42
ARDS ITACCS Key West 2006 Ruben J Azocar, M.D. Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology Boston University School of Medicine

Ards azocar

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Ards   azocar

ARDS

ITACCS Key West 2006

Ruben J Azocar, M.D.Assistant Professor of AnesthesiologyBoston University School of Medicine

Page 2: Ards   azocar

ARDS: DefinitionsARDS: Definitions First described in 1967 as Adult Respiratory

Distress Syndrome American-European Consensus Conference

Committee (1994) criteria– Acute onset– Bilateral infiltrates in chest radiography– Pulmonary-artery wedge pressure<18 mmHg– Acute lung injury PaO2/FiO2<300– Acute respiratory distress syndrome PaO2/FiO2<200

Page 3: Ards   azocar

ARDS: CausesARDS: Causes

Page 4: Ards   azocar

ARDS:EpidemiologyARDS:Epidemiology

Incidence: 80 per 100,000 Outcomes:

– Traditionally 40-60% mortality– Majority of deaths due to MSOF– Low tidal volume ventilation decreases mortality – Other critical care improvements may be involved– Predictive factors for death: CLD, non pulmonary

organ dysfunction, sepsis and advance age– Survivors: Most of them will have normal

pulmonary function within a year

Page 5: Ards   azocar

ARDS:PathogenesisARDS:Pathogenesis

ARDS is the manifestation of SIRS in the lungs– Influx of protein rich edema into the air spaces due

to increased permeability of the alveolar-capillary barrier

Endothelial damage pathophysiology is similar to that of SIRS/SEPSIS

Page 6: Ards   azocar

ARDS:PathogenesisARDS:Pathogenesis

– Epithelial damage Loss of epithelial integrity which in normal

conditions less permeable than endothelium Type II cells injury

– disrupts normal epithelial fluid transport– reduces production of surfactant

May lead to septic shock in patients with pneumonia

Severely injured epithelium lead to disorganized repair and fibrosis

Page 7: Ards   azocar

ARDS:PathogenesisARDS:Pathogenesis

Neutrophils Cytokines

– Unbalanced production of pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines

Ventilator induced injury– High FiO2– Overdistention– Recruitment/De-recruitment– May exacerbate and perpetuate ARDS/ALI as well

as SIRS/Sepsis/MSOF

Page 8: Ards   azocar

ARDS: Exudative PhaseARDS: Exudative Phase

The definition applies for the acute “exudative” phase Rapid onset Hypoxemia refractory to supplemental oxygen CXR similar to pulmonary edema CT Scan: Alveolar filling, consolidation and

atelectasis in the dependent lung zones Pathologic findings:

– diffuse alveolar damage with capillary injury and disruption of the alveolar epithelium

– hyaline membranes – protein rich fluid edema with neutrophils and

macrophages

Page 9: Ards   azocar

ARDS:PathogenesisARDS:Pathogenesis

Page 10: Ards   azocar

ARDS: Exudative PhaseARDS: Exudative Phase CT Scan During Acute Phase

Page 11: Ards   azocar

ARDS: Fibroproliferative phaseARDS: Fibroproliferative phase

Some patients progress to fibrosing alveolitis with persistent hypoxemia, increase alveolar dead space and further decrease in pulmonary compliance

The process may start as early as 5-7 days The alveolar space becomes filled with

mesenchymal cells and their products as well as new blood vessels

Page 12: Ards   azocar

ARDS: Fibroproliferative phaseARDS: Fibroproliferative phase

Pulmonary HTN due to obliteration of pulmonary bed may lead or worsen RV dysfunction

CXR shows linear opacities. PTX and bullae are common Histologically, there is fibrosis and partial

resolution of the pulmonary edema Mortality is 80% if this phase persists

Page 13: Ards   azocar

ARDS: Fibroproliferative phaseARDS: Fibroproliferative phaseCT Scan during fibroproliferative phase.

– Diffuse interstitial opacities and bullae

Page 14: Ards   azocar

ARDS:PathogenesisARDS:Pathogenesis

Page 15: Ards   azocar

ARDS:TreatmentARDS:Treatment

Recent decrease of mortality – Treatment of underlying cause– Better supportive ICU Care

Prevention of infections Appropriate nutrition GI prophylaxis Thromboembolism prophylaxis

Page 16: Ards   azocar

ARDS TreatmentARDS Treatment

Mechanical ventilation– Buys time for the lungs to heal and solve the

inciting cause – “New” ventilator strategies

Recognition of ventilator induced injury (VILI)– Overdistention – Recruitment/de-recruitment

Mechanical ventilation induces cytokine response which is worse with alveoli overdistention and recruitment/ de-recruitment of the lung (Ranieri et al JAMA 1999;282: 54-61)

