43
AFFORDANCES OF PHYSICAL AND VIRTUAL LEARNING SPACES Professor Mike Keppell Professor of Higher Education President, ascilite Director, The Flexible Learning Institute Charles Sturt University 1 Wednesday, 21 July 2010

Affordances of Physical and Virtual Learning Spaces

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Charles Darwin University presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Affordances of Physical and Virtual Learning Spaces

AFFORDANCES OF PHYSICAL AND

VIRTUAL LEARNING SPACES

Professor Mike KeppellProfessor of Higher Education

President, asciliteDirector, The Flexible Learning Institute

Charles Sturt University

1Wednesday, 21 July 2010

Page 2: Affordances of Physical and Virtual Learning Spaces

OverviewAssumptions

PrinciplesLearning spaces?

Subject InteractionsDiversity of learning

spacesBlended learning spaces

AffordancesPutting it all together

2Wednesday, 21 July 2010

Page 3: Affordances of Physical and Virtual Learning Spaces

AssumptionsUniversities value and seek to inculcate the skills essential for lifelong and life wide learning, producing graduates who will continue to develop intellectually, professionally and socially beyond the bounds of formal education.

Universities believe that programs, services and teaching methods should be responsive to the diverse cultural, social and academic needs of students, enabling them to adapt to the demands of university education and providing them with the cultural capital for life success.

3Wednesday, 21 July 2010

Page 4: Affordances of Physical and Virtual Learning Spaces

Higher Education PrinciplesEquivalence of Learning Outcomes ethical obligations

Student Learning Experience traverses physical,

blended and virtual learning spaces

Constructive Alignment

learning outcomes, subject, degree

program, generic attributes

Discipline Pedagogies specific needs of disciplines

4Wednesday, 21 July 2010

Page 5: Affordances of Physical and Virtual Learning Spaces

Learning Spaces? Physical, blended or virtual learning environments that enhance as opposed to constraining learning

Physical, blended or virtual ‘areas’ that motivate a user to participate for learning benefits

Spaces where both teachers and students optimize the perceived and actual affordances of the space

Spaces that promote authentic learning interactions

5Wednesday, 21 July 2010

Page 6: Affordances of Physical and Virtual Learning Spaces

Subject Interactions

Information access (subject expectations)

Interactive learning (learner-to-content interactions):

Networked learning (learner-to-learner, learner-to-teacher interactions)

User-generated content (learners-as-designers, assessment-as-learning) (Herrington & Oliver, 2001).

6Wednesday, 21 July 2010

Page 7: Affordances of Physical and Virtual Learning Spaces

Diversity of Learning Spaces

Physical Virtual

Formal Informal InformalFormal

Blended

Mobile Personal

Outdoor Professional Practice

7Wednesday, 21 July 2010

Page 8: Affordances of Physical and Virtual Learning Spaces

Physical Learning Spaces

Formal physical learning spacesInformal physical learning spacesIndependent learning Peer learningStudy-time and spaceNeed to be adaptable and flexible for learning and teaching as opposed to being designed for one purpose

8Wednesday, 21 July 2010

Page 9: Affordances of Physical and Virtual Learning Spaces

Formal & Informal Spaces

9Wednesday, 21 July 2010

Page 10: Affordances of Physical and Virtual Learning Spaces

10Wednesday, 21 July 2010

Page 11: Affordances of Physical and Virtual Learning Spaces

11Wednesday, 21 July 2010

Page 12: Affordances of Physical and Virtual Learning Spaces

12Wednesday, 21 July 2010

Page 13: Affordances of Physical and Virtual Learning Spaces

13Wednesday, 21 July 2010

Page 14: Affordances of Physical and Virtual Learning Spaces

14Wednesday, 21 July 2010

Page 15: Affordances of Physical and Virtual Learning Spaces

Virtual Learning Spaces

Formal virtual learning spacesInformal virtual learning spacesIndependent learning Peer learning

15Wednesday, 21 July 2010

Page 16: Affordances of Physical and Virtual Learning Spaces

Formal Virtual Learning Spaces

BlackboardWebCTMoodle Sakai

FacebookFlickr

YouTubeTwitter

IFormal

Formal

Informal

Informal Virtual Learning Spaces

Informal

16Wednesday, 21 July 2010

Page 17: Affordances of Physical and Virtual Learning Spaces

Personal Learning Spaces

17Wednesday, 21 July 2010

Page 18: Affordances of Physical and Virtual Learning Spaces

18Wednesday, 21 July 2010

Page 19: Affordances of Physical and Virtual Learning Spaces

19Wednesday, 21 July 2010

Page 20: Affordances of Physical and Virtual Learning Spaces

Mobile Learning SpacesIs mobile learning just part of everyday learning? (ALT-J Vol 17, No.3)GPS, wi-fi, mp3 players“Learning when mobile means that context becomes all-important since even a simple change of location is an invitation to revisit learning” (p.159)Extending lecturers personal ‘presence’Disruption of users’ presence using SMS (Corneulius & Marston, 2009).

20Wednesday, 21 July 2010

Page 21: Affordances of Physical and Virtual Learning Spaces

Outdoor Learning Spaces

These pathways, thoroughfares and occasional rest areas are generally given a functional value in traffic management and are more often than not developed as an after thought in campus design. As such the thoroughfares and rest areas are under valued (or not recognized) as important spaces for teaching and learning (Rafferty, 2009).

