Upload
joanna-hicks
View
627
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
A presentation from the WCCA 2011 event held in Brisbane, Australia.
The role of systems analysis in co-learning
Walter Rossing
Wageningen Centre for Agro-ecology and Systems Analysis (WaCASA), Wageningen University
Take home messages
Systems analysis offers varied career opportunities
Model to create diversity, not to find the answer
Projects with impact start from vague deliverables
Outline of presentation
Learning and systems research cycles Different types of problems and systems
research Co-learning and boundary work Knowledge for different uses Effective co-learning strategies Challenges for systems science
Learning
Learning is the process whereby knowledge is created through the transformation of experience: the learning cycle (Kolb 1984, Prentice Hall)
Abstract versus concrete Active versus reflective
The learning cycleAction:
Implementing a
‘bright idea’
Observation:Find out
consequences
Analysis:What are
implications?
Plan:Which
improveme
nts?
Kolb 1984, Prentice Hall
Models to support the reflective phases
The learning cycle, supported by the research cycle Action:
Implementing a
‘bright idea’
Observation:Find out
consequences
Analysis:What are
implications?
Plan:Which
improveme
nts?
Describe: what?
Explain: why?
Explore: what if?
Design / select: Which?
Kolb 1984, Prentice HallGiller et al. 2008, Ecol. & Soc.
Learning to make decisions: Four types of problems..
Unstructuredproblems
Moderatelystructured problems
(goals)
Moderatelystructured problems
(means)
Structuredproblems
Close to agreement on norms and values at stake
Far from certainty on required and available knowledge
Close to certainty
Far from agreement
Hisschemöller & Hoppe 2001, Policy Studies Review Annual
... and the role of science
Unstructured problems
Science as problem recognizer
Moderately structured problems (goals)
Science as analyst or advocate
Moderately structured problems (means)
Science as mediator
Structured problems
Science as problem solver
Close to agreement on norms and values at stake
Far from certainty on required and available knowledge
Close to certainty
Far from agreement
R. Hoppe 2007, WUR-CSIRO Workshop
‘Messy’ problems
Co-learning as a way to deal with ‘messy’ problems A process in which several agents
simultaneously try to adapt to each other's behaviour so as to produce desirable global system properties
Co-learning is stimulated by boundary work: Social practices to mediate between knowledge and
action Not fixed, negotiated and re-negotiated Often implicit or ambiguous Multiple arrangements per institute and per person
possible
Five boundary arrangements in land use modelling
Sterk et al. 2009, Land Use Pol.
3 cases
1 case
4 cases
1 case
No preferred arrangement in the literature
Outline of presentation
Learning and systems research cycles Different types of problems and systems
research Co-learning and boundary work Knowledge for different uses Effective co-learning strategies Challenges for systems science
Outline of presentation
Learning and systems research cycles Different types of problems and systems
research Co-learning and boundary work Knowledge for different uses Effective co-learning strategies Challenges for systems science
Knowledge: different uses, different requirements
Adapted from Clark et al. 2011, PNAS
Credibility Saliency
Legitimacy
Enlightenment: no clear user
Decision support: single user
Negotiation support: multiple users
Technically adequate in handling of evidence?
Relevant to the decision or policy?
Fair, unbiased, respectful of all stakeholders?
Adapted from Clark et al. 2011, PNAS
Credibility Saliency
Legitimacy
Enlightenment: no clear user ***Decision support: single user
*** ***
Negotiation support: multiple users
*** *** ***
Deviation from science tradition - ++ +++
Technically adequate in handling of evidence?
Relevant to the decision or policy?
Fair, unbiased, respectful of all stakeholders?
Knowledge: different uses, different requirements
Effective co-learning strategies
Meaningful participation during agenda setting and research
Arrangements for accountability Production of boundary objects, adaptable and
robust to different viewpoints
Carberry et al. 2002McCown 2002Sterk et al. 2009 Land Use PolClark et al. 2011 PNAS
Participation in agenda setting and research Goal definition
Formulation of a case-specific
perception of sustainability
System definitionDefinition of actual or
potential agro-ecosystems
Indicator setEvaluation of the state
aspired: dimensions and
thresholds
Integrative modelsExpress system performance
in terms of indicator set
Sustainabilityassessment
• Credible: ⋎• Salient: ?• Legitimate: ?
?
Rossing et al. 2007, AGEE
Arrange for accountability
Reflexive monitoring among case study leaders and monitors
E.g. EU project PURE: IPM for pesticide reduction Innovation system
Suppliers
Retail
Extension
NGOs
Research on both production and innovation system
Process facilitation: keeping up the ambition through involvement
Model outputs as boundary objects
Objective 1
Obje
ctiv
e 2
Scenario studies Pareto based explorationOptimization
Area of possible solutions
Calculated solutions in white
Groot et al. 2009, JEM
Model outputs as boundary objects
Objective 1
Obje
ctiv
e 2
Pareto based exploration
Groot et al. 2010, EJA
Groot & Rossing, 2011, MEE
Challenges for systems science from boundary work Requirements on knowledge
Credibility: science business-as-usual Saliency: specificity versus generality Legitimacy: research versus social embedding
Requirements on organization of research (projects!) Accommodating multiple disciplines, stakeholders,
levels of analysis Providing governance to balance the above Focus on research products that stimulate co-
learning
Take home messages
Systems analysis offers varied career opportunities
Model to create diversity, not to find the answer
Projects with impact start from vague deliverables
From hermitic scientist to political activist
A focus on boundary objects stimulates co-learning
Adaptive (self-reflexive) project management is indispensable (and a research topic in itself!)
Thank you for your attention!
© Wageningen UR