Citace, metriky, spolupráce

Co nového u Elsevier

Lucie Boudová, PhD

18/2/2016

Co nového u Elsevier

CITACE METRIKY SPOLUPRÁCE

Citace

Short Introduction to Mendeley

What is Mendeley?

Mendeley is a reference manager

allowing you to manage, read,

share, annotate and cite your

research papers...

… forming a crowdsourced database with a

unique layer of social research information

and an Open API

...and an academic collaboration

network with 4 million users to

connect like-minded researchers &

discover research trends and

statistics.

What is Mendeley?

Desktop

Web

Mobile

• Free Academic Software

• Cross-Platform (Win/Mac/Linux)

• All Major Browsers

Mendeley’s Three Key Values

Reference manager

“Drives Researcher Productivity”

Research Data & API

“Creates Additional Insights & Build Apps”

Research Network & Groups

“Enables Collaboration and Knowledge Sharing”

What is Mendeley Institutional Edition?

Reference manager

“Drives Researcher Productivity”

Research Data & API

“Creates Additional Insights & Build Apps”

Research Network & Groups

“Enables Collaboration and Knowledge Sharing”

More Storage Space

More teams, more collaborators

More Insight for Librarian:

Administration & Analytics Dashboard

Plus all the institutional services: • Alumni policy • Access to online training • Pre-arranged train-the-

trainer sessions • 24x5 customer support • Deployment program

services

Mendeley Library Certification

Programme

• Become a Certified Mendeley Librarian and secure a Mendeley Premium

Upgrade for 500 users at your institution – at no cost.

• Self-paced, self-study program that will take you approximately 15-20 hours

to complete;

• Mendeley Premium Upgrade means:

– Increase in personal library size for each user, from 2 GB to 5 GB

– Increase in group storage, from 100 MB to 20 GB

– Increase in private group size, from three to 25 members

– Increase in number of private groups, from one to unlimited

http://www.elsevier.com/online-tools/mendeley/training-and-support#for-academic-librarians

Metriky

Rethinking Scopus

| 11

Scopus is the Gold standard: more than 150 leading

research organizations rely on Scopus data

MD Anderson

Keio

University

Kiel

University

Gazi

University

Queen’s

University

Belfast

Ural Federal

University

CAPES Brazil

Nanyang

Technological

University

UK BIS

ERA 2014

UK REF

Nigerian

Government

ISTIC Peking

University

NRF -Korea

FCT Portugal

Danish BFI

Germany IFQ

Italy ANVUR

IISER

STINT Michigan Corporate

Relations Network

ReachNC

Russian Foundation

of Basic Research

TCI -

Thailand

Rankings:

NSF

European Commission & ERC

NCN Poland

Estonia Research Council

| 12

Comparison with nearest peer

Scopus 22,245

Web of Science 12,140

Scopus

7,443 (+73%)

WoS

4,291

Scopus

6,795 (+96%)

WoS

3,472

Scopus

4,492 (+50%)

WoS

3,002

Scopus

8,086 (+99%)

WoS

4,060

Physical Sciences Health Sciences Life Sciences Social Sciences

~12K titles (Core Collection)

3,300 publishers

Updated weekly

~22K titles

>5,000 publishers

Updated daily

Source: Web of Science Real Facts, Web of Science title list and Scopus’ own data (April 2015)

| 13

Different source types to ensure coverage in all subject

fields

21,362 peer-reviewed

journals

362 trade journals

• Full metadata, abstracts

and cited references (ref’s

post-1995 only)

• Pre-1996 cited ref’s

expansion 4M out of 12M

• Going back to 1823

• Funding data from

acknowledgements

Physical

Sciences

7,443

Health

Sciences

6,795

Social

Sciences

8,086

Life

Sciences

4,492

JOURNALS

84K events

7.0M records (12%)

Conf. expansion (2005 – 2013)

1,017 conferences

6,022 conf. events

410K conf. papers

5M citations

Mainly Engineering and

Physical Sciences

CONFERENCES

521 book series

- 28K Volumes

- 1.1M items

98,060 stand-alone books

- 785K items

Books expansion:

120K books by 2015

- Focus on Social Sciences

and A&H

BOOKS

Different source types are added to ensure that coverage, discoverability,

profiles and impact measurement for research in all subject fields is

accounted for in Scopus.

