50
Mass Media and Politics: Lecture Overview 1. Democratic vs. totalitarian r egimes 2.News filters 1. Ownership 2. Advertising 3. Sources 4. Anti-communism 1

COMS305: Media and Politics

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

A 300-level lecture on media and politics as part of a course on media and social change.

Citation preview

Page 1: COMS305: Media and Politics

1

Mass Media and Politics: Lecture Overview

1. Democratic vs. totalitarian regimes

2. News filters1. Ownership2. Advertising3. Sources4. Anti-communism

Page 2: COMS305: Media and Politics

2

Mass Media and Politics: Lecture Overview

3. Media regulation in democratic societies

1. Military2. Radio3. Deregulation4. Ownership regulation: US & NZ5. Content regulation: US & NZ

Page 3: COMS305: Media and Politics

3

Mass Media and Politics: Lecture Overview

3. Effects theory1. Aggressor2. Victim3. Desensitization4. Structure and agency

Page 4: COMS305: Media and Politics

4

Last week: Economic influence on the media

Page 5: COMS305: Media and Politics

5

Political influence on the media

Page 6: COMS305: Media and Politics

Mass Media & Politics

• We must consider the differences between democratic and totalitarian regimes

Page 7: COMS305: Media and Politics

7

Propaganda• Propaganda is the deliberate and systematic

attempt to shape perceptions, manipulate cognitions, and direct behavior to achieve a response that furthers the desired intent of the propagandist

Page 8: COMS305: Media and Politics

Mass Media & Politics

• In totalitarian regimes, audiences become adept at decoding propaganda

• This propaganda can have a domestic and/or international focus

Page 9: COMS305: Media and Politics

Mass Media & Politics

• In totalitarian regimes, audiences become adept at decoding propaganda

• Of course, some attempts at propaganda are more subtle than others, even in totalitarian regimes…

…there are no protests…

Page 10: COMS305: Media and Politics

Mass Media & Politics

• In democratic regimes, we pride ourselves on our relative freedom of expression…

Tiananmen Square

Page 11: COMS305: Media and Politics

Mass Media & Politics

• But should we really be so secure in our superiority? Some say ‘no’…

Page 12: COMS305: Media and Politics

Mass Media & Politics

• Edward Herman and Noam Chomsky: ‘The Propaganda Model’ of news creation in ‘Manufacturing Consent’ (1988)

The existence of 5 new filters:

1. Ownership2. Advertising3. Sourcing4. Flak5. Anti-communism

Page 15: COMS305: Media and Politics

Mass Media & Politics

• Sourcing: political elites over-relied upon

Page 16: COMS305: Media and Politics

Mass Media & Politics

• Anti-communism: now better conceived of more generally as ‘threats to capitalism’

Page 17: COMS305: Media and Politics

Mass Media & Politics

• ‘Manufacturing Consent: Noam Chomsky and the Media’

• Well-worth watching• Should be available

at some video stores if your internet isn’t up to streaming the whole thing.

Page 18: COMS305: Media and Politics

Mass Media & Politics

• Therefore, in democratic societies, the questions become:

– Should the media

be regulated?– And if so, how

should they be regulated?

– By who?

Page 19: COMS305: Media and Politics

Media Regulation

• Military content regulation– Press pools are

established, which• Help the military

ensure safety• But they do so by

restricting press access

– Information is censored

Page 20: COMS305: Media and Politics

Media Regulation

• Military content regulation– Does it just end up producing propaganda?

Page 21: COMS305: Media and Politics

Media Regulation

• Military content regulation– Propaganda

• not necessarily true

Page 22: COMS305: Media and Politics

Media Regulation

Military content regulation• Propaganda has a long history, and was very

prominent during WW2 on both sides

Page 23: COMS305: Media and Politics

Media Regulation

Military content regulation• But is it persuasion or propaganda?• Is everything relativist propaganda?• Who controls the flow of information?

Page 24: COMS305: Media and Politics

Media Regulation

Radio• ‘Pirate radio’ rebels

against idea that the radio spectrum is a protected space that can be owned…

• but the spectrum is limited

Page 26: COMS305: Media and Politics

Media regulation

Radio• Pirate radio is based on the idea that

the radio spectrum should be free and open to everyone– Radio Hauraki: Later granted a

private land licence

Page 27: COMS305: Media and Politics

Media Regulation

Radio • on the margins

– Democracy Now– Plains FM

Page 28: COMS305: Media and Politics

Media Regulation

Deregulation• AGAINST

regulation• ...but what do

they favour?• …what would

media like that look like?

