30
[email protected] Vienna, 16.11.2009 1 International Congress Cultural Heritage and New Technologies Geo-Tagging in Archaeology: Practical Experiences with the TUGeoWiki Katharina Holzinger, Christian Safran, Martin Ebner, Frank Kappe, Gabriele Koiner, Andreas Holzinger Institute for Information Systems and Computer Media, TU Graz in cooperation with the Institute of Archaeology, Graz University Monday 16 November, 2009, 13:30-17:00 – Workshop 4 Venue: Rathaus Wien, Room 319 http://www.stadtarchaeologie.at Chairs: Michael DONEUS, Austria & Samuel PALEY, USA

Geo-Tagging in Archaeology: Practical Experiences with the TUGeoWiki

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Presentation at International Congress “Cultural Heritage and New Technologies” (Workshop “Archäologie & Computer”)”

Citation preview

Page 1: Geo-Tagging in Archaeology: Practical Experiences with the TUGeoWiki

[email protected] Vienna, 16.11.20091

International Congress Cultural Heritage and New Technologies

Geo-Tagging in Archaeology:Practical Experiences with the TUGeoWiki

Katharina Holzinger, Christian Safran, Martin Ebner, Frank Kappe, Gabriele Koiner, Andreas Holzinger

Institute for Information Systems and Computer Media, TU Grazin cooperation with the Institute of Archaeology, Graz University

Monday 16 November, 2009, 13:30-17:00 – Workshop 4Venue: Rathaus Wien, Room 319http://www.stadtarchaeologie.at

Chairs: Michael DONEUS, Austria & Samuel PALEY, USA

Page 2: Geo-Tagging in Archaeology: Practical Experiences with the TUGeoWiki

[email protected] Vienna, 16.11.20092

Overview

Images and their Location in ArchaeologyMobile Geotagging Archaeological Documentation in the TUGeoWikiUse Case 1: Roman Stones (Graz)Use Case 2: Vindobona (Vienna)Use Case 3: Tavium (Turkey)Problems and Solutions

Page 3: Geo-Tagging in Archaeology: Practical Experiences with the TUGeoWiki

[email protected] Vienna, 16.11.20093

Visual Information -> Photographs

Textual information (e.g. Pausanias) often reflects the ideological, educational or mental background of the authorVisual information helps identifying an object better than by reading a text-> Visual information (drawings, photographs, or the object itself!) is essential for Archaeologists

Introduction MethodsMaterials Discussion ConclusionBackground

(Alexandridis & Heilmeyer, 2004)

Page 4: Geo-Tagging in Archaeology: Practical Experiences with the TUGeoWiki

[email protected] Vienna, 16.11.20094

Photographs + Location

Page 5: Geo-Tagging in Archaeology: Practical Experiences with the TUGeoWiki

[email protected] Vienna, 16.11.20095

Geocoded digital images include

latitude and longitudealtitude metadata, e.g., accuracy data, andplace names, find spots and further notes

Introduction MethodsMaterials Discussion ConclusionBackground

Page 6: Geo-Tagging in Archaeology: Practical Experiences with the TUGeoWiki

[email protected] Vienna, 16.11.20096

GPS as basis technology

24 satellites circle in 12-hour in evenly distributed orbits at an altitude of 17,000 kmEach satellite carries a computer and a very accurate atomic clock Handheld GPS units operate by picking up the continuously signals from at least 4 satellites GPS is controlled by the US Department of Defense

Nyquist & Czech

Introduction MethodsMaterials Discussion ConclusionBackground

Page 7: Geo-Tagging in Archaeology: Practical Experiences with the TUGeoWiki

[email protected] Vienna, 16.11.20097

Social Software: Blogs versus Wikis

WikiWikis allow many contributors to add or edit contentNo specific organization: hyperlinksIt is always work in progressBeneficial for supporting collaborative work

BlogOnly the author can edit the blog (others post just comments) Posts are permanent and the person owns itSpecific organization, e.g. reverse chronologicalBeneficial for information sharing, starting a discussion, etc.

