Upload
mike-keppell
View
2.039
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Charles Darwin University presentation
Citation preview
AFFORDANCES OF PHYSICAL AND
VIRTUAL LEARNING SPACES
Professor Mike KeppellProfessor of Higher Education
President, asciliteDirector, The Flexible Learning Institute
Charles Sturt University
1Wednesday, 21 July 2010
OverviewAssumptions
PrinciplesLearning spaces?
Subject InteractionsDiversity of learning
spacesBlended learning spaces
AffordancesPutting it all together
2Wednesday, 21 July 2010
AssumptionsUniversities value and seek to inculcate the skills essential for lifelong and life wide learning, producing graduates who will continue to develop intellectually, professionally and socially beyond the bounds of formal education.
Universities believe that programs, services and teaching methods should be responsive to the diverse cultural, social and academic needs of students, enabling them to adapt to the demands of university education and providing them with the cultural capital for life success.
3Wednesday, 21 July 2010
Higher Education PrinciplesEquivalence of Learning Outcomes ethical obligations
Student Learning Experience traverses physical,
blended and virtual learning spaces
Constructive Alignment
learning outcomes, subject, degree
program, generic attributes
Discipline Pedagogies specific needs of disciplines
4Wednesday, 21 July 2010
Learning Spaces? Physical, blended or virtual learning environments that enhance as opposed to constraining learning
Physical, blended or virtual ‘areas’ that motivate a user to participate for learning benefits
Spaces where both teachers and students optimize the perceived and actual affordances of the space
Spaces that promote authentic learning interactions
5Wednesday, 21 July 2010
Subject Interactions
Information access (subject expectations)
Interactive learning (learner-to-content interactions):
Networked learning (learner-to-learner, learner-to-teacher interactions)
User-generated content (learners-as-designers, assessment-as-learning) (Herrington & Oliver, 2001).
6Wednesday, 21 July 2010
Diversity of Learning Spaces
Physical Virtual
Formal Informal InformalFormal
Blended
Mobile Personal
Outdoor Professional Practice
7Wednesday, 21 July 2010
Physical Learning Spaces
Formal physical learning spacesInformal physical learning spacesIndependent learning Peer learningStudy-time and spaceNeed to be adaptable and flexible for learning and teaching as opposed to being designed for one purpose
8Wednesday, 21 July 2010
Formal & Informal Spaces
9Wednesday, 21 July 2010
10Wednesday, 21 July 2010
11Wednesday, 21 July 2010
12Wednesday, 21 July 2010
13Wednesday, 21 July 2010
14Wednesday, 21 July 2010
Virtual Learning Spaces
Formal virtual learning spacesInformal virtual learning spacesIndependent learning Peer learning
15Wednesday, 21 July 2010
Formal Virtual Learning Spaces
BlackboardWebCTMoodle Sakai
FacebookFlickr
YouTubeTwitter
IFormal
Formal
Informal
Informal Virtual Learning Spaces
Informal
16Wednesday, 21 July 2010
Personal Learning Spaces
17Wednesday, 21 July 2010
18Wednesday, 21 July 2010
19Wednesday, 21 July 2010
Mobile Learning SpacesIs mobile learning just part of everyday learning? (ALT-J Vol 17, No.3)GPS, wi-fi, mp3 players“Learning when mobile means that context becomes all-important since even a simple change of location is an invitation to revisit learning” (p.159)Extending lecturers personal ‘presence’Disruption of users’ presence using SMS (Corneulius & Marston, 2009).
20Wednesday, 21 July 2010
Outdoor Learning Spaces
These pathways, thoroughfares and occasional rest areas are generally given a functional value in traffic management and are more often than not developed as an after thought in campus design. As such the thoroughfares and rest areas are under valued (or not recognized) as important spaces for teaching and learning (Rafferty, 2009).
21Wednesday, 21 July 2010
22Wednesday, 21 July 2010
23Wednesday, 21 July 2010
24Wednesday, 21 July 2010
25Wednesday, 21 July 2010
Blended Learning?
“It is a design approach whereby both face-to-face and online learning are made better by the presence of each other” (Garrison & Vaughan, 2008, p.5).
