82
john a. powell Director, Kirwan Institute for the Study of Race and Ethnicity Williams Chair in Civil Rights & Civil Liberties, Moritz College of Law CHILDRESS LECTURE October 2, 2009 St. Louis University School of Law

Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

john a. powell

Director, Kirwan Institute for the Study of Race and EthnicityWilliams Chair in Civil Rights & Civil Liberties, Moritz College of Law

CHILDRESS LECTUREOctober 2, 2009St. Louis University School of Law

Page 2: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence
Page 3: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

Objectivity Determinacy

(Certainty) Universal Truth Neutrality Subject-Object

Duality Linear Causality Man-Nature Duality

Mind-Body Duality Representationalism Transparency of

Mind Reductionism Reason/Emotion

Duality Unitary, Stable Self

Page 4: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

They Know!

What do these folks have in common?

Isaac Newton

Justice Scalia

Rene Decartes

Jerry Falwell

Page 5: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

Who are We?

A short history of knowing

Page 6: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence
Page 7: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

Transcendent Authority:

Adam and Eve and

The Tree of Knowledge

Page 8: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence
Page 11: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

Francis Bacon

Johannes Kepler

Galileo Galilei

Isaac Newton

Page 12: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

Since Newton had proved that the universe worked according to certain laws, discovered via the scientific method, shouldn't man, society, government work according to universal laws, too?

This is the birth of the social sciences: sociology, economics, psychology, anthropology…

David Hume: The Newton of the “Moral Sciences.”

Page 13: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

Modern jurisprudence has been an attempt to make the law more scientific: Objective, neutral, mechanical, certain.

Hugo Grotius: “The Galileo of law”

Francis Bacon Blackstone Montesquieu

Page 14: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

14

Professor Herbert Wechsler‟s Neutral Principles◦ Wechsler‟s assailed Brown v. Board of Education as

unprincipled violation of neutral principles of law:

“If the freedom of association is denied by segregation, integration forces an association upon those for whom it is unpleasant or repugnant”

◦ According to Wechsler, there was no „neutral‟ way to decide between these two claims

Page 15: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

Law as a neutral non actor, much like the neutral background of space in Newton‟s model

Instead, we should think of the law as bending or curving around certain ideals of society to better understand how “clockwork” policies affect different parts of society differently.

The Newtonian Legal Paradigm

Page 16: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

Newton‟s theory of gravity was based on flat space

Einstein theorized that space is not inert: Space is acted on by objects and objects are acted on by space

Objects curve space

Page 17: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

A belief in the objective meaning of words is the essence of textualism.

Objective

Page 18: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

Newtonian physics defined space and time as absolute.

General Relativity:◦ While the speed of light is constant time and space

are not

◦ Rest and motion are relative

There is no place of absolute rest

There is no independent point of reference.

Page 19: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

Assumed intrinsic separability of the knower and known, subject and object (Cartesian cut)◦ Observer could view world without affecting it.

Quantum Physics calls into question the limits of possible objectivity and certainty.

Uncertainty Principle: in measuring the characteristics of a particle, we necessarily disturb its pre-measurement values.

Page 20: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

Position

Momentum

Page 21: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

Newtonian physics assumed that all objects have position and momentum, and that these properties are knowable.

Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle: we cannot know both the position and the momentum of a particle simultaneously. There is a trade-off.

The observer is never separate from the system studied.

Page 22: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

Uncertainty v. Indeterminacy ◦ For Bohr, it was not that we cannot know both the

position and momentum of a particular; rather, the particles do not have determinate values of position and momentum simultaneously.

◦ Contradicts idea of determinacy in Newtonian physics

◦ The world is merely probabilitistic.

Page 23: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

Racial imbalance (in schools) can result from any number of innocent private

decisions, including voluntary housing choices.

Individuals schools fall in and out of balance in the natural course, and the appropriate balance will shift with a

school district‟s changing demographics.

Justice Thomas, Concurring, Parents Involved in Community Schools v.

