adopt official policy that gives RNs the "right to accept or reject a work assignment" to prevent risks from fatigue. The policy should be clear that rejecting an assignment under these conditions is not patient abandonment and that RNs will not be retaliated against or face negative consequences for rejecting such an assignment

Alexandra 2015

RECOMMENDATIONS

Let bring humanity back to our workplaces

QUESTIONS?

Questions Clarifications Contributions Answers

THANK YOU FOR LISTENING

References

Alexandra, L (2015) Burnout: Impact on Nursing and Quality of Care. Retrieved on the 8th June, 2016 from http://www.netce.com/coursecontent.php?courseid=1167

A video excerpt on nurses burnout (2015) retrieved https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ILcmfHmpfI Borgogni, L, Consiglio, G. Alessandri, W.B. Schaufeli (2012) Don’t throw the baby out with the bathwater! Interpersonal

strain at work and burnout. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol., 21 (6) (2012), pp. 875–898 Burisch, M. (2006). Das Burnout-Syndrom: Theorie der inneren Erschöpfung [The Burnout- Syndrome: A Theory of inner

Exhaustion]. Heidelberg: Springer Medizin Verlag. American Association of Critical-Care Nurses. AACN Standards for Establishing and Sustaining Healthy Work

Environments. Available athttp://www.aacn.org/wd/hwe/docs/hwestandards.pdf. Last accessed June 6, 2016 Canadian Nurses Association (2002) Planning for the Future: Nursing Human Resource Projections. Canadian Nurses

Association, Ottawa. Carr JL (2006) Healthy Nurse: Escape Burnout and Discover the Ultimate Life/Work Balance. Columbus, IN: Matilda

Publishing; 2006. Cho J., Laschinger H.K.S. & Wong C. (2006) Workplace empowerment, work engagement and organizational commitment

of new graduate nurses. Nursing Leadership 19(3), 43–60. Gustavsson J.P., Hallsten L. & Rudman A. (2010) Early career burnout among nurses: modelling a hypothesized process

using an item response approach. International Journal of Nursing Studies 47(7), 864–875. Laschinger, H. S., Grau, A. L., Finegan, J., & Wilk, P. (2010). New graduate nurses' experiences of bullying and burnout in

hospital settings. Journal Of Advanced Nursing, 66(12), 2732-2742 11p. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05420.x

References

Maslach C. (2003) Burnout: The Cost of Caring. Cambridge, MA: Malor Books. Maslach C, Jackson SE. (1981) Maslach Burnout Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 397-422.

doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.397 Mealer, M., Burnham, E. L., Goode, C. J., Rothbaum, B. & Moss, M. (2009). The prevalence and impact of post traumatic stress disorder

and burnout syndrome in nurses. Depression & Anxiety, 26, 1118-1126. Pfifferling JH. Burnout Risk Appraisal. Available at http://www.cpwb.org/burnout_information.htm. Last accessed June 12, 2016 Vallerand, R., Paquet, Y., Philippe, F., & Charest, J. (2010). On the Role of Passion for Work in Burnout: A Process Model.Journal of Personality, 78(1),

289-312. Worden JW. (1991)Grief Counseling and Grief Therapy: A Handbook for the Mental Health Professional. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Springer. Spinetta JJ, Jankovic M, Ben Arush MW, et al. Guidelines for the recognition, prevention, and remediation of burnout in health care

professionals participating in the care of children with cancer: report of the SIOP Working Committee on Psychosocial Issues in Pediatric Oncology. Med Pediatr Oncol. 2000;35(2):122-125.

Schaufeli, W. B. & Enzman, D. (1998). The burnout companion to study & practice. London: Taylor & Francis.