“It is a complete rethinking and redesign of the educational environment and learning experience” (p.x)
Is blended learning the future of higher education?
26Wednesday, 21 July 2010
Activity-level Blending Instructor Role Student
RoleResources (Content)
Resources (Services) Assessment
Off-line
Allocate reading. Ask
students to read required reading
and post summary in
LMS
Read respective
chapterReading
Some discussion
about topic in face-to-face
class
Online Facilitator
Post a one paragraph
summary and comment on
two other posts
Student and instructor posts in
discussion forum
Discussion forum
Feedback from peers in online
discussion. Feedback from
instructor in online
discussion forum.
27Wednesday, 21 July 2010
Subject & Course Level Blending
Subject-level blending: One of the most common forms. Distinct face-to-face and online components to support learning outcomes.
Degree-level blending: Different learning experiences using physical and virtual spaces across the degree program. Use of e-portfolio in key subjects throughout degree.
28Wednesday, 21 July 2010
Paradigms of Blended Learning
Enabling blends: These address access and equity issues. Provision of equivalent learning outcomes in physical, virtual and blended learning environments.
Enhancing blends: Incremental changes to the pedagogy in face-to-face, virtual and blended learning environments.
Transforming blends: Major redesign of pedagogy e.g. Blended problem-based learning (Graham, 2006).
29Wednesday, 21 July 2010
Flexibility of Learning SpacesFlexible learning and teaching spaces allow adaptability over time for different uses. Spaces need to be used for students who are both physically present and students who never visit the campus. In addition homes, cars, buses, hotels, cafes become mobile spaces where the student undertakes learning. Studying subject materials while travelling to work via train or bus may represent the learning space for some students
30Wednesday, 21 July 2010
31Wednesday, 21 July 2010
32Wednesday, 21 July 2010
Study, Time & Space
In addition to the notion of physical/virtual and formal/informal, the concept of time also needs to be considered. Students’ use of space during a semester will be influenced by time of day, day of week and week of semester. Students may utilize space dependent on their other constraints of work and family and timing of classes and travel.
33Wednesday, 21 July 2010
34Wednesday, 21 July 2010
Study, Time & Space
Students may have only certain days to study. Early stages of a subject may encourage students to discuss content with other peers, while group assessment tasks will also require students to work in teams and use space for discussion and negotiation. When exams are nearing, students may revert to quiet individual spaces for self-study as opposed to peer learning.
35Wednesday, 21 July 2010
What are Affordances? When you first see something you have never seen before, how do you know what to do?
“An affordance is the design aspect of an object which suggests how the object should be used” (Norman, 1988).
Determined by context, culture, instinct, mental model e.g. hyperlinked text on website
When designers make use of affordances the user knows what to do just by looking
36Wednesday, 21 July 2010
Learning Space Affordance Example
Face-to-Face Teaching & Learning
oral communication oral feedback to a question
Learning Management
Systems
information accessinteractive learningnetworked learning
materials development
subject outlinemultimedia
forumproject
Learning Commons informal learningdiscussion about
lecturepeer learning
37Wednesday, 21 July 2010
Learning Space Affordance Example
Tutorialin-depth group
discussionpeer learning
discussion of reading
discussion of presentation
Residential School
practical workpeer interaction
sense of belonging to university
practical work on IT networks
Practice
authentic learningcommunity of
practicementor/mentee
applied learning in discipline
38Wednesday, 21 July 2010
Putting it all
together
39Wednesday, 21 July 2010
40Wednesday, 21 July 2010
41Wednesday, 21 July 2010
http://www.csu.edu.au/division/landt/flexible-learning/
http://www.skgproject.com
42Wednesday, 21 July 2010
2010 BookPhysical and Virtual Learning Spaces in Higher Education: Concepts for the Modern Learning
Environment
http://web.me.com/keppell/spaces/Welcome.html
A book edited by Professor Mike Keppell
Associate Professor Kay Souter & Matthew Riddle
Charles Sturt University, AustraliaLatrobe University, Australia
43Wednesday, 21 July 2010