28
Topological constraints in magnetic field relaxation Simon Candelaresi

Topological restrictions in magnetic field dynamics and reconnection

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Topological constraints inmagnetic field relaxation

Simon Candelaresi

trefoil knottwisted field

Topologies of Magnetic Fields

2

Hopf link

Borromean rings IUCAA knotmagnetic braid

See Ilan Roth's poster for more knots and knot theory.

Twisted Magnetic Fields

Twisted fields are morelikely to erupt (Canfield et al. 1999).

Tuesday's talk by Zhang Mei

3

Magnetic HelicityMeasure for the topology:

number of mutual linking

Conservation of magnetic helicity:

magnetic resistivity

Realizability condition:Magnetic energy is bound from below by magnetic helicity.

4

Interlocked Flux Rings

● initial condition: flux tubes

● isothermal compressible gas

● viscous medium

● periodic boundaries

actual linking vs. magnetic helicity

(Del Sordo et al. 2010)

5

Interlocked Flux Rings

6

Interlocked Flux Rings

Magnetic helicity rather then actual linking determines the field decay.

7

IUCAA knotBorromean rings

IUCAA Knot and Borromean Rings

IUCAA = The Inter-University Centre for Astronomy and Astrophysics, Pune, India

● Is magnetic helicity sufficient?

● Higher order invariants?

(Candelaresi and Brandenburg 2011)

8

Reconnection Characteristics

3 rings Twisted ring + interlocked rings

2 twisted rings

9

Magnetic Energy Decay

Higher order invariants?10

Fixed Point Index

mapping:

(Yeates et al. 2011)

Trace magnetic field lines from to .

Color coding:

Compare with :

red

yellow

green

blue

fixed points:

11

Fixed Point Index

Taylor state is not reached→ is additional constraint

Fixed point index:

Sign of fixed point :

conserved for

12

Summary and Outlook

● Braiding increases stability through the realizability condition.

● Turbulent magnetic field decay is restricted by magnetic helicity.

● Fixed point index as additional constraint in relaxation.

● Use fixed point index for knots and links (Yeates A.).

13

References

Del Sordo et al. 2010

Fabio Del Sordo, Simon Candelaresi, and Axel Brandenburg. Magnetic-field decay of three interlocked flux rings with zero linking number. Phys. Rev. E, 81:036401, Mar 2010.

Candelaresi and Brandenburg 2011

Simon Candelaresi, and Axel Brandenburg. Decay of helical and non-helical magnetic knots. Phys. Rev. E, 84:016406, 2011

Yeates, A. R., Hornig, G. and Wilmot-Smith, A. L.Topological Constraints on Magnetic Relaxation.Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 085002, 2010

Yeates et al. 2011

www.nordita.org/~iomsn 14

Canfield, R. C., Hudson, H. S., and McKenzie, D. E.Sigmoidal morphology and eruptive solar activity.Geophys. Res. Lett., 26:627, 1999

Canfield et al. 1999

Equilibrium StatesIdeal MHD:

Induction equation:

Woltjer (1958):

Taylor (1974):

constraint equilibrium

total volume volume along magnetic field line

constant along field line

Task: Find the state with minimal energy.Constraint: magnetic helicity conservation

15

Magnetic energy decay

16

Simulations● mesh point

● Isothermal compressible gas

● Viscous medium

● Periodic boundaries

17

N-foil Knots

3-foil 5-foil4-foil 6-foil 7-foil

*

* from Wikipedia, author: Jim.belk

cinquefoil knot

18

Magnetic helicity is approximately conserved.

Self-linking is transformed into twisting after reconnection.

N-foil Knots

19

N-foil Knots

20

Realizability condition more important for high .

N-foil Knots

21

Linking Number

Number of crossingsincreases like

Sign of the crossings for the 4-foil knot

22

Helicity vs. Energy

Knot is more strongly packed with increasing .

Magnetic energy is closer to its lower limit for high .

23

Braid Representation

4-foil knot

need braid representation of knots and links

24

AAA (trefoil knot) AABB (Borromean rings)

Magnetic Braid Configurations

25

Field Line Tracing

Reconnection rate:Generalized flux function:

26

Partition fluxes 2D:(Yeates, Hornig 2011b)

Magnetic Reconnection Rate

Classic: look for local maxima of

2D Magnetic field.Thick lines: separatrices.

(Yeates, Hornig 2011b)

Reconnection rate =magnetic flux through boundaries (spearatrices):

27

Magnetic Reconnection Rate

Partition reconnection rate 3D:Yeates, Hornig 2011b

Generalized flux function (curly A):

invariant in ideal MHD

Fixed points:

Reconnection rate:

28