Upload
dr-praveen-kumar-tripathi
View
18
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
NORMAL PRESSURE HYDROCEPHALUS
DR PRAVEEN K TRIPATHI
02-Dec-15
2
NORMAL PRESSURE HYDROCEPHALUS In 1964, Colombian
neurosurgeon Salomón Hakim and colleagues described a syndrome of
Progressive cognitive decline
Gait difficulties Urinary incontinence Ventricular dilatation Normal cerebrospinal
fluid (CSF) pressure during lumbar puncture
02-Dec-15
3
HISTORY 1982, CM Fisher underscored the importance of
the gait disturbance in the description of NPH. 1986, Graff-Radford and Godersky correlated
clinical symptoms and shunt responsiveness. The term idiopathic adult hydrocephalus
syndrome may be more accurate, because intracranial pressure is not always normal in NPH.
02-Dec-15
4
EPIDEMIOLOGY elderly individuals (age >65 y) the prevalence of
NPH was 1.4% Incidence -1.4 per 1,00,000 No race or gender prediliction more than 60% of patients with iNPH had
cerebrovascular disease. In another similar study, more than 75% had
Alzheimer disease pathology at the time of shunt surgery.
02-Dec-15
5
ETIOLOGY IDIOPATHIC – 50 % SECONDARY CAUSES subarachnoid hemorrhage (23%), meningitis (4.5%) and traumatic brain injury (12.5%)Secondary NPH has higher response rate to
shunting than idiopathic NPH
02-Dec-15
6
ETIOLOGY 50% cases idiopathic
Leading theory is impairment of CSF outflowIntraventricular pressure studies reveal waves
of increased pressure- B-wavesAdult hydrocephalus syndromeAdult symptomatic hydrocephalus
02-Dec-15
7
CSF DYNAMICS
02-Dec-15
8
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY Ventricle enlargement leads to periventricular
ischemia regardless of etiology Compression and stretching of arterioles and
venules Arterial hypertension and cerebral
arteriosclerosis increased in NPH
02-Dec-15
9
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY Increased subarachnoid space volume does not
accompany increased ventricular volume. Symptoms result from distortion of the central
portion of the corona radiata by the distended ventricles. Interstitial edema of the white matter
The periventricular white matter anatomically includes the sacral motor -abnormal gait and incontinence.
Dementia results from distortion of the periventricular limbic system.
02-Dec-15
10
Kiefer, M; Unterberg, AThe Differential Diagnosis and Treatment of Normal-Pressure HydrocephalusDtsch Arztebl Int 2012; 109(1-2): 15-26; DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2012.0015
02-Dec-15
11
CLINICAL FEATURESCLASSIC TRIAD GAIT DISTURBANCE -is typically the earliest feature
noted and considered to be the most responsive to treatment No classic gait disturbance Gait may be wide based, shuffling More severely affected patients have “magnetic gait”- feet
stuck to ground and difficult to initiate walking Difficulties with walking motions resolve with minimal
support of patient or lying patient down May resemble Parkinson’s gait Hyperreflexia Apraxia of gait – no weakness or ataxia.
02-Dec-15
1202-Dec-15
13
DIAGNOSTIC TRIADUrinary Incontinence True incontinence found only in severely
affected patients Urinary urgency in most patients with NPH Due to stretching of periventricular nerve
fibers and loss of detrusor inhibition Bladder sphincter muscle unaffected
02-Dec-15
14
CLINICAL FEATURESDEMENTIA Usually mild Presence of dementia in NPH extremely variable Some shunt responsive patients have little or no dementia Dementia usually least responsive of symptoms to
intervention Mental status changes may resemble depression prominent memory loss and bradyphrenia. Frontal and subcortical deficits forgetfulness, decreased attention, Aphasia /agnosia – alternate diagnosis -Alzheimer
02-Dec-15
15
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSES- ALZHEIMER’S (AD)
Both AD and NPH cause memory impairment
AD- “cortical” abnormalitiesAphasia, Apraxia, Agnosia Impaired recognition and encoding deficits
NPH- “subcortical” abnormalitiesMemory impairment but intact recognitionSlow information processingDifficulty with complex tasks
02-Dec-15
16
COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENTS AD VERSUS NPH
AD NPH
Impaired
MemoryLearningOrientationAttention/concentrationExecutive functionWriting
Psychomotor slowingFine motor speedFine motor accuracy
Borderline Impaired
Motor and psychomotor skillsVisuospatial skillsLanguageReading
Auditory memoryAttention/concentrationExecutive functionBehavior/personality changes
02-Dec-15
17
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSES- ALZHEIMER’S (AD) AD and NPH can usually be distinguished with
formal neuropsychological testing Primary care office testing may not be
adequate to distinguish Mental impairment early in course of AD but
