88 Bell Labs Technical Journal ◆ Autumn 1996
IntroductionThe market for wireless telecommunications
infrastructure equipment is expected to continue to
grow at an astonishing pace. Lucent Technologies
Network Systems’ projections show the market for
infrastructure equipment and support services increas-
ing at a 20% compounded annual growth rate until
the year 2000. Factors that contribute to this growth
include:
• Deregulation in telecommunications markets
on a global scale,
• Rapidly growing economies and an insatiable
appetite for telecommunication services,
• Decreasing terminal costs,
• Migration of analog networks to digital net-
works, and
• Increased competition among service
providers and the resulting need for differenti-
ated services.
Rapid market growth, the emergence of new
applications and services, and general increases in
wireless use rates have changed our view of telecom-
munications services, the network infrastructure, and
end-user products we associate with mass-market
telecommunications. The network infrastructure must
support not only mobile communications, such as cel-
lular and personal communications services (PCS), but
also fixed wireless access for narrowband and broad-
band services, as well as data and network access to
people and computers. The advantages of tetherless
communications combined with a broader range of
services will continue to bring forth technology and
product innovations in this arena for the radio access
and integration of access systems with circuit-switched
narrowband terrestrial networks and packet-switched
broadband asynchronous transfer mode (ATM) net-
works. At the same time, end-user equipment will
evolve in terms of both the user interface and the
capabilities to handle speech, audio, data, image, and
video services.
The network infrastructure to support these ser-
vices must continue to evolve for base station and net-
work switching and control systems. This paper
♦ Next Generation Wireless NetworksGeorge E. Fry, Albert Jordan, David Y. Lee, Anil S. Sawkar, Nitin J. Shah, and William C. Wiberg
The market for wireless telecommunications infrastructure equipment is expected tocontinue to grow at an astonishing pace. Projections show the market for infrastruc-ture equipment and support services increasing at a 20% compounded annualgrowth rate until the year 2000. Factors that contribute to this growth include thederegulation in telecommunications markets on a global scale; rapidly growingeconomies and an insatiable appetite for telecommunication services; decreasingterminal costs; migration of analog networks to digital networks; and increasedcompetition among service providers and the resulting need for differentiated ser-vices. The network infrastructure to support new wireless services must continue toevolve for base station and network switching and control systems. This paper dis-cusses the next generation of wireless communications infrastructure productsdesigned and manufactured by Lucent Technologies that will provide end users witha wide range of wireless access and advanced services.
Bell Labs Technical Journal ◆ Autumn 1996 89
discusses the next generation of wireless communi-
cations infrastructure products designed and manu-
factured by Lucent Technologies to provide end
users with a wide range of wireless access and
advanced services.
Forces Driving ChangeNumerous forces drive the need for change in the
wireless infrastructure. Any one of these forces is suffi-
cient to cause wireless equipment vendors to adapt
their product offerings. In combination, they have a
multiplying effect resulting in an imperative for wire-
less network advances not seen before. This section
explores the various forces driving the need for next-
generation wireless infrastructure products.
Deregulation and the Competitive ClimateThe emergence of standards and persistent market
growth will continue to diminish the barriers to entry
and raise the level of competition among equipment
providers. We have already witnessed the emergence
of new entrants who have made great strides in estab-
lishing themselves in the market. Some have done so
by providing particular adjunct solutions consistent
with emerging standards (for example, stand-alone
home location register [HLR] databases, authentication
centers, intelligent antennas, and even cellular digital
packet data [CDPD] systems). Successive generations
of products, as well as competition facilitated by open
systems defined by both American National Standards
Institute (ANSI) and European Telecommunications
Standards Institute (ETSI) committees, have resulted
in the introduction of wireless solutions at extremely
competitive price points.
The net result is that today’s advanced base sta-
tions and switching equipment (hardware) will
become tomorrow’s commodity products, and manu-
facturers must innovate new products to maintain or
enhance market position. Success in the marketplace
will depend instead on the delivery of complete solu-
tions—especially software—that bring enhanced value
to carriers.
