12
Table 1. Different aspects of CALL in structural, cognitive, and sociocognitive framework Theoretical Framework Structure Cognitive Sociocognit ive History of computer development? Mainframes Personal computer Network computers How language is understood development? Through transmission from computer users. International ization of structures and habits through repetition and corrective Through the operation of innate cognitive heuristics on language input. Through social interaction and assimilatio n of others’ speech. 1

Theoretical framework of network-Based language teaching

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Theoretical framework of network-Based language teaching

Table 1. Different aspects of CALL in structural, cognitive, and sociocognitive

framework

Theoretical

Framework

Structure Cognitive Sociocognitive

History of

computer

development?

Mainframes Personal

computer

Network

computers

How language is

understood

development?

Through

transmission from

computer users.

Internationalization

of structures and

habits through

repetition and

corrective

feedback.

Through the

operation of

innate

cognitive

heuristics on

language input.

Through social

interaction and

assimilation of

others’ speech.

What is role of

computers?

To provide

grammar and

vocabulary

tutorials,

drills,practices,and

immediate

To provide

language input

and analytic

and inferential

tasks; learners

use their

To provide

alternative

contexts for

social

interaction; to

facilitate access

1

Page 2: Theoretical framework of network-Based language teaching

feedback existing

knowledge to

develop new

understanding

to existing

discourse

communities

and the creation

of new ones.

Crook’s

Metaphor of

CALL

Tutorial metaphor

(computer-as tutor)

Construction

metaphor

(computer-as-

pupil)

Toolbox

metaphor

(computer-as-

tool)

Web1.0 vs. Web 2.0

O'Reilly addresses that the concept of "Web 2.0" began with a conference brainstorming session. O’Reilly (2005) pointed out the companies which had survived the collapse. it seemed to have some things in common. We can say some kind of key point for the web such as "Web 2.0"

The term "Web 2.0" has been developments. There is more than 9.5 million information in Google. But there's still the amount of disagreement about just what Web 2.0 means, some people questions it? , How 2.0 can be running in our society, and how people are accepting it as the new conventional culture.

2

Page 3: Theoretical framework of network-Based language teaching

In O’Reilly (2005) initial thought. He formulated his sense of Web 2.0 by example:

Web 1.0   Web 2.0

DoubleClick --> Google AdSense

Ofoto --> Flickr

Akamai --> BitTorrent

mp3.com --> Napster

Britannica Online --> Wikipedia

personal websites --> blogging

evite --> upcoming.org and EVDB

domain name speculation --> search engine optimization

page views --> cost per click

screen scraping --> web services

publishing --> participation

content management systems --> wikis

directories (taxonomy) --> tagging ("folksonomy")

stickiness --> syndication

LinkedIn survey for teachers.WELCOME! 

. We would like you to be part of this survey. This survey aims to look at LinkedIn across the social networking, your response is important to us. 

INSTRUCTIONS 

This short survey will take about 10 minutes to complete. It asks questions about your use of LinkedIn.

3

Page 4: Theoretical framework of network-Based language teaching

Please rate your level of agreement with the statements in this Question using the following scale. SA – Strongly Agree      A – Agree      N – Neutral      D  – Disagree      SD – Strongly Disagree      NA – Not Applicable

   8. Please rate the following aspects of your LinkedIn experience. SA A N D SD NA

  a. The LinkedIn resources I access are of high quality. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

  b. The LinkedIn resources I access have enhanced my teaching. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

  c. The use of LinkedIn has improved my teaching practices. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

  d. The use of LinkedIn has enabled me to facilitate a more personalized approach to learning for my students.

☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

  e. The use of LinkedIn has increased my students’ access to learning resources.

☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

  f. The use of LinkedIn has made learning more interesting for my students.

☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

  g. I encourage greater interaction between my students through the use of LinkedIn.

☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

  h. The use of LinkedIn has improved learning outcomes for my students.

☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

  Teachers Interview questions1. How much you expect your students want in their course? Please

explain your answer in terms of the benefits or disadvantages of LinkedIn.

 

   

 2. Are you aware of eLearning solutions by LinkedIn?

  3. Does your organization have a strategy to provide teachers/trainers with the skills

needed to use LinkedIn to deliver reading comprehensive 

4. After teaching training, do you think LinkedIn can enhance reading comprehensive via educators collaborate

5. Is LinkedIn a useful one-stop resource that includes information I might need for my student (such as handbooks, past papers, reading lists, information about teaching staff)

4

Page 5: Theoretical framework of network-Based language teaching

LinkedIn survey for Students.WELCOME! 