Introduction MethodsMaterials Discussion ConclusionBackground

Page 8: Geo-Tagging in Archaeology: Practical Experiences with the TUGeoWiki

[email protected] Vienna, 16.11.20098

Related Work (Example)

GeoWiki is an established termThese are geographically contextualized wikise.g. Priedhorsky & Terveen, 2008, cyclopath for cyclists documenting cyclepaths

Introduction MethodsMaterials Discussion ConclusionBackground

Page 9: Geo-Tagging in Archaeology: Practical Experiences with the TUGeoWiki

[email protected] Vienna, 16.11.20099

GeoWikis have limitations …

Introduction Methods Materials Discussion ConclusionBackground

Other GeoWikis implementations are focused on the geographical aspect only, e.g. editable mapsthe TUGeoWiki focuses on the documentation of the individual locations and the connections between them, supports collaborative workThe design of the TUGeoWiki as a server-side and client-side application was based on four central requirements

Page 10: Geo-Tagging in Archaeology: Practical Experiences with the TUGeoWiki

[email protected] Vienna, 16.11.200910

Requirements

1) Geotagging InterfacePossibility of correcting errors manually

2) Mobile AND Desktop InterfaceSystem must also be useful and useable during field studies, i.e. create and edit information on the spot

3) Collaborative EnvironmentEducational benefit from WIKI principle

4) Map Mash-upIntegration of location-based material using a API to Google Maps

Introduction MethodsMaterials Discussion ConclusionBackground

Page 11: Geo-Tagging in Archaeology: Practical Experiences with the TUGeoWiki

[email protected] Vienna, 16.11.200911

The TUGeoWiki: Desktop Scenario & Mobile Scenario

Mobile Domain Server DomainMobile Browser

J2ME ApplicationWebserver

GPSUnit

...

Introduction MethodsMaterials Discussion ConclusionBackground

Page 12: Geo-Tagging in Archaeology: Practical Experiences with the TUGeoWiki

[email protected] Vienna, 16.11.200912

Page 13: Geo-Tagging in Archaeology: Practical Experiences with the TUGeoWiki

[email protected] Vienna, 16.11.200913

What equipment did we use?

HOLUX M-241 (39 g device)Wireless logger shows position, speed, date time130.000 positions can be stored including longitude, latitude, time, and altitude Camera (EXIF format jpg files and internal clock)Software to synchronize gps track with timestamp of photoSoftware to create google earth file (.kml) – or put it directly into the TUGeoWiki

Introduction MethodsMaterials Discussion ConclusionBackground

Page 14: Geo-Tagging in Archaeology: Practical Experiences with the TUGeoWiki

[email protected] Vienna, 16.11.200914

Camera with Inbuilt-GPS and compass

Introduction MethodsMaterials Discussion ConclusionBackground

3GS

Page 15: Geo-Tagging in Archaeology: Practical Experiences with the TUGeoWiki

[email protected] Vienna, 16.11.200915

The classic discrepancy according to Norman (1986)

Norman,(1986), Holzinger (2005)

System

Information-Presentation

Model

DesignModel

COMPUTERS

UserModel

ARCHAEOLOGY

Introduction MethodsMaterials Discussion ConclusionBackground

Page 16: Geo-Tagging in Archaeology: Practical Experiences with the TUGeoWiki

[email protected] Vienna, 16.11.200916

How to build systems for Archaeologists?

Understanding Archaeologists

Understanding Domain and Context

OptimalUser Experience

e.g. Shackel (1991), Vredenburg (1999), Thimbleby (2007) Introduction MethodsMaterials Discussion ConclusionBackground

Page 17: Geo-Tagging in Archaeology: Practical Experiences with the TUGeoWiki

[email protected] Vienna, 16.11.200917

Methods

Introduction MethodsMaterials Discussion ConclusionBackground

cf. Nielsen (1994), Andrews (2002), Holzinger (2003), Holzinger (2005)

