Transcript
Page 1: UPDATE on  the US v. Virginia  Settlement Agreement and National Enforcement Efforts

UPDATE on the US v. Virginia Settlement Agreement and National

Enforcement Efforts

U.S. Department of JusticeCivil Rights Division

Special Litigation Section

Page 2: UPDATE on  the US v. Virginia  Settlement Agreement and National Enforcement Efforts

Background

• CRIPA investigation • Expanded investigation – Apr. 2010 • Findings – Feb. 2011 • Negotiations – 2011-2012• Agreement – Jan. 2012 • Approval by court – Mar. & Aug. 2012• Implementation / Enforcement – Now

Page 3: UPDATE on  the US v. Virginia  Settlement Agreement and National Enforcement Efforts

Activities of the DOJFY 2013

• Meetings w/ Stakeholders (500+)• Families (waitlist, TC, waiver recipients)• Providers • Organizations• CSB’s• Case managers• Employment coordinators• Crisis services

Page 4: UPDATE on  the US v. Virginia  Settlement Agreement and National Enforcement Efforts

Activities of the DOJFY 2013

• Reviewing Data

• Meetings with Independent Reviewer

• Meetings with State of Virginia• including drill downs on specific topics

Page 5: UPDATE on  the US v. Virginia  Settlement Agreement and National Enforcement Efforts

Topics we’ll discuss today

1. Waivers 2. Transition Planning3. Indv. & Family Supports 4. Crisis System 5. Integrated Housing6. Integrated Employment and Day Activities7. Family-to-family and peer-to-peer programs

8. Case Management9. Access and Availability10. Quality Assurance

Page 6: UPDATE on  the US v. Virginia  Settlement Agreement and National Enforcement Efforts

WaiversFY 2014

• 225 ID Waivers• 25 DD Waivers • 160 TC Waivers• 40 prioritized for Youth in Nursing Homes/large

ICFs

• Independent Reviewer reported Virginia has allocated many more waivers than required in FY 2014

Page 7: UPDATE on  the US v. Virginia  Settlement Agreement and National Enforcement Efforts

National Perspective: Youth with ID/DD in Nursing Homes

Florida• 2012 Findings Letter

– Found hundreds of children with significant medical needs resided unnecessarily in nursing homes & many more at-risk of entering nursing homes because lack of community alternatives and cuts to in-home supports (esp. in-home nursing)

• After six months of negotiations United States filed suit in July 2013.– Lawsuit seeks a comprehensive remedy, including offering

community alternative s to all children in nursing homes, effective transition planning, expansion of community-based and in-home services as alternatives to nursing home care, and changes to policies/practices re in-home supports. It also seeks damages for affected children.

Page 8: UPDATE on  the US v. Virginia  Settlement Agreement and National Enforcement Efforts

National Perspective: Adults with ID/DD in Nursing HomesTexas

• Intervened in Steward v. Perry, a class-action regarding the unnecessary institutionalization of thousands of people with ID/DD in and at-risk of entering private nursing homes

• Litigation implicates intersection of ADA and PASRR • Reached Interim Agreement (to be filed for Court approval in Aug

2013) that requires Texas to:– identify people with ID/DD in NHs, inform them about community

alternatives, and establish necessary services and transition those who want to move to the community

– create hundreds of new Medicaid waivers to transition people from, and divert people from entering, NHs

– expand community-based medical services– establish a system to divert people from unnecessary NH

admissions (including regional diversion coordinators)• Continuing to finalize a final comprehensive agreement

Page 9: UPDATE on  the US v. Virginia  Settlement Agreement and National Enforcement Efforts

Transition PlanningFY 2014

• Individualized, person-centered plans• Essential supports and Barrier-busting • Both the DOJ and the Independent

Reviewer will continue to focus on: – Adequate Community Options for those receiving

waivers from the ID/DD waitlists and from Training Centers

Page 10: UPDATE on  the US v. Virginia  Settlement Agreement and National Enforcement Efforts

Indv. & Family SupportsFY 2014

• In FY 2013 established the program and met targets of 700 individuals

• Commonwealth reports that typical requests in FY 2013 were for respite, summer camps, or transportation

• In FY 2014 required to support 1000 individuals• Commonwealth reports there will be an online

application in addition to the paper application

Page 11: UPDATE on  the US v. Virginia  Settlement Agreement and National Enforcement Efforts

Crisis SystemFY 2014

• Mobile crisis response times• Crisis plans• Region 4 & 5 stabilization units• Transportation to the stabilization units• Number of regional stabilization units• Serving children with ID/DD• Staffing• Coordination with CSB Emergency Services

Page 12: UPDATE on  the US v. Virginia  Settlement Agreement and National Enforcement Efforts

Integrated HousingFY 2014

• Increased specificity of March 6, 2013 Housing Plan

• Section 811 application• $800,000 Rental Assistance Pilot Program• Coordination with local housing entities• Increased development of living options

Page 13: UPDATE on  the US v. Virginia  Settlement Agreement and National Enforcement Efforts

