Upload
ehelfant
View
529
Download
4
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
TPACK and SAMR as Unifying and Evaluative Models
Goals
• Understand TPACK• Survey TPACK integration• Uses to set goals – institutional and individual• Uses to determine PD• Overview of SAMR scale
Déjà vu or Véjà du
Great Integrations start with TPACK
http://tpack.org
How Big is Your Bubble?
Size Matters
Content Bubble
Content and Skills
CONSISTENT VOCABULARY
http://www.flickr.com/photos/l-e-e/3949211987/sizes/z/in/photostream/
7 Cs + 3Rs
• Content Understanding• Critical Thinking• Cross Cultural Understanding• Collaboration• Communication• Computing Skills• Career and Civic Learning and Self-Reliance
Partnership for 21st Century Skills
http://www.p21.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=254&Itemid=120
Basic, Scientific and Technological Literacy
Visual and Information Literacy
Cultural Literacy and Global Awareness
Adaptability and Managing Complexity
Curiosity, Creativity and Risk Taking
Higher Order Thinking and Sound Reasoning
Teaming, Collaboration and Interpersonal Skills
Personal and Social Responsibility
Interactive Communication
Prioritising, Planning and Managing Results
Effective Use of Real World Tools
High Quality, Meaningful Results
21st Century Skills (Engage)21st Century Skills (Engage)
Inventive Thinking:
Effective Communication: High Productivity:
Digital Age Literacy:
NETS
Bucks Institute Skills Matrix
Pedagogy Bubble
DifferentiationFormative Assessment
PBLExecutive Function
Learning Styles DifferencesTrans-Disciplinary Traits
Danielson’s DomainsPortfolio Assessment
Brain Rules/Brian based researchMultiple Intelligences
Technology Bubble
MICDS Tech Tool Kit
On the Web
Creating Your Toolkit
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Overlap is Important
Relationships among Bubbles
Essential Questions
as the driver
Portal as
delivery
system
Wikispaces as Curriculum Mapping toolsThe Sweet
Spot
A TPACK CMS
Faculty Survey
MATH Department
Suspected Artificial High
Our Lowest Scores
Scores on MICDS Initiatives
Some Interpretations
• We are moving to a version of PBL but still high premium on lecture/discussion
• We believe in differentiation and formative assessment but aren’t really sure how to do either well
• Computer is definitely integrated not necessarily transformative (SAMR)
Domain Number of Responses
K-12 Mean MICDS Mean
Pedagogy 1645 4.04 4.41
Technology 1659 3.23 3.77
Content 1654 4.02 4.65/4.19Content/Skills
Pedagogical Content
2191 4.04 4.02
Technological Content
1611 3.87 4.06
Technological Pedagogy
2175 3.65 4.12
Technological Content Pedagogy
2189 3.79 4.06
Institutional Bubbles
My Bubbles
Tech
Content
Pedagogy
Self Assess with Tech Matrix
Also ArizonaEncourage Reflective Practice
Goal Setting – Individual and Institutional
• With input from CIT, department chair, division head
• Based on survey and bubble output• In all three areas• Awareness of overlap• Reflection each trimester (Reflective
Practice)
Facutly Portfolio
Responding with PD
Individual - After School
Every Monday afternoon, some ThursdaysExamples• Google Docs – for collaborating, formative assessment,
and peer review• DyKnow and Formative Assessment
Faculty determine topics- • Email me• We’ll vote• Some of you might give a topic too
Institutional - Project Based Learning
• Project Rubric• PBL Site• Summer Session
Also address First Trimester Project Issues -
Summer PD
Learning Groups
• Project Based Learning• Assessment and Portfolios• Differentiation• CABAL (Caring about the Brain and Learning)
One person per departmentLunch meetings
Reading Materials
Assessing Integration Levels -SAMR
SAMR Tech Transformation
TPACK Lesson Rubric
Project Rubrics
• Buck’s Institute• POGIL Submision Rubric