Transcript
Page 1: Open Access Week: Athabasca University

Making sense of complexity in open information environments

George SiemensOctober 26, 2011

Page 2: Open Access Week: Athabasca University

Openness is a control tradeoff

And it means we have to do different things

Page 3: Open Access Week: Athabasca University

Where are our control points?

Page 4: Open Access Week: Athabasca University

Our curriculum?

Page 5: Open Access Week: Athabasca University

Our teaching?

Page 6: Open Access Week: Athabasca University

Fragmentary experience

• Conversations, content, context not (only) shaped by the school/educator

• Learners are in control

Fragmentation is a new reality. Our learning models need to embrace

(reflect) it.

Page 7: Open Access Week: Athabasca University

Coherence is an orientation about the meaning and value of information elements based on how they are connected, structured, and related

Antonovsky 1993

Page 8: Open Access Week: Athabasca University

Existing coherence forming systems

BooksNewspapersTV news programsMagazines

(anything that is structured and that the end user can’t speak into and alter)

Page 9: Open Access Week: Athabasca University

Openness messes up coherence (and control)

Page 10: Open Access Week: Athabasca University

Fragmentation of information requires that we weave together elements into some type of coherent framework

YoutubeBlogsTwitterFacebookTEDtalksKahn AcademyOnline news/information sitesTraditional coherence frameworks

Page 11: Open Access Week: Athabasca University

Networked information doesn’t have a centre

Page 12: Open Access Week: Athabasca University

Information fragmentation…loss of narratives of coherence

Page 13: Open Access Week: Athabasca University

“the rise of millions of fragmented discussions across the world tend instead to lead to fragmentation of audiences into isolated publics”

Habermas 2006

Page 14: Open Access Week: Athabasca University

Argument: we socialize to make sense of information

… i.e. it is our ability to work with information

(abstraction, representation, “point to”) that defines humanity

Page 15: Open Access Week: Athabasca University

As information quantity and complexity increase…

We adopt two approaches:

1. Better technical systems2. Better connected social systems

Page 16: Open Access Week: Athabasca University

setnet

group

collective

Social forms

Jon Dron & Terry Anderson

Page 17: Open Access Week: Athabasca University
Page 18: Open Access Week: Athabasca University
Page 19: Open Access Week: Athabasca University

‘‘. . . information foraging refers to activities associated with assessing, seeking, and handling information sources”

Piroli and Card, 1995

Page 20: Open Access Week: Athabasca University

What is sensemaking?

Page 21: Open Access Week: Athabasca University

“Sensemaking is about labelling and categorizing to stabilize the streaming of experience”

Weick et al. 2005

Page 22: Open Access Week: Athabasca University

“a motivated, continuous effort to understand connections . . . in order to anticipate their trajectories and act effectively”

Klein et al. 2006

Page 23: Open Access Week: Athabasca University

Cynefin FrameworkDave Snowden

Page 24: Open Access Week: Athabasca University

Domains of Sensemaking

Page 25: Open Access Week: Athabasca University

Complicated is not complex.

Page 26: Open Access Week: Athabasca University

When an answer and path is known, but requires time and effort, it is complicated.

Page 27: Open Access Week: Athabasca University

When an answer is not known, or when agents interact in unpredictable

ways, it is complex.

Page 28: Open Access Week: Athabasca University

Education system is treating a complex problem as a complicated one.

Lessons #1 in Paths to Failure:

Page 29: Open Access Week: Athabasca University

Complex unknown problems require:1. Mind of a scientist2. Mind of an artist

Page 30: Open Access Week: Athabasca University

What is wayfinding?

Page 31: Open Access Week: Athabasca University

“the process that takes place when people orient themselves and navigate through space”

Raubal and Winter 2002

Page 32: Open Access Week: Athabasca University

“is the cognitive element of navigation … it does not involve movement of any kind but only the tactical and strategic parts that guide movement.”

Darken and Peterson 2002

Page 33: Open Access Week: Athabasca University
Page 34: Open Access Week: Athabasca University

The Landing

Page 35: Open Access Week: Athabasca University

2008, 2009, 2011

Finding complex information environments: research spaces

Page 36: Open Access Week: Athabasca University

The data set

Connectivism and Connective Knowledge 2008(CCK08)

Page 37: Open Access Week: Athabasca University

Tools used by learners

http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/643/1402Fini, 2009

Roughly anything.

Page 38: Open Access Week: Athabasca University

The methods

1. Social network and participation analysis

2. Corbin & Strauss’ (1990) version of grounded theory

Page 39: Open Access Week: Athabasca University

SNA & Participation Habits

Page 40: Open Access Week: Athabasca University

CCK08 Weekly Forum Posts

Page 41: Open Access Week: Athabasca University

CCK08: Introduction forum

Limited interaction. Most are isolated

Page 42: Open Access Week: Athabasca University

Introduction forum posts: CCK08

Dialogue limited: Group too large?

Page 43: Open Access Week: Athabasca University

Week 12 forum posts: CCK08

More equitable distribution? Due to smaller #’s of participants?

Page 44: Open Access Week: Athabasca University
Page 45: Open Access Week: Athabasca University

Open coding using Cohere

http://cohere.open.ac.uk

Page 46: Open Access Week: Athabasca University

Axial Coding

Page 47: Open Access Week: Athabasca University
Page 48: Open Access Week: Athabasca University

Self-organization and sub-networks

Sensegiving through artefact creation and sharing

Sensemaking/giving through language games

Knowledge domain expansion

Wayfinding cues, symbols

Social organization through creating sharing

Page 49: Open Access Week: Athabasca University

Coherence expression(sensegiving)

ArtifactsNarratives

Page 50: Open Access Week: Athabasca University

Participatory sensemaking:“the coordination of intentional activity in interaction, whereby individual sense-making processes are affected and new domains of social sense-making can be generated that were not available to each individual on her own”

De Jaegher and Di Paolo 2007

Page 51: Open Access Week: Athabasca University

Artefacts re-centre the learning conversation

Page 52: Open Access Week: Athabasca University

Artifacts of sensemaking

Page 53: Open Access Week: Athabasca University

Organizing course content

Dolors Capdet

Page 54: Open Access Week: Athabasca University

http://x28newblog.blog.uni-heidelberg.de/2008/09/06/cck08-first-impressions/

Image of course structure created by course participant

Page 55: Open Access Week: Athabasca University

Language/externalization reduces the “occult character” of mental images.

Wittgenstein

Language gives birth to thought

Vygotsky

Page 56: Open Access Week: Athabasca University

Language games

Storytelling

Debate, dialogue

Descriptions

Clarification

Metaphors

Analogies

Examples

Resonance

Narratives of sensemaking

Page 57: Open Access Week: Athabasca University

change.mooc.ca

Twitter: gsiemens

www.elearnspace.org/blog

http://www.solaresearch.org/

Learning Analytics & Knowledge 2012: Vancouver

http://lak12.sites.olt.ubc.ca/