1. PS 701 701 1. (Approach) 2. Approach ** Approach *** 2 1. 2. Approach Approach ( Approach ) 1. ( Elite Approach) 2. 3. (Cultural Approach) 4. Approach ( Approach ) 1. 2. Approach 3. (Approach) 4. Approach (Politics) 1. 1

2. 2. (Power) (Mean) (End) 3. ( ) 4. Demand Supply ( ) (Political Science) - - (New Politics) 2 3. (Approach) . Approach Approach (Vernon Van Dyke) Approach Approach (Approach) (Conceptual Framework) 2 (Causality) 3 4. - - - ( ) 1. () - ( 4 5. ) - ( ) 2. Approach - 3. 4 ( ) 1. (Philosophy Approach) (Value) 5 6. 2. (Legal Institutional ) - - - - 2 2 2. (Behavioralism) 1. (Neutrality) (Non-Biased) 2. (Causality) (Test) 3. (Prediction) 4. 6 7. 1. (Systematic) (Empirical) (Predictive) 2. (Individual & Collective Behavior as a Unit of Analysis) 3. 4. Research Methodology ) (Being) (What Ought to be) 4 4. (Post-Behavioralism) 1. Multi-Disciplinary Interdisciplinary 2. (Problem Oriented) (Theory Oriented ) 3. 7 8. 4. 1. (Political Cultural Approach) : .. .. : - 8 9. - ( ) 2. (Elite Approach) : 2 - - - 2 9 10. : 3. (Interest Group Approach) : 4. (Historical Approach) 5. () - (Economic Approach) - (Sociological Approach) - (Psychological Approach) 10 11. (Psycho Analytic) (Power Approach) 2475 1. () Elite Approach ****** (Elite Approach) 2 - - - 11 12. 2475 3 . 16 2516 NPL 5 12 13. - - - . - - - 3 .. 2 2. (Political Culture) 13 14. (Political Socialization) 2006 () 3. - 2550 14 15. 2550 . 2550 2 ... 14 2516 6 2519 ... ... ... ... 15 16. ... (Network Monarchy) ... ..2544 2548 .. .. ... .. . ... 16 17. 703 PS 703 1. 2. 3. 4. *************** 2 17 18. 1. (International Cooperation) - - 2. (International Conflict ) - - ***************************** 1. (Realism) 2. (Liberalism) 3. (Structuralism) 4. (Constructivism) 1. (Realism) 1.1 (Classical Realism) 1. 2. (National Interest) - - - - - 18 19. 3. 1.2 (Neo-realism) 1. - - - - 1 2 3 (Uni- multipolar System) 2. 3. (Balance of Terror) () 19 20. 4. (Deterrence) 2. (Liberalism) 2.1 (Liberalism) 2.2 (Neo-liberalism) 1. WTO 2. 3. 4. (Democratic Peace Theory) 5. (Interdependence) 6. (Collective Security) 7. 3. (Structuralism) 20 21. ** ** 4. (Constructivism) 1990s ( ) 2 1. (Security Dilemma) ( ) ) 2./ (Security Community) 21 22. () ( ) 1 2 1980 (Neo-liberalism) 1990 Constructivism / ( Constructivism Post Modern) 1. (Interdependence Theory) 22 23. . . 1. (Symmetrical Interdependent) 2 2 2.(Asymmetry Interdependent) 2 2. (International Integration Theory) 23 24. Bela Balassa ( ) 5 1. (Free Trade Area / Agreement: FTA) (AFTA) 2. (Custom Union) Common Custom Policy 3. (Common Market) 4. (Economic Union) 1 + 2 + 3 5. (Political Union) United States of America ( ) 1. (Balance of Bower) 1. (Dependency Theory) (Core) (Periphery) 24 25. 2. (World System Theory) ( WTO ) - (Core) - (Semi-periphery) (NICs) - (Periphery) 3. (Imperialism) .. (Overproduction) (Under-consumption) 25 26. 