usually late in course of NPH and often minimal impairment
AD often associated with hippocampal atrophy on imaging studies
02-Dec-15
18
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSES- PARKINSON’S DISEASE Both NPH and Parkinson’s Disease (PD) can
have similar gait disturbancesHypokinesiaFreezingImbalanceExtrapyramidal symptoms
Trial of levadopa can help distinguish between PD and NPH
02-Dec-15
19
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSES- OTHER Depression Subcortical arteriosclerotic encephalopathy Multi-infarct encephalopathy Chronic alcoholism B12, Folate deficiency Electrolyte abnormalities Cervical or lumbar stenosis Peripheral neuropathy
02-Dec-15
20
DIAGNOSIS- PROBABLE IDIOPATHIC NPH History
Insidious onsetAge over 40Symptom duration 3-6 monthsNo antecedent event known to cause
secondary NPHProgressive over timeNo other medical, psychiatric or neurological
condition that could cause symptoms
02-Dec-15
21
DIAGNOSIS- PROBABLE IDIOPATHIC NPH Brain imaging
Ventricular enlargement not attributable to cerebral atrophy or congenital disorder
No macroscopic obstruction presentAt least one of the following
Enlargement of lateral horns not attributable to hippocampus atrophy
Callosal angle greater or equal to 40 degreesEvidence of altered brain water content on
imaging not attributable ischemia or demylination
An aqueductal or fourth ventricular flow void on MRI
02-Dec-15
2202-Dec-15
23
CALLOSAL ANGLE Angle of roof of lateral ventricles in A-P projection
02-Dec-15
24
MRI FLOW VOID Loss of MRI signal due to flow of CSF
Normal aqueduct Abnormal aqueduct02-Dec-15
25
MRI FLOW VOID
Normal fourth ventricle Abnormal fourth ventricle
02-Dec-15
26
DIAGNOSIS- PROBABLE IDIOPATHIC NPH Clinical
Gait/Balance- at least two of following presentDecreased step heightDecreased step lengthDecreased cadence/speedDecreased trunk swayWidened stanceToes turned outward while walkingEn bloc turning- turns take three or more steps Impaired balance- two or more corrective steps
for eight steps on tandem gait testing02-Dec-15
27
DIAGNOSIS- PROBABLE IDIOPATHIC NPH Cognition- two of following present
Psychomotor slowingDecreased fine motor speedDecreased fine motor accuracyDifficulty dividing or maintaining attentionImpaired recall especially for recent eventsImpairment of executive functions- multi-step
procedures, working memory, formulation of abstractions, insight
Behavioral or personality changes
02-Dec-15
28
DIAGNOSIS- PROBABLE IDIOPATHIC NPH Urinary Symptoms- one of following
Episodic urinary incontinence not attributable to other causes
Persistent urinary incontinenceFecal and urinary incontinence
OR One of following
Urinary urgencyUrinary frequency- 6 or more voids in 12 hour
periodNocturia- more than two voids in night
02-Dec-15
29
DIAGNOSIS- PROBABLE IDIOPATHIC NPH Physiological
Opening pressure 70-240 mmH2O
02-Dec-15
30
POSSIBLE INPH History- Symptoms are
Subacute or indeterminate onsetOnset any time after childhood<3 months or indeterminate durationMay follow trauma, hemorrhage or meningitisSymptoms not entirely explained by co-existing
neurological conditionsNon-progressive or not clearly progressive
02-Dec-15
31
POSSIBLE INPH Brain imaging- Ventricular enlargement
associated with followingCerebral atrophy of sufficient severity to
explain ventricular enlargementStructural lesion that may increase
ventricular size
02-Dec-15
32
POSSIBLE INPH Clinical
Incontinence and/or cognitive impairment in absence of gait or balance dysfunction
Gait disturbance or dementia alone
PhysiologicalOpening pressure unavailable or outside of
range for probable NPH
02-Dec-15
33
UNLIKELY INPH No ventriculomegaly Signs of increased intracranial pressure
such as papilledema No component of clinical triad Symptoms explained by other causes (eg,
spinal stenosis)
02-Dec-15
34
INVESTIGATIONS- Vit B12 , Thyroid profile- CSF – analysis – opening pressure – 11 +/- 3 mm hg (150 mm H2o)
slightly higher than normal - Transient high pressure B waves may be detected- (CSF) protein Lipocalin-type prostaglandin D
synthase (L-PGDS) – marker of Frontal lobe dysfunction in iNPH – decreased due to damage of arachnoid cells
02-Dec-15
35
CT SCAN Ventriculomegaly that is out of proportion to sulcal
atrophy. differentiates NPH from ex vacuo
ventriculomegaly, Frontal and occipital periventricular
hypoattenuating areas, represent transependymal CSF flow -infrequent and often may represent periventricular leukoencephalopathy
corpus callosal thinning, -nonspecific
02-Dec-15
36
Rounding of frontal horns clinical picture and ventriculosulcal
disproportion on either CT or MRI scans, 50-70% of patients are likely to respond to a CSF-shunting procedure.