National Perspective: Housing for People with Disabilities

June 2013 HUD Guidance– HUD-funded affordable housing programs are a critical

resource for Olmstead implementation– HUD is committed to ensuring that HUD-funded housing gives

choice, self-determination, and opportunities for people with disabilities to live and interact with people without disabilities

– Provides guidance on how to structure preferences that relate to state Olmstead implementation (VA has a HUD-approved preference for US v. VA implementation)

Page 14: UPDATE on  the US v. Virginia  Settlement Agreement and National Enforcement Efforts

National Perspective: Housing for People with Disabilities

CMS Regulations re HCBS Settings– CMS finalizing regulations defining characteristics of

community-based settings for HCBS authorities (1915c, 1915i, Community First Choice (1915k))

– NPRM has list of required positive characteristics for all HCBS settings, additional requirements for provider-owned settings, list of non-HCBS settings (eg, ICFs, NHs), and presumptively non-HCBS settings (eg, on grounds of or adjacent to public institution)

Page 15: UPDATE on  the US v. Virginia  Settlement Agreement and National Enforcement Efforts

Integrated EmploymentFY 2014

• December 2012 Employment First Policy

• Increased specificity of November 7, 2012 Employment Implementation Plan

• Sufficiency of March 29, 2013 supported employment targets

• Implementation of training initiatives

Page 16: UPDATE on  the US v. Virginia  Settlement Agreement and National Enforcement Efforts

National Perspective: Integrated DaysRhode Island

-- Investigation regarding adults with ID/DD in state’s largest sheltered workshop and pipeline of students from school-based SW to this adult SW

-- Interim Settlement Agreement June 2013• Integrated supported employment (individual placements,

at least min. wage) and integrated day services for more than 200 people currently in SWs

• “40-20” Integration Standard• Requirement of average of at least 20 hours a week across the group• Requirement of integrated day activities when not working, for a total of

40 hours of integrated work and non-work activities per week.

Page 17: UPDATE on  the US v. Virginia  Settlement Agreement and National Enforcement Efforts

National Perspective: Integrated DaysOregon

• Findings Letter June 2012– Found segregation in sheltered workshops of people who could and

want to work in integrated settings– Focus on people unnecessarily in sheltered workshops and people at

risk (esp. transition age students)– Seeks expansion of integrated supported employment (individual, at

least min. wage)

• Complaint and Motion to Intervene March 2013– Over-reliance on segregated employment settings -- 61% of people

receiving e-ment svs are in SWs; only 16% are in indiv. supp. employment

– No real opportunity to leave segregated e-ment -- People remain in SWs an average of 11-12 years, up to 30 years.

– Pipeline from school to segregated e-ment

Page 18: UPDATE on  the US v. Virginia  Settlement Agreement and National Enforcement Efforts

Family-to-family/Peer-to-peerFY 2014

• Activities of Family Recourse Consultant

• Meeting with Family and Peer Mentors

• Waitlist mentoring, as well as training center mentoring

Page 19: UPDATE on  the US v. Virginia  Settlement Agreement and National Enforcement Efforts

Case ManagementFY 2014

• Regular face-to-face meetings• Individual Support Plans• Enhanced case management – Safety– Increased integration

• Role of case manager

Page 20: UPDATE on  the US v. Virginia  Settlement Agreement and National Enforcement Efforts

Access & AvailabilityFY 2014

• Guidelines for families seeking services

• Easy Access website

• Transportation oversight

• Access to Adaptive Equipment/ Environmental Modifications

Page 21: UPDATE on  the US v. Virginia  Settlement Agreement and National Enforcement Efforts

Quality Assurance & Risk Management

FY 2014

• Expanded reporting: Computerized Human Rights Information System

• Quality Improvement Committee• Regional Quality Council development• Quality Service Reviews development• Licensure• Process for Corrective Action Plans

Page 22: UPDATE on  the US v. Virginia  Settlement Agreement and National Enforcement Efforts

Independent ReviewerNext Report- Dec 2013

• Crisis Services

• Case Management

• Quality and Risk Management

• Transition & Discharge Planning from Southside & Northern Virginia Training Center

Page 23: UPDATE on  the US v. Virginia  Settlement Agreement and National Enforcement Efforts

Websites• www.ada.gov/olmstead

– All of DOJ’s Olmstead enforcement efforts nationally (findings letters, settlements, briefs, etc.) [includes US v. Virginia]

– Guidance documents– Speeches– Faces of Olmstead

• www.justice.gov/crt/about/spl/virginia-ada.php

• US v. Virginia specific website– Independent reviewer’s reports– Settlement agreement and summary– Findings letter

Page 24: UPDATE on  the US v. Virginia  Settlement Agreement and National Enforcement Efforts

Contact InformationKyle Smiddie

[email protected]

Bo [email protected]

202-514-8103

Richard [email protected]

202-307-3116

Alison [email protected]

202-307-3216

Jason [email protected]

202-353-1106


Recommended