Page 17: Ards   azocar

ARDS: TreatmentARDS: Treatment

Page 18: Ards   azocar

ARDS: TreatmentARDS: Treatment

Protective ventilation– Smaller tidal volumes

• Avoid overdistention• Tolerate “permissive hypercarbia”

– “Open lung” ventilation• Avoid alveolar collapse and reopening

Page 19: Ards   azocar

Ventilation with Lower Tidal Volumes Ventilation with Lower Tidal Volumes as Compared with Traditional Tidal as Compared with Traditional Tidal

Volumes for Acute Lung Injury and the Volumes for Acute Lung Injury and the Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeAcute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network N Engl J Med 2000;342:1301-8N Engl J Med 2000;342:1301-8

Study stopped after 2nd interim analysis

Reduction of mortality by 22%

Page 20: Ards   azocar

NIH/ARDS NetworkNIH/ARDS Network VARIABLES

– Ventilator mode– Tidal Volume– Plateau Pressure– Ventilation rate/pH

goal– Inspiration flow, I:E– Oxygenation goal

– FIO2/PEEP– Weaning

PROTOCOL– Volume assist control– < 6mL/Kg body weight– <30 cm H2O– 6-35/min adjusted for pH of

7.30 if possible– Adjust to 1:1-1:3– PaO2>55 and or

SpO2>88%– Combinations– PS wean when

FiO2/PEEP<.40/8

Page 21: Ards   azocar

Ventilation with Lower Tidal VolumesVentilation with Lower Tidal Volumes

The goal of providing small tidal volumes is to maintain the patient on the steep, more compliant portion of the curve without exceeding the upper inflection point

Page 22: Ards   azocar

ARDS:Permissive HypercapniaARDS:Permissive Hypercapnia

Hypercarbic acidosis– Hypoxemia– Respiratory failure and

arrest– Decrease myocardial

contractility– Cerebral vasodilatation– Decrease seizure

threshold– Hyperkalemia

Permissive hypercapnia– Supplemental oxygen

overcomes CO2 induced hypoxia

– No evolution to respiratory arrest

– Lack of significant deleterious effects

– Is hypercarbia beneficial?

Page 23: Ards   azocar

Kregenov et al: Hypercapnic acidosis and Kregenov et al: Hypercapnic acidosis and mortality in ALI mortality in ALI CCM 2006;34:1-7CCM 2006;34:1-7

Patients from the low tidal volume trial

Hypercapnic acidosis was associated with reduced 28-day mortality in the 12 mL/kg VT group after controlling for comorbidities and severity of lung injury.

These results are consistent with a protective effect of hypercapnic acidosis against ventilator-associated lung injury that was not found when the further ongoing injury was reduced by 6 mL/kg predicted body weight tidal volumes.

Page 24: Ards   azocar

Effect of a protective ventilation strategy Effect of a protective ventilation strategy on mortality in ARDSon mortality in ARDS

Amato M et al NEJM 1998;338:347-354Amato M et al NEJM 1998;338:347-354 End-expiratory pressure above the lower inflection

point VT less 6ml/kg Driving pressures less than 20 cm H2O above PEEP Permissive hypercarbia 38% Mortality in protective group vs. 71% in control

group 66% of patient in “protective” group wean off

ventilation vs. 29% control group No difference in survival at 28 days

Page 25: Ards   azocar

Optimal “PEEP”Optimal “PEEP”

Positive end-expiratory pressure should be high enough to shift the end-expiratory pressure above the lower inflection point by 2-3 cm H2O (usually 12-15 cm H2O)

– Allows maximal alveolar recruitment

– Decreases injury by repeated opening and closing of small airways

Page 26: Ards   azocar

Slutsky, A. S. et al. N Engl J Med 2006;354:1839-1841

Ventilation of an ex Vivo Rat Lung

Page 27: Ards   azocar

Higher Vs. Lower PEEP in Higher Vs. Lower PEEP in Patients With ARDS, Patients With ARDS, NEJM 2004NEJM 2004

NIH/ARDS Trail Network549 patientsLower PEEP 8.3+/- 3.2Higher PEEP 13.2+/-3.5All on low tidal volume ventilationNo differences on clinical outcomeTrial stop due to rule of futility

Page 28: Ards   azocar

BUT…..BUT….. In the first 171 patients: “the difference in

mean PEEP levels between study groups on days 1 to 7 was less that the difference in the previous study that tested the effects of higher PEEP levels and smaller tidal volumes”

Should have these patients not been included, would have the trial been stopped early?