21Wednesday, 21 July 2010

Page 22: Affordances of Physical and Virtual Learning Spaces

22Wednesday, 21 July 2010

Page 23: Affordances of Physical and Virtual Learning Spaces

23Wednesday, 21 July 2010

Page 24: Affordances of Physical and Virtual Learning Spaces

24Wednesday, 21 July 2010

Page 25: Affordances of Physical and Virtual Learning Spaces

25Wednesday, 21 July 2010

Page 26: Affordances of Physical and Virtual Learning Spaces

Blended Learning?

“It is a design approach whereby both face-to-face and online learning are made better by the presence of each other” (Garrison & Vaughan, 2008, p.5).

“It is a complete rethinking and redesign of the educational environment and learning experience” (p.x)

Is blended learning the future of higher education?

26Wednesday, 21 July 2010

Page 27: Affordances of Physical and Virtual Learning Spaces

Activity-level Blending Instructor Role Student

RoleResources (Content)

Resources (Services) Assessment

Off-line

Allocate reading. Ask

students to read required reading

and post summary in

LMS

Read respective

chapterReading

Some discussion

about topic in face-to-face

class

Online Facilitator

Post a one paragraph

summary and comment on

two other posts

Student and instructor posts in

discussion forum

Discussion forum

Feedback from peers in online

discussion. Feedback from

instructor in online

discussion forum.

27Wednesday, 21 July 2010

Page 28: Affordances of Physical and Virtual Learning Spaces

Subject & Course Level Blending

Subject-level blending: One of the most common forms. Distinct face-to-face and online components to support learning outcomes.

Degree-level blending: Different learning experiences using physical and virtual spaces across the degree program. Use of e-portfolio in key subjects throughout degree.

28Wednesday, 21 July 2010

Page 29: Affordances of Physical and Virtual Learning Spaces

Paradigms of Blended Learning

Enabling blends: These address access and equity issues. Provision of equivalent learning outcomes in physical, virtual and blended learning environments.

Enhancing blends: Incremental changes to the pedagogy in face-to-face, virtual and blended learning environments.

Transforming blends: Major redesign of pedagogy e.g. Blended problem-based learning (Graham, 2006).

29Wednesday, 21 July 2010

Page 30: Affordances of Physical and Virtual Learning Spaces

Flexibility of Learning SpacesFlexible learning and teaching spaces allow adaptability over time for different uses. Spaces need to be used for students who are both physically present and students who never visit the campus. In addition homes, cars, buses, hotels, cafes become mobile spaces where the student undertakes learning. Studying subject materials while travelling to work via train or bus may represent the learning space for some students

30Wednesday, 21 July 2010

Page 31: Affordances of Physical and Virtual Learning Spaces

31Wednesday, 21 July 2010

Page 32: Affordances of Physical and Virtual Learning Spaces

32Wednesday, 21 July 2010

Page 33: Affordances of Physical and Virtual Learning Spaces

Study, Time & Space

In addition to the notion of physical/virtual and formal/informal, the concept of time also needs to be considered. Students’ use of space during a semester will be influenced by time of day, day of week and week of semester. Students may utilize space dependent on their other constraints of work and family and timing of classes and travel.

33Wednesday, 21 July 2010

Page 34: Affordances of Physical and Virtual Learning Spaces

34Wednesday, 21 July 2010

Page 35: Affordances of Physical and Virtual Learning Spaces

Study, Time & Space

Students may have only certain days to study. Early stages of a subject may encourage students to discuss content with other peers, while group assessment tasks will also require students to work in teams and use space for discussion and negotiation. When exams are nearing, students may revert to quiet individual spaces for self-study as opposed to peer learning.

35Wednesday, 21 July 2010

Page 36: Affordances of Physical and Virtual Learning Spaces

What are Affordances? When you first see something you have never seen before, how do you know what to do?

“An affordance is the design aspect of an object which suggests how the object should be used” (Norman, 1988).

Determined by context, culture, instinct, mental model e.g. hyperlinked text on website

When designers make use of affordances the user knows what to do just by looking

36Wednesday, 21 July 2010

Page 37: Affordances of Physical and Virtual Learning Spaces

Learning Space Affordance Example

Face-to-Face Teaching & Learning

oral communication oral feedback to a question

Learning Management

Systems

information accessinteractive learningnetworked learning

materials development

subject outlinemultimedia

forumproject

Learning Commons informal learningdiscussion about

lecturepeer learning

37Wednesday, 21 July 2010

Page 38: Affordances of Physical and Virtual Learning Spaces

Learning Space Affordance Example

Tutorialin-depth group

discussionpeer learning

discussion of reading

discussion of presentation

Residential School

practical workpeer interaction

sense of belonging to university

practical work on IT networks

Practice

authentic learningcommunity of

practicementor/mentee

applied learning in discipline

38Wednesday, 21 July 2010

Page 39: Affordances of Physical and Virtual Learning Spaces

Putting it all

together

39Wednesday, 21 July 2010

Page 40: Affordances of Physical and Virtual Learning Spaces

40Wednesday, 21 July 2010

Page 41: Affordances of Physical and Virtual Learning Spaces

41Wednesday, 21 July 2010

Page 42: Affordances of Physical and Virtual Learning Spaces

http://www.csu.edu.au/division/landt/flexible-learning/

http://www.skgproject.com

42Wednesday, 21 July 2010

Page 43: Affordances of Physical and Virtual Learning Spaces

2010 BookPhysical and Virtual Learning Spaces in Higher Education: Concepts for the Modern Learning

Environment

http://web.me.com/keppell/spaces/Welcome.html

A book edited by Professor Mike Keppell

Associate Professor Kay Souter & Matthew Riddle

Charles Sturt University, AustraliaLatrobe University, Australia

43Wednesday, 21 July 2010