Page 18: Geo-Tagging in Archaeology: Practical Experiences with the TUGeoWiki

[email protected] Vienna, 16.11.200918

Methods used

cf. Nielsen (1994), Andrews (2002), Holzinger (2003), Holzinger (2005)

Introduction MethodsMaterials Discussion ConclusionBackground

Page 19: Geo-Tagging in Archaeology: Practical Experiences with the TUGeoWiki

[email protected] Vienna, 16.11.200919

Guiding principle

ISO 9241Extent to which a product can be used by specified users to achieve specified goals with effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction in a specified context of use

Introduction MethodsMaterials Discussion ConclusionBackground

Page 20: Geo-Tagging in Archaeology: Practical Experiences with the TUGeoWiki

[email protected] Vienna, 16.11.200920

Use Case 1: Report from Roman Stone Documentation

Introduction MethodsMaterials Discussion ConclusionBackground

Page 21: Geo-Tagging in Archaeology: Practical Experiences with the TUGeoWiki

[email protected] Vienna, 16.11.200921

Use Case 1: Problems

Introduction MethodsMaterials Discussion ConclusionBackground

Page 22: Geo-Tagging in Archaeology: Practical Experiences with the TUGeoWiki

[email protected] Vienna, 16.11.200922

Use Case 2: Report from Vindobona

Introduction MethodsMaterials Discussion ConclusionBackground

Page 23: Geo-Tagging in Archaeology: Practical Experiences with the TUGeoWiki

[email protected] Vienna, 16.11.200923

Use Case 2: Report from Vindobona

Introduction Methods Materials Discussion ConclusionBackground

Page 24: Geo-Tagging in Archaeology: Practical Experiences with the TUGeoWiki

[email protected] Vienna, 16.11.200924

Use Case 3: Tavium (Turkey)

Introduction MethodsMaterials Discussion ConclusionBackground

Page 25: Geo-Tagging in Archaeology: Practical Experiences with the TUGeoWiki

[email protected] Vienna, 16.11.200925

Use Case 3: Tavium (Turkey)

Introduction MethodsMaterials Discussion ConclusionBackground

Page 26: Geo-Tagging in Archaeology: Practical Experiences with the TUGeoWiki

[email protected] Vienna, 16.11.200926

Conclusions (Pros)

KILL THREE BIRDS WITH ONE STONE – combine visual, textual and geographical informationimmediate exchange of information and the ability to cooperate with other archaeologists etc.Future possibilities of geotagging are manifold, e.g. a navigation system which reconstructs antique routes (roman roads)

Introduction MethodsMaterials Discussion ConclusionBackground

Page 27: Geo-Tagging in Archaeology: Practical Experiences with the TUGeoWiki

[email protected] Vienna, 16.11.200927

Conclusions (Cons)

relative inaccuracy of the GPS location data; deviation between the distance of the camera and the object;Battery lifetime (keep reserve batteries at hand)data protection; archaeologists are extremely worried about tomb raiders gaining access to sensitive archaeological information;

Introduction MethodsMaterials Discussion ConclusionBackground

Page 28: Geo-Tagging in Archaeology: Practical Experiences with the TUGeoWiki

[email protected] Vienna, 16.11.200928

Everything begins with small steps …

Page 29: Geo-Tagging in Archaeology: Practical Experiences with the TUGeoWiki

[email protected] Vienna, 16.11.200929

International Congress Cultural Heritage and New Technologies

Thank you!Contact:

[email protected]

Page 30: Geo-Tagging in Archaeology: Practical Experiences with the TUGeoWiki

[email protected] Vienna, 16.11.200930

Glossary

API= Application Programming Interface is an interface that a software program implements in order to allow other software to interact with itGeotagging = is the process of adding geographical metadata to various media such as photographs, videos, websites, etc.GPS = Global Positioning System provides reliable positioning, navigation, and timing services to worldwide usersHeuristic = is a experience based technique by application of "rules of thumb" or principles Mash-Up = is an application that combines external applications in order to create a new service by using an APIWiki = A wiki is a website that allows the easy creation and editing of any number of interlinked Web pages.