Upload
nhsscotlandevent
View
948
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Deterioration of a patient can occur at any time in the patient’s journey and eventually they may need critical care intervention or worse. Hear about NHS Ayrshire & Arran’s rescue system and how their model for improvement was used to design, implement and sustain reliable care processes that facilitated a reduction in mortality rates.
Citation preview
Early Rescue
Diane MurrayAssistant Director Clinical Improvement
Susan Hannah Clinical Improvement Lead
Eddie Docherty Nurse Consultant
Session Aims
To Describe;
Why we needed to improve
What we needed to do to improve
How we implemented changes for improvement
How much we improved
The Burning Platform
The “Burning Platform”
AC
AB
AA
Z
Y
X
WV
UT
S
N
R
Q
OP
MLK
J
I
H
GF
E
C
B
D
A
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 45,000
Number of Patients
Rat
e(%
)
“NHS hospital scandal which left 1,200 dead 400 of which could not be explained. This could happen again, warn campaigners”
Daily Mail19 March 2009
Exploring HSMR•3x2 Mortality Tool50 Consecutive Death Reviews •Exclude Patientsadmitted to palliativecare facility
•Apply GTT to all box 4
•Validation by 2 external clinicians
•Mediation Plan
•QIS Involvement •Scottish Government reporting
What did we find?
Failures
•Identification of sick patients
•Planning and execution of care and treatment
•Rescue of deteriorating patients
Back to Basics
An approach to improving care delivery to support the rescue of acutely unwell patients
Susan HannahClinical Improvement Lead
What We Needed to Improve
Early recognition of deteriorating patient
Regularity of observations according to clinical concern
Complete and accurate MEWS and action plan recording
Nursing staff escalation where expected
Appropriate response of medical staff to MEWS
Consistent approach to documentation of decision making
Clinical Improvement in Acute Ward Settings
Delivering education at the point of care
Accurate patient observation and MEWS; identifying and responding to patient deterioration
Escalation of patients effectively through SBAR communication at all times
Awareness of patient safety issues through Safety Brief ‘huddles’
Improvement Methodology for All
SPSP tools and methods to support implementation of improved practices
Plan-Do-Study–Act (PDSA) cycles to develop improvements in clinical practice
Engaging all staff to ensure ownership of new ways of working
Measurement for improvement - MEWS
Developing an understanding of the value of measurement for improvement
Introducing new measures
Involving staff in measuring performance
Providing feedback and supporting improved practices
Back to Basics - Improving the Quality of MEWS
Detailed MEWS measurement tool introduced w eekly
Bac
k to
Bas
ics
com
men
ces
staf
f aw
aren
ess
and
trai
ning
Measuring performance of MEWS
w ith short audit tool
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
3/1
/09
4/1
/09
5/1
/09
6/1
/09
7/1
/09
8/1
/09
9/1
/09
10
/1/0
9
11
/1/0
9
12
/1/0
9
1/1
/10
2/1
/10
3/1
/10
4/1
/10
5/1
/10
6/1
/10
7/1
/10
8/1
/10
9/1
/10
10
/1/1
0
11
/1/1
0
11
/1/1
0
12
/1/1
0
1/1
/11
2/1
/11
3/1
/11
4/1
/11
5/1
/11
Date
SBAR for all
Communication for escalation of deteriorating patient
SBAR developed to support handovers and transfers
Implemented for all routine and emergency communications
Becoming the norm – ‘it’s just how we communicate now
Back to Basics - SBAR Exchanges of High Quality
Reinforce SBAR quality w ith staff
1:1 staff education to improve quality of SBAR exchanges
Intr
oduc
tion
of B
ack
to B
asic
s in
crea
sed
min
torin
g an
d ed
ucat
ion
in th
e w
ard
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
3/1/
09
4/1/
09
5/1/
09
6/1/
09
7/1/
09
8/1/
09
9/1/
09
10/1
/09
11/1
/09
12/1
/09
1/1/
10
2/1/
10
3/1/
10
4/1/
10
5/1/
10
6/1/
10
7/1/
10
8/1/
10
9/1/
10
10/1
/10
11/1
/10
11/1
/10
12/1
/10
1/1/
11
2/1/
11
3/1/
11
4/1/
11
5/1/
11
Date
Achieving Sustainability
Monitoring and evaluating performance by:
• Measuring compliance with MEWS weekly, improvement methodology to drive improvements
• Evaluating quality of exchange using SBAR for escalation of patient concern and ward communication between staff at handover and transfer
• Monitoring daily safety briefs to ensure effectiveness and compliance
Communicating Performance
Improving HSMR
Jun 08, Jun 09 & Jun 10 HSMR Reviews Top 5 Trigger Comparisons