The Federal Communications Commission
recently completed the auction of A-, B-, and C-band
PCS frequencies in the United States. Total receipts—
$7.7 billion from the A and B bands and $10 billion
from the C band—are a clear signal of the intention of
the new entrants to compete aggressively in a mod-
ern emerging market. Internationally, governments
are quickening the pace of deregulation as they rec-
ognize the clear benefits of competitive forces driving
service costs down and enhancing local telecommuni-
cations infrastructures. Increased competition will
lead carriers to seek new ways to differentiate or
Panel 1. Abbreviations, Acronyms, and Terms
AMPS—Advanced Mobile Phone ServiceANSI—American National Standards InstituteAP—adjunct processorATM—asynchronous transfer modeCDMA—code division multiple accessCDPD—cellular digital packet dataDCS—digital cellular switchE-SMR—enhanced specialized mobile radioETSI—European Telecommunications Standards
InstituteGSM—Global System for Mobile
CommunicationsHLR—home location registerIN—intelligent networkIQ—in-phase and quadratureISDN—integrated services digital networkLAN—local area networkLEOS—low earth orbit satelliteMS—message serviceMSC—mobile switching centerMUX—multiplexerNNI—network-to-network interfaceOA&M—operation, administration, and mainte-
nancePCS—personal communications servicesPDA—personal digital assistantPDN—packet data networkPOTS—”plain old telephone service”PPC—packet processing complexPSTN—public switched telephone networkQOS—quality of serviceRF—radio frequencySMR—specialized mobile radioSMS—short message serviceSS7—Signaling System 7TCAP—Transaction Capabilities Application PartTDMA—time division multiple accessUNI—user-to-network interfaceWLL—wireless local loop
90 Bell Labs Technical Journal ◆ Autumn 1996
focus their service offerings and to reduce costs.
With competition increasing for basic voice ser-
vices and minute-of-use prices falling, carriers are
seeking to differentiate themselves in two notable
ways. First, they are attempting to develop branded
identities through the use of logos and signature
sounds/tones (for example, pre-call announcements
and voice mail notification tones) and focused market-
ing campaigns. Often, such attempts involve forging
marketing partnerships with other carriers in other
markets who may have deployed non-Lucent equip-
ment. In this situation, interoperability and feature
transparency are crucial to a campaign’s success.
Network-based features and services must be flexible
in the ways in which they are administered and pre-
sented to an end customer.
Second, carriers are trying to segment their sub-
scriber base and offer more targeted features and ser-
vices. Initially, these features and services have taken
the form of simple multirate and use-sensitive billing
plans. More recent approaches, however, have
become more complex, bundling wireless and wireline
services, adding geographic or time-of-day/day-of-
week restrictions, and supporting custom calling plans
or private networks. The trend is toward more sophis-
ticated horizontal (messaging, paging, and data) and
vertical (cellular dispatch, power company meter read-
ing) applications. Ideally, carriers would like to see a
continuous stream of new applications and features
becoming available to their subscribers. Such a strategy
is key to their differentiated and share growth in the
marketplace.
Additionally, to foster competition among equip-
ment vendors, carriers will demand solutions that are
based on industry standards with the ultimate goal of
achieving interoperability among network nodes.
Standards not only will allow carriers to secure solu-
tions at lower price points. Standards-based solutions
will also enable carriers to obtain a complete solution
by purchasing partial solutions from a multitude of
equipment providers. Such an environment will place
new pressure on equipment vendors to become com-
petitive in areas that were bundled with the total net-
work offering.
Increasing Customer Demand for TelecommunicationsServices
With the introduction of PCS, wireless local loop
(WLL), and data services, wireless networks will expe-
rience significant traffic increases. Projections indicate
that by the year 2000, nearly 50% of all traffic in the
network will be attributed to wireless traffic. This
increase will have a tremendous impact on the net-
work in terms of meeting quality-of-service (QOS)
parameters expected by customers for the services
requested. The anticipated increases in signaling and
capacity loads will require that current networks
evolve to continue to meet customer expectations.
Over the next three to five years, a multitude of differ-
ent access technologies will be introduced, and the
evolving network will need to support interoperation
among some subset of the growing set of all access
technologies.
Downward Pressure on CostsCarriers will be under increased pressure to lower
both capital outlays and annual expenses. Said
another way, carriers will seek to lower total network
life-cycle costs. Successful solutions, therefore, will
address network acquisition and deployment, network
operations, marketing and sales, distribution of termi-
nals, as well as service and general/administrative
functions.
Demand will increase for technological solutions
that reduce initial capital outlay, taking into account
equipment and site acquisition/preparation costs.