02-Dec-15
37
CT SCAN
disproportionately enlarged temporal horns of the lateral ventricles compared with the relatively normal sulcal size. 02-Dec-15
38
The Evans index (EI), a linear ratio between the maximal frontal horn width and the cranium diameter,
signifies ventriculomegaly if it is 0.3
02-Dec-15
39
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING Temporal horns out of proportion to hippocampal
atrophy MRI provides additional physiologic information on
NPH T2-weighted images, regions of moving CSF
demonstrate no signal, instead of the increased signal observed in slow-moving CSF,
CSF flow studies- jet of turbulent CSF flow may be observed distal to the aqueduct
Cine phase-contrast MRI quantifies CSF flow in terms of stroke volume
- significant corelation to shunt responsiveness02-Dec-15
4002-Dec-15
41
CSF TAP TEST Most prefer 45 -50 ml removal Csf pressures may be transiently elevated Improvement may be delayed and appear 1-2
days after Sensitivity of test – 62 % and 33 % specificity However it has been listed in guidelines of
prognostic evaluation of NPH
02-Dec-15
42
EXTERNAL LUMBAR DRAINAGE greater impact on brain volume expansion 300 ml drained for 5 days Complications -including headache,
radiculopathy, and bacterial meningitis More sensitive than csf tap test sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive
value were 95%, 64%, and 78%, respectively. PPV 80 -100 % Requires hospitalisation specialised care
02-Dec-15
4302-Dec-15
44
OTHER TESTS CSF infusion testing.- One drain is used for
continuous pressure monitoring while the other drain is used to continuously infuse solution into the CSF space.
Ro – impedance of flow offered by csf absorption Isotopic cisternography is no longer in frequent use Acqueductal CSF flow – not of much diagnostic use
02-Dec-15
4502-Dec-15
46
PRESURGICAL EVALUATION Neuropsychological evaluation (eg, Folstein test
or formal neuropsychological evaluation)- not validated
Timed walking test. Videotaping the gait evaluation before and after
the large volume lumbar puncture.- IS PREFERABLE
Reduction in bladder hyperactivity also may be a sign of good outcome from shunting.
02-Dec-15
47
MANAGEMENT No prospective, double blind, randomized, controlled clinical triaL Medical management – levodopa trial to rule out
idiopthic parkinson disease No drug is known to work in NPH
Surgical Management – mainstay Benefit expected from shunt surgery in probable case
of NPH 50 %- 61 %
02-Dec-15
48
MANAGEMENT OF NORMAL PRESSURE HYDROCEPHALUS
02-Dec-15
4902-Dec-15
5002-Dec-15
51
NEWER ADVANCES Adjustable shunt valves – adjusts the opening
pressure Gravity-controlled valves - low valve opening
pressure when the patient is lying down. G valves lower the risk of overdrainage by 90%
02-Dec-15
52
Endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV). Alternative to shunt placement for treatment of
hydrocephalus. Effective in obstructive hydrocephalus.
Efficacy in NPH not known
02-Dec-15
53
FOLLOW UP
Routine follow up 2 to 3 times per year Earlier if shunt inection/failure Bedside clinical examination follow up CTScan
within few weeks D Dimer ,CRP in case of ventriculoatrial shunts
for subclinical septicemia and thromboembolism
02-Dec-15
54
WHETHER TO SHUNT OR NOT? High CSF pressure should prompt investigation
for a secondary cause of NPH Response to a 40-mL to 50-mL (high-volume)
lumbar tap suggests a potential benefit to shunting An ELD may be used to evaluate those who do
not respond to a high-volume tap There is no substantial predictive value to MRI
CSF flow studies IF multi-infarct or Alzheimer’s disease
dementia ??