100% 4. (Mercantilism) (Protectionism) (New Protectionism) (Tariff Barrier) - - - - () 1. (Hegemony) ********************** 1. 2 1. 5 2. 1. (Atomic Energy) IAEA 26 27. 2./ (Nuclear Proliferation) -Antarctic Treaty .. 1959 - (NPT) .. 1968 - Sea Bed Treaty .. 1971 - (Nuclear Weapon Free Zone: NWFZ) 3. (Yield) LTBT/PTBT (Limited Test Ban Treaty/Partial Test Ban Treaty) .. 1963 4. - (Misunderstanding) - (Miscalculation Early Warning System) Nuclear Deterrence Triad 5. SALT 1 .. 1972 SALT 2 .. 1979 27 28. 1. 2. (Loose Nuke Problem) - ( Loose Border Control) - (Loose Nuclear Facility Control) - Nuclear arsenal - Nuclear Material Storage - Nuclear Power Station - Nuclear Research Center 3. (Brain Drain) 1991 5 4. ( National Missile Defense -NMD) 100 % (Nuclear Deterrence) (Balance of Terror) 28 29. 2 100 % 100 % 2 1. 2. 2006 2007 (Centrifuge- Aided Uranium-Enrichment Program) (International Atomic Energy Agency-IAEA) IAEA 23 ..2006 1737 60 2007 2006 2007 29 30. (Centrifuge-Aided Uranium-Enrichment Program) (International Atomic Energy Agency-IAEA) IAEA (United Nation Security Council-UNSC) IAEA 3 (Non-Aligned Movement-NAM) 118 23 ..2006 1737 60 2007 100 % 30 31. 2. 1. (Actors) WTO IMF 3 IMF . IMF IMF 2. ( ) (Multi-polar) 3. - (Bilateral Agreement) 31 32. 2 WTO - - ISO ( ) 4. - -- - 32 33. 3. 1. 2. 3. ( ) *** (State as a necessary evil) 33 34. " (The Washington Consensus) (Structural Adjustment Program) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10., ,, 11. 4 1.Liberation 2.Stabilization 3.Privatization 4.Deregulation 1987 2 5. Democracy 34 35. 6.Good Governance 4. ** () 5. 1. 1.1 2 (Bi-Polar System) (Multi-Polar System) 1.3 1.4 2. 2.1 (International Trade) 35 36. 2.2 2 (New Economic Order) 2.4 2.6 ( ) 2.7 ( ) 2.8 3. - - - Information Technology - - 4. 3 4.1 4.2 36 37. 4.3 4.4 1.. 2.. 3.. 4.. 5. 3.. PS 704 37 38. 704 1. 2. 3. (Development) 2 - - 2 2504 ** 38 39. *** 1. 2. 3. (Foreign Aid) (Main Stream) 3 3 3 ****************** . 10 1. 2. 39 40. 3. 4. 5. Good Governance 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. (Development as Freedom) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. (Protective Security) (Freedom Centered) Agent Orientation GDH-Gross Domestic Happiness 3 1. Neo-liberalism 40 41. 2. (Radical) 50 3. - - ( . 4 ) 3 1. 1970 Keynesian Consensus 41 42. 2. 1980 Washington Consensus 3. Post Washington Consensus PWC 1990 Washington Consensus Post Washington Consensus (PWC) ( ) ( 4 ) ** ** 1 ( Linear Stages of Growth Model) 1950-60 1.1 5 (Traditional Society) 2 (Pre Condition for Take Off) 3 (Take Off ) 3 3 2540 42 43. 1.2 1.3 2. (The Theories and Patterns of Structural Changes) Trickle Down Effect 3 (Import Substitution Industries :ISI) (Export Promotion Oriented) - - ISI 3 - 3 70 % 2 43 44. 