Page 29: Ards   azocar

ARDS: TreatmentARDS: Treatment

Recruiting maneuvers Prone positioning Steroids APRV

Volume cycle vs. pressure cycle Inverse-Ratio Ventilation Non invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation High-Frequency Ventilation Tracheal Gas Insufflation Extracorporeal gas exchange Fluorocarbon Liquid Gas Exchange

Page 30: Ards   azocar

Recruitment maneuversRecruitment maneuvers

Lung recruitment in patients with ARDS Gattinoni NEJM 2006;354:1175-86

– Sixty eigt patients with ALI/ARDS underwent whole lung CT Scan during breath holding session at airway pressures of 5, 15 and 45 cm of water

– The percentage of potentially recruitable lung was defined as the proportion of lung tissue in which aeration was restored (Recruited)

Page 31: Ards   azocar

RecruitmentRecruitment The potentially recruitable lung was significantly

variable but highly correlated with the percentage of lung tissue in which aeration was maintained with PEEP

Patients with more recruitable lung were sicker– Greater lung weight– Poorer oxygenation– Poorer compliance– Higher levels of death space– Higher mortality

Page 32: Ards   azocar

RecruitmentRecruitment

Knowing the % of recruitable lung might be the key to the effects of PEEP

PEEP in patients with limited recruitable areas might be of little benefit or harmful– Overdistention– Worsening of Shunt– Authors suggest PEEP of 15 for those

recruitables and 10 for those who are not

Page 33: Ards   azocar

ARDS TreatmentARDS Treatment

Prone positioning– In about 70% of ARDS patients, prone positioning

improves the PaO2 by > 20%

– Consider a lung recruitment strategy, since allows a decrease in FiO2 and PEEP

– A more uniform distribution of pleural pressure gradients, result in greater ventilation of dependent lung than in supine positioning

Page 34: Ards   azocar

ARDS TreatmentARDS Treatment

Gattinoni et al, NEJM 2001;345:568-573– 304 patients with ARDS– Prone group: at least six hours/day for ten days– Better oxygenation in the prone patients– Similar incidence of complications– No improvement in survival– However patient only prone for 7 hours a day and

up to 10 days

Page 35: Ards   azocar

ARDS TreatmentARDS Treatment

Fluid and hemodynamic management– Optimal fluid management is controversial

There is data supporting fluid restriction as a mean to minimize lung edema

However maintenance and preservation of oxygen delivery may require fluid administration

– Euvolemia, judicious use of vasopressors– Effects of ventilation in circulation– To Swan or not to Swan

Page 36: Ards   azocar

Swan and ARDSSwan and ARDS

PAC versus CVP to guide treatment of ALI NEJM 2006; 354: 2213-2224

– 1000 patients– Mortality at 60 days was similar between

groups, as well as the ventilator free days and days not spent in the ICU

– Fluid balances were similar among the groups

– PAC had double complications mainly arrhythmias

Page 37: Ards   azocar

APRVAPRV

It uses a release of airway pressure from an elevated baseline to simulate expiration.

The elevated baseline facilitates oxygenation avoids collapsing of alveoli and the timed releases aid in carbon dioxide removal.

Potential advantages of APRV include lower airway pressures, lower minute ventilation, minimal adverse effects on cardio-circulatory function.

Airway pressure release ventilation is consistent with lung protection strategies that strive to limit lung injury associated with mechanical ventilation, particularly recruitment/derecruitment

More (larger) studies are needed to define its role in ALI/ARDS

Page 38: Ards   azocar

ARDS:TreatmentARDS:Treatment Inhaled nitric oxide and other vasodilators

– Most ARDS/ALI patient may have mild to moderate pulmonary HTN

– Improvement in oxygenation was small and not sustained

– No change on mortality or duration of mechanical ventilation

– May be used as “rescue” therapy

Surfactant– Successful in neonatal respiratory distress

syndrome

Page 39: Ards   azocar

ARDS: TreatmentARDS: Treatment Glucocorticoids

– No benefits in acute phase– Some evidence of improvement during

proliferative phase (Meduri et al JAMA 1998;280:159-165)

Methylprednisolone 2mg/kg initially for 32 days Improvement in Lung injury scores, MOSD scores and

mortality Benefits may be noticed by day 3

– High risk of infection– ? May consider a short course of high dose as

rescue therapy

Page 40: Ards   azocar

ARDS: SteroidsARDS: Steroids Efficacy and safety of corticosteroids for persistent

acute respiratory distress syndrome NEJM 2006.354: 1671-84

– 180 patients – Mortality at 60 days

28.9% mortality in the placebo group and 29.2% in the methylprednisolone group

Methylprednisolone increased the number of ventilator free and shock free days during the first 28 days in association with an improvement in oxygenation, respiratory system compliance and blood pressure with fewer vasopressor days

But methylprednisolone was associated with a significant increase 60-180 days mortality in patients enrolled at least 14 days after the onset of ARDS

Page 41: Ards   azocar

ARDS: TreatmentARDS: Treatment

Anti-inflammatory Strategies– Prostaglandin agonist/inhibitors– Lisofylline and pentoxifylline– Anti IL-8

Antioxidant therapyEnhanced resolution of pulmonary

edemaEnhanced repair of alveolar epithelial

barrier

Page 42: Ards   azocar

ARDS: QuestionsARDS: Questions