Global Earthquake Preparedness and Emergency Response
Part 2
Learning From Others
Part 2
Learning From Others
EXAMPLES OF HISTORIC EMERGENCY RESPONSE
SITUATIONSPart 2: The Wise ALSO Learn From All Global Earthquake
Disasters
YOUR
COMMUNITY
YOUR
COMMUNITYDATA BASES AND INFORMATIONDATA BASES AND INFORMATION
HAZARDS: GROUND SHAKING GROUND FAILURE SURFACE FAULTING TECTONIC DEFORMATION TSUNAMI RUN UP AFTERSHOCKS
• MONITORING• HAZARD MAPS• INVENTORY• VULNERABILITY• LOCATION
RISK
ACCEPTABLE RISK
UNACCEPTABLE RISK
BOOKS OF KNOWLEDGE
• PREPAREDNESS• PROTECTION• EM RESPONSE• RECOSTRUCTION AND
RECOVERY
EARTHQUAKE DISASTER RESILIENCE
PREPAREDNESS AND
EMERGENCY RESPONSE ARE ESSENTIAL PILLARS OF
GLOBAL EARTHQUAKE DISASTER RESILIENCE
PREPAREDNESS AND
EMERGENCY RESPONSE ARE ESSENTIAL PILLARS OF
GLOBAL EARTHQUAKE DISASTER RESILIENCE
NOTE:EVERY TIME AN EARTHQUAKE
DISASTER OCCURS, WE HAVE NEW KNOWLEDGE TO ADD TO OUR “BOOKS OF KNOWLEDGE” ON
PREPAREDNESS AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
EXAMPLE: 240,000 DEADEXAMPLE: 240,000 DEAD
• TANGSHAN, CHINA (1976) EARTHQUAKE: The impossible situation; too late for a race against time” to save lives and protect property.
• TANGSHAN, CHINA (1976) EARTHQUAKE: The impossible situation; too late for a race against time” to save lives and protect property.
EXAMPLE: THE IMPOSSIBLE SITUATIONEXAMPLE: THE IMPOSSIBLE SITUATION
• BAM, IRAN (2003): • Too late for a race
against time” to save lives and protect property.
•
• BAM, IRAN (2003): • Too late for a race
against time” to save lives and protect property.
•
EXAMPLE: 230,000 DEAD IN TSUNAMIEXAMPLE: 230,000 DEAD IN TSUNAMI
• INDONESIA (2004): The impossible situation; too late for a race against time” to save lives and protect property.
• INDONESIA (2004): The impossible situation; too late for a race against time” to save lives and protect property.
EXAMPLE: 88,000 DEAD; 50 MILLION BUILDINGS DAMAGED
EXAMPLE: 88,000 DEAD; 50 MILLION BUILDINGS DAMAGED
• CHINA (2008): • The impossible
situation; too late for a race against time” to save lives and protect property.
• CHINA (2008): • The impossible
situation; too late for a race against time” to save lives and protect property.
EXAMPLE: 220,000 DEADEXAMPLE: 220,000 DEAD
• HAITI (2010): • The impossible
situation; too late for a race against time” to save lives and protect property.
• HAITI (2010): • The impossible
situation; too late for a race against time” to save lives and protect property.
EXAMPLE: 30,000 DEADEXAMPLE: 30,000 DEAD
• JAPAN (2011): • The impossible
situation; too late for a race against time” to save lives and protect property.
• JAPAN (2011): • The impossible
situation; too late for a race against time” to save lives and protect property.