1 2 3 (The International Dependence Revolution) 1970 2 1960 2 3 3 ( ) 3 - 3 - 3 3 - 3 3 1970 (.. 1973 1979) .. 1975 4 The Neoclassical Counter Revolution ( ) 3 1 44 45. 1970 ( ) (Maximize Profit, Minimize Cost) 1980 IMF, World Bank (Washington Consensus) IMF, World Bank ()** 1. 2. 3. (Public Expenditure) 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 4 ation 1. Liberalization 45 46. 2. Stabilization 3. Privatization 4. Deregulation 5. Democratization 6. Good Governance *** - - - - 5 (New Growth Theory) (Old Growth Theory) ****************** 46 47. 1. 2. 3. 47 48. (GDH- Gross Domestic Happiness) 4 GDH - - - - (Good governance) (Efficiency Economy) 3 2 - - - - - () ************************ (New World Order) () 48 49. 2475 76 76 22 1 3.4 16 4 7 1. (Evolution) 2. - - 49 50. 2540 19 2549 3. 1. 2. (The Politics Typical of Industrial Society) 3. (Political Modernization) 4. (The Operation of a Nation state) 5. (Administrative and Legal Development) 6. (Mass Mobilization and Participation) 7. (Building of Democracy) 8. (Stability and Orderly Change) 4 9. (Mobilization and Powers) 50 51. 10. (One Aspect of Multidimensional Process of Social Change) 4. . (Samuel P. Huntington) (Political Modernization) 1. (Rationalization of Authority) 2. (Differentiation and Specialization) 3. (Political Participation) *** ** 2475 3 14 6 . 2540 .. (Representative 51 52. Democracy) Participatory Democracy 5 () 19 2549 (Informal Politics) (Civil Politics) New Politics Movement Politics (Social Movement) 52 53. (Civic Virtue) () ****************** () (Economic Growth) () 53 _ + + + + _ + +- - + 54. (Mass Violence) (Government Expenditure) (Social Welfare) (Social Mobilized) ( ) 1. (Distributive) 2. (Redistributive) 54 55. 3. (Regularity) 4. 4 1. 2. 3. () 4. ************************************* 2007 1. 2. 3. () 4. 2475 ****** 1. () 2. ( ) 3. () 4. 5. () 55 56. PS 705 PS 705 3 1.. 3 - Orthodoxy - Social Science Heterodoxy - New PA-New Public Administration 2.. - - 3.. - - 56 57. (NPM) PS 705 Plan C 707 708 711 2 1. 2. (Paradigm) . Nicholas Henry 5 1 (The Politics/ Administration Dichotomy) - - . - -Administrative Reform -Good Governance -Strong Executive -Rational and Efficient Bureaucracy 57 58. 2 (The Principles of Administration) - POCCC ( 14 ) - POSDCORB - - (Bureaucracy) 3 (Public Administration as Political Science) 1 - -John M. Guas - . - 4. (Public Administration as Management) - System Analysis () -Operation Research ( -Decision Making () 5. (Public Administration as Public Administration) 58 59. 2. 1 2 3 2 3 100 4 - - - Subjective -Objective - (Organization Theory) - (.) 3 Organization Theory 59 60. Orthodoxy 1. - - (One Best Way) - (Scientific Management) 2. ( 2 ) - - POSCoRB 7 60 Orthodoxy (..1887- 1930) 1.1 1.1.1 - - - - 1.1.2 - (POCCC) - (POSCoRB) - (Bureaucracy) -+ - 1.2 / - - Social Science Heterodoxy (..1947-1967) 2.1 - - - - 2.1 - - - - - - New PA 1968- 3.1 3.1.1 - + 3.1.2 -+ -Pfeler - 3.2 ( ) 61. 