37
Tocolytic Therapy for preterm labor Atosiban vs Nifedipine: meta-analysis

Is tocolytic therapy of value ??? Tractocile vs Nifedipine

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

tocolytic therapy has been adopted for prevention of preterm labor. is this true: which tocolytic should we use?

Citation preview

Page 1: Is tocolytic therapy of value ???  Tractocile  vs Nifedipine

Tocolytic Therapy for preterm labor

Atosiban vs Nifedipine: meta-analysis

Page 2: Is tocolytic therapy of value ???  Tractocile  vs Nifedipine

The perfect tocolytic

is uniformly effective with complete fetomaternal safety does not exist

Page 3: Is tocolytic therapy of value ???  Tractocile  vs Nifedipine

Types

beta-agonists, Ca(2+) channel blockers oxytocin receptor antagonists. differ in cost, utero-specificity, safety,

efficacy

Page 4: Is tocolytic therapy of value ???  Tractocile  vs Nifedipine

Tocolytic agents

ß-agonistß2-receptor: uterus, blood vessels,

bronchioles Stimulate receptoren -> adenyl

cyclase -> ↑ cAMP -> ↓ calciumMost important: ritodrine

Page 5: Is tocolytic therapy of value ???  Tractocile  vs Nifedipine

Side Effects : Maternal

Page 6: Is tocolytic therapy of value ???  Tractocile  vs Nifedipine

Side Effects: Fetal

Page 7: Is tocolytic therapy of value ???  Tractocile  vs Nifedipine

RCOG, 2002

If tocolysis is indicated, B2-agonist should not be used

Choice should be either CCB or Atosiban

Page 8: Is tocolytic therapy of value ???  Tractocile  vs Nifedipine

CCB: Nifdipine (Adalat )

EffectiveSE: Hypotension & tachycardia

especially multiple pregnancy

Page 9: Is tocolytic therapy of value ???  Tractocile  vs Nifedipine

Tractocile® : uterospecific

Introduced in Europe in 2000

Atosiban = structure similar to oxytocine -> inhibit uterus contractions

Page 10: Is tocolytic therapy of value ???  Tractocile  vs Nifedipine

Tractocile®

Page 11: Is tocolytic therapy of value ???  Tractocile  vs Nifedipine

Tractocile vs Nifedipine

Both drugs are effective but maternal adverse events are more with Nifedipine (Al-Omari et al, 2006)

Page 12: Is tocolytic therapy of value ???  Tractocile  vs Nifedipine

In another RCT

Atosiban was effective in 75% of the cases, and nifedipin in 65% of the cases, for delaying delivery for more than 7 days.

The maternal side effects in the atosiban group were 17.5%, and in the nifedipin group they were 40%, which had a statistically significant difference (p=0.027). (Kanashian et al, 2005)

Page 13: Is tocolytic therapy of value ???  Tractocile  vs Nifedipine

How to use

Page 14: Is tocolytic therapy of value ???  Tractocile  vs Nifedipine

Injection

Not longer than 48 hour infusionTotal dose: < 330 mg atosiban

Page 15: Is tocolytic therapy of value ???  Tractocile  vs Nifedipine

Interesting

Both B2 agonists and Atosiban are registered in Europe for management of preterm labor

Nifedipine: no

Page 16: Is tocolytic therapy of value ???  Tractocile  vs Nifedipine

Objective of Meta-analysis

to determine the comparative clinical value of atosiban versus nifedipine in women in preterm labor by evaluating both, their comparative effectiveness and safety profiles

Page 17: Is tocolytic therapy of value ???  Tractocile  vs Nifedipine

Methodology: Meta-analysis

Randomised controlled trials according to the guidelines of the

Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (version 5.0.1)

Page 18: Is tocolytic therapy of value ???  Tractocile  vs Nifedipine

Outcomes

Prolongation of pregnancy prevention of preterm labor maternal and fetal side effects and

infant morbidity and mortality

Page 19: Is tocolytic therapy of value ???  Tractocile  vs Nifedipine
Page 20: Is tocolytic therapy of value ???  Tractocile  vs Nifedipine
Page 21: Is tocolytic therapy of value ???  Tractocile  vs Nifedipine
Page 22: Is tocolytic therapy of value ???  Tractocile  vs Nifedipine
Page 23: Is tocolytic therapy of value ???  Tractocile  vs Nifedipine

safety in favor of atosiban:

there were lower incidence of adverse drug reactions, flushing, GIT upset, hypotension, palpitation, and tachycardia in women prescribed atosiban, with the exception of nausea, which was more frequent in such women

Page 24: Is tocolytic therapy of value ???  Tractocile  vs Nifedipine

So

The balance of evidence indicates that atosiban is as effective as nifedipine and is significantly safer than it

Page 25: Is tocolytic therapy of value ???  Tractocile  vs Nifedipine

However

We have two major problems: Cost Real value

Page 26: Is tocolytic therapy of value ???  Tractocile  vs Nifedipine

Cost

Atosiban is extremely expensive compared to Nifidipine

This is a major limiting issue in the use of Atosiban

Page 27: Is tocolytic therapy of value ???  Tractocile  vs Nifedipine

Sustained Tocolysis? Nifidipine could be better choice

406 women with threatened preterm birth randomised to an additional 12 days of nifedipine or placebo after completion of a 48-hour initial course of tocolysis.

The probability of adverse perinatal outcomes was similar between groups, as were mean gestational age and birth weight and likelihood of neonatal intensive care unit admission .

Page 28: Is tocolytic therapy of value ???  Tractocile  vs Nifedipine

Moreover

Among participants still using Nifedipine at the time of delivery, mean blood loss was higher in those women assigned to nifedipine (432 mL vs. 307 mL; P=0.045). Journal Watch Women's Health January 17, 2013

Page 29: Is tocolytic therapy of value ???  Tractocile  vs Nifedipine

Why tocolysis?

To allow for a course of corticosteroids To allow for in utero transfer (women go

to tertiary center)

Page 30: Is tocolytic therapy of value ???  Tractocile  vs Nifedipine

Questioning Tocolysis!!!!

Patient oriented outcome: neonatal mortality ????

Page 31: Is tocolytic therapy of value ???  Tractocile  vs Nifedipine

What a surprise!!!

No clear evidence was found for the relative effectiveness of any tocolytic versus placebo being beneficial for neonatal mortality

Page 32: Is tocolytic therapy of value ???  Tractocile  vs Nifedipine

Fig  Compared to Placebo

Haas D M et al. BMJ 2012;345:bmj.e6226©2012 by British Medical Journal Publishing Group

Page 33: Is tocolytic therapy of value ???  Tractocile  vs Nifedipine

No evidence !!

No evidence of beneficial effect does not mean Evidence of no value

No evidence could be due to small number of patients (type II error), or heteregeneity of studies, or different entry point at time of study

Page 34: Is tocolytic therapy of value ???  Tractocile  vs Nifedipine

What to do now??

we have become accustomed to the fact that tocolytics buy us time.

The question is : Does it Worth?

Page 35: Is tocolytic therapy of value ???  Tractocile  vs Nifedipine

To get an answer

is a large scale multi-centred randomised non-blinded trial, analysed by intention to treat.

Page 36: Is tocolytic therapy of value ???  Tractocile  vs Nifedipine

Till then

Tocolysis will continue So use the most cost effective

modality : CCB

Page 37: Is tocolytic therapy of value ???  Tractocile  vs Nifedipine

Thank You