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
M8 - Antiemetics G4 -Readmission to
hospital within 30days
G5 - Shock orcardiac arrest
G2 - Any patientfall
G3 - PressureUlcer
L13 - Nosocomialpneumonia
L11 - HospitalAcquired Infection
G1 - Lack of earlywarning score or
early warningscore requiring
response
I2 - Unplannedtransfer to ICU or
HDU
Trigger
To
tal
Jun 2008
Jun 2009
Jun 2010
Improving ward MEWS and escalation of patient concern contributed to reduced numbers of unplanned admissions to HDU/ICU
Supporting the Emergency Response Team
Back to Basics programme:
• Improves staff capacity and capability to quickly identify deterioration
• Ensures effective communication and escalation of findings and concerns
• Improves record keeping and provides accurate documentation of patient observations and interventions
• Increased awareness of safety issues for patients, staff and the environment
Eddie Docherty Nurse Consultant
Managing the acutely unwell patient The development of an Emergency Response Team :
a practical approach
Role
• Ward trawl and follow up of identified patients• Response to sick patients via MEWS or
identified criteria only:
In the absence of the patient’s own team
or own team unable to respond within
30 minutes• All intervention will be fed back to own team
• Rescue only!
Why do we need this team?
• Continuous clinical quality improvement
• Changing face of ‘the front door’
The Evidence So far
A number of observational studies from Australia and the United States of America have shown
beneficial effects in reducing cardiac arrests after the introduction of a MET/RRS
• Buist MD, Moore GE, Bernard SA, et al. (2002) Effects of a medical emergency team on reduction of incidence of and mortality from unexpected cardiac arrests in hospital: preliminary study. BMJ. 324(7334): 387-390.
• Bellomo R, Goldsmith D, Uchino S, et al. (2003) A prospective before-and-after trial of a medical emergency team. Med J Aust. 179(6): 283-287.
• DeVita MA, Braithwaite RS, Mahidhara R, et al. (2004) Use of medical emergency team responses to reduce hospital cardiopulmonary arrests. Qual Saf Health Care. 13(4): 251-254.
• Offner PJ, Heit J, Roberts R. (2007) Implementation of a rapid response team decreases cardiac arrest outside of the intensive care unit. J Trauma. 62(5): 1223-1227; discussion 1227-1228.
• Hillman K, Chen J, Cretikos M, et al. (2005) Introduction of the medical emergency team (MET) system: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 365(9477): 2091-2097.
Evidence (2)
– A large cluster randomized control trial (MERIT) failing to show reduction in cardiac arrests by MET.
– The study was highly under-powered to detect such an effect???
• Hillman K, Chen J, Cretikos M, et al. (2005) Introduction of the medical emergency team (MET) system: a cluster- randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 365(9477): 2091-2097.
• Are we asking the right questions?
• HSMR figures
• Advanced metrics
Call-out criteria
• General Ward
• High care area
• Emergency Response call-out criteria – • High Dependency
• Airway– Any airway compromise
• Breathing– Marked respiratory distress / progressive dyspnoea
• Marked change in respiratory pattern unrelieved by nursing interventions
• Marked de-saturation unrelieved by nursing interventions
• Circulation– Impending circulatory collapse
• Marked haemodynamic compromise despite nursing intervention
• Sustained symptomatic dysrythmia
• Disability– Acute change in mental state
• Decreased responsiveness (new, persistent)• Seizure activity (new, persistent)
• Exposure– Uncontrolled pain despite treatment– Staff concern – Uncontrolled bleeding
• Emergency Response Team call-out criteria – General Ward Area
• Airway– Any airway compromise
• Breathing– Respiratory distress/ progressive dyspnoea
• Respirations less than 8/min or greater than 30 min (new, persistent)
• Sa02 less than 88 per cent on oxygen (new, persistent)
• Increase in oxygen requirements to 50%
• Circulation– HR >130 or HR< 40
• Blood pressure less than 90mmHg (new, persistent)• Symptomatic dysrythmia
• Disability– Acute change in mental state
• Decreased responsiveness (new, persistent)• Seizure activity
• Exposure– Uncontrolled pain despite treatment
• Staff concern, for example sustained chest pain despite nursing intervention
• Uncontrolled bleeding
Patient in Cardiac Arrest?