3. - - - - - - ** ** - 5 - & - Social Science Heterodoxy 1. - - 2. 3. . 4. () 1. 5 2. 3 3. X Y 4. 2 5. 6. 61 62. 2 () ************ (Development Administration : DA) 1 2 62 63. 2 1. (Administration of Development : A of D) 2. (Development of Administration : D of A) 3 1. - - - 2. 3. ( ) 3 (A of D) - - - - - - - 63 64. ****************** (CPA) CPA 2 CPA - - CPA (D of A) - - / - ( DA) 64 (A of d ) - - - - - - - 65. -WCY (World Competitive Years) NGO -CPI (Corruption Perception Index) NGO Global Corruption Report (GCR) -WDR (World Development Report) -HDR (Human Development Report) -HDI (Human Development Index) -Worlds Best Cities ********************** 65 66. 707 4 1.. 2. 2.. 3.. 3 1. 2. 3. 3 1. *** *** 66 - - - - - - . - - - - - 67. 2. - - ( ) () ( ) () - 67 - - - - - 68. **** 3. 68 69. 1. (Vision) 2. (Mission) 3. (Major Goals) 4. (Strategy) SWOT SWOT S: Strengths () W: Weakness () O: Opportunities () T: Threats () PEST Analysis P-Political E-Economic S=Social T=Technological PEEST E= Ecological **** **** 1. ( ) 19 ... 69 70. 2549 2551 () 2. Case Case 1. ( ) 2. (. ) 19 49 Anti Royalist 70 71. SWOT ** *** - - ** 3. - - ( ) () ( ) () - 2 71 72. 2 ( ) ********************** - ( ) - ( ) - 1. - - 2. 3. () 4. - Good Governance - **** *** *********** 72 73. 8 1. - - 12 - - - 2. - 73 74. - / 200 1 3. 4. - 4 *************************************** - - ** ** () ESCAP 3 1. 2. 3. 3 3 - - 74 75. - 1. 2. (Quality of life) (Quality of Work Life) 3. (Productivity) 4. 5. 1. 75 76. 2. 3. (Political Participation) 1. (Political Efficacy) 2. 3. ( ) ( 2 ) 4. ( ) 5. () 76 77. 6. - - - - ( . ) 1. 2. - - 3. Single Parent () Single Parent 4. 1. 2. ***************** 77 78. 1.. ( ) - 2. 3. ( ) - - 4. - PS 709 4 . 1. SBS 2. - - - 3. 3 4 2 1. SBS 78 79. 1. 1.1. (External Setting) - UN WTO IMF - - 1.2 (Internal Setting) - - - - - - **** - *** ( . ) (Bureaucratic State) 79 80. EXIM Bank ( ) 4 - (FTA) ( FTA ) FTA NGOs FTA 2. 2.1 ( ) 2.2 (Perception) Perception 80 81. Perception Formal Relation Economic Diplomacy Personal Diplomacy 2.3 Groupthink . . . (FTA) FTA FTA FTA Perception 81 82. *** SBS Perception *** 2 ( 3 ) 1. 2. 1. 2. 1. ( ) 2. ( ) 82 83. 3. - - 1 15 3 - - - 2 - - - 83 84. 2 1. 2. - - - ******************* 84 85. . 1. 2. . 3. 4. ( ) - - - *** SBS 3 ** Case Study 1-2 2542 ( ) 8 1988 ( 8888 ) (NLD) NLD () 85 86. 1 2542 2 89 2 1 .. - 86 87. - - 1. 2. (Constructive Engagement) (Flexible Intervention) (Flexible Engagement) 87 88. Ps 711 3 1. (Policy Formulation) 2. (Planning) 3. (Policy Implementation) 88 89. ** 3 *** (Policy Formulation) 1. (Elite Model) 2. (Group Model) 3. (Institutional Model) 4. (System Model) Input Input 5. (Decision Model) 89 1. 2. 3. 1. 2. 3. 90. 3 1. 2. 3. 1. - (Societal Problems) - (Serious Problems) (Widespread Problems) - 2. 