44
County Funding Option for Transportation Projects Chairman Michael Pipe Centre County Board of Commissioners Centre County MPO – Coordinating Cmte Tuesday, February 28, 2017 [email protected]

CCMPO - Local Transportation Funding Options

  • Upload
    mpipe

  • View
    18

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: CCMPO - Local Transportation Funding Options

County Funding Option for Transportation Projects

Chairman Michael PipeCentre County Board of Commissioners

Centre County MPO – Coordinating CmteTuesday, February 28, 2017

[email protected]

Page 2: CCMPO - Local Transportation Funding Options

Where are we now…County Liquid Fuels Program 2008-2017

• Annual application cycle• Typical requests include:

– Repaving– Bridges/Culverts/Pipes– Stormwater (Inlets/Ditches)– Signage & Guide Rails– Equipment

• Typical Available Funding:– $185,000 to $205,000

• Average Annual Amount Requested:– $937,993

Page 3: CCMPO - Local Transportation Funding Options

County Liquid Fuels Program

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017$0

$200,000

$400,000

$600,000

$800,000

$1,000,000

$1,200,000

$1,400,000

$1,600,000

UnfundedFunded

Page 4: CCMPO - Local Transportation Funding Options

County Liquid Fuels Program

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017$0

$200,000

$400,000

$600,000

$800,000

$1,000,000

$1,200,000

$1,400,000

$1,600,000

Requested Funded

AVERAGE FUNDING GAP = $735,006

Page 5: CCMPO - Local Transportation Funding Options

Mountaintop Region Requested: $1,004,343

Awarded: $257,57525.6%

Liquid Fuel Requests & Awards By Region: 2008-2017Lower Bald Eagle

Valley Region Requested: $2,112,590

Awarded: $408,38319.3%

Moshannon Valley Region

Requested: $567,589Awarded: $103,088

18.2%

Upper Bald Eagle Valley Region

Requested: $2,171,565Awarded: $362,551

16.7%

Page 6: CCMPO - Local Transportation Funding Options

Centre Region Requested: $2,798,370

Awarded: $332,12511.9%

Liquid Fuel Requests & Awards By Region: 2008-2017

Nittany Valley Region Requested: $441,672Awarded: $199,697

45.2%

Penns Valley Region Requested: $1,194,633

Awarded: $396,45333.2%

Page 7: CCMPO - Local Transportation Funding Options

7

Transportation Bill (Act 89 of 2013)

• Signed by Governor Corbett in 2013

• By 2020, $2.3-$2.4 billion in new revenue for transportation funding1

• Gives Counties option to increase registration fees by $5 starting in 2015 1 - ftp://ftp.dot.state.pa.us/public/pdf/TRANSPLAN/FINAL_Trans_Funding_Plan_Summary.pdf

Page 8: CCMPO - Local Transportation Funding Options

How Would Centre County Benefit?

• As of December 4, 2016, 120,537 non-exempt vehicles registered in Centre County• Potential funding to be used for

transportation projects:–$5 Fee annual yield at 100% - $602,685–$5 Fee annual yield at 80% - $482,148

Page 9: CCMPO - Local Transportation Funding Options

9

Important Points

• 100% spent in Centre County• 0% for administration at PennDOT &

County (per the law)• Can only be used for transportation

projects (per the law)• Can be used to leverage State and

Federal Transportation Funds

Page 10: CCMPO - Local Transportation Funding Options

$5 Fee Survey ResponseAs of 2/28

• 17 of 35 municipalities have responded:– 10 are in favor of enacting fee– 6 are not in favor of enacting fee– 1 will support county decision, either way

Responses To Date

In FavorNot In FavorSupport County Decision

Page 11: CCMPO - Local Transportation Funding Options

$5 Fee Survey ResponseAs of 2/28

• US Census ACS 2011-2015 Population Estimates for Centre County: 157,823• 17 - Responding Municipalities: 109,233

