Upload
ace-matilac
View
28
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Color Stroop Effects on Students’ Cognitive Ability
By:
Frances Divine A. Fang
Maanyag Q. Cabulao
Ace S. Matilac
INTRODUCTIONTHE STUDY…This study is about stroop task presenting stimuli having two dimensions, and participants respond to one dimension while ignoring the other.
THE GAP…The gap of this study is whether there is influence of interferences in color-naming task.
THE PROBLEM…To know if there is color stroop effects on students’ cognitive ability.
INTRODUCTION
SELECTIVE ATTENTION THEORY
Broadbent (1958) proposed that physical characteristics of messages are used to select one message for
further processing and all others are lost.
INTRODUCTION
INDEPENDENT VARIABLE
Color StroopEffects
DEPENDENT VARIABLE
Cognitive Ability
FRAMEWORK
PRE-EXPERIMENT
• Experimental method
• Multiple-independent-groups design
• Between-subjects design
• Cluster Sampling
• Fish bowl method
POST-EXPERIMENT
• Likert-scaled questionnaires
• Microsoft Excel 2010
• Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)
Results:
GROUP MEAN
F-valueDecisio
nCompute
d
Tabular
Controlled 23.7
13.18 3.42
Reject
HoTreatment 1 17.75
Treatment 2 22
Accuracy
Results:
GROUP MEAN
F-valueDecisio
nCompute
d
Tabular
Controlled 0.16
3.95 3.42
Reject
HoTreatment 1 0.39
Treatment 2 0.22
Speed
DISCUSSION
• Reading is an automatic process.
• Naming colors required more attention than reading.
• Repeated practices enables a person to perform a task more quickly and easily.
• Presentation helps participants allocation of attention.
• Stroop interferences test identifies healthy individual.
DISCUSSION
• Reading is an automatic process.
• Naming colors required more attention than reading.
• Repeated practices enables a person to perform a task more quickly and easily.
• Presentation helps participants allocation of attention.
• Stroop interferences test identifies healthy individual.
DISCUSSION
• Reading is an automatic process.
• Naming colors required more attention than reading.
• Repeated practices enables a person to perform a task more quickly and easily.
• Presentation helps participants allocation of attention.
• Stroop interferences test identifies healthy individual.
DISCUSSION
• Reading is an automatic process.
• Naming colors required more attention than reading.
• Repeated practices enables a person to perform a task more quickly and easily.
• Presentation helps participants allocation of attention.
• Stroop interferences test identifies healthy individual.
DISCUSSION
• Reading is an automatic process.
• Naming colors required more attention than reading.
• Repeated practices enables a person to perform a task more quickly and easily.
• Presentation helps participants allocation of attention.
• Stroop interferences test identifies healthy individual.
DISCUSSION
• Theory of automaticity.
• Selective Attention Theory.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
XUNBALANCED/UNCERTAINTY THEORY