Upload
hesham-al-inany
View
1.151
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
tocolytic therapy has been adopted for prevention of preterm labor. is this true: which tocolytic should we use?
Citation preview
Tocolytic Therapy for preterm labor
Atosiban vs Nifedipine: meta-analysis
The perfect tocolytic
is uniformly effective with complete fetomaternal safety does not exist
Types
beta-agonists, Ca(2+) channel blockers oxytocin receptor antagonists. differ in cost, utero-specificity, safety,
efficacy
Tocolytic agents
ß-agonistß2-receptor: uterus, blood vessels,
bronchioles Stimulate receptoren -> adenyl
cyclase -> ↑ cAMP -> ↓ calciumMost important: ritodrine
Side Effects : Maternal
Side Effects: Fetal
RCOG, 2002
If tocolysis is indicated, B2-agonist should not be used
Choice should be either CCB or Atosiban
CCB: Nifdipine (Adalat )
EffectiveSE: Hypotension & tachycardia
especially multiple pregnancy
Tractocile® : uterospecific
Introduced in Europe in 2000
Atosiban = structure similar to oxytocine -> inhibit uterus contractions
Tractocile®
Tractocile vs Nifedipine
Both drugs are effective but maternal adverse events are more with Nifedipine (Al-Omari et al, 2006)
In another RCT
Atosiban was effective in 75% of the cases, and nifedipin in 65% of the cases, for delaying delivery for more than 7 days.
The maternal side effects in the atosiban group were 17.5%, and in the nifedipin group they were 40%, which had a statistically significant difference (p=0.027). (Kanashian et al, 2005)
How to use
Injection
Not longer than 48 hour infusionTotal dose: < 330 mg atosiban
Interesting
Both B2 agonists and Atosiban are registered in Europe for management of preterm labor
Nifedipine: no
Objective of Meta-analysis
to determine the comparative clinical value of atosiban versus nifedipine in women in preterm labor by evaluating both, their comparative effectiveness and safety profiles
Methodology: Meta-analysis
Randomised controlled trials according to the guidelines of the
Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (version 5.0.1)
Outcomes
Prolongation of pregnancy prevention of preterm labor maternal and fetal side effects and
infant morbidity and mortality
safety in favor of atosiban:
there were lower incidence of adverse drug reactions, flushing, GIT upset, hypotension, palpitation, and tachycardia in women prescribed atosiban, with the exception of nausea, which was more frequent in such women
So
The balance of evidence indicates that atosiban is as effective as nifedipine and is significantly safer than it
However
We have two major problems: Cost Real value
Cost
Atosiban is extremely expensive compared to Nifidipine
This is a major limiting issue in the use of Atosiban
Sustained Tocolysis? Nifidipine could be better choice
406 women with threatened preterm birth randomised to an additional 12 days of nifedipine or placebo after completion of a 48-hour initial course of tocolysis.
The probability of adverse perinatal outcomes was similar between groups, as were mean gestational age and birth weight and likelihood of neonatal intensive care unit admission .
Moreover
Among participants still using Nifedipine at the time of delivery, mean blood loss was higher in those women assigned to nifedipine (432 mL vs. 307 mL; P=0.045). Journal Watch Women's Health January 17, 2013
Why tocolysis?
To allow for a course of corticosteroids To allow for in utero transfer (women go
to tertiary center)
Questioning Tocolysis!!!!
Patient oriented outcome: neonatal mortality ????
What a surprise!!!
No clear evidence was found for the relative effectiveness of any tocolytic versus placebo being beneficial for neonatal mortality
Fig Compared to Placebo
Haas D M et al. BMJ 2012;345:bmj.e6226©2012 by British Medical Journal Publishing Group
No evidence !!
No evidence of beneficial effect does not mean Evidence of no value
No evidence could be due to small number of patients (type II error), or heteregeneity of studies, or different entry point at time of study
What to do now??
we have become accustomed to the fact that tocolytics buy us time.
The question is : Does it Worth?
To get an answer
is a large scale multi-centred randomised non-blinded trial, analysed by intention to treat.
Till then
Tocolysis will continue So use the most cost effective
modality : CCB
Thank You