Seattle School Dist. No. 1 (2007)

Natural

Page 24: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

“Natural science does not simply describe and explain nature; it is partof the interplay between nature and

ourselves…[The Cartesian] separation between the world and I [is]

impossible.”

Heisenberg

Page 25: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

25

Justice Henry

Billings Brown

The object of the amendment was undoubtedly to enforce

equality of the races before the law, but, in the nature of

things, it could not have intended to abolish distinctions

based upon color, or to enforce social as distinguished

from political, equality, or a commingling of the races

upon terms unsatisfactory to either.

We consider the underlying fallacy of the plaintiff’s argument to

consist in the assumption that the enforced separation of the

two races stamps the colored race with a badge of inferiority.

If this be so, it is not by reason of anything found in the act, but

solely because the colored race chooses to put that

construction upon it.

Page 26: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

26

From which top hat will the magician pull a bunny?

Page 27: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

27

Neither one. When a question is framed as a dichotomy, it is difficult to think outside of

the “either – or” mindset.

Page 28: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

Decartes “Automaton” duck

Page 29: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

The State certainly has a legitimate and substantial interest in ameliorating, or

eliminating where feasible, the disabling effects of identified discrimination.

[That] goal [is] far more focused than the remedying of the effects of “societal discrimination,” an amorphous concept

of injury that may be ageless in its reach into the past.

Justice Powell

In Bakke

Page 30: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

30

It is this essential fact of a predominantly Negro school population in Detroit –caused by unknown and perhaps unknowable factors such as in-migration, birth rates, economic changes, or cumulative acts of private racial fears – that accounts for the ‘growing core of Negro schools,’ a core that has grown to include virtually the entire city.

Justice Potter Stewart, Concurring, Milliken v. Bradley

Page 31: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

Systems Thinking:

A D

C

B

E

Causation is reciprocal, mutual, and

cumulative.

The Newtonian Perspective:

A B C D E

Linear causation

31

31

Page 32: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

Patterns arise from the interaction of parts.

Termite Colony Mound

Page 33: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence
Page 34: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

34

Lower Educational

Outcomes for Urban

School Districts

Increased Flight

of Affluent

Families from

Urban Areas

Neighborhood

(Housing)

Segregation

School

Segregation

Page 35: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence
Page 36: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

A defendant‟s action must be sufficiently related to an injury to be held the cause of that injury. Generally, the injury must be reasonably foreseeable by the defendant.

– Emphasis on causation as limited in time and space, and directly traceable to one cause.

– Emphasis on foreseeability.

Page 37: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

37

Victim/perpetrator

(individualistic view)

Intent (purpose or motive)

(prejudiced “bad apple)

Decision-maker self awareness

(transparency of mind)

Page 38: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

The individual is the focus of much discrimination law, even though discrimination can often be the product of numerous factors.

Page 39: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

It is necessary to consciously will discrimination for the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause to apply.

This assumes the

enlightenment precept of

complete access to the

mind.

Page 40: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

As little as 2% of our thinking takes place at the conscious level.

Much of the mind operates, makes decisions, and processes information at a level below consciousness. It turns out that these processes are necessary for both survival and intelligence.

Page 41: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

Or a Rabbit?

A Duck?

Page 42: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence
Page 43: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

43

The Kanizsa Triangle

Page 44: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

Source: Drew Westin, the Political Brain

Page 45: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

Planet or a Satellite?

The Answer depends on your paradigm

Page 46: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

Beautiful

Page 47: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

47

What colors are the following lines of text?

Page 48: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

48

What colors are the following lines of text?

Page 49: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

49

What colors are the following lines of text?

Page 50: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

50

What colors are the following lines of text?

Page 51: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

51

What colors are the following lines of text?

Page 53: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FqGqGwRaILg&feature=player_embedded

Page 54: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

54

People have multiple networks that may be activated without our awareness◦ Depending on the situation, one network becomes

dominant over the others

Even though we may fight them, implicit biases reside within us…

Page 55: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

55

In a video-game experiment, images of suspects -both armed and unarmed, black and white – flash rapidly on a monitor. Within a split-second, subjects must decide whether to shoot.

