10
Creating Sharable Sakai Screencasts for Your Institution Amy Neymeyr, Carol Rhodes Indiana University University Information Technology Services

Sharable Content

  • Upload
    iusakai

  • View
    520

  • Download
    3

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: Sharable Content

Creating Sharable Sakai Screencasts for Your Institution

Amy Neymeyr, Carol RhodesIndiana University

University Information Technology Services

Page 2: Sharable Content

2

Screencasts, Oncourse CL and IU

• How do screencasts fit into our online support offerings?

Page 3: Sharable Content

How We Distribute Screencasts1

2

Page 4: Sharable Content

How Users Find Screencasts

2007 2008

Page 5: Sharable Content

Screencasts: The Good

Page 6: Sharable Content

Screencasts: The Bad

Branding

Size

Page 7: Sharable Content

New Directions:What We Needed to Do

• Screencast Requirements:– Sharable with [editable by] Sakai Partners

• What Technologies?– What is accessible by many?– What will allow us to update easily?

– Generic Sakai content only– Able to be played on portable devices– Exchangeable audio and other assets– Accessible

7

Page 8: Sharable Content

How We Responded• Experimentation with PowerPoint

Using Sakai-only Content– http://www.indiana.edu/~edclass/Sakai08/WeightedCategory_PercentCSR.ppt– http://www.indiana.edu/~edclass/Sakai08/Regular_PowerPoint_Messages_Tool_POC.ppt– http://www.indiana.edu/~edclass/Sakai08/csrMergeSiteContent_1_.ppt

– Pros:• Most have PowerPoint• Screen snaps in grayscale can reflect most Sakai environments• Master pages enable swappable content• Imported audio is exchangeable• Accessible• Wondershare or other conversion software converts to MP4

– Cons:• Timeline is difficult to manage• No savings in development time compared to Captivate

8

Page 9: Sharable Content

How We Responded• Experimentation with Captivate

Using Sakai-only Content– http://www.indiana.edu/~ittrain/oncourse/feature_demos/

qs_gdbook_change_grade_type.htm

– Demonstration of customizing skins– Pros:

• More focused, Sakai-only content mostly reflects various Sakai environments

• Library objects enable swappable content• Imported audio is also exchangeable• ByteScout SWF to Video conversion software converts to

mp4

– Cons:• Captivate does not record in Grayscale• Editing requires investment in Captivate• SWFs are not accessible, necessitating scripts. Example:

http://www.indiana.edu/~edclass/Sakai08/gdbook_change_grade_type.doc 9

Page 10: Sharable Content

Your Turn

• What do our Sakai partners need?• Your input• Questions?

10