Does the Patient meet the ERT call out criteria or are they triggering a MEWS >4
NO
Activate the Cardiac Arrest team via 2222
YES
Emergency Response Team callout Criteria General Ward Area
AirwayAny airway compromise
BreathingRespiratory Distress/ progressive dyspnoeaRespirations less than 8/min or greater than 30 min(new, persistent)Sa02 less than 88% on oxygen(new, persistent)Increase in oxygen requirements to 50%
CirculationHR >130 or HR< 40Blood pressure less than 90mmHg (new, persistent)Symptomatic dysrythmia
DisabilityAcute change in mental stateDecreased responsiveness (new, persistent)Seizure activity
ExposureUncontrolled pain despite treatmentStaff concern e.g. sustained chest pain despite nursing interventionUncontrolled bleeding
Contact Patients own team, develop a continuing plan of care
Patients own team unavailable or unable to attend in 30 mins or request ERT activation
Activate the
Emergency
Response team*
ERT team Assess and initiate appropriate intervention
Contact Patients own team and develop a continuing plan of care
Documentation by ERT, follow up protocol activated
ERT Activation and feedback Pathway
* Dial 0 Switchboard and ask them to fast page the Emergency Response Team
Why ANP’s?
Competence Framework
Log Book and Case note review
• Simulator work
• Systems and staff ‘testing’
It worked in Crosshouse
SO LETS TAKE IT TO AYR HOSPITAL?
Same principle- but different players
So………………
Engagement
• Associate director of medicine and nurse consultant ‘road show’
• Clinical director level / ward manager/ critical care ‘champions’- influencing the key influencers
• Taking it to the wards- not waiting for them to come to us.
• Making sure its safe- AND PROVING IT
one patient & one nurse- one area- one week
Crosshouse Hospital (excluding maternity and paediatrics)ERT Activity per 1000 OBD
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
14.00
16.00
18.00
20.00
22.00
24.00
26.00
Aug-10 Sep-10 Oct-10 Nov-10 Dec-10 Jan-11 Feb-11 Mar-11
Month
ER
T A
ctivity p
er
10
00
OB
D
ITU Outreach per 1000 OBD ERT Calls per 1000 OBD P.A.R. Assessments per 1000 OBD
NHS Ayrshire & Arran: Crosshouse Hospital. Unadjusted Inpatient Mortality
to April 2011.
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
Oct
-06
Nov
-06
Dec
-06
Jan-
07Fe
b-07
Mar
-07
Apr
-07
May
-07
Jun-
07
Jul-0
7A
ug-0
7S
ep-0
7O
ct-0
7N
ov-0
7D
ec-0
7Ja
n-08
Feb-
08M
ar-0
8A
pr-0
8M
ay-0
8Ju
n-08
Jul-0
8A
ug-0
8S
ep-0
8O
ct-0
8N
ov-0
8D
ec-0
8
Jan-
09Fe
b-09
Mar
-09
Apr
-09
May
-09
Jun-
09Ju
l-09
Aug
-09
Sep
-09
Oct
-09
Nov
-09
Dec
-09
Jan-
10Fe
b-10
Mar
-10
Apr
-10
May
-10
Jun-
10Ju
l-10
Aug
-10
Sep
-10
Oct
-10
Nov
-10
Dec
-10
Jan-
11Fe
b-11
Mar
-11
Apr
-11
Month
%
Baseline Period
Baseline Mean = 3%Oct 06 - Dec 07
National Target 15% ____
Local Target 30% _ _ _
Awareness Training Back to Basics. ERT
& Coding Improvements Implemented
Median lines change in relation to shifts in run chart
Increased service pressures
Any Questions?