. We would like you to be part of this survey. This survey aims to look at Lnkedin across the social networking, your response is important to us. 

INSTRUCTIONS 

This short survey will take about 10 minutes to complete. It asks questions about your use of LinkedIn.

Please rate your level of agreement with the statements in this Question using the following scale. SA – Strongly Agree      A – Agree      N – Neutral      D  – Disagree      SD – Strongly Disagree      NA – Not Applicable

1 Please rate the following aspects of your LinkedIn experience. SA A N D SD NA

  a. The LinkedIn enables me to enhance my reading comprehensive

☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

  b. I sometimes have technical difficulties accessing the LinkedIn

☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

c.

  d. The LinkedIn facilitates group wok ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

  e. Using the LinkedIn has enhanced the knowledge and understanding I gain from classroom, tutorials and practical.

☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

  e The LinkedIn allows me to provide feedback to my classmates and tutors.

☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

g. Assessments and tests posted on the LinkedIn are a useful way of checking that I understand course material

☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

5

Page 6: Theoretical framework of network-Based language teaching

Example of reading story 1

Social Networks

Do the names MySpace, Facebook, Orkut, etc. ring a bell? They probably do because they are some of the most popular sites on the internet today. These sites are all called 'social networking' sites because they help people meet and discuss things online. Each of these social networking sites has its own strengths: MySpace is especially popular among teenagers, Facebook is popular with college age people, Orkut is especially loved in Brazil, and CyWorld is the site to visit in South Korea. The common thread between all of these social networks is that they provide a place for people to interact, rather than a place to go to read or listen to 'content'. Web 2.0

Social networks are considered to be web 2.0. What does this mean? To understand this, it's important to understand what the original web did (often called web 1.0). Back in the nineties, the internet - or web - was a place to go to read articles, listen to music, get information, etc. Most people didn't contribute to the sites. They just 'browsed' the sites and took advantage of the information or resources provided. Of course, some people did create their own sites. However, creating a site was difficult. You needed to know basic HTML coding (the original

6

Page 7: Theoretical framework of network-Based language teaching

language the internet uses to 'code' pages). It certainly wasn't something most people wanted to do as it could take hours to get a basic page just right. Things began to get easier when blogs (from web log) were introduced. With blogs, many more people began writing 'posts', as well as commenting on other people's blogs.

MySpace Surprises Everybody

In 2003 a site named MySpace took the internet by storm. It was trying to mimic the most popular features of Friendster, the first social networking site. It quickly became popular among young users and the rest was history. Soon everyone was trying to develop a social networking site. The sites didn't provide 'content' to people, they helped people create, communicate and share what they loved including music, images and videos. They key to the success of these sites is that they provide a platform on which users create the content. This is very different from the beginning of the internet which focused on providing 'content' for people to enjoy.

Key to Success

Relying on users to create content is the key to the success of web 2.0 companies. Besides the social networking sites discussed here, other huge success stories include: Wikipedia, Digg.com and the latest success - Twitter. All of these companies rely on the desire of users to communicate with each other, thereby creating the 'content' that others want to consume.

Key Vocabulary

social networkto ring a bellsitestrength - weaknesscommon threadto interactcontentninetiesinternet - webto contributeto browse a siteto createcode / codingblog - web logpostto comment on to take by stormto mimicthe rest was historyplatformto consume

7

Page 8: Theoretical framework of network-Based language teaching

Which social networking site was not mentioned in the reading?

MySpace

LinkedIn

Facebook

What is Facebook?

A blog

A content site

A social networking site

Where is Orkut especially popular?

In Japan

In South Korea

In Brazil

Which phrase best describes what people do at social networking sites?

They interact with other people.

They browse articles and other content.

They code pages in HTML

Social networks are considered:

8

Page 9: Theoretical framework of network-Based language teaching

Web 1.0 sites

Web 2.0 sites

Web blogs

What was the original web mainly used for?

Interacting with other people

Browsing content

Creating pages in HTML

Why didn't many people create web pages in the beginning?

They didn't like communicating with others.

They didn't feel comfortable coding HTML pages.

They didn't know they could create web pages.

Which is the best description of web 2.0 sites?

They are content driven sites.

They are platforms for interaction.

They are like blogs, but better.

What do web 2.0 sites rely on?

Articles written by professional journalists

Users creating content

Fast internet connectionsWhat is most important for these new sites?

Users' desire to communicate with each other

Users' desire to read interesting content written by professionals

Users' desire to learn coding

9