18
Flooding, Public Parks, & Marshes | Daniel Cazap | Paul Cho | Joe McLaughlin | Radu Stancut | Christopher Tull Spatial Analytics Final Project 5.13.2015

Flooding, public parks, & marshes

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Flooding, public parks, & marshes

Flooding, Public Parks, & Marshes

| Daniel Cazap | Paul Cho | Joe McLaughlin | Radu Stancut | Christopher Tull

Spatial AnalyticsFinal Project

5.13.2015

Page 2: Flooding, public parks, & marshes

In response to the unforeseen damages from Hurricane Sandy, New York State announced a program pursuant to which the State would purchase highly vulnerable properties, tear down existing structures, and convert such properties into permanent open space.

Resiliency Initiative

Page 3: Flooding, public parks, & marshes

Can we create a tool to help New York State find groupings of “at risk” properties that qualify for its Smart Home Buyout Program?

Problem Statement

Page 4: Flooding, public parks, & marshes

● Program budget limited to $171 million

● Absence of data about individual housing units that sustained damage

● Real world constraints and externalities (Resident consent, property proximity)

Constraints

Page 5: Flooding, public parks, & marshes

NYC Floodplainfrom ‘FEMA’

Building ‘Basemap’: Floodplain

Page 6: Flooding, public parks, & marshes

Building Age

Lot Type

Land Usage

Number of Floors

Proximity Code

Owner

Before 1983

Waterfront, Island, or Submerged

Vacancy

Detached Housing

One and Two Story Homes

+

City, State, Federal

Observed Attributes

Page 7: Flooding, public parks, & marshes

Wetlands in New York Statefrom ‘National Wetlands Inventory’

Clip ‘Wetlands’ for New York City

Building ‘Basemap’: Wetlands [Marshes]

Page 8: Flooding, public parks, & marshes

Waterfront Parks

+ PAWS (Publicly Accessible Waterfront Spaces)

+ Parks

Building ‘Basemap’: Parks

Page 9: Flooding, public parks, & marshes

Site Selection: Criteria

Identify high-risk properties:

● Far from existing parks○ Provide recreation space○ Improve park equity

● Near existing wetlands○ Minimize habitat fragmentation○ Promote species diversity

Lehtinen, R. M., Galatowitsch, S. M., & Tester, J. R. (1999). Consequences of habitat loss and fragmentation for wetland amphibian assemblages.Wetlands, 19(1), 1-12.

Page 10: Flooding, public parks, & marshes

Site Selection: Result

> 1700 ft. from a parkAND< 1000 ft. from a wetland

Page 11: Flooding, public parks, & marshes

Region of Interest: Hamilton Beach, Queens

● High-risk, single-family homes

● Next to existing wetland

● Relatively inexpensive land ($26.6M based on Zillow zestimates)

Page 12: Flooding, public parks, & marshes

Constructed wetlands

Page 13: Flooding, public parks, & marshes

Industrial Synergy?

Page 14: Flooding, public parks, & marshes

Identified by Both Tools

Parks and Marshland Proximity Tool Factory Proximity Tool

Page 15: Flooding, public parks, & marshes

Income Considerations

Page 16: Flooding, public parks, & marshes

Density Considerations

Page 17: Flooding, public parks, & marshes

Conclusions & Next Steps

➢ Floods are real and costly risks faced by many NY’ers; Paid for by all.

➢ Limited Green Space

➢ Marshes Mitigate Industrial Runoff

➢ An opportunity for synergy

➢ The real world is messier than this analysis, especially when dealing with people’s homes.

Page 18: Flooding, public parks, & marshes

Thank you / Q & A