Examples include advanced antenna technology
(which increases per-site capital costs but lowers the
total capital expenditure required to service an area)
and microcell technology (which substantially lowers
site acquisition/preparation costs through small size
and innovative packaging). This is particularly impor-
tant for startup network operators who are under con-
siderable pressure from lenders to begin generating
revenue and hence, debt-servicing payments as soon
as possible.
Successful offers will also address growth and
maintenance costs, as well as back-end costs (for
example, network engineering, billing, fraud, and cus-
tomer administration/support activities), mainte-
nance/operations, and facilities charges.
Bell Labs Technical Journal ◆ Autumn 1996 91
Network enhancements need not strictly address
operations-oriented functions. For example, over-the-
air activation and fraud control features, which reduce
marketing and sales expenses, are two enhancements
currently being lauded heavily by carriers.
Carriers expect to buy a flexible platform that will
support incremental cost improvements as solutions
become available (that is, smaller cell sites, improved
voice quality, and enhanced fraud control). In addi-
tion, carriers expect the network to support incremen-
tal process improvements by the operations staff and
the sales and marketing teams.
The Pace of Technological AdvancesTechnology—particularly in the commercial hard-
ware and software industries—is advancing at an
unprecedented rate. The power of today’s computing
platforms continues to increase geometrically while
cost-to-performance ratios have placed these systems
in the commodity field. In fact, even the line between
the computing and telecommunications worlds has
begun to blur in favor of the computing model.
Advanced off-the-shelf software applications—
particularly in the area of middleware—have sup-
planted the ad hoc approaches to systems integration.
What once took a team of developers months to inte-
grate now takes a single user a few hours with the
help of these advanced packages.
The Internet is another technological advance
whose full impact is yet to be determined. While tele-
phony over the Internet is in its nascent stage, equip-
ment manufacturers would be wise to continue
exploring its potential in the coming years. The chal-
lenge for equipment vendors is to understand what
potential effects the Internet has for their products
and to take advantage of those opportunities.
Customers look to Lucent Technologies and its
world-class Bell Labs for leadership into revolution-
ary technologies and the products and services that
bring them to market.
The purpose of research and development is to
solve problems using existing techniques and scientific
knowledge to deliver technologies that can be sold as
products. Depending on whether the products and
markets are existing or new, the technology focus can
be redirected to address the needs of the particular
market segment. Figure 1 illustrates this concept.
To deliver total system solutions, technology plat-
forms are more important than one or two critical
Increasefunction
New
Current
Reducecost
Product
• E-SMR• Wireless FAX/image• Wireless data
• Cellular• SMR• Wireless LAN• Telepoint• Cordless• Paging
• PCS• Video distribution• Wireless multimedia• Mobile satellite• LEOS• PDAs
• Wireless local loop• Wireless PBX
Reducerisk
Increaseflexibility
Current New
Market
E-SMR – Enhanced specialized mobile radioLEOS – Low earth orbit satellitePCS – Personal communications servicesPDA – Personal digital assistantSMR – Specialized mobile radio
Figure 1.Market segmentation.
92 Bell Labs Technical Journal ◆ Autumn 1996
technologies. A platform spans multiple disciplines
and makes allowance for the following key opera-
tional factors:
• Technology insertions to extend product life,
• Multiple use to save development costs, and
• Reuse to save future development time.
For wireless, the trend is for technology to support
an application evolution from voice to multimedia; a
network evolution from fixed/homogenous to mobile
and heterogeneous; a system architecture from cen-
tralized host to distributed client server; transmission
and switching from a narrowband circuit to broadband
packet; radio-frequency (RF) coverage from outdoor
to seamless indoor/outdoor; RF distribution from
macrocell to micro/picocell; and equipment packaging
from indoor frame to miniaturized outdoor boxes.
Lucent Technologies Corporate NeedsIn addition to meeting customers’ needs, Lucent
Technologies’ product organizations must also meet
corporate requirements. These requirements are
mainly focused on reducing the development intervals
and total life-cycle costs of telecommunications prod-
ucts. For Lucent Technologies, the challenge becomes
defining a network infrastructure that will support
many different access technologies (such as code divi-
sion multiple access [CDMA], time division multiple
access [TDMA], and the Global System for Mobile
Communications [GSM]) across a wide range of hori-
zontal products (for example, wireless, wireline, and
data networks) while at the same time enabling the
reuse of advanced services and features across all offer-
ings. Meeting this challenge requires outlining a family
of products based on a common network infrastruc-
ture made up of the specific applications running on
well-defined hardware and software platforms. The
resulting purchasing volumes of these platforms will
translate into lower unit costs, thus benefiting the bot-
tom line across Lucent’s many businesses.
