Click here to load reader

[Maksimenkova_Neznanov] Peer Assessment to Programmers & Peer Assessment System for Complex Artifacts

  • View
    271

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Text of [Maksimenkova_Neznanov] Peer Assessment to Programmers & Peer Assessment System for Complex...

  1. 1. , , .., .., 1
  2. 2. ? , , , , E-mail: [email protected] Web-site: http://hse.ru/staff/maksimenkova Blog: http://stoptoscale.blogspot.ru (RU) , , , , E-mail: [email protected] Web-site: http://hse.ru/staff/aneznanov Blog: http://siberianshamanssongs.blogspot.ru (RU) .., .., 2
  3. 3. ? () PASCA PASCA 3
  4. 4. .., .., 4
  5. 5. : (code review) Computer Science Curricular 2013 Software development fundamentals(SDF) .., .., 5
  6. 6. .., .., 6
  7. 7. () (pedagogical code review, PCR) Hundhausen, C.D., Agrawal, A., and Agarwal, P. Talking about Code: Integrating Pedagogical Code Reviews into Early Computing Courses. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ., 13, 3 (August2013), 14:28 - , (POGIL, Process-Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning) Hu, H. H. and Shepherd, T. D. 2013. Using POGIL to help students learn to program. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 13, 3, Article 13 (August2013), 23 pages. .., .., 7
  8. 8. : Falchikov N, Goldfinch J. Student Peer Assessment in Higher Education:A Meta-Analysis Comparing Peer and Teacher Marks. Review of EducationalResearch,70(3),2000.pp.287- 322 .., .., 8
  9. 9. (code review) ( ) ( ) .., .., 9
  10. 10. C MyPeerReview, (computer science) Hamalainen, H., Hyyrynen, V., Ikonen, J., and Porras, J. Applying peer-review for programming assignments. International Journal on Information Technologies & Security, 1 (2011), 3-17. Arop, . Hamer J, Purchase H, Denny P, Luxton-Reilly A. Quality of Peer Assessment in CS1. 5th International Workshop on Computing Education Research, Berkeley, 2009. pp. 27-36. ... .., .., 10
  11. 11. , , web- .., .., 11 , ?!
  12. 12. .., .., 12
  13. 13. - .., .., 13
  14. 14. : [Peer Assessment (PA)] , [peer review (PR)] , (PR session) , , .., .., 14
  15. 15. : : 1. [Teacher] , 2. [Student] , 3. [Initial Author] , 4. [Submitter] , 5. [Reviewer] , .., .., 15
  16. 16. : : 1. [PA parameters] 2. [PR form] , ; , . 3. [Submission] , 4. [Review] , 5. [Feedback] , .., .., 16
  17. 17. Peer-Assessment Sytem for Complex Artifacts (PASCA) .., .., 17
  18. 18. PASCA : 1. 2. (peer-reviewform) 3. 4. - .., .., 18
  19. 19. : ( ) .., .., 19
  20. 20. : Microsoft Office 2010+ Office 365 : IMAP- Microsoft Exchange .., .., 20
  21. 21. PASCA .., .., 21 () !
  22. 22. : 1. 1.1. ( ) 1.2. [rubric] 1.3. () 1.4. 1.5. < , > .., .., 22
  23. 23. : 2. 2.1. 2.2. 2.3. [] (% ) .., .., 23
  24. 24. : 3. 3.1. 3.2. 3.3. .., .., 24
  25. 25. : 4. 4.1. 4.2. 4.3. .., .., 25
  26. 26. : - : .., .., 26
  27. 27. .., .., 27
  28. 28. (PR-Form) .., .., 28
  29. 29. : .., .., 29
  30. 30. : .., .., 30
  31. 31. .., .., 31
  32. 32. 1 , 09.03.04 66 35 (2014-2015), 58 (2015-2016) (https://www.hse.ru/edu/courses/177016040) 2015-2016 . (https://sites.google.com/site/progintro2015/) .., .., 32
  33. 33. . . . C# . . # . . .., .., 33
  34. 34. - - (Post-servey) PASCA .., .., 34 Lab1 Lab2 Lab3 Not desided 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Which of PA assignments was the most useful for you personally? Number of students
  35. 35. .., .., 35 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Numberofstudents Scores
  36. 36. , , , . Microsoft OneNote Class Notebook (https://www.onenote.com/classnotebook) (rubric + grading rule + scale) ( , ) () ? ? ? . .., .., 36
  37. 37. ?! ! : , , , , E-mail: [email protected] Web-site: http://hse.ru/staff/aneznanov Blog: http://siberianshamanssongs.blogspot.ru (RU) , , , , E-mail: [email protected] Web-site: http://hse.ru/staff/maksimenkova Blog: http://stoptoscale.blogspot.ru (RU) .., .., 37

Search related