36
Bringing sexy back? biomarkers - useful or useless? Katrin Hruska

Biomarkers in the ED - useful or useless

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Biomarkers in the ED - useful or useless

Bringing sexy back?

biomarkers - useful or useless?Katrin Hruska

Page 2: Biomarkers in the ED - useful or useless

No disclosures

Page 3: Biomarkers in the ED - useful or useless
Page 4: Biomarkers in the ED - useful or useless

N Engl J Med 2015; 373:1916-1925November 12, 2015

Page 5: Biomarkers in the ED - useful or useless

”in the near future, high suPAR levels probably will inform physician-patient conversations about

preventing kidney disease"

Page 6: Biomarkers in the ED - useful or useless

”rigorous NEJM study is a significant breakthrough in preventive medicine"

Page 7: Biomarkers in the ED - useful or useless
Page 8: Biomarkers in the ED - useful or useless

Groundbreaking blood test predicts kidney disease FIVE YEARS BEFORE symptoms appear

Page 9: Biomarkers in the ED - useful or useless

”Trisaq's product strategy has been designed to yield early proof-of-

concept as well as commercialization opportunities”

”Conservatively estimated, Trisaq's current pipeline of products can benefit about 15-25% of all CKD patients and their combined sales potential well

exceeds $1 billion.

Page 10: Biomarkers in the ED - useful or useless

Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the full text of this article at NEJM.org.

Page 11: Biomarkers in the ED - useful or useless
Page 12: Biomarkers in the ED - useful or useless

Novel Blood Biomarker May Predict CKD RiskOutcomes studies necessary to prove clinical efficacy

Page 13: Biomarkers in the ED - useful or useless

suPAR: Strong and independent predictor of survival

Page 14: Biomarkers in the ED - useful or useless
Page 15: Biomarkers in the ED - useful or useless
Page 16: Biomarkers in the ED - useful or useless

Rather young and healthy than old and

sick

Page 17: Biomarkers in the ED - useful or useless
Page 18: Biomarkers in the ED - useful or useless

The primary endpoint was to create an accurate prognostication score of death by combining APACHE II score and serum suPAR.

Page 19: Biomarkers in the ED - useful or useless

💀14 ng/mL

3-70 ng/mL 1-65 ng/mL

😀9 ng/mL

suPAR levels and survival in sepsis

range:

Page 20: Biomarkers in the ED - useful or useless

Copyright ©2012 Giamarellos-Bourboulis et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. Crit Care. 2012; 16(4): R149.

Page 21: Biomarkers in the ED - useful or useless

suPAR

Copyright ©2012 Giamarellos-Bourboulis et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. Crit Care. 2012; 16(4): R149.

Page 22: Biomarkers in the ED - useful or useless

APACHE II

Page 23: Biomarkers in the ED - useful or useless

Copyright ©2012 Giamarellos-Bourboulis et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. Crit Care. 2012; 16(4): R149.

Page 24: Biomarkers in the ED - useful or useless

Copyright ©2012 Giamarellos-Bourboulis et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. Crit Care. 2012; 16(4): R149.

Page 25: Biomarkers in the ED - useful or useless

Mor

talit

y%

0

10

20

30

40

i ii iii iv

Apache II<17 Apache II≥17

suPAR≥12

suPAR≥12

”validated” in a Swedish cohort

Page 26: Biomarkers in the ED - useful or useless

Mor

talit

y%

0

10

20

30

40

i ii iii iv

suPAR≥12

suPAR≥12

the high mortality in stratum (ii) may be due to small number of patients in this group (n = 21) and chance variations in mortality. Apart from that

aberration, the findings validate those from the larger Greek study

”validated” in a Swedish cohort

Page 27: Biomarkers in the ED - useful or useless

”this strong discriminative prognostic score developed in Greek patients was validated in a cohort of Swedish patients”

”There is no doubt that suPAR has strong prognostic value in ICU patients. However, in many cases this knowledge may not lead to lifesaving interventions, as limited treatment options are efficient

in severely ill sepsis patients”

Page 28: Biomarkers in the ED - useful or useless

Prediction of 30 day mortality compared to Danish Emergency Process Triage

Page 29: Biomarkers in the ED - useful or useless
Page 30: Biomarkers in the ED - useful or useless

Agreement in 55% of cases

”additional biomarkers other than CT are needed"

”we acknowledge the editorial and statistical contribution of Leslie S. Prichep, PhD”

Page 31: Biomarkers in the ED - useful or useless

”we acknowledge the editorial and statistical contribution of Leslie S. Prichep, PhD”

Page 32: Biomarkers in the ED - useful or useless

A biomarker is a characteristic that is objectively measured and evaluated as an indicator of normal biological processes, pathogenic processes or pharmacologic responses to a therapeutic intervention

Page 33: Biomarkers in the ED - useful or useless

A clinical endpoint is a characteristic or variable that reflects how a patient feels, functions or survives

A surrogate endpoint is a biomarker that is intended to substitute for a clinical endpoint

Page 34: Biomarkers in the ED - useful or useless

A clinical endpoint is a characteristic or variable that reflects how a patient feels, functions or survives

A surrogate endpoint is a biomarker that is intended to substitute for a critical endpoint

Page 35: Biomarkers in the ED - useful or useless

Image: Bengt Nyman

SNTF

Page 36: Biomarkers in the ED - useful or useless

photo: Michele di Trani

So you think you’re in pain?