As time goes on, one of Lucent’s strategies to
increasing profitability while reducing capital invest-
ment is to add value to off-the-shelf hardware and
software platforms. This will require increased empha-
sis on gaining revenue from software sales. Advanced
architectures emphasizing hardware and software
reuse, such as the one discussed in this paper, can be
leveraged to increase reuse among product families
and thereby improve time-to-market and cost profiles
for those products.
Proposed Next Generation Wireless InfrastructureWhat might a wireless network that addresses all
the needs of end users, service providers, and equip-
ment vendors look like? To meet the demands placed
on future wireless communications by end users, ser-
vice providers, and equipment vendors, the next gen-
eration wireless network must:
• Support multiple access technologies on a sin-
gle network infrastructure;
• Separate wireless-specific and Lucent value-
added applications from commodity-based
hardware and software platforms;
• Leverage hardware and software platforms
from the commercial computing industry; and
• Support continuums of service, feature con-
tent, and reliability.
This section describes the basic network infrastruc-
ture and general approaches to service delivery.
Network TopologyThe network topology that results from combining
the various needs and approaches into a single net-
work is shown in Figure 2.
Several key characteristics distinguish this archi-
tecture. First is its division into three main areas: intel-
ligent network (IN) services, the core network, and the
access networks. Emphasis is placed on the functional
isolation between the networks and the interfaces
between them. Thus, each major area can evolve at its
own pace and the interoperability between them
remains intact.
Second is the architecture’s use of ATM features
throughout the network infrastructure. Using a single
network technology for all nodes greatly simplifies
network integration, as well as operation, administra-
tion, and maintenance (OA&M) functions. In addition,
broadband technology positions product offerings for
future growth.
Third is the emphasis on application and resource
servers in the IN and access networks. We propose
moving from the traditional, tightly integrated service-
control architecture to a more computer-centric dis-
Bell Labs Technical Journal ◆ Autumn 1996 93
tributed client/server model. Resource servers manage
the access network resources, such as radios and chan-
nels. Application servers—for example, call servers and
user agent servers, make requests of these resource
servers to carry out their functions. This model also
extends into the IN domain in which access network
application servers request services of IN servers. The
reverse may also be true. An IN server may make a
request of an access network server—for example, to
find and page a particular user.
The following subsections provide more detail on
each of the major infrastructure areas.
Intelligent Network ServicesThe term “IN services” applies to a broad category
of advanced capabilities provided by the network.
Examples of IN services include voice mail systems,
home location register (HLR) databases, short message
service (SMS) capabilities, and user agents that exist in
the IN network and act on behalf of a user. Typically,
IN services are implemented on adjunct processors
ATM – Asynchronous transfer modeCDMA – Code division multiple accessDCS – Digital cellular switchIN – Intelligent networkMS – Message serviceMUX – Multiplexer
PDN – Packet data networkPPC – Packet processing complexPSTN – Public switched telephone networkSS7 – Signaling System No. 7TDMA – Time division multiple access
Applicationservers
Resourceservers
Applicationservers
Applicationservers
Applicationservers
IN services
Corenetwork(s)
Backbone ATM switch(20 Gb/s and up)
Applicationservers
Resourceservers
Accessnetwork(s)
Edge ATM switch(2.4 Gb/s)
PPC5ESS®
DCS
PDN
PSTN
SS7 signaling network
CDMAMS
TDMAMS
OtherMS
Circuit switchedATM transport
ATMMUX
CDMAcell site
TDMAcell site
Othercell site
Figure 2.Next generation wireless network architecture.
94 Bell Labs Technical Journal ◆ Autumn 1996
(AP) and accessed through a common protocol stack.
Application messages are delivered to the IN server
through a Transaction Capabilities Application Part
(TCAP) and Signaling System 7 (SS7) protocol stack.
We propose providing access to IN servers directly
from the access network application servers, as well as
through the core network. By separating these
advanced services from the access network, we pro-
vide a means by which these services become available
on any access network—for example, TDMA and
CDMA. Further, by linking them with the core net-
work, we establish the basic infrastructure necessary to
achieve true wireless/wireline integration at the ser-
vice level. Thus, users will have access to these
advanced services regardless of whether they are
accessing them from a mobile or fixed terminal.
