Transcript
Page 1: Risk Management Reconstructed Implementing fraud risk intelligence practices July 2011 KPMG FORENSIC SM

Risk Management Reconstructed

Implementing fraud risk intelligence practices

July 2011

KPMG FORENSICSM

Page 2: Risk Management Reconstructed Implementing fraud risk intelligence practices July 2011 KPMG FORENSIC SM

© 2011 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.

Risk aversion vs. Risk intelligence

Risk Aversion

Risk Intelligence

Risk aversion ignores the basic principle of risk vs. reward. Companies should be averse to unrewarded risks (e.g., ethical and non-compliance risks)

Page 3: Risk Management Reconstructed Implementing fraud risk intelligence practices July 2011 KPMG FORENSIC SM

© 2011 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.

Major considerations for financial institutions

Fraud risk

Anti-money laundering compliance

Anti-bribery and corruption/FCPA

Page 4: Risk Management Reconstructed Implementing fraud risk intelligence practices July 2011 KPMG FORENSIC SM

Fraud risk management

Page 5: Risk Management Reconstructed Implementing fraud risk intelligence practices July 2011 KPMG FORENSIC SM

© 2011 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.

The design, implementation, and evaluation of

programs and controls that prevent, detect, and

respond appropriately to fraud and misconduct risks.

Fraud and risk management

Page 6: Risk Management Reconstructed Implementing fraud risk intelligence practices July 2011 KPMG FORENSIC SM

© 2011 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.

Sample fraud and misconduct conditions

Opportunity

Incentive/Pressure

Rationalization

Page 7: Risk Management Reconstructed Implementing fraud risk intelligence practices July 2011 KPMG FORENSIC SM

© 2011 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.

Sample categories of fraud and misconduct

Fraudulent financial reporting (e.g., improper revenue recognition, overstatement of assets, understatement of liabilities)

Misappropriation of assets (e.g., theft of cash, physical assets or intellectual property)

Revenue or assets gained by fraudulent or illegal acts (e.g., deceptive sales practices, market rigging, over-billing customers)

Expenses or liabilities avoided by fraudulent or illegal acts (e.g., improper avoidance of tax liabilities, wage and hour abuses, falsifying information provided to regulators)

Expenses or liabilities incurred for fraudulent or illegal acts (e.g., commercial kickbacks, bribery of domestic or foreign officials)

Other misconduct (e.g., other violations of legal, regulatory or ethical standards)

Page 8: Risk Management Reconstructed Implementing fraud risk intelligence practices July 2011 KPMG FORENSIC SM

© 2011 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.

Antifraud program objectives

Prevent

fraud and misconduct

Detect

occurrence

Respond

appropriately once

discovered

Page 9: Risk Management Reconstructed Implementing fraud risk intelligence practices July 2011 KPMG FORENSIC SM

© 2011 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.

Sample antifraud program elements

Prevention Detection Response

Board/audit committee oversightExecutive and line management functions

Internal audit, compliance, and monitoring functions

Fraud and misconduct risk assessment

Code of conduct and related standards

Employee and third-party due diligence

Communication and training

Process-specific fraud risk controls

Proactive forensic data analysis

Hotlines and whistleblower mechanisms

Auditing and monitoring

Retrospective forensic data analysis

Internal investigation protocols

Enforcement and accountability protocols

Disclosure protocols

Remedial action protocols

Page 10: Risk Management Reconstructed Implementing fraud risk intelligence practices July 2011 KPMG FORENSIC SM

© 2011 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.

Putting it all together

Page 11: Risk Management Reconstructed Implementing fraud risk intelligence practices July 2011 KPMG FORENSIC SM

Anti-money launderingcompliance

Page 12: Risk Management Reconstructed Implementing fraud risk intelligence practices July 2011 KPMG FORENSIC SM

© 2011 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.

The U.S. regulatory environment

Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) (1970)

USA PATRIOT Act

Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)

Foreign Corruption Practices Act (FCPA)

Page 13: Risk Management Reconstructed Implementing fraud risk intelligence practices July 2011 KPMG FORENSIC SM

© 2011 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.

Risk-based approach to AML compliance

The “Four Pillars” of AML Compliance

Policies, Procedures, and Internal

Controls

Designated BSA/AML

Compliance Officer*

* Should have Board-designated authority to carry out his/her role and responsibilities

Training and Communication

Independent Testing / Audit

Page 14: Risk Management Reconstructed Implementing fraud risk intelligence practices July 2011 KPMG FORENSIC SM

Anti-bribery and corruption/FCPA

Page 15: Risk Management Reconstructed Implementing fraud risk intelligence practices July 2011 KPMG FORENSIC SM

© 2011 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.

Corruption risk for banks

More than 1 trillion dollars is paid in bribes each year*

* Source: World Bank Institute

Page 16: Risk Management Reconstructed Implementing fraud risk intelligence practices July 2011 KPMG FORENSIC SM

© 2011 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.

Interplay between FCPA and money laundering

The FCPA prohibits bribery of foreign government officials bribery by definition involves the transfer of money or property

The Money Laundering Control Act prohibits transfer of money or property derived from “specified unlawful activity”

transfer of money or property for an unlawful purpose

FCPA violation is an SUA

Therefore, payment of bribes in violation of the FCPA usually involves violations of the Money Laundering Control Act

Page 17: Risk Management Reconstructed Implementing fraud risk intelligence practices July 2011 KPMG FORENSIC SM

© 2011 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.

Corruption risk for banks

The Bank’s clients Potential AML reporting obligations

Bank’s client is engaged in corruption and the transactions are being facilitated by the bank

The Bank itself Engages through an employee or authorized agent in bribery to gain an

advantage

Acquired liability Through violations committed by entity acquired

Page 18: Risk Management Reconstructed Implementing fraud risk intelligence practices July 2011 KPMG FORENSIC SM

© 2011 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.

Putting it All Together

Page 19: Risk Management Reconstructed Implementing fraud risk intelligence practices July 2011 KPMG FORENSIC SM

Thank you

Sven Stumbauer

Director, KPMG LLP

[email protected]

+1-305-913-2772

Page 20: Risk Management Reconstructed Implementing fraud risk intelligence practices July 2011 KPMG FORENSIC SM

© 2011 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.

The KPMG name, logo and “cutting through complexity” are registered trademarks or trademarks of KPMG International.

All information provided is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to accurate in the future. No one should act upon such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation.


Recommended