1.1 (Back -of -the Envelope Calculations) 1.2 (Quick Decision Analysis ) 1.3 1.4 (Planning) 1. 2. 3. 90 91. / / / (Feasibility Study) 1. 2. (Cash Flow Analysis) (Net Present Value) (Benefit Cost Ratio) 3. (Political Viability) - (Acceptability) - (Appropriateness) - (Responsiveness) - (Laws and Equity) 4. (Administrative Operability) (Policy Implementation) 3 1. The Rational Model 2. 4 -The Management Model -The Bureaucratic Model -The Organizational Development Model - The Contingency Model 3. (Political Theory) The Political Model 91 92. () 1. Rational Model (Cause) - - - - - - - 2. (Cause) 1. Management Model - - - - - 2. ( The Bureaucratic Model) - - 3. (The Organization Development Model-OD) - - 92 93. - - - - 4.(The Contingency Model) 3. (Political Model) - - - - - - (1) (Network Analysis) (2) Critical Path Method (CPM) (3) Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) (4) Gantt Chart *** **** 1. 2. ( ) 3. (Public Policy Analysis) (Public 93 94. Policy Studies) (Policy Process) 1 2 - () - 1 ************************************************************ ********************** PS 711 2 1. 3 1.1 . 1.2 ,, 3. . 2. 3 1. 2. 3. 94 95. ************************************************************ **** (ps 711) 1. 1.1 . Policy Stakeholders Policy Environment Public Policy 1. Policy Stakeholders 2.Policy Environment 3.Public Policy 3 3 200 . 95 1. 2. 3. 1. 2. 3. 96. 2. (Dror, Pressman, Wildarsky, Anderson) ) 1. (Policy Formation) Input 2. (Policy Decision) Input (Output) Input 3. (Policy Implementation) ( ) 96 Input Black Box Output Outcome Policy Formation Policy Decision Policy Implementatio n Policy Evaluation Prospective Policy Analysis Retrospective Policy Analysis Feedback Policy Termination 97. 4. (Policy Evaluation (Output) (Outcome) 5. Outcome Outcome Feedback Input 2 3. . ( ) ( 2) 5 1.Policy Problem 2.Policy Alternatives 3.Policy Actions 4.Policy Outcomes 1. Problem Structure 2. (Forecasting) 3. (Recommendation) 4. (Monitoring) 5. (Evaluation) 97 Policy Problem Foreca sting Practical Inference Policy Performance Policy Outcomes Policy Alternative s Policy Evaluati on Problem Structure Monitor ing Recommend ation 98. Structuring Problem Policy Problem Forecasting Policy Alternative (Actions) (Recommendation) (Monitoring) (Outcome) (Evaluation) Policy Performance ** ** () 1. (Policy Problem) . 6 - - - 2. (Policy Alternatives) . 6 3 98 99. 1. 2. 3. 3. (Actions) (Recommendation) 1. 20000 2. 3. 4. (Monitoring) 4. (Policy Outcomes) (Evaluation) - - - . 6 - 99 100. - 5. (Policy Performance) () - . 6 90 % 70 % - 30 20 - () 2. (Monitoring) 1. (Input) 1.1 1.2 () 1.3 IT () 100 101. 1.4 2. 2.1 2.2 - 20000 - 6 2.3 **************** *** 101 102. PS 712 (Political Participation) 200 () 3 1. (Direct Democracy ) 2. (Representative Democracy) 3. (Participatory Democracy) ( ) 102 103. 1. 2. 3. 2550 4. 5. () 1. 