Source: Scopus title list (June 2015)

| 14

Pre-1996 cited reference expansion

Coverage years

• Pre-1996, going back to 1970

Number of articles

• Around 8M+ articles will be re-processed to include cited references. In addition around 4M pre-1996 articles will be backfilled

Scope • Archives from major publishers

with available digital archives

H-index for senior researchers increases:

2015 processing planning:

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Author 1 Author 2 Author 3 Author 4

10-Jul

22-Aug

14-Nov

20-Nov

4-Dec

30-Dec

23-JanTier 1

Tier 2

Tier 3

Tier 4

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Source: Scopus (August 2015)

| 15

Curation matters: re-evaluation

Our customers demand it. Our business depends on it

The re-evaluation process is essentially a rigorous housekeeping exercise

designed to ensure that the journal content in Scopus meets the high standards

we and our customers now demand.

Identify and Evaluate

Titles

Select only high quality

content

Index titles Re-evaluate

Titles

Discontinue poor performing

titles

• Annual rolling initiative:

• Identify and notify underperforming

journals

• One year to improve quality based on

metrics & set benchmarks (output,

usage, citations, self-citations)

• If red flag remains, the journal will be

reviewed by the CSAB with the possible

consequence of discontinuation in

Scopus

• Incentive for continuous journal performance

• Launch Q1 2015, re-evaluation to start Q1 2016

| 16

More accuracy, transparency, more metrics

www.journalmetrics.com/

| 17

Integration of article level metrics into Scopus

| 18

Scopus API to provide Scopus data as key citation

information on the publisher platform

| 19

What are the most common uses of Scopus APIs? Scopus Use cases API More information

Showing publications from Scopus on your website

Scopus Search API Detailed policy Implementation guide

Showing Scopus cited-by counts on your website

Scopus Search API / Abstract Citation Count API

Detailed policy Implementation guide

Federated search Scopus Search API Detailed policy Implementation guide

Populating IRs with basic document metadata from Scopus

Scopus Search API / Abstract Retrieval API / Citation Count API

Detailed policy Implementation guide

Populating current research information systems with basic document metadata and citation overviews from Scopus

Scopus Search API/ Abstract Retrieval API / Citation Count API/ Citation Overview API

Detailed policy Implementation guide

Populating publication histories of VIVO profiles

Scopus Search API / Abstract Retrieval API / Citation Count API

Detailed policy Implementation guide

Showing SNIP/SJR/IPP on journal homepage

Serial Title API Detailed policy Implementation guide

Spolupráce

People and solutions integrated

ScienceDirect

TITLE OF PRESENTATION |

ScienceDirect and institutional repositories

• Store research output or make it available

• Grant access to any user visiting the IR

• Track research output: evaluation of the efficiency of researchers

• Compliance reporting for funding bodies

• Managing access and entitlements; provide the best versions to users

• Copyright compliant for publishers

All of this is time sensitive and

time consuming.

| 23 Open Access

Elsevier Services for Institutional Repositories

Elsevier supports Institutional Repositories to help their researchers share their research and collaborate effectively.

Our new API’s help IR’s to:

- Easily retrieve all articles of your affiliated author for better coverage

- Comply easily with access entitlements (see Elsevier sharing and hosting policies),which will include embargo end dates soon

- Ensure your users have access to the best available version.

The 3 API’s:

1. The ScienceDirect Search API; provides metadata including DOIs and abstracts

2. Article / User Entitlement API; check for the best available version.

3. Optional: Full Text Retrieval API for Embedding of PDFs. Links to the final version on SD or a first page preview.

Sign up for updates on Elsevier news for Institutional Repositories on

http://www.elsevier.com/online-tools/sciencedirect/linking-and-integration/institutional-

repository

| 24 Open Access

Example– MyScienceWork

The first Institutional Repository is yet to go live with the implementation of the API

package, however:

www.MyScienceWork.com, a Scientific Social Network is already using our APIs to let

their users search, view, and even annotate and share ScienceDirect content on their

website. 2. Green check mark

indicates the user is entitled

to view the full text

Using entitlements API

3. First page preview from

ScienceDirect API

(not counted as full-text

download),

using the full-text API

1. Search results based

on indexed XML/

structured meta data

3. User can read and

annotate ScienceDirect

embedded articles on

Mysciencework.com

Using the full-text API

| 25 Open Access

Next steps to participate in the pilot

1. If you’re interested in participating, we will share a pilot

agreement for your signature as soon as possible

2. We create a token you need to access our API’s

3. We will provide you with developer instructions how to integrate

the relevant API’s into your repository

4. Your repository team will integrate the API’s, our API support

team will be available to support your developers

5. We will ask for your feedback at two points in time:

1. When you have just launched the API integration – to obtain

feedback on the ease of implementation, the clarity of the instructions,

etc.