Page 29: COMS305: Media and Politics

Media Regulation

Media regulation• Can be hard to

detect, but it is fairly widespread

• Content regulation• Ownership

regulation

Page 30: COMS305: Media and Politics

Media Regulation

Advertising regulation in NZ• The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA)

– Public & professional with public majority– Public decision-making process

Objectives• Regulating misleading or deceptive advertising• Promote voluntary self-regulation• Fund Advertising Standards Complaints Board

Page 31: COMS305: Media and Politics

Media Regulation

Regulation is generally done in the name of the public interest

• What public?• What interest?

Page 32: COMS305: Media and Politics

Media Regulation

The BBC or Reithian model

• Government control of organisation & financing– Emphasizes public

service– Nationalistic– Politicized– Noncommercial (but

some private interests)

Page 33: COMS305: Media and Politics

Media Regulation

Media ownership regulation

• The US situation:– 1996

Telecommunications Act in U.S.

– Eased restrictions on cross-media ownership

Page 34: COMS305: Media and Politics

Media Regulation

Media ownership regulation

• The New Zealand situation:– No regulatory body

examining:– Ownership

restrictions– Programme-based

license requirements

– Programme quotas

Page 35: COMS305: Media and Politics

Media Regulation

Media content regulation• The US situation

– The (repealed) Fairness Doctrine

– Broadcasters must cover public issues & provide both sides

– Result: one-sided popular programming

Page 36: COMS305: Media and Politics

Media Regulation

Media content regulation• The NZ situation

– New Zealand Press Council (NZPC)• Created in response to potential for Labour

governmental interference– Mix of industry & public reps– Objectives

• Considering complaints against the press• Promoting freedom of speech/press• Maintaining professional standards of the

press

Page 37: COMS305: Media and Politics

Media Regulation

Media content regulation• The NZ situation

– The Broadcasting Standards Authority (BSA)• Funded by Parliament & broadcasters• A government-initiated regulatory

framework– Tasks and objectives

• Receiving complaints about alleged breaches of practice

• Encouraging broadcasters to develop codes of ethics

• Conducting research on broadcast standards

Page 38: COMS305: Media and Politics

Media Regulation

Media content regulation• The NZ situation

– The Broadcasting Standards Authority (BSA)• Responsible for programme

standards– Good taste – Fairness– Accuracy– Privacy

• They can impose fines and other punishment if the complaint is upheld.

Page 39: COMS305: Media and Politics

Media Regulation

Film content regulation• In the US, the Motion

Picture Association of America (MPAA)• In NZ, the Office of Film

and Literature Classification (OFLC)

Page 40: COMS305: Media and Politics

Media regulation

Content regulation• Regulation via citizen protest

– Monitorial citizen groups

Page 41: COMS305: Media and Politics

Media Regulation

Film content• Realities

– 80 percent of R16/R18 rated films marketed to kids

Page 42: COMS305: Media and Politics

Media Regulation

Broadcast content• Realities

– V-chips rarely used

Page 43: COMS305: Media and Politics

Media Regulation

Music• Realities

– Advisory labels boost sales

Page 44: COMS305: Media and Politics

Media Regulation

Content regulation• Violence

– 8,000 murders seen before finishing primary school

Page 45: COMS305: Media and Politics

Effects Theory

The ‘Aggressor Effect’• Violent programming leads to violent

acts

Page 46: COMS305: Media and Politics

Effects Theory

• Exposure to violence and the Aggressor Effect– Exposure to violent media DOES have short

and long term effects on children’s aggressive behavior

Page 47: COMS305: Media and Politics

Effects Theory

The ‘Victim Effect’• Violent programming

leads to fearfulness of violence

Page 48: COMS305: Media and Politics

Effects Theory

The ‘Desensitization Effect’• Violent programming leads to callousness

about seeing others in violent situations

Page 49: COMS305: Media and Politics

Effects Theory

• Overall, there is a positive and significant relationship between television violence and aggressive behaviour

Page 50: COMS305: Media and Politics

Effects Theory

How can you explain the tension between institutional structure and individual agency?