2. (Compromise) (Consensus) 3. 4. (Voluntarism) 3 1. (Formal Participation) 2. (Informal Participation) 3. (Exceptional Form of Participation) - 103 104. - - .. 2550 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 1. (Political Violence) (Terrorism) - - - 2552 - 2. (Revolution) 3. 2550 () 104 105. 2550 25540 5 87 1. 2. ( ) 3. 4. 5. 1. (Voting) 2. (Referendum) 3. 2 - (Recall) ( 270-275) 2 - (Initiative) ( 170) 1 4. - ( 285) - ( 286) 105 106. - 2550 1. 2550 2550 2540 2550 1. 480 400 80 ( 40 .. 500 100 400 ) 2. .. 1 .. 3 ( 2540 1 ) 3... 8 ( 8 ) .. 10 ( 80 ) 4. ( 40 ) 1. 150 1 ( 40 200 ) 2. () 2540 2550 2550 1. () ** .. 2 - 106 107. 2. .. 3 1 ( 1 ) 3. 8 .. .. ( ) 4. .. 1 ( 2540 ..) 2. (Recall) 2550 2540 2550 2 ( 2540 5 ) 2550 2 . . 3 5 3. (Referendum) 2540 2550 107 108. 300 3 2550 *************************** (Civil Political Participation) *** *** (Civil Politics ) (Civil Society Sector) - - - (State Sector) 108 109. 1. 2. 3. (Social Movement) 5. (Civic Virtue) (Public Spirit) 6. (Civil Rights) 7. 8. 9. 1. 109 110. 3. 3. 4. 5. 6. (Political Apathy) 8. (Cost) (Opportunity Cost) 4. ( ) (.) 2 1. 2. (1) / 110 111. (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) 3. 2 - - ( Democratic Personality) 1. (1) / (2) (3) 2. (1) (2) 3. (1) (2) 111 112. 2 . - . . 2550 2 - - 2550 / - -- - 2006 . (Participatory Democracy) 112 113. . 1. 3 2. 3. 2540 5 ( 1 ) 4. 5. PS 714 PS 714 3 1.. 2.. 3. 1 2 PS 714 1. 2. 2.1 2.2 - 113 114. - - - 3. *** *** 1. - - 2.- 3. - - () 2510 . 10 7 .. 2527 28 .. 2538 23 2540 30 .. 42 (Regional Integration Theory) 1995 (AFFTA) (ASEAN Community) 114 115. 2003 Bali Concord 2020 2015 (ASEAN Charter) (Vientiane Declaration 2004) 1. (ASEAN Economic Community : AEC) 2. (ASEAN Security Community : ASC) 3.- (ASEAN Socio-Cultural Community -ASCC) (AEC) 2558 (ASEAN Charter) AEC (Single Market) AEC 1. - - - - - () 2. - - - - 3. CLMV ( ) 115 116. 4. ( EU) - - East Asia Community (: EAC) EAC - (ASEAN: ) 10 - () ( + 3 ) - () - (BIM-TECT) (ACMEC) 116 10 -AFTA - 3 IMT GT / = (EAST ASIA Community) 117. + 1. 550 2. 3. 1. 10 4 - - - - 2. 3. 117 ( 2015) - (AEC) - (ASC) - = + 3 118. 4. (CLMV) CLMV 5. 6. 7. (Asian Way ) - (Informality) - - (Dialogue) (Consensus) - 1995 (AFTA) 118 119. - - - ( ) 2007 - 30 30 (ASEAN-EU Commemorative Summit) TAC (Treaty of Amity and Cooperation) FTA - ASEM-Asia-Europe Meeting 10 1990 ( ARF) ASEM 6 2006 7 2008 119 120. New Partnership with South East Asia 1. 2. Good Governance 3. (Money Laundering) (Piracy) 4. (Trans - Regional EU ASEAN Trade Initiative: TREATI) 5. (Less Prosperous Countries) 6. - 2007 - - (Join Committee on Asian-Europe FTA) 4 7 2009 () 1. 120 121. 4 2. 3. 18-19 .. 1946 . 1954 17 121 122. .. 1965 17 SEATO () - .. 1973 1975 122 123. (1979-1991) 1975 1. 2. (Parrots Beak) 3. ( ) 1977 2 2 4. 3 1. - - 3 () 2. 2 3 3. 2 3 3 123 124. 1987 1989 23 1991 124