EXAMPLE: SEARCH AND RESCUEEXAMPLE: SEARCH AND RESCUE
• TURKEY (1999) KOCALEI EARTH-QUAKE):
• Timely responses during a forty-eight hour “race against time” to save lives and protect property
• TURKEY (1999) KOCALEI EARTH-QUAKE):
• Timely responses during a forty-eight hour “race against time” to save lives and protect property
EXAMPLE: SEARCH AND RESCUEEXAMPLE: SEARCH AND RESCUE
• PERU (2000):• Timely search and
rescue during a forty-eight hour “race against time” to save lives and protect property
• PERU (2000):• Timely search and
rescue during a forty-eight hour “race against time” to save lives and protect property
EXAMPLE: LIQIEFACTIONEXAMPLE: LIQIEFACTION
• NIIGATA, JAPAN (1964):
• Timely responses during a thirty day “race against time” to save lives and protect property
• NIIGATA, JAPAN (1964):
• Timely responses during a thirty day “race against time” to save lives and protect property
EXAMPLE: COLLAPSE OF SCHOOLEXAMPLE: COLLAPSE OF SCHOOL
• EL ASNAM, ALGERIA (1980):
• Timely responses during a thirty day “race against time” to save lives and protect property
• EL ASNAM, ALGERIA (1980):
• Timely responses during a thirty day “race against time” to save lives and protect property
EXAMPLE: DAMAGE AND COLLAPSED BUILDINGS
EXAMPLE: DAMAGE AND COLLAPSED BUILDINGS
• EL ASNAM, ALGERIA (1980):
• Timely responses during a forty-eight hour and thirty day “race against time” to save lives and protect property
• EL ASNAM, ALGERIA (1980):
• Timely responses during a forty-eight hour and thirty day “race against time” to save lives and protect property
EXAMPLE: LANDSLIDEEXAMPLE: LANDSLIDE
• IRPINIA, ITALY (1980): Timely responses during a forty-eight hour and thirty day “race against time” to save lives and protect property
• IRPINIA, ITALY (1980): Timely responses during a forty-eight hour and thirty day “race against time” to save lives and protect property
EXAMPLE: DAMAGE TO 1,000 BUILDINGS
EXAMPLE: DAMAGE TO 1,000 BUILDINGS
• DASHUR, EGYPT (1992):
• Timely responses during a thirty day “race against time” to save lives and protect property
• DASHUR, EGYPT (1992):
• Timely responses during a thirty day “race against time” to save lives and protect property
EXAMPLE: COLLAPSE OF HIGH-RISE APARTMENT BUILDINGS
EXAMPLE: COLLAPSE OF HIGH-RISE APARTMENT BUILDINGS
• MEXICO CITY AFTER 1985 EARTHQUAKE: Timely responses during a forty-eight hour and thirty day “race against time” save lives and protect property
• MEXICO CITY AFTER 1985 EARTHQUAKE: Timely responses during a forty-eight hour and thirty day “race against time” save lives and protect property
EXAMPLE: DAMAGE AND COLLAPSESEXAMPLE: DAMAGE AND COLLAPSES
• BOUMERDES, ALGERIA (2003):
• Timely responses during a thirty day “race against time” to save lives and protect property
• BOUMERDES, ALGERIA (2003):
• Timely responses during a thirty day “race against time” to save lives and protect property
EXAMPLE: DAMAGE TO UNREINFORCED BUILDINGS
EXAMPLE: DAMAGE TO UNREINFORCED BUILDINGS
• CHRISTCHURCH, NEW ZEALAND (2010): Timely responses during a forty-eight hour and thirty day “race against time” to save lives and protect property
• CHRISTCHURCH, NEW ZEALAND (2010): Timely responses during a forty-eight hour and thirty day “race against time” to save lives and protect property
EXAMPLE: LOSS OF FUNCTION OF ELEVATED EXPRESSWAY (NO DEATHS)
EXAMPLE: LOSS OF FUNCTION OF ELEVATED EXPRESSWAY (NO DEATHS)
• KOBE, JAPAN (1995): “The forty-eight hour and thirty day “race against time” to save lives and protect property.
• KOBE, JAPAN (1995): “The forty-eight hour and thirty day “race against time” to save lives and protect property.
EXAMPLE: 600 FIRESEXAMPLE: 600 FIRES
• KOBE, JAPAN (1995): “The race against time” to save lives and protect property.
• KOBE, JAPAN (1995): “The race against time” to save lives and protect property.