Core NetworkAlso referred to as the backbone network, the core
network provides the interconnect mechanism for the
various access networks. It provides the network-to-
network interface (NNI). Examples of NNI protocols
include TR303 for local loop networks and IS41 for
wireless networks.
The first aspect to note about the proposed core
network is its emphasis on ATM transport. High-speed
ATM connectivity affords flexibility in distributing
functions over multiple hardware platforms. Migration
of intelligence away from the endpoints of the net-
work allows ease of maintenance and administration
by the network service provider. Broadband technolo-
gies supporting voice, data, and video will drive the
telecommunications architectures of the future. With
an inherent packet-based transport mechanism, the
ability to support multiservice environments over a
common network, a more efficient signaling mecha-
nism, and built-in simplified OA&M procedures, ATM-
based networks promise to provide the ideal fixed
backbone to the multitude of access technologies—
both wireline and wireless—emerging for cellular and
PCS networks.
The second aspect to note in the core network is
the packet processing complex (PPC). To conserve
bandwidth on the air interface, wireless access proto-
cols transmit user information (for example, voice) at
compressed data rates in the range of 8 to 13 kb/s. The
public switched telephone network (PSTN) expects to
transmit user information at 64 kb/s. This conversion
is performed in the PPC. It is desirable to carry user
information at the compressed rate throughout as
much of the core network as possible for the same rea-
son—namely, conservation of bandwidth. This leads to
placement of the PPC within the core network, allow-
ing the compressed user information to travel as far as
possible through the core network before entering the
PSTN at the full 64-kb/s rate.
Access NetworkThis infrastructure area provides for termination
of the user-to-network interface (UNI). Examples of a
UNI for wired access include “plain old telephone ser-
vice” (POTS) and ISDN. For wireless access, CDMA,
wideband CDMA, TDMA, and GSM are the major
systems being deployed for cellular and PCS mobile
and wireless local loop (WLL) applications. In such a
network arrangement, one can see how users within
each of these technologies may access not only the
core network but IN services too.
The next generation wireless network divides the
access network into two major components. The net-
work complex consists of clustered processors inter-
connected via a traditional local area network (LAN)
or ATM switch. The cell sites are the remote end-
points of the network and provide termination of the
LAN
Clusteredcommercialprocessors
ATMedge switch
Server process
To cell sites
ATM – Asynchronous transfer modeLAN – Local area network
Figure 3.Next generation network complex.
Bell Labs Technical Journal ◆ Autumn 1996 95
air interface. The following two subsections provide
more detail about these areas.
Network complex. As Figure 3 illustrates, the
network complex consists of clustered processors
interconnected via a traditional LAN or ATM switch.
The network complex contains processes that perform
call and connection control, mobility management (for
mobile applications), and overall network manage-
ment. The key network elements are:
• Commercial computing platforms.
• An ATM edge switch that provides intercon-
nection to remote cell sites.
• Server processes that provide network man-
agement and call processing functions.
• A packet processing complex (PPC) providing
speech coders and protocol handlers that
process end-user traffic. Current and evolved
5ESS switches will support the functionality
based on the specific market segments.
• Interworking functions to gateway into other
networks—for example, packet data networks
and the PSTN.
• Interconnection technologies between the net-
work elements—for example, a LAN.
Cell sites. The access network component provid-
ing wireless connections to an end user is called a cell
site. It incorporates functionality to process over-the-air
information. The coverage capacity and reliability are
the key drivers for providing the QOS for a certain
geographic region. The ability to adapt a cell site to
network capacity and coverage demands by sectoriza-
tion, expansion of radio capacity, and migration to
spectrally efficient access technologies are some of the
major considerations in determining the architecture
for a cell site.
Current cell site implementations have varying
degrees of functionality. The trend is to make cell sites
cheaper, smaller, and scaleable for pico, micro, and
macro environments. The number of access standards
will continue to proliferate beyond the current
Advanced Mobile Phone Service (AMPS), TDMA,
CDMA, and GSM standards. The service provider’s
expectation is to offer an access technology that meets
customers’ service needs in terms of bandwidth, bit
ATM – Asynchronous transfer modeIQ – In-phase and quadrature
MSC – Mobile switching centerRF – Radio frequency
3rd Generation• RF amp/filter• Spectrum digitizer• Intelligent radios• Base station controller• ATM backplane• MSC/wireless servers
Othernetworks ATM
4th Generation Activeantenna
2nd Generation
Othernetworks T1/E1
Digital bus
Analogcombiners/
splitters
Wirelessserver
Radioport
controller
Spectrumdata
processor
Spectrumdigitizer/
synthesizer
RFamp/filter
DigitalIQ bus
Wirelessadd-ons
MSCBase
stationcontroller
Intelligentradios
RFamp/filter
Figure 4.Cell site evolution.
