Download pptx - Game theory and strategy

Transcript
Page 1: Game theory and strategy

Game Theory and Product Strategy

Or: It’s all fun and games until someone loses an eyeball

Nir Soffer

http://www.linkedin.com/in/nirsoffer@TheNirEast

Page 2: Game theory and strategy

Game Theory and Strategy

It’s all fun and games until someone loses an eyeball

Page 3: Game theory and strategy

What?

• A primer on basic game theory concepts– Very basic– No math!– If you know a lot about Game Theory already, you

may get bored• A discussion on applying game theoretic

concepts to product strategy

Page 4: Game theory and strategy

Why?

• I think Game Theory is Fun!• Interesting perspective on behavior of both

people and firms• Analytical toolset for competitive scenarios

Page 5: Game theory and strategy

Who?

• Israeli, permitted to live in Austin by his cat• Student of Behavior and Business• GTM Consultant for multiple startups• Previously in PdM and Strategist in Dell and a

variety of software development roles• First time ProductCamp Presenter!• Very, very bad at making slides pretty.

Page 6: Game theory and strategy

Agenda

• What is Game Theory?• A Few Games and Business Analogies– Rock, Paper, Scissors:

• Zero-sum, symmetric game

– Prisoner’s Dilemma:• Pricing, market entry, volume• Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma: TFT• Collusion/Cooperation in IPD – cartels

– Chicken and the Value of Commitments• Investment, market entry

Page 7: Game theory and strategy

What is Game Theory?

• You are playing Rock Paper Scissors. Which do you choose?

• You sell a product that is very similar to your competitor. Do you:– Price low to steal his customers?– Price the same?– Price higher?

• You need to invest in a factory to create your product

Page 8: Game theory and strategy

Types of Games

• Sequential vs. Simultaneous– Sequential: Chess, Checkers, Tic-Tac-Toe

• Solvable• Game tree solution

– Simultaneous: Rock Paper Scissors• Solvable• Equilibria solutions• Most business problems are simultaneous (or very close

to it) rather than sequential

• Our focus will be simultaneous, 2 player games

Page 9: Game theory and strategy

Brain Teaser – Cut the Cake

• Two twin brothers have gotten a cake from their parents for their birthday.

• What is the best way for them to split it so they are both happy?

Page 10: Game theory and strategy

Rock, Paper, Scissors

This is a gameRock Paper Scissors

Rock 0 , 0 0 , 1 1 , 0

Paper 1 , -1 0 , 0 0 , 1

Scissors -1, 1 1 , 0 0 , 0

So how do I read it?• The first number in each

pair is the payout for the row player – the second is for the column

So, who cares?• This is a boring game – but

it’s here as an example for more interesting ones

• Still – interesting to note:– Symmetric– Zero Sum

Page 11: Game theory and strategy

Rock, Paper, Scissors

Rock Paper Scissors

Rock 0 , 0 0 , 1 1 , 0

Paper 1 , -1 0 , 0 0 , 1

Scissors -1, 1 1 , 0 0 , 0

So, again, I ask, who cares?• RPS is a classic example for

a zero sum, symmetric game– Zero sum: Winning is done at

the expense of the loser– Symmetric: Identical options

with identical payoffs exist to all players

Page 12: Game theory and strategy

Let’s Play!

Find a partner – and play Rock, Paper, Scissors!

Rock Paper Scissors

Rock 0 , 0 0 , 1 1 , 0

Paper 1 , -1 0 , 0 0 , 1

Scissors -1, 1 1 , 0 0 , 0

Page 13: Game theory and strategy

What have we learned?

• Does RPS have much in common with real business problems?

• What’s the best strategy for playing RPS?

Page 14: Game theory and strategy

Prisoner’s Dilemma

• A classic!• Probably most famous game in Game Theory• We are going to spend some time here, so get

comfy

Page 15: Game theory and strategy

So, what’s the big deal?(positive payoffs are desirable)

Shut up

Snitch!

Shut up

3 , 3 0 , 5

Snitch! 5 , 0 1 , 1

• Two burglars are busted and put in separate rooms

• Police interrogate and promise the first one to snitch a deal

• Now, things get interesting.

• What would you do?

Page 16: Game theory and strategy

Equilibrium(positive payoffs are desirable)

Shut up

Snitch!

Shut up

3 , 3 0 , 5

Snitch! 5 , 0 1 , 1

• The problem should be clear

• Everyone would be better off shutting up – but each individual would rather snitch

• Therefore, the Nash Equilibrium (and therefore the result of the game if played by rational, payoff maximizing players) is the sub optimal bottom right corner

Page 17: Game theory and strategy

What does PD apply to?

• Can you think of any real life scenario in which PD applies to?

Page 18: Game theory and strategy

A ton of them!

• Pricing/Promotions: We are selling a similar product; should I price low (and then steal share) or high?– http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-11-19/

best-buy-and-the-holiday-retail-prisoners-dilemma• “Feature Wars”• In fact, most non-zero sum games in which

cooperation yields more benefits than competing can be modeled like a PD game

Page 19: Game theory and strategy

So what do we do?

• The bad news: The solution to a standard, “pure” Prisoner’s Dilemma game is always mutual defection. Sorry. It’s a cruel world.

• The good news: Reality is infinitely more complex; there are factors we can explore and ways to “change the game”– IPD– Collusion (don’t do that!)– Change the Game

Page 20: Game theory and strategy

Let’s try something

• Pick your gaming partner• Play the game!

(positive payoffs are desirable)

Shut up

Snitch!

Shut up

3 , 3 0 , 5

Snitch! 5 , 0 1 , 1

Page 21: Game theory and strategy

Show of Hands

• Who picked snitching? Why?• Who picked shutting up? Why?

Page 22: Game theory and strategy

And now, a Twist!

• Play the game again. • And again.• And again.• Until I tell you to stop.

Page 23: Game theory and strategy

Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma

• An interesting result emerges when playing PD multiple times. Why?

• What if I told you that you had exactly 100 turns to play?

• Strategies: TFT, TF2TT• Axelrod’s Successful Strategy:– Clear– Provocable– Nice– Forgiving

Page 24: Game theory and strategy

CollusionCareful! I’m not a lawyer, but usually, this is illegal

Excerpt from Cramton & Schwartz 2002 – see table 1 at http://drum.lib.umd.edu/bitstream/1903/7061/1/cramton-schwartz-collusive-bidding.pdf

(can’t put table here for copyright reasons)

Page 25: Game theory and strategy

Change the Game

• What are other options to change the game?• What if you locked the loot from the burglary

with two keys?• Examples from a Product Strategy perspective:– Differentiation– Consortiums (pooled standard ownership)– Punitive clauses in contracts– Price matching clauses (retroactive ones as well) – Most favored customer clauses

Page 26: Game theory and strategy

Last One! Chicken!Swerve Drive

on!

Swerve Lose, Lose

Lose , Win

Drive on!

Win , Lose

Splat! , Splat!

• Anti-cooperation game• What are business

analogies?• How can you win?

Page 27: Game theory and strategy

Some interesting questions if we have time left

• You need to bid on ad keywords. Are you better off having keywords that are identical, or different from your competition?

• Do you think it’s better to ape your competitors features or remove them entirely?

• When you build a store location – would you rather build it next to your competitor, or somewhere else?

Page 28: Game theory and strategy

Thank you!

Page 29: Game theory and strategy

Backup

Page 30: Game theory and strategy

Further Reading

• Art of Strategy: Dixit & Nalebuff• Evolution of Cooperation: Axelrod• Prisoner’s Dilemma: Poundstone


Recommended