(69.21%)–10 - In Favor: 73,978 (67.72%)–6 - Not In Favor: 18,700 (17.12%) –1 - Will Support County Decision: 18,238

(16.70%)

Page 12: CCMPO - Local Transportation Funding Options

MPO Local Bridge Funding• 1 local bridge (over 20’) programmed on Transportation

Improvement Program (TIP)– T-348 Ardery Hollow Run Road (Worth Twp) bridge replacement– Programmed Amount: $1,218,380 – Local Share: $60,912 ($50,000 County Act 13)

• New local bridge start proposed 2017-20 TIP– $356,000 for preliminary engineering

• Local Bridge Retroactive Reimbursement Line Item– $161,117

Page 13: CCMPO - Local Transportation Funding Options

County Funding Available• County Liquid Fuels Program– Covers a number of project types– $185,000 to $205,000 estimated annually

• Act 13 “At Risk Local Bridge Funding” – Can only be used on locally owned SD bridges– Repairs must remove SD designation– $992,036 available– $155,000 allocated

Page 14: CCMPO - Local Transportation Funding Options

Local Bridges: Age• 58 municipally

owned bridges with 20’ or greater spans– 24 (41.4%) are 50+

years old– 9 (15.5 %) are 40-49

years old– 18 (31%) are 25-39

years old– 7 (12.1%) are 0-24

years old 50 or older 40-49 25-39 0-24

0

5

10

15

20

25

Bridge Age

Page 15: CCMPO - Local Transportation Funding Options

Local Bridges: Condition Rating• Assigns a single-digit number that describes the physical condition

of the structures major components compared to its original as-built condition

• Number is assigned by state-certified bridge inspectors during each inspection of the bridge, which occurs at least every two years

• Number range is 9 (best) to 0 (worst)

• A rating of 4 or below indicates poor conditions that result in a structural deficient classification

Page 16: CCMPO - Local Transportation Funding Options

Rating Condition

N Not applicable

9 Excellent

8 Very Good

7 Good, some minor problems noted

6 Satisfactory, structural elements showing minor deterioration

5 Fair, primary structural elements are sound but showing minor cracks and signs of deterioration

4 Poor, deterioration of primary structural elements has advanced

3 Serious, deterioration has seriously affected the primary structural components

2 Critical, deterioration of primary structural components has advanced and bridge will be closely monitored, or closed, until corrective action can be taken.

1 Imminent failure, major deterioration in critical structural components. Bridge is closed but corrective action may put the bridge back into light service.

0 Failed, bridge is out of service and beyond corrective action.

Local Bridges: Condition Rating

Page 17: CCMPO - Local Transportation Funding Options

Local Bridges: Structurally Deficient• Indication of bridge’s overall status in terms of structural soundness

and ability to service traveling public

• An “SD” designation indicates that the bridge has deterioration to one or more of its major components

T-419 Lower Georges Valley Road BridgeGregg Twp

If you’ve passed a sign like this…

Then you’ve likely crossed an SD bridge.