Participants must assess whether the man in each picture is carrying a gun. Within 850 milliseconds they must press one key to shoot or another to leave the figure unharmed.

After repeated experimentation, people‟s mistakes,

although rare, follow a pattern:◦ They shoot more unarmed blacks than unarmed whites;

◦ They fail to shoot more whites than blacks are holding weapons.

Page 56: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

56

Page 57: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

57http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/08/19/

https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/

Page 58: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

Before enlightenment causation was in god or magic

After there is an inter (intra)action between subject/object/environment◦ There is no inert environment or background

Observing affects the observed and the observe affects the observer

There is a limit to certainty

The self needs to be re-conceptualized.

Page 59: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

Adam and Eve: Original Sin

Page 61: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

- Don Cherry

Page 62: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence
Page 63: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

You Lie!

Page 64: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

I think an overwhelming portion of the intensely demonstrated animosity toward President Barack

Obama is based on the fact that he is a black man, that he's African-American

Page 65: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

You Lie, (Boy)!

Page 66: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

[M]y impression is that race is largely beside the point. There are other, equally important strains in American history that are far more germane to the

current conflicts.

For example, for generations schoolchildren studied the long debate between Hamiltonians and Jeffersonians. Hamiltonians stood for urbanism, industrialism and federal power. Jeffersonians stood for [states-rights, local control, and was suspicious of financial concentration].

Jefferson‟s philosophy inspired Andrew Jackson, who led a movement of plain people against the cosmopolitan elites. Jackson dismantled the Second Bank of the United States because he feared the fusion of federal and financial power.

Page 67: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

This populist tendency continued through the centuries. Sometimes it took right-wing forms, sometimes left-wing ones. Sometimes it was agrarian. Sometimes it was more union-oriented. Often it was extreme, conspiratorial and rude.

What we‟re seeing is the latest iteration of that populist tendency and the militant progressive reaction to it. We now have a populist news media that exaggerates the importance of the Van Jones and Acorn stories to prove the elites are decadent and un-American, and we have a progressive news media that exaggerates stories

like the Joe Wilson shout and the opposition to the Obama schools speech to show that small-town folks are dumb wackos.

Page 68: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

Not About Race?

Page 69: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

[Obama] attended a Black Liberation Theology church for 20 years. Black Liberation Theology teaches it is the white man that has kept you down. It is the white man that you must take money from, you

must take power from to make up for the past.

Barack Obama is setting up universal healthcare, universal college, green jobs as stealth reparations. That way the victim status is maintained. And he also brings back back-door reparations.

http://www.glennbeck.com/content/articles/article/198/28317/

Page 70: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

What we‟re seeing is the latest iteration of that populist tendency ... We now have a populist news media that

exaggerates the importance of the Van Jones and Acorn stories to prove the elites are decadent and un-American…

Scene from Birth of a

Nation

Page 71: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

From Bacon to Montesquieu

Page 72: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

Sir William Blackstone

Blackstone systematized and organized

English law.

Page 73: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

Hobbes The Leviathan State

Page 74: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

John Locke: Social Contract Theory

“Life, Liberty, Property” “Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness”

Page 75: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

Montesquieu

Page 76: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence
Page 77: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence
Page 78: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence
Page 79: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

79

People have multiple networks that may be activated without our awareness.

◦ Depending on the situation, one network becomes dominant over the others

Even though we may fight them, implicit biases reside within us…

Page 80: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

things to be represented

representation

Page 81: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

experimenting

theorizing

objects

meaning

subjects

matter

Page 82: Remaking Law: Moving Beyond an Enlightenment Jurisprudence

Reductionism permeates our legal system.

Cross-cutting issues such as environmental law, housing, or national security have been divided into many discrete agencies with specific missions.

Coordination is almost impossible.