EXAMPLE: UNEXPECTED INUNDATIONEXAMPLE: UNEXPECTED INUNDATION
• NEW ZEALAND (2010): Timely responses during a thirty day “race against time” to save lives and protect property
• NEW ZEALAND (2010): Timely responses during a thirty day “race against time” to save lives and protect property
EXAMPLE: DAMAGE TO NUCLEAR POWER PLANT
EXAMPLE: DAMAGE TO NUCLEAR POWER PLANT
• JAPAN (2011): Timely responses during a thirty day “race against time” to save lives and protect property
• JAPAN (2011): Timely responses during a thirty day “race against time” to save lives and protect property
EXAMPLE: SCHOOL COLLAPSEEXAMPLE: SCHOOL COLLAPSE
• CHINA (2008): • Timely responses
during a forty-eight hour and thirty day “race against time” to save lives and protect property
• CHINA (2008): • Timely responses
during a forty-eight hour and thirty day “race against time” to save lives and protect property
EXAMPLE: SEARCH AND RESCUEEXAMPLE: SEARCH AND RESCUE
• CHINA (2013):• Timely responses
during a forty-eight hour “race against time” to save lives and protect property
• CHINA (2013):• Timely responses
during a forty-eight hour “race against time” to save lives and protect property
EXAMPLE: EMERGENCY MEDICALEXAMPLE: EMERGENCY MEDICAL
• CHINA (2008): Timely responses during a forty-eight hour “race against time” to save lives and protect property
• CHINA (2008): Timely responses during a forty-eight hour “race against time” to save lives and protect property
EXAMPLE: EMERGENCY MEDICALEXAMPLE: EMERGENCY MEDICAL
• CHINA (2008): • Timely responses
during a forty-eight hour “race against time” to save lives and protect property
• CHINA (2008): • Timely responses
during a forty-eight hour “race against time” to save lives and protect property
EXAMPLE: CONCENTRATION OF RESOURCES
EXAMPLE: CONCENTRATION OF RESOURCES
• PAKISTAN (2005): Timely responses during a thirty day “race against time” to save lives and protect property
• PAKISTAN (2005): Timely responses during a thirty day “race against time” to save lives and protect property
EXAMPLE: CONCENTRATION OF RESOURCES
EXAMPLE: CONCENTRATION OF RESOURCES
• HAITI (2010): • Timely responses
during a thirty day “race against time” to save lives and protect property
• HAITI (2010): • Timely responses
during a thirty day “race against time” to save lives and protect property
EXAMPLE: MASS CAREEXAMPLE: MASS CARE
• CHILE EARTHQUAKE: “The race against time” to save lives and protect property starts immediately.
• CHILE EARTHQUAKE: “The race against time” to save lives and protect property starts immediately.
EXAMPLE: TEMPORARY HOUSING EXAMPLE: TEMPORARY HOUSING
• CHINA (2008):• Timely responses
during a thirty day “race against time” to save lives and protect property
• CHINA (2008):• Timely responses
during a thirty day “race against time” to save lives and protect property
EXAMPLE: A TENT CITYEXAMPLE: A TENT CITY
• HAITI (2010): Timely mass care during a thirty day “race against time” to save lives and protect property
• HAITI (2010): Timely mass care during a thirty day “race against time” to save lives and protect property
EXAMPLE: DEBRIS FROM TSUNAMI WAVE RUN UP
EXAMPLE: DEBRIS FROM TSUNAMI WAVE RUN UP
• SENDAI, JAPAN AFTER THE MARCH 2011 TSUNAMI: Timely responses during a thirty day “race against time” to save lives and protect property
• SENDAI, JAPAN AFTER THE MARCH 2011 TSUNAMI: Timely responses during a thirty day “race against time” to save lives and protect property
EXAMPLE: PACIFIC RIM FORECAST OF TSUNAMI
EXAMPLE: PACIFIC RIM FORECAST OF TSUNAMI
• CHILE: TSUNAMI: Timely responses during the forty-eight hour and a thirty day “race against time” to save lives and protect property
• CHILE: TSUNAMI: Timely responses during the forty-eight hour and a thirty day “race against time” to save lives and protect property
EXAMPLE: TAKING CARE OF THE DEADEXAMPLE: TAKING CARE OF THE DEAD
• IRPINIA, ITALY EARTHQUAKE (1980):
• Timely responses during a forty-eight hour “race against time” to save lives and protect property
• IRPINIA, ITALY EARTHQUAKE (1980):
• Timely responses during a forty-eight hour “race against time” to save lives and protect property
CONCLUSIONEVERY TIME AN EARTHQUAKE
DISASTER OCCURS, WE HAVE NEW KNOWLEDGE TO ADD TO OUR
“BOOKS OF KNOWLEDGE” FOR THE NEXT STEPS:
POST-DISASTER RECOVERY
THE NEXT STEPS:RECONSTRUCTION AND
RECOVERY