96 Bell Labs Technical Journal ◆ Autumn 1996
error rates, voice quality, and coverage area. This
places a wide range of demands on cell site design. For
cost-effective implementation, cell sites will simply
work as protocol converters to terminate the physical
layer of the air interface and transport the raw infor-
mation processing in the network. This would allow
such hardware as speech coders to be taken out of cell
sites and centrally pooled in the network, providing
economies of scale and ease of maintenance and oper-
ation.
Given the foregoing discussion, one can envision
today’s rather complex base stations evolving to future
base stations that are much simpler and lower in cost
(see Figure 4).
Such technologies as fixed and adaptive beam anten-
nas will effectively address the coverage-versus-capacity
tradeoffs in the pico, micro, and macro environments.
SummaryWireless is expected to be a major driver for growth
in the telecommunications industry over the next
decade, becoming a cornerstone of the information soci-
ety. Future networks (both wireless and wireline) of the
type described in this paper will pave the way for an
environment in which the information revolution will
be made more portable, personal, and affordable.
(Manuscript approved October 1996)
GEORGE E. FRY is a member of technical staff in theWireless Systems Core TechnologyDepartment in the Wireless TechnologyLaboratory at Bell Labs in Whippany, NewJersey. He is conducting research and proto-typing efforts on next-generation wireless
networks. Mr. Fry holds a B.S. degree in mechanicalengineering from Clarkson University in Potsdam, NewYork. He also has an M.S. degree from the University ofNew Haven in Connecticut.
ALBERT JORDAN is manager of the PCS WirelessManagement Group at Bell Labs inWhippany, New Jersey. He is currently theproduct team leader for the next-generationCDMA in the AMPS PCS business leadershipgroup (BLG). Mr. Jordan, who holds two
patents, has B.S. and M.S. degrees in electrical engineer-ing, as well as an M.B.A., all from Stanford University inPalo Alto, California.
DAVID Y. LEE is a technical manager in the WirelessSystems Core Technology Department inthe Wireless Technology Laboratory at BellLabs in Whippany, New Jersey. He is respon-sible for wideband (5-MHz) CDMA proto-typing, base station technologies, as well as
management of intellectual property, technology plan-ning, and technical marketing. Mr. Lee holds aB.A. degree in chemistry and a B.S. in electrical engi-neering from the State University of New York(S.U.N.Y.) in Stony Brook. He also has an M.E. degreefrom Cornell University in Ithaca, New York.
ANIL S. SAWKAR is a technical manager in the NetworkSystems Wireless Technology Laboratory atBell Labs in Whippany, New Jersey. Hisgroup is responsible for wireless networkarchitecture, technology concept prototyp-ing, and for influencing wireless product
directions. Mr. Sawkar received a B.S. degree in elec-tronics engineering and an M.S. in electrical engineer-ing from Drexel University in Philadelphia,Pennsylvania.
NITIN J. SHAH is technology director of the WirelessSystems Core Technology Department inthe Network Wireless Systems Business Unitof Lucent Technologies. His department,which is part of the company’s networkinfrastructure manufacturing division, is
responsible for cellular, personal communications, andother wireless products. Areas of research he currentlyleads include technology planning, wireless networkarchitecture, radio multiple access methodologies, anddigital compression techniques for speech and visualcommunication. Mr. Shah received B.A., M.A., andPh.D. degrees in microelectronic engineering from theUniversity of Cambridge in England.
WILLIAM C. WIBERG is product management vice presi-dent at the Lucent Technologies NetworkWireless Systems Business Unit inWhippany, New Jersey. His organization isresponsible for researching, developing,and marketing products for Advanced
Mobile Phone Service (AMPS), as well as personal com-munications services (PCS). Mr. Wiberg has anM.S. degree in engineering systems from StanfordUniversity in Palo Alto, California, and an M.B.A. fromColumbia University in New York City. ◆