02-Dec-15
55
DIAGNOSTIC STUDIES Ventricle enlargement on CT or MRI
Severity graded by ratio of maximal frontal horn width divided by transverse inner diameter of skull
0.32 minimal for NPH but 0.40 more typical Lack of hippocampus or cortical atrophy Periventricular and cortical white matter lesions
may be found in patients with NPH Large number white matter lesions may be marker
for poor response to shunting
02-Dec-15
56
NORMAL VENTRICLES
02-Dec-15
57
EnlargedVentricles
02-Dec-15
58
EnlargedVentricles
02-Dec-15
59
ARE BENEFITS OF SHUNTING LONG LASTING? Most studies show fairly significant
decline in benefits over time Initial improvement 60-75% of patientsSustained improvement only 24-42%
Results confounded due to high mortality from co-morbid conditions57% patients dead within 5 years in study
by Raftopoulos et.al.
02-Dec-15
60
HOW CAN I TELL WHO WILL BENEFIT?
Good response to shuntingClinical presentation
Gait disturbance preceded mental impairmentShort duration of mild mental impairmentKnown cause of NPH- e.g. infection, bleed
02-Dec-15
61
HOW CAN I TELL WHO WILL BENEFIT?
Good response to shuntingSpecial studies
Lack of white matter lesions on MRIMarked resolution of symptoms with CSF
drainageOne time removal 30-50 cc CSFMulti-day drainage of 100-150 cc CSF
B-waves greater than 50% of time with continuous intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring
Resistance to CSF outflow greater than 18 mmHg 02-Dec-15
62
HOW CAN I TELL WHO WILL BENEFIT?
Poor response to shuntingSevere dementiaDementia presenting symptomMRI abnormalities
Cerebral atrophyMultiple white matter lesions
02-Dec-15
63
HOW CAN I TELL WHO WILL BENEFIT? Indeterminate significance
Patient ageDuration of symptomsLack of response to removal CSF
02-Dec-15
64
HOW ACCURATE ARE PREDICTORS OF RESPONSE TO SHUNTING?
Normal pressure hydrocephalus: an update, Stein, SC, Neurosurgery Quarterly (2001)11(1):26–35
02-Dec-15
65
HOW ACCURATE ARE PREDICTORS OF RESPONSE TO SHUNTING?
Normal pressure hydrocephalus: an update, Stein, SC, Neurosurgery Quarterly (2001)11(1):26–35
02-Dec-15
66
WHAT KIND OF SHUNT IS USED?
Externally programmable valve allows transcutaneous adjustment CSF outflow resistance
02-Dec-15
67
SHUNT VALVE ADJUSTMENTS
02-Dec-15
68
NOW THAT MY PATIENT HAS HAD A SHUNT WHAT HAPPENS NEXT?
Monitoring of mental functionPatients should have neuropsychiatric testing
prior to shuntPeriodic testing post shunt to document
improvement
02-Dec-15
69
NOW THAT MY PATIENT HAS HAD A SHUNT WHAT HAPPENS NEXT? Monitor for complications of shunt
InfectionShunt malfunctionExcessive CSF drainageSubdural hematoma
02-Dec-15
70
OBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT OF INPH
02-Dec-15
71
KEY POINTS The INPH is a syndrome, characterized by gait
impairment, cognitive decline and urinary incontinence
Associated with ventriculomegaly in the absence of elevated CSF pressure.
Pathogenesis is not understood; intermittent intracranial hypertension, decreased CSF absorption and cerebral ischemia have been blamed.
Hallmark of neuroimaging in NPH is ventriculomegaly out of proportion with sulcal atrophy 02-Dec-15
72
KEY POINTS MRI is the choice of imaging; CSF flow in NPH is
hyperdynamic, with an increase in the amount and velocity of CSF passing rostrally, then caudally, through the cerebral aqueduct with each cardiac cycle.
Clinical improvement after CSF drainage implies good response to shunting.·
The best results are found in the subjects treated with low-pressure valves.·
Increased use of adjustable valve seems to be beneficial. Gait is most likely to improve. Postoperative reduction
in ventriculomegaly is not always seen or proportionate to the clinical improvement.
02-Dec-15
73
THANK YOU
02-Dec-15