Page 18: CCMPO - Local Transportation Funding Options

T-419 Lower Georges Valley Road BridgeGregg Twp• 23’ span

Abutment and wall • Severe scour• Mortar cracking/loss• Abutments need removed

from stream

Superstructure• Heavy corrosion & pitting

Superstructure• Deck pans in poor

condition • Crumbling asphalt

Page 19: CCMPO - Local Transportation Funding Options

T-942 Lower Coleville Road BridgeSpring Twp• 52’ span Cracks with

displacement on Beams 1 & 12

Rust stains under Beam 2…precursor to cracking

Page 20: CCMPO - Local Transportation Funding Options

T-489 Front Street BridgeCurtin Twp• 90’ span

Cracking under joints on Beam 1

Page 21: CCMPO - Local Transportation Funding Options

Mill Street BridgeHoward Borough• 28’ span

Deterioration of several substructure components

Page 22: CCMPO - Local Transportation Funding Options

T-519 Fiedler Road BridgeHaines Twp• 26’ span

Section Loss & Severe Corrosion on Exposed Beam

Page 23: CCMPO - Local Transportation Funding Options

T-305 East Hannah Road BridgeTaylor Twp• 33’ span

Section loss & exposed rebar

Hole exposing beam

Missing stone in abutment

Page 24: CCMPO - Local Transportation Funding Options

Cracking and rust staining

T-312 Shady Dell Road BridgeWorth Twp• 25’ span

Page 25: CCMPO - Local Transportation Funding Options

T-467 Hoy Road BridgeWalker Twp• 25’ span

Hole & depression in deck

Crack with displacement Cracked wing wall

Page 26: CCMPO - Local Transportation Funding Options

Local Bridges: “Borderline”

• “Borderline” is an Centre County MPO staff term for bridges that have a 5 rating in one or more structural areas

• While these bridges are still in “fair” condition, they are nearing SD designation

T-525 Wolves Gap Road Bridge

Miles Twp

Page 27: CCMPO - Local Transportation Funding Options

Local Bridges: Functionally Obsolete

• An “FO” designation indicates that the bridge has older features (for example, road widths and weight limits) compared to more recently built bridges.

T-524 Brown Road BridgeMiles Twp

If you’ve crossed a one lane bridge

Then you’ve crossed an FO bridge.

Page 28: CCMPO - Local Transportation Funding Options

Local Bridges: Condition Analysis• 58 municipally owned bridges– 13 (22.4%) are Structurally Deficient– 18 (31%) are “Borderline” or nearing SD designation

(5 rating) in 1 or more areas– 10 (17.2%) are Functionally Obsolete

Bridge Conditions

No DesignationStructurally DeficientFunctionally Obsolete"Borderline"

22.4%17.2%

31% 29.4%

Page 29: CCMPO - Local Transportation Funding Options

58 Municipally Owned Bridges20’ or greater length

Page 30: CCMPO - Local Transportation Funding Options

13 Structurally Deficient

Page 31: CCMPO - Local Transportation Funding Options

18 “Borderline” Bridges

Page 32: CCMPO - Local Transportation Funding Options

10 Functionally Obsolete

Page 33: CCMPO - Local Transportation Funding Options

41 of 58Municipally Owned Bridgesfall into those 3 categories

Page 34: CCMPO - Local Transportation Funding Options

Small Local Structure Inventory• Locally owned structures under 20’ are not

inspected under PennDOT contract• Centre County MPO inventoried locations

several years ago• Focused on 8’-20’ spans (bridges, pipes)

Page 35: CCMPO - Local Transportation Funding Options

Around 100Locations with bridges orpipes that are 8’ to 20’ in length

Page 36: CCMPO - Local Transportation Funding Options

Sizeable holes & severe rust on at least 5 beams

Page 37: CCMPO - Local Transportation Funding Options

Jersey barrier (no railing)

Concrete deterioration

Vertical crack across entire structure

Page 38: CCMPO - Local Transportation Funding Options

Structure in fair condition…but maintenance needed

Page 39: CCMPO - Local Transportation Funding Options

Hole in roadway above concrete slab…

…because the slab and abutment had collapsed

Page 40: CCMPO - Local Transportation Funding Options

A typical cross pipe

second pipe to accommodate heavier storm events

Page 41: CCMPO - Local Transportation Funding Options

Success StoryT-710 Kato Road Bridge• Snow Shoe Twp• 103’ span

Bridge was closed due to condition

Funding source was difficult to find

Page 42: CCMPO - Local Transportation Funding Options

Success Story• Township & PennDOT 2-0 Municipal Services

developed a repair solution

• Locally bid project

Rebuilt abutments

Repaired pier

Page 43: CCMPO - Local Transportation Funding Options

Success Story

Total Project Cost: $300,000• Local Share: $270,000• County Act 13: $30,000

New beams & deck

Page 44: CCMPO - Local Transportation Funding Options

44

Thank you!Questions?