FIELDTEST#2

EXPERTSREVIEW

ONE-ON-ONEEVALUATION

FIELDTEST#1

TENTATIVEMODEL

FIELDTEST#3

FINALMODEL

revision

revision

revision

revision

PROCEDURE

• Self-directedlearningatany1meandanywehere

• Learningany1me,anyweherewithothers

• Learningatthesame1mebutdiferentplace

• Learningatthesame1meandplace

LiveSynchronous

VirtualSynchronous

Self-directedAsynchronous

CollaboraJveAsynchronous

SYNCHRONOUS

ASYNCHRONOUS

BLENDED

QUADRANTOFBLENDEDLEARNINGSETTING

PEDATI:ABLENDEDLEARNINGSYSTEMDESIGNMODEL

CRITERIAFORSELECTINGANDDETERMININGBLENDEDLEARNINGSTRATEGY

LEARNING DEEPENING

APPLYING MEASURING

deductive inductive

LEARNINGPATH

Scale 1stFieldTest

2ndFieldTest

3rdFieldTest

4–Excellen 33.6% 67.5%

3–Good 20% 47.7% 31.7%

2–Fair 48% 25% 0.8%

3-Poor 32%

PARTICIPANTS’ABILITYINDESIGNINGEFFECTIVEBLENDEDLEARNINGIMPROVED

32

26

34

2832

39

30

37

051015202530354045

easy systema1c&logic

interac1ve appelang

AGREE STRONGLYAGREE DISAGREE STRONGLYDISAGREE

RELATIVEADVANTAGESOFTHEMODEL

33

49

37

47

31

15

25

14

1 1 3 40 0 0 00

10

20

30

40

50

60

Compa1bility User-friendliness Observability Trialibility

StronglyAgree Agree Disagree StronglyDisagree

INNOVATIONCHARACTERISTICSOFTHEMODEL

A"erhavingthreestagesofforma1veevalua1ons,i.e.expertsreview,one-on-oneevalua1on,andthree1mesoffieldtests,itisconcludedthatthismodelwasfeasible,effec*veandimplementable.

J