2. When the integration has been live for a while, to obtain feedback on

user experience.

Mendeley Social • Profile

• Stats

• Suggestions

Profile

Suggest

Fine tuning recommendations

Articles stats

Citing articles

Key insights

Elsevier Research Data

Management (Mendeley Data)

Summary

The methods and results of health research are documented in study protocols, full study

reports (detailing all analyses), journal reports, and participant-level datasets. However,

protocols, full study reports, and participant-level datasets are rarely available, and journal

reports are available for only half of all studies and are plagued by selective reporting of

methods and results. Furthermore, information provided in study protocols and reports

varies in quality and is often incomplete. When full information about studies is

inaccessible, billions of dollars in investment are wasted, bias is introduced, and

research and care of patients are detrimentally affected. To help to improve this

situation at a systemic level, three main actions are warranted. First, academic institutions

and funders should reward investigators who fully disseminate their research protocols,

reports, and participant-level datasets. Second, standards for the content of protocols and

full study reports and for data sharing practices should be rigorously developed and

adopted for all types of health research. Finally, journals, funders, sponsors, research

ethics committees, regulators, and legislators should endorse and enforce policies

supporting study registration and wide availability of journal reports, full study reports, and

participant-level datasets.

A view on Research Data:

A similar view on Research Data - Christine L. Borgman

“…issues are becoming clear: the need for coordination among stakeholders,

economic challenges to the sustainability of archives, and misaligned public

policies for open access to publications and data. The practice and policy

issues on the ground are much less well understood, however. Norms for the

acquisition, release, and reuse of data –and the very definition of data – vary

widely between research domains, and motivations to share data vary

accordingly.... Releasing data offers benefits, but so does controlling data.

The workforces required for the stewardship of data are many and varied; they

too must be nurtured and sustained. Wise investments must be made in

knowledge infrastructures – and soon – if research data are to remain

useful for generations to come.”

- Christine L. Borgman. "Keynote: Data, Data, Everywhere, Nor Any Drop to

Drink (slides)" Research Data Alliance Fourth Plenary Meeting. Amsterdam.

Sep. 2014.

Signs of hope

36

Peter W. Kirlew, Life Science Data Repositories in the

Publications of Scientists and Librarians

Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship,

Spring 2011 DOI: 10.5062/F4X63JT2

2011 1988

Data citations per year (100s) Data citation index coverage (log scale)

http://arxiv.org/vc/arxiv/papers/1306/1306.6584v1.pdf

If this trend continues, we will see more

datasets than articles being posted well

before 2020

Common practice: data storage is still very fragmented

Researcher survey, 1202 respondents

(PARSE.insight 2010)

3 37

When you leave your institution…what happens with your data?

„Forschende und ihre Daten. Ergebnisse einer österreichweiten Befragung (eBook)“

E-infrastructures Austria

Bauer, B. (Bruno) et all

Oct 2015

https://phaidra.univie.ac.at/detail_object/o:407736

Stays at

institution

Take it with me

Don’t know

Data is lost

Other

The 10 components for effective research data 10.

Inte

gra

te u

pstr

eam

and d

ow

nstr

eam

– m

ake m

eta

da

ta t

o s

erv

e u

se.

Save

Share

Use

9. Re-usable (allow tools to run on it)

8. Reproducible

7. Trusted (e.g. reviewed)

6. Comprehensible (description / method is available)

5. Citable

4. Discoverable (data is indexed or data is linked from article)

3. Accessible

2. Preserved (long-term & format-independent)

1. Stored (existing in some form)

39

Mendeley Research Data Beta

Individual researchers can already sign up and try Data.Mendeley.com,

publish data articles, and link their data.

Děkuji za pozornost!

l.boudova@elsevier.com