42
DELL HYMES B.F . SKINNER ADELUISA G. SANTIAGO

Dell hymes and B.f skinner

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Dell hymes and  B.f skinner

DELL HYMES

B.F. SKINNER

ADELUISA G. SANTIAGO

Page 2: Dell hymes and  B.f skinner
Page 3: Dell hymes and  B.f skinner

(June 7, 1927, – November 13,

2009)

Page 5: Dell hymes and  B.f skinner

He was one of the first to call the

fourth subfield of anthropology

"linguistic anthropology" instead of

"anthropological linguistics".

Page 6: Dell hymes and  B.f skinner

Hymes helped to pioneer the

connection between speech and social

relations and this started the speaking

model.

Page 7: Dell hymes and  B.f skinner

Hymes formulated a response

to Noam Chomsky's competence

vs. performance

“What we know cannot be equated with

what we do”

Page 8: Dell hymes and  B.f skinner

Linguistic competence is not

post natal, but innate.

Linguistic competence underlies linguistic

performance.

(A speaker still has his linguistic

competence even he does not speak.)

Page 9: Dell hymes and  B.f skinner

D.H. extends the idea of competence to

communicative competence.

Linguistic competence is only part of

communicative competence.

CC is what the speaker needs to know in

order to be communicatively

competent on a speech community.

Page 10: Dell hymes and  B.f skinner

Example:

Linguistic competence tells you whether a

sentence is grammatical or not,

communicative competence tells you

whether an utterance is appropriate or

not within a situation.

Page 11: Dell hymes and  B.f skinner

THEORY OF COMMUNICATIVE COMPETENCE

1. Possibility –able to produce

2. Feasibility-can be decoded

3. Appropriateness-use of correct form

4. Performance-utterance is completed

Page 12: Dell hymes and  B.f skinner

“Learning a language is

learning to perform certain

function.”

Page 13: Dell hymes and  B.f skinner

THE "S-P-E-A-K-I-N-G" MODEL

Hymes developed a valuable model to assist the

identification and labeling of components of

linguistic interaction THAT in order to speak a

language correctly, one needs not only to learn its

vocabulary and grammar, but also the context in

which words are used.

Page 15: Dell hymes and  B.f skinner
Page 16: Dell hymes and  B.f skinner
Page 17: Dell hymes and  B.f skinner
Page 18: Dell hymes and  B.f skinner
Page 19: Dell hymes and  B.f skinner
Page 20: Dell hymes and  B.f skinner
Page 21: Dell hymes and  B.f skinner
Page 22: Dell hymes and  B.f skinner
Page 23: Dell hymes and  B.f skinner
Page 24: Dell hymes and  B.f skinner
Page 25: Dell hymes and  B.f skinner
Page 26: Dell hymes and  B.f skinner

Burrhus Frederic (B. F.) Skinner

(March 20, 1904 – August 18, 1990)

Page 27: Dell hymes and  B.f skinner

an American psychologist,

behaviorist,

author,

inventor, and

social philosopher.

invented the operant conditioning chamber, also

known as the Skinner Box.

Page 28: Dell hymes and  B.f skinner

SKINNER BOX

Page 29: Dell hymes and  B.f skinner

He was a firm believer of the idea that human free

will was actually an illusion and any human action

was the result of the consequences of that same

action. If the consequences were bad, there was a

high chance that the action would not be repeated;

however if the consequences were good, the

actions that led to it would be reinforced.[8] He

called this the principle of reinforcement

Page 30: Dell hymes and  B.f skinner
Page 31: Dell hymes and  B.f skinner

OPERANT CONDITIONING

Operant conditioning

Page 32: Dell hymes and  B.f skinner

BEHAVIORIST THEORY &

LANGUAGE LEARNING

Core to all of behaviorism is the

assumption that human and animal

behaviors are determined by learning

and reinforcement.

A basic assumption of his was that all

language, including private, internal

discourse, was a behavior that

developed in the same manner as

other skills.

Page 33: Dell hymes and  B.f skinner

The probability of a verbal response

was contingent on four things:

reinforcement, stimulus control,

deprivation, and aversive

stimulation. The interaction of these

things in a child’s environment would

lead to particular associations, the

basis of all language.

Page 34: Dell hymes and  B.f skinner

TYPES OF SPEECH

He claimed that there were four general

types of speech: echoic

behavior, mand, tact, interverbals and a

utoclitic.

Page 35: Dell hymes and  B.f skinner

ECHOIC BEHAVIOR

Echoic behavior is the primary form of verbal behavior of

language learners. These verbalizations include repeated

utterances, as in

Page 36: Dell hymes and  B.f skinner

MAND

Mands (short for deMANDS) are defined as

utterances that are reinforced by the elevation of

deprivation. So for instance, if a child were hungry

or cold, her requests (as in (2))

(2) Cookie.

Directives such as “Stop,” “Go,” and “Wait” also

count as mands.

However, in (3), the child may be simply naming the

object or stating what she likes. (3) Cookie

Page 37: Dell hymes and  B.f skinner

UTTERANCES

tact (short for conTACT). Tacts are verbalizations

that the speaker produces to provide information

instead of attending to states of deprivation.

tacts and mands may seem similar, their underlying

motivations (stimuli) and their reinforcements are

different.

When a mand is reinforced, the need is

sated. When a tact is reinforced, there is no need

to sate.

Page 38: Dell hymes and  B.f skinner

INTERVERBAL

The fourth type of utterance is the interverbals. These include such things as “Please” and “Thank you.” for example, in (4), the second utterance, the response to the question, is an interverbal. Likewise, the associative response in number (5) is also an interverbal.

(4) SPEAKER A: Who’s your favorite graduate student?

SPEAKER B: You

(5) WORD: CATRESPONSE: Dog

Page 39: Dell hymes and  B.f skinner

AUTOCLITICS

Autoclitics, will influence not only current and future

thought but also current and future verbal behavior.

Differences among the four types

Page 40: Dell hymes and  B.f skinner
Page 41: Dell hymes and  B.f skinner
Page 42: Dell